hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetBakırköy Escortcasibom9018betgit casinojojobet

Tag: break

  • The Surprising Reason How You Cut Onions Can Make Or Break Your Recipe

    The Surprising Reason How You Cut Onions Can Make Or Break Your Recipe

    Onions are one of the most widely used ingredients in cuisines across the world. They add a unique texture, aroma, and flavour to dishes – a mix of sweet, savoury, pungent, and umami flavours. Now, we all know that how you cook onions can greatly impact a recipe. However, did you know that how you chop the onions can also change the flavours of your dish? Yes, here’s a dose of cooking science on onions, shared by Chef Pankaj Bhadouria on her Instagram handle.

    In a post showing different kinds of chopped onions – big chunks, rings, slices, minced – the chef shares that the way you manipulate your onions can change the flavours of your dish. You can try this for yourself in the same recipe and experience the difference. If you want a strong taste of the onions in the dish, cut them as finely as possible. In the post, the chef shares, “Minced onion tastes stronger than chopped onion, which tastes stronger than sliced.”

    Science Of Cutting Onions

    How does that happen? Here’s the science. The chef explains, “At the root of onion flavour are enzymes called onion alliinase and LF synthase, which are released the moment the vegetable’s cells are damaged, jump-starting a pivotal chemical reaction. The enzymes act on a sulfur-containing molecule called isoalliin. The more you break down onion cells by chopping, the more isoalliin is produced.
    Also Read:To Buy Or Not To Buy? 5 Key Things To Evaluate Before Buying A Chopping Board

    Cutting Onion With The Grain vs. Against The Grain

    Even the angle or direction in which you cut the onion affects its pungency. “Slicing pole to pole or from north to south (with the grain) ruptures fewer cells than slicing parallel to the equator (against the grain), thus producing fewer thiosulfinates.”

    The same applies to whether you want crunchy or softer onions. Cutting the onion with the grain exposes fewer fibres. When you cut it this way, the onion doesn’t release too much water, and when you cook it, it stays crunchy and has more texture. This style is great for pickled onions and stir-fries. On the other hand, if you want to caramelise the onions, such as for gravies and soups, cut them across the grain, and you’ll get softer onions.
    Also Read: Guinness World Records: Chef Chops Most Number Of Celery Slices While Blindfolded

    Interestingly, a similar logic applies to garlic. For a subtle, mellow garlic flavour, leave the cloves whole. Slicing garlic results in a moderate flavour. Mincing garlic significantly increases the surface area, leading to a more pronounced garlic flavour.

    Want to perfect your onion-chopping skills? Click here to learn how to cut onions the way a Michelin-star chef would.



    Source link

  • Congress is gridlocked. These members are convinced AI legislation could break through

    Congress is gridlocked. These members are convinced AI legislation could break through

    WASHINGTON — A bipartisan group of lawmakers plans to introduce legislation Tuesday that would prohibit political campaigns and outside political groups from using artificial intelligence to misrepresent the views of their rivals by pretending to be them.

    The legislation is being introduced as Congress has failed to regulate the fast-evolving technology and experts warn that it threatens to overwhelm voters with misinformation. Those experts have expressed particular concern over the dangers posed by “deepfakes,” AI-generated videos and memes that can look lifelike and cause voters to question what is real and what is fake.

    Lawmakers said the bill would give the Federal Election Commission the power to regulate the use of artificial intelligence in elections in the same way it has regulated other political misrepresentation for decades. The FEC has started to consider such regulations.

    “Right now, the FEC does not have the teeth, the regulatory authority, to protect the election,” said Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican who is co-sponsoring the legislation. Other sponsors include Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat; Rep. Derek Kilmer, a Washington Democrat; and Lori Chavez-DeRemer, an Oregon Republican.

    Fitzpatrick and Schiff said the odds were against the bill passing this year. Nevertheless, they said they don’t expect the measure to face much opposition and could be attached to a must-pass measure in the waning days the congressional session.

    Schiff described the bill as a modest first step in addressing the threat posed by deepfakes and other false AI-generated content, arguing the legislation’s simplicity was an asset.

    “This is really probably the lowest hanging fruit there is” in terms of addressing the misuse of AI in politics, Schiff said. “There’s so much more we’re going to need to do, though, to try to attack the avalanche of misinformation and disinformation.”

    Congress has been paralyzed on countless issues in recent years, and regulating AI is no exception.

    “This is another illustration of congressional dysfunction,” Schiff said.

    Schiff and Fitzpatrick are not alone in believing artificial intelligence legislation is needed and can become law. Rep. Madeleine Dean, a Pennsylvania Democrat, and Rep. María Elvira Salazar, a Florida Republican, introduced legislation earlier this month that aims to curb the spread of unauthorized AI-generated deepfakes. A bipartisan group of senators proposed companion legislation in the Senate.

    Opposition to such legislation has primarily focused on not stifling a burgeoning technology sector or making it easier for another country to become the hub for the AI industry.

    Congress doesn’t “want to put a rock on top of innovation either and not allow it to flourish under the right circumstances,” Rep. French Hill, an Arkansas Republican, said in August at a reception hosted by the Center for AI Safety. “It’s a balancing act.”

    The Federal Election Commission in August took its first step toward regulating AI-generated deepfakes in political advertising when it took a procedural vote after being asked to regulate ads that use artificial intelligence to misrepresent political opponents as saying or doing something they didn’t.

    The commission is expected to further discuss the matter on Thursday.

    The commission’s efforts followed a request from Public Citizen, a progressive consumer rights organization, that the agency clarify whether a 1970s-era law that bans “fraudulent misrepresentation” in campaign communications also applies to AI-generated deepfakes. While the election commission has been criticized in recent years for being ineffective, it does have the ability to take action against campaigns or groups that violate these laws, often through fines.

    Craig Holman, a government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen who helped the lawmakers write the bill being introduced Tuesday, said he was concerned that fraudulent misrepresentation law only applies to candidates and not parties, outside groups and super PACs.

    The bill being proposed by Schiff and Fitzpatrick would expand FEC’s jurisdiction to explicitly account for the rapid rise of generative AI’s use in political communications.

    Holman noted that some states have passed laws to regulate deepfakes but said federal legislation was necessary to give the Federal Election Commission the clear authority.

    ___

    This story is part of an Associated Press series, “The AI Campaign,” exploring the influence of artificial intelligence in the 2024 election cycle.

    ___

    The Associated Press receives financial assistance from the Omidyar Network to support coverage of artificial intelligence and its impact on society. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org

    Source link