hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetjojobet

Tag: advice

  • The best advice on dementia, according to the experts

    The best advice on dementia, according to the experts

    Source link

  • ‘Live’ Kelly Ripa & Mark Give Romance Advice For Vacations

    ‘Live’ Kelly Ripa & Mark Give Romance Advice For Vacations

    Mark Consuelos - Kelly Ripa - Live With Kelly and Mark - ABC

    Live With Kelly and Mark is back for a new season after a hiatus, and this week, Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos both appeared on the set of the ABC talk show. Now they are both back, there is laughter and innuendos. Speaking about romantic destinations, Mark and his wife made people giggle when they gave their fans some advice.

    Kelly Ripa & Mark Bring The Laughter On ABC

    When Mark Consuelos first joined his wife on the talk show, ABC fans thought it would never work for them. After all, who would tune in and watch a married couple talk about their life?  Well, as Mark loved talking about sports, more men tuned in. And of course, Kelly, with her sharp humor, always had a great fan base. 

    Kelly Ripa has been on the show for decades, and ABC fans never tire of her one-liners. One of the best parts of the show comes when they arrive and start talking about the headlines or interesting snippets about lifestyle. This week, they talked about Friday the 13th being unlucky. And they discussed the top countries in the world to live in.

    Mark Consuelos Dishes Romance Advice 

    Live with Kelly and Mark fans heard from Kelly that these days, Paris dropped and is no longer the best romantic destination in the world. Actually, she pointed out that “Maui” is. The ABC host said that it was based on traveler polls. So, France has slipped. 

    Live With Kelly and Mark - ABC - Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos
    Live With Kelly and Mark – ABC – Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos

    Kelly Ripa then said, “Maui is the most romantic destination to visit with a partner…But when you travel to romantic places, no matter how romantic and beautiful they are, if you are with your children, you don’t really understand the romance.”

    Mark Consuelos threw in his thoughts on romantic destinations with kids. He said, “If you’re with a bunch of kids, that last thing you’re thinking about is making more kids.” That got a good laugh from the audience.

    Other Romantic Destinations 

    Of interest, another romantic destination is “Aspen Colorado,” and Mark Consuelos said that he “loves” the place. But, if you look for romance, Kelly Ripa pointed out that “11% of the voters said New York City” is a top romantic city. Well, Kelly and Mark liked that even more, as they didn’t have to travel to get there. Still, Mark Consueloa chimed in and told his fans that “one of kids nicknames is Made In Montreal.” So clearly, Canada is top of his list of favorite romantic destinations. 

    What do you think of Mark Consuelos agreeing with Kelly Ripa that romantic destinations with kids just don’t cut it? Shout out in the comments below, and remember to come back here for all your Live with Kelly and Mark news and updates.

    SOURCE: YouTube 

    Source link

  • Uncertain if lifestyle advice actually works

    Uncertain if lifestyle advice actually works

    Healthcare professionals are increasingly giving advice to patients on how to improve their health, but there is often a lack of scientific evidence if this advice is actually beneficial. This is according to a study from the University of Gothenburg, which also guides towards more effective recommendations.

    The researchers do not criticize the content of the advice — it is good if people lose weight, stop smoking, eat a better diet or exercise more. However, there is no evidence that patients actually change their lifestyle after receiving this advice from healthcare professionals.

    “There is often a lack of research showing that counseling patients is effective. It is likely that the advice rarely actually helps people,” says Minna Johansson, Associate Professor at Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg and General Practitioner at Herrestad’s Healthcare Center in Uddevalla, who is the study’s lead author.

    Few pieces of advice are well-founded

    The study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, was conducted by an international team of researchers. They have previously analyzed medical recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK. This organization is behind 379 recommendations of advice and interventions that healthcare professionals should give to patients, with the aim of changing their lifestyle.

    In only 3% of cases there were scientific studies showing that the advice has positive effects in practice. A further 13% of this advice had some evidence, but with low certainty. The researchers also reviewed additional guidelines from other influential institutions around the world and found that these often overestimate the positive impact of the advice and rarely take disadvantages into account.

    “Trying to improve public health by giving lifestyle advice to one person at a time is both expensive and ineffective. Resources would probably be better spent on community-based interventions that make it easier for all of us to live healthy lives,” says Minna Johansson, who also believes the advice could increase stigmatization for people with e.g., obesity.

    Showing the way forward

    Today’s healthcare professionals would not be able to give all the advice recommended while maintaining other care. The researchers’ calculations show that in the UK, for example, five times as many nurses would need to be hired, compared to current levels, to cope with the task.

    The study also presents a new guideline to help policy makers and guideline authors consider the pros and cons of the intervention in a structured way before deciding whether or not to recommend it. Victor Montori, Professor of Medicine at the Mayo Clinic in the United States is a co-author of the study: “The guideline consists of a number of key questions, which show how to adequately evaluate the likelihood that the lifestyle intervention will lead to positive effects or not,” says Victor Montori.

    Source link

  • Uncertain if lifestyle advice actually works

    Uncertain if lifestyle advice actually works

    Healthcare professionals are increasingly giving advice to patients on how to improve their health, but there is often a lack of scientific evidence if this advice is actually beneficial. This is according to a study from the University of Gothenburg, which also guides towards more effective recommendations.

    The researchers do not criticize the content of the advice — it is good if people lose weight, stop smoking, eat a better diet or exercise more. However, there is no evidence that patients actually change their lifestyle after receiving this advice from healthcare professionals.

    “There is often a lack of research showing that counseling patients is effective. It is likely that the advice rarely actually helps people,” says Minna Johansson, Associate Professor at Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg and General Practitioner at Herrestad’s Healthcare Center in Uddevalla, who is the study’s lead author.

    Few pieces of advice are well-founded

    The study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, was conducted by an international team of researchers. They have previously analyzed medical recommendations from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK. This organization is behind 379 recommendations of advice and interventions that healthcare professionals should give to patients, with the aim of changing their lifestyle.

    In only 3% of cases there were scientific studies showing that the advice has positive effects in practice. A further 13% of this advice had some evidence, but with low certainty. The researchers also reviewed additional guidelines from other influential institutions around the world and found that these often overestimate the positive impact of the advice and rarely take disadvantages into account.

    “Trying to improve public health by giving lifestyle advice to one person at a time is both expensive and ineffective. Resources would probably be better spent on community-based interventions that make it easier for all of us to live healthy lives,” says Minna Johansson, who also believes the advice could increase stigmatization for people with e.g., obesity.

    Showing the way forward

    Today’s healthcare professionals would not be able to give all the advice recommended while maintaining other care. The researchers’ calculations show that in the UK, for example, five times as many nurses would need to be hired, compared to current levels, to cope with the task.

    The study also presents a new guideline to help policy makers and guideline authors consider the pros and cons of the intervention in a structured way before deciding whether or not to recommend it. Victor Montori, Professor of Medicine at the Mayo Clinic in the United States is a co-author of the study: “The guideline consists of a number of key questions, which show how to adequately evaluate the likelihood that the lifestyle intervention will lead to positive effects or not,” says Victor Montori.

    Source link

  • WWE legend Bill Goldberg gave a combat sports legend incredible advice while walking him to the cage at ONE 168

    WWE legend Bill Goldberg gave a combat sports legend incredible advice while walking him to the cage at ONE 168

    WWE icon, Bill Goldberg, told Liam Harrison an inspiring story in the moments before his fight with Seksan at ONE 168.

    The former wrestler hyped up the 8x Muay Thai world champion, while walking him to the cage for one of the biggest fights of his career.

    WWE Super star Bill Goldberg prior to the running of the NASCAR Cup Series Food City 500 on March 17, 2024 at Bristol Motor Speedway in Bristol, TN.
    Photo by Jeff Robinson/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

    Bill Goldberg gives Liam Harrison words of wisdom before fight with Seksan at ONE 168

    On Friday evening, Liam Harrison went head-to-head with Seksan Or. Kwanmuang in a clash of two of the greatest Muay Thai fighters to have ever graced the sport.

    And if the Brit wasn’t already fuelled for the bout, he was given an extra push by WWE Hall of Famer, Bill Goldberg.

    After watching Harrison defeat Malaipet Sasiprapa in Los Angeles in 2015, the wrestling icon went out of his way to introduce himself to the Leeds fighter, and the pair have remained close ever since.

    The duo even engaged in some training during fight week for ONE 168, with Harrison teaching the powerhouse the ropes of Muay Thai.

    Sheesh: ‘Do you care today?’… UFC legend questions whether Jorge Masvidal can still be a star

    Therefore, it only made sense for Goldberg to walk ‘The Hitman’ to the cage for his major bout inside the Ball Arena in Denver, Colorado.

    While Harrison marched towards his rival, the 285lbs monster, delivered a powerful speech to motivate his friend to put on the performance of a lifetime.

    He exclaimed: “I had doubt about myself one time before I walked in the ring. I picked up the phone and called a friend of mine, and he said, ‘You’re Bill f***ing Goldberg’. You’re Liam, motherf***ing Harrison. That’s all you need. Go out and bash his brains in. Do what you do.”

    Despite not emerging victorious, Goldberg’s words clearly made an impact as Harrison produced one of the bravest performances ONE Championship has ever seen.

    Even in the face of getting knocked down twice, he kept on swinging, doing everything in his power to land a knockout blow of his own, before ultimately hitting the canvas for a third time.

    So, if that’s the final time we see him compete, he certainly went out with a bang.

    Liam Harrison leaves his gloves in the center of the cage after brutal loss at ONE 168

    As great fighters often do, following the end of the contest, the Englishman left his gloves in the cage, signaling a potential retirement from the sport.

    Having set the world alight, and pioneered a new wave of British Muay Thai fighters, Harrison has undeniably carved his legacy in stone.

    However, while his post-fight actions indicated the end, he later flirted with the possibility of one final roll of the dice, revealing the location where he’d like to say goodbye to combat sports.

    WOW: John Kavanagh praises Michael Chandler but says he’s got nothing Conor McGregor hasn’t seen

    Related Topics



    Source link

  • Never take health and lifestyle advice from centenarians

    Never take health and lifestyle advice from centenarians

    When the world’s oldest person, Spaniard
    Maria Branyas Morera, died at the age of 117 in August 2024, a Japanese woman took over
    the title.

    Tomiko Itooka celebrated her 116th birthday
    in May.

    She drinks a Japanese yoghurt-flavoured
    drink every morning. And she loves bananas, the AP
    news agency
    reported.

    But asking the world’s oldest people why
    they have lived so long is a bad idea, according to researchers.

    May have unhealthy diets and smoke

    “What you see with most centenarians most of the time – and these are generalisations – is that they don’t take much exercise. Quite often, their diets are rather unhealthy,” Richard
    Faragher told The Guardian
    .

    Some centenarians have even been heavy
    smokers.

    But does that mean smoking is healthy after all? Absolutely not, according to Faragher, who studies ageing at Brighton
    University.

    “Never, ever take health and lifestyle tips from a centenarian,” he told the British newspaper.

    Good genes

    His opinion is supported by Morten Valberg,
    who studies medical statistics at the University of Oslo.


    Morten Valberg does lifespan analyses at the University of Oslo’s Department of Biostatistics and the Department of Community Medicine and Global Health.

    “If you’re interested in saying something
    more general about how to live to be a hundred years old, I agree that it’s not necessarily best to ask centenarians,” Valberg wrote to sciencenorway.no.

    Why some people live so long is still a
    mystery that researchers are trying to solve.

    But one of the main theories is that they
    have good genes.

    May have survived despite lifestyle

    If you are naturally very robust, you might be able to tolerate eating two packs of bacon or smoking 40 cigarettes a day.

    In that case, you have survived despite your
    lifestyle. Not because of it.

    “If you only ask people who have lived to
    be a hundred years old, you could, at least in theory, find that factors we know are harmful to most people seem to have a positive
    effect on survival,” Valberg wrote.

    Seemingly good habits, like eating bananas or taking long walks, also don’t necessarily correlate with centenarians’ longevity.

    A statistical phenomenon

    The problem has its own name: survivorship
    bias.

    When you only look at survivors, you get a
    distorted picture of reality, Valberg explains.

    He uses a typical example from a Norwegian TV segment, where we see an old lightbulb
    that shines brightly after 100 years of use.

    It’s easy to think, “they made better lightbulbs back then.”

    The problem is that we only see the one
    bulb that has survived.

    All the old lightbulbs that no longer work
    have disappeared from sight and mind.

    “You’re comparing this one, robust, unique bulb with all those made today. It doesn’t necessarily mean we are generally worse at making lightbulbs today,” Valberg wrote.

    Win an Oscar and live longer?

    Or like when a study
    from some years ago
    revealed that actors who won an Oscar lived
    longer than those who were only nominated.

    Win an
    Oscar and live longer,
    ‘ the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation NRK wrote.

    NRK was far from the only media outlet to jump on the news.

    But the study garnered a lot of criticism
    from other researchers, precisely because of survivorship bias.

    “Most actors must have held on for a while
    to have the opportunity to win an Oscar. So it was getting old that increased
    the chances of winning an Oscar, not the other way around,” Valberg wrote.

    Better to follow a group of people over time

    The same problem arises when asking centenarians for lifestyle advice.

    Fortunately, there are other methods to figure
    out what is healthy and what is harmful.

    “A better way to investigate
    what leads to a longer life would be to follow a group of people forward in
    time,” Valberg pointed out.

    Imagine if we could follow an entire
    generation of people like Tomiko Itooka. In other words, everyone who was born
    in 1908.

    We would probably discover that bananas were not a miracle cure. And that those who smoked, on average, died earlier than those who did not.

    Hardly the most important explanation

    Fortunately, smarter statistical
    methods exist.

    Researchers do not have to
    follow an entire generation from birth to death to find answers.

    But explaining why a single
    person lives to be very old is still difficult.

    Eating healthy and exercising may have helped, but it is likely not the main explanation, if we are to believe
    researchers who study ageing.

    Could be pure luck

    According to Richard Faragher, there are
    two main theories as to why some people live exceptionally long.

    In addition to the theory of good genes,
    some may simply have been lucky.

    But Valberg is not entirely convinced of
    this.

    “If by luck you mean that it’s ‘completely
    random’ who lives so long, then I doubt that’s the main reason,” he wrote.

    ———

    Read the Norwegian version of this article on forskning.no

    Source link

  • Never take health and lifestyle advice from centenarians

    Never take health and lifestyle advice from centenarians

    When the world’s oldest person, Spaniard
    Maria Branyas Morera, died at the age of 117 in August 2024, a Japanese woman took over
    the title.

    Tomiko Itooka celebrated her 116th birthday
    in May.

    She drinks a Japanese yoghurt-flavoured
    drink every morning. And she loves bananas, the AP
    news agency
    reported.

    But asking the world’s oldest people why
    they have lived so long is a bad idea, according to researchers.

    May have unhealthy diets and smoke

    “What you see with most centenarians most of the time – and these are generalisations – is that they don’t take much exercise. Quite often, their diets are rather unhealthy,” Richard
    Faragher told The Guardian
    .

    Some centenarians have even been heavy
    smokers.

    But does that mean smoking is healthy after all? Absolutely not, according to Faragher, who studies ageing at Brighton
    University.

    “Never, ever take health and lifestyle tips from a centenarian,” he told the British newspaper.

    Good genes

    His opinion is supported by Morten Valberg,
    who studies medical statistics at the University of Oslo.


    Morten Valberg does lifespan analyses at the University of Oslo’s Department of Biostatistics and the Department of Community Medicine and Global Health.

    “If you’re interested in saying something
    more general about how to live to be a hundred years old, I agree that it’s not necessarily best to ask centenarians,” Valberg wrote to sciencenorway.no.

    Why some people live so long is still a
    mystery that researchers are trying to solve.

    But one of the main theories is that they
    have good genes.

    May have survived despite lifestyle

    If you are naturally very robust, you might be able to tolerate eating two packs of bacon or smoking 40 cigarettes a day.

    In that case, you have survived despite your
    lifestyle. Not because of it.

    “If you only ask people who have lived to
    be a hundred years old, you could, at least in theory, find that factors we know are harmful to most people seem to have a positive
    effect on survival,” Valberg wrote.

    Seemingly good habits, like eating bananas or taking long walks, also don’t necessarily correlate with centenarians’ longevity.

    A statistical phenomenon

    The problem has its own name: survivorship
    bias.

    When you only look at survivors, you get a
    distorted picture of reality, Valberg explains.

    He uses a typical example from a Norwegian TV segment, where we see an old lightbulb
    that shines brightly after 100 years of use.

    It’s easy to think, “they made better lightbulbs back then.”

    The problem is that we only see the one
    bulb that has survived.

    All the old lightbulbs that no longer work
    have disappeared from sight and mind.

    “You’re comparing this one, robust, unique bulb with all those made today. It doesn’t necessarily mean we are generally worse at making lightbulbs today,” Valberg wrote.

    Win an Oscar and live longer?

    Or like when a study
    from some years ago
    revealed that actors who won an Oscar lived
    longer than those who were only nominated.

    Win an
    Oscar and live longer,
    ‘ the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation NRK wrote.

    NRK was far from the only media outlet to jump on the news.

    But the study garnered a lot of criticism
    from other researchers, precisely because of survivorship bias.

    “Most actors must have held on for a while
    to have the opportunity to win an Oscar. So it was getting old that increased
    the chances of winning an Oscar, not the other way around,” Valberg wrote.

    Better to follow a group of people over time

    The same problem arises when asking centenarians for lifestyle advice.

    Fortunately, there are other methods to figure
    out what is healthy and what is harmful.

    “A better way to investigate
    what leads to a longer life would be to follow a group of people forward in
    time,” Valberg pointed out.

    Imagine if we could follow an entire
    generation of people like Tomiko Itooka. In other words, everyone who was born
    in 1908.

    We would probably discover that bananas were not a miracle cure. And that those who smoked, on average, died earlier than those who did not.

    Hardly the most important explanation

    Fortunately, smarter statistical
    methods exist.

    Researchers do not have to
    follow an entire generation from birth to death to find answers.

    But explaining why a single
    person lives to be very old is still difficult.

    Eating healthy and exercising may have helped, but it is likely not the main explanation, if we are to believe
    researchers who study ageing.

    Could be pure luck

    According to Richard Faragher, there are
    two main theories as to why some people live exceptionally long.

    In addition to the theory of good genes,
    some may simply have been lucky.

    But Valberg is not entirely convinced of
    this.

    “If by luck you mean that it’s ‘completely
    random’ who lives so long, then I doubt that’s the main reason,” he wrote.

    ———

    Read the Norwegian version of this article on forskning.no

    Source link