hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetBakırköy Escortcasibom9018betgit casinojojobetmarsbahismatbet

Tag: Backlash

  • Raygun retires from breakdancing after Paris Olympics backlash

    Raygun retires from breakdancing after Paris Olympics backlash

    Your support helps us to tell the story

    From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

    At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

    The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

    Your support makes all the difference.

    Australian breakdancer Rachael Gunn is retiring from competitive breaking following the harsh reaction to her performance at the 2024 Paris Olympics.

    Gunn, also known as “B-girl Raygun”, shot to internet notoriety almost overnight in August after she performed unusual moves at the Games, including a kangaroo hop and a wriggle on the floor.

    “I just didn’t have any control over how people saw me or who I was. I was going to keep competing, for sure, but that seems really difficult for me to do now,” Gunn, 37, a university lecturer with a PhD in dance, told local radio station 2DayFM on Wednesday.

    “I think the level of scrutiny that’s going to be there, and people will be filming it, and it will go online.”

    Australian Olympic breaking athlete Rachael Gunn poses in Sydney

    Australian Olympic breaking athlete Rachael Gunn poses in Sydney (Getty)

    The Paris Olympics was criticised for including breaking as a port. The Los Angeles Olympics in 2028 has ditched it, but Gunn said she won’t be participating in local competition either.

    “I still break but that’s like, in my living room with my partner,” she said.

    The Australian left the Paris competition without scoring a single point. She was knocked out at the round robin stage after losing all three of her bouts. Her performance, especially a step where she seemed to wriggle on the ground, bemused Olympic fans and officials alike and she became the subject of condescending social media chatter.

    Rachael Gunn competes at the Paris Olympics

    Rachael Gunn competes at the Paris Olympics (Getty Images)

    Gunn’s performance sparked a petition calling for an apology from the athlete as well as Australia’s Olympic chef de mission Anna Meares. The petition, which received over 50,000 signatures, derided Gunn and Meares for “attempting to gaslight the public and undermining the efforts of genuine athletes”.

    She described the response to her performance “devastating”.

    Rachael Gunn represented Australia in breaking at the 2024 Paris Olympics

    Rachael Gunn represented Australia in breaking at the 2024 Paris Olympics (Getty Images)

    “I’d really like to ask the press to please stop harassing my family, my friends, the Australian breaking community and the broader street dance community,” she said in an Instagram video at the time.

    “Everyone has been through a lot as a result of this, so I ask you to please respect their privacy.”

    Gunn also apologised to the breaking community but insisted that her “record speaks” to her being Australia’s best B-girl.

    Source link

  • Trending Now: Zomato, Swiggy Face Backlash After Raising Platform Fee To Rs 10

    Trending Now: Zomato, Swiggy Face Backlash After Raising Platform Fee To Rs 10

    Food delivery applications like Swiggy and Zomato have become an inevitable part of our lives. However, it seems foodies are not too happy with a recent change introduced by both platforms. As per reports, Zomato and Swiggy have increased the platform fee to ₹10 amid the ongoing festive rush. But this decision has not gone over well with customers. On the microblogging platform X (formerly known as Twitter), the revised platform fee sparked widespread outrage. Many users voiced their frustration, highlighting how food delivery charges have been steadily increasing. They pointed out that the rising costs are making it difficult for customers to continue ordering, as it has become too expensive.

    A user wrote, “Swiggy Also Increased Platform Fee To ₹10. This Happened Right After Zomato’s Hike. Food Ordering Started With Free Delivery, Now GST, Delivery & Packing Charges, Platform Fee. Zomato & Swiggy Does 3.5 Million Orders Daily.”

    Also Read:Swiggy Introduces New ‘Seal’ Badge To Identify Restaurants Following Food Hygiene And Quality Standards

    Another person said, “Zomato hikes platform fee! Pay an inflated cost of food to use the platform. Pay a platform fee to use the platform. Restaurants pay a fee to use the platform. And finally, pay with your health by eating outside food. What an idea sirjee.”

    “Zomato honey we’re all struggling but please behave yourself what is festive season platform fee,” read a post.

    A user announced, “Just a day after Zomato increased platform fees to Rs 10, Swiggy follows suit.”

    Many noted, “Zomato and Swiggy hiked their platform fee to ₹10 during festive season.”

    Also Read:Zomato CEO Deepinder Goyal Shares Unpleasant Food Delivery Experience In Gurugram Mall

    A post read, “Both Zomato and Swiggy have hiked their platform fees to ₹10 per order, just in time for the festive rush. They both started with a ₹2 fee and now process over 3.5 million orders daily combined! Food delivery has evolved from free services to GST, delivery & packing charges, and now platform fees.”

    An X user mentioned, “#Swiggy and #Zomato have both started charging a ₹10 platform fee. I was surprised to see the steep jump from ₹6 to ₹10 on Swiggy, which will surely boost Zomato’s profits in the next quarter. However, after checking Zomato, I realized this increase is temporary, likely to capitalize on the festive season demand. Nevertheless, these tech-driven, asset-light platforms continue to generate substantial profits.”

    What are your thoughts on this increase in platform fees? Share your opinions in the comments section below.



    Source link

  • Australian Woman Disses Indian Food For Using “Dirt Spices,” Faces Backlash Online

    Australian Woman Disses Indian Food For Using “Dirt Spices,” Faces Backlash Online

    Nothing delights the taste buds of desi foodies like Indian cuisine. Whether in America, Canada, or Australia, we always seek out authentic Indian food to satisfy our cravings. But what happens when someone criticises the ingredients used in Indian cuisine? Recently, an Australian woman made a racist comment about Indian food. Her post, which criticised Indian food for using “dirt spices,” went viral and sparked a fierce debate on social media.

    Also Read:Watch: Viral Video Of Kunafa-Making Process Gets Over 15 Million Views

    It all started with a post shared on X (formerly Twitter) by a user named Jeff who called Indian food “the best on earth.” Sharing a picture of dishes like Indian curries, rice, kebabs and chutney, he wrote, “Indian food is the best on earth. Fight me.” While many agreed with his opinion, a person named Dr Sydney Watson said, “It really, really isn’t.” Expanding on her thought, the woman added, “If your food requires you to put dirt spices all over it in order for it to be palatable, your food is not good.”

    Watch Sydney Watson’s comments below:

    Sydney’s post faced harsh criticism from desis. Many people took offence at her comment and came to the defence of Indian food.

    One user said, “I fact checked it – and it is, in fact, the best food.” 

    Another added, “Indian food is delicious, much better tasting than most European food. You are objectively wrong on this one.” 

    A user gave her a lesson in colonial history and wrote, “Wars were fought for India’s spices. America was found because of them. At one point, these spices were worth more than their weight in gold.”

    Another chimed in, “This is such an unsophisticated take. Indian food is overall healthier than North American food. Ability to appreciate strengths of other cultures shows ability to parse nuance, instead of first order low IQ thinking like those you accuse the same thing of. Enjoy McDonald’s.” 

    “Indian food is awesome, deal with it,” read another comment.

    Also Read: Why You Should Never Throw Away Food Delivery Boxes Without Doing This First

    What do you think about this post? Tell us in the comments.



    Source link

  • Starbucks Faces Backlash For Featuring Taylor Swifts Exes As Drinks On Menu

    Starbucks Faces Backlash For Featuring Taylor Swifts Exes As Drinks On Menu

    Taylor Swift is undoubtedly one of the most renowned pop stars globally. Known for her unique blend of country and pop music, she has been in the public eye for almost a decade now. The 33-year-old singer is a global icon and an inspiration for music lovers worldwide. Not only this, but Taylor has also established a strong connection with her fans through social media, who proudly refer to themselves as ”Swifties”. Recently, a Twitter user shared a picture of a Starbucks menu that featured Taylor’s ex-partners as drinks, which has divided the internet.

    Also Read:“Taylor Swift Is An Exceptional Cook,” Gigi Hadid Reveals Foods Swift Cooks Best

    The post was shared on Twitter by @misamericana. The photo features a Starbucks signboard with some drinks labelled as Taylor Swift’s ex-boyfriends. For instance, Harry Styles was a ‘Hot Vanilla Latte’, Jake Gyllenhaal was ‘Decaf Americano’, Calvin Harris was ‘Vanilla Bean Frappe’ and Joe Alwyn was ‘Hot Chai with Oat Milk’. “This is so gross @starbucks,” read the caption of the post.

    Since it was shared, the post has accumulated over 7.2 million views, 2.4K retweets, and thousands of comments. Internet users were unimpressed with the Starbucks sign board and expressed their discontent in the comments section. However, some people felt that it wasn’t such a big issue. One person wrote, “Literally making me sick! Starbucks, get rid of it now!”

    Another person called for action by commenting, “@Starbucks excuse me, please do something.”

    A third person wrote, “Why are you trying to get a worker in trouble for something that’s not a big deal? Like, you just got a fellow Swiftie in trouble. Way to go.”

    Also read:Kourtney Kardashian’s Weird Food Binge In Bathroom Has Shocked Internet

    Here’s how other people reacted to the post:

    Starbucks was quick to respond to the post and claimed that the sign had been taken down. “Thank you for bringing this to our attention. This certainly doesn’t uphold our mission and values, and the sign has been taken down by the store.”

    What do you think of this Starbucks signboard? Do share your thoughts with us in the comments section below.



    Source link

  • The Backlash Over Keeping Olympic Rings on Eiffel Tower

    The Backlash Over Keeping Olympic Rings on Eiffel Tower

    As much as the French capital reveled in the celebratory air of the Olympics this summer, many are less than thrilled to discover Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo’s plan to keep the iconic Olympic rings on France’s most iconic monument even after the Games.

    “The decision is up to me, and I have the agreement of the [International Olympic Committee]. So yes, they will stay on the Eiffel Tower,” Hidalgo said in an interview published in Ouest-France on Saturday. She told the news outlet that, thanks to the Olympics, the French “have fallen in love with Paris again” and that she wanted “this festive spirit to remain.”

    Hidalgo’s plan to permanently alter the facade of the Eiffel Tower has sparked opposition from heritage conservation advocates, her peers, and even the family of the monument’s architect Gustave Eiffel. 

    The Association of Descendants of Gustave Eiffel, consisting of about 70 living descendants of the architect, said in a press release cited by French media on Sunday that “it does not seem appropriate to us” that the Eiffel Tower, a historical symbol of Paris and France, “should be added to the symbol of an external organization in a lasting way, whatever its prestige.”

    Built for the 1889 World’s Fair, the Eiffel Tower was initially meant to be dismantled after 20 years. But the structure was retained after Eiffel suggested that it be used for a variety of scientific purposes, including meteorological research and optical telegraph communications. It was designated as a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1991.

    Olivier Berthelot-Eiffel, president of the descendants group, told AFP that while they “don’t see any problem” with the Olympic rings staying on the tower “a little longer” after the Paralympic Games, which conclude on Sunday, “the Eiffel Tower is not intended as an advertising antenna.” He added that Hidalgo should have consulted the Paris Council and other experts about such a decision.

    Meanwhile, heritage conservation group SOS Paris accused Hidalgo of trying to leave her personal legacy on the iconic architecture. “Using the most famous monument in France to establish one’s dogma and remind the whole world, forever, that Anne Hidalgo made the 2024 Olympics, is going really far,” the group posted Sunday on X. 

    Read More: Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo Has a Lot Riding on the 2024 Olympics

    Even for Hidalgo, there are a few issues still to be ironed out. She said that the current Olympic rings attached to the Eiffel Tower, which are too heavy to permanently withstand winter weather conditions, will need to be replaced with lighter replicas from the same manufacturer. She also said that the city would have to think of a way to conceal the rings when needed, to protect it from breaching the Olympics’ political neutrality rules. (Last year, the tower was lit up with customized colors and messages in shows of solidarity with women’s rights protesters in Iran and a warring Ukraine.)

    A Change.org petition opposing the move to keep the Olympic rings on the Eiffel Tower was started on Sunday and has garnered thousands of signatures as of Monday. “Once the party time is over, our emblematic monument must return to its natural state,” it reads.

    Culture Minister Rachida Dati, who unsuccessfully ran against Hidalgo for mayor in 2020, also weighed in on Sunday: “The Eiffel Tower is a protected monument, the work of an immense engineer and creator,” she posted on X. “Before any decision is made or any announcement is made in this matter, it is important that all procedures and consultations aimed at protecting heritage are respected.”

    Criticisms have also reverberated among social media users, who are increasingly echoing calls to classify the Eiffel Tower as a historical monument. While the Eiffel Tower was listed as a historical monument in 1964, it has not been classified as one—a status that would give it the highest level of protection. In February, a proposal by Dati to classify the Eiffel Tower was struck down by Hidalgo.

    Others have decried the Olympic rings as having “no place” on the Eiffel Tower.“Keeping the Olympic rings on the Eiffel Tower after the Olympics,” a popular French account posted on X, “is exactly like refusing to take down the Christmas decorations in your house because you had a great Christmas Eve.”

    Source link