hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetjojobet

Tag: century

  • Volkswagen ID. Buzz zooms into Singapore with a 21st century reinvention, Lifestyle News

    Volkswagen ID. Buzz zooms into Singapore with a 21st century reinvention, Lifestyle News

    The much-anticipated Volkswagen ID. Buzz has now officially arrived in Singapore, and Volkswagen’s modern interpretation of its iconic van was launched at a beach party held at Sentosa’s Emerald Pavilion on Oct 16.

    What is the ID. Buzz?

    Those of a certain age may remember the classic Volkswagen Kombi and Transporter vans from the 1950s and 60s, and the ID. Buzz is meant to be a 21st century reinvention of the concept, modernised for today’s world.

    To that end, the ID. Buzz is fully electric, and features styling that are in line with Volkswagen’s ID range of electrified vehicles. At the same time, the design is also clearly inspired by the classic Volkswagen vans, with elements such as the large VW logo up front, the ‘vents’ on the D-pillar, and the two-tone paintwork all a reflection of its roots.

    The interior is as contemporary as it can be, with a clean-looking dashboard featuring a large 14-inch infotainment touchscreen, and interior ambient lighting that offers a choice of 30 selectable colours. It scores high on sustainability too, with the seat covers being made from materials crafted from recycled plastic.

    What versions of the ID. Buzz are there?

    Volkswagen Singapore will be offering four different variants of the ID. Buzz here, catering to those with varying needs.

    There is the ID. Buzz Cargo available, which is a commercial van meant for business use, and retails for $156,900 including COE.

    For those who need to ferry passengers, the most affordable version is the 5-seater Normal Wheelbase (NWB), which is priced at $299,900 with COE. Those who need more space can opt for the 6-seater ($324,900 with COE) or 7-seater ($319,900 with COE) models, both of which feature the Long Wheelbase (LWB) body that is 250mm longer than the NWB car, translating into more interior room overall.

    All versions feature an electric drivetrain that produces 210kW/282hp, but come with differing battery sizes and range. The LWB models have an 86kWh battery and allows the car to travel up to 487km while fully charged. The NWB and Cargo models though have a smaller 79kWh battery, and a driving range of 461km. All models can be charged from 10 to 80 per cent in just 26 minutes using a DC charger.

    The differing variants cater to different needs, with the 5-seater NWB version meant for those who prioritise practicality, with its generous boot space. The 6-seater LWB model is designed for comfort and luxury, with the second-row seats being individual captain’s chairs, while the 7-seater LWB is targeted at families, offering plenty of space to accommodate seven adults.

    The ID. Buzz Cargo van features its own unique design elements, like the twin-swinging rear wing doors instead of the large opening tailgate on the passenger versions. It has a cargo area of 3.9 cubic metres, and a payload carrying capacity of 770kg, making it an ideal choice for small businesses looking for a stylish van to meet their needs.

    The ID. Buzz arrives at a time where competition for MPVs in Singapore have been heating up, with a number of large people carriers being launched in recent months. The Chinese brands in particular have released a number of new MPVs recently, notably the Denza D9 and the Maxus Mifa 7, while Kia has also launched its updated Carnival Hybrid to compete in the market.

    [[nid:705313]]

    The ID. Buzz’s unique style and nod to its heritage though makes it stand out from the crowd, and will appeal to those looking for a large MPV that is uniquely-styled and yet spacious and practical enough for everyday use as a family or lifestyle vehicle.

    ALSO READ: Large MPV segment heats up with the launch of the Maxus Mifa 7

    benjamin.chia@asiaone.com

    No part of this article can be reproduced without permission from AsiaOne.

    Source link

  • Sail of the century: Ben Ainslie leads GB’s chase for the sporting trophy they want most | America’s Cup

    There were 15 boats in the very first race for the Royal Yacht Squadron’s £100 Cup back in 1851, 14 British, and one not. The odd one out was a 101ft schooner named America, which had been built in New York, and brought across especially to show off the prowess of US shipbuilders. It arrived, in the words of one writer, like a sparrow hawk among a flock of wood pigeons. As every young English sailor learns at his grandfather’s knee, the story goes that when America came into sight at the end of the 53-mile (98km) race around the Isle of Wight, Queen Victoria, watching from the Royal Yacht, turned to a signalman and asked who was in second place behind it. “Your Majesty,” he is supposed to have said back to her, “there is no second.”

    America won that first race by 24 minutes, and, the best part of 200 years later the British still have not come close to winning the trophy, which was soon renamed in the winner’s honour. They have not even had a chance since 1964, when Sovereign, skipped by Peter Scott, only child of Antarctic explorer Robert Scott, lost 4-0 to the US yacht Constellation.

    Until now. At two o’clock on Saturday afternoon, Sir Ben Ainslie will finally lead another British challenge for the Cup. His team, Ineos Britannia, won the right to race against the defending America’s Cup champions, Emirates Team New Zealand, by defeating four other competing teams, from Switzerland, Italy, the US, and France, in the Challenger Selection Series which finished last week. It has cost Ainslie and his team tens of thousands of hours, and hundreds of millions of pounds, just to make it this far. Now they have, at most, 13 races to find out whether it was all worth it. The first to seven wins.

    “It’s a really proud moment for us,” Ainslie said on Friday. “We’ve been going for 10 years to get ourselves into this final, so what an opportunity this is. We’re going to give it everything we’ve got.” Ainslie, 47, has already won pretty much everything there is in his sport. He is the most successful sailor in Olympic history, and has won 11 world championship titles, and the America’s Cup too, as the tactician for Oracle Team USA in 2013. But this, the chance to become the first captain to win the Cup for Britain, has become his white whale. He has spent a decade chasing after it. His backer, Sir Jim Ratcliffe, has put in well over £100m so far.

    “Why?” Ainslie said, he turned to look at the trophy, affectionately known as the “auld mug”. “It speaks for itself doesn’t it? Britain is a very proud sporting nation, and has a very proud maritime history, and this Cup is the one thing that’s missing. That’s why. The fact that Britain has never won the America’s Cup is what drives us.”

    Ainslie describes it as the hardest task in sport. New Zealand, under their captain, Peter Burling, have won the past two editions of the competition, and as defending champions they had the right to dictate the terms and conditions of the latest contest. On top of that, while Ainslie and his crew have spent the past three weeks competing in a series of gruelling races against the other challengers, the New Zealanders have been watching and working on their boat. They have had plenty of opportunity to study Ainslie’s strategy, and Ineos Britannia’s strengths and weaknesses on the water, but Ineos Britannia have no real idea what shape Emirates New Zealand will be in.

    Team New Zealand’s Peter Burling (second left) will defend the Cup against Ineos Britannia’s Ben Ainslie (second right) in Barcelona. Photograph: Enric Fontcuberta/EPA

    “In terms of who’s got the advantage I’d say for sure it is team New Zealand,” Ainslie said. “They’ve been able to have two or three weeks to work on the configuration of their boat, to get the data on the competing boats. If there’s one team here that really knows the competition, it’s Team NZ, not us. So that’s what we’re up against. But we’ve come through one incredible final, and we’re up for another. That’s the game.”

    Ainslie’s co-helm, Dylan Fletcher, described Ineos Britannia as “pretty broken and knackered” after their last qualifying race against the Italian team Luna Rossa. Although on Friday, Fletcher said it was “exactly what we needed to prepare ourselves for the Kiwis”.

    skip past newsletter promotion

    The British team do have two aces to play. One is in their backroom. All the data from their boat is fed back to the analysis team at the Mercedes Formula One factory in Brackley, where analysts will work on it in real time. The tweaks they make to the boat’s configuration mean it will only get faster from one race to the next.

    The New Zealanders will be doing the same thing, but do not have all that F1 expertise to draw on. Ineos Britannia’s other card is Ainslie himself, who has more experience in match racing than Burling. Not that Burling, who is a laconic sort, seems especially worried about the comparison. They said similar things about his contests against another great match racer, Jimmy Spithill, in 2017 and 2021, and Burling won both.

    Still, the expectation is that these two boats will be more evenly matched, despite their radically different hulls. Which means that the Cup will probably come down to which of the two skippers is able to outmanoeuvre the other at the pre-start. The America’s Cup is a very long way from the sort of dinghy boats Ainslie started out in. He says himself that these AC75 yachts, which work almost on push button technology, have taken the sport to the point where they are almost over reliant on automation and that the human element “isn’t as relevant as it should be”. But it still tells, especially at that pre-start, when the two boats jostle for optimal position heading into the race. “Ultimately, the start is what’s going to define a race,” says Burling’s co-helm, Nathan Outteridge.

    And the end is what it will be remembered for.

    Source link

  • Man City ‘could be expelled from the Champions League, Club World Cup, FA Cup AND Carabao Cup’ if they are found guilty of breaking financial rules in football’s ‘trial of the century’

    Man City ‘could be expelled from the Champions League, Club World Cup, FA Cup AND Carabao Cup’ if they are found guilty of breaking financial rules in football’s ‘trial of the century’

    • Many Premier League clubs thought to want a relegation if City found guilty
    • Rules of domestic and international tournaments cast doubt on future there too
    • The hearing into the club’s 115 alleged financial rule breaches began on Monday 

    Manchester City reportedly face being ‘expelled from all competitions’, not just the Premier League, if they are found guilty of breaking financial rules.

    The hearing into Manchester City’s 115 alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules began on Monday with the club accused of financial impropriety spanning nine years from 2009.

    The League charged City with a failure to provide accurate financial information and a failure to provide accurate details for player and manager payments. 

    An investigation was sparked by Der Spiegel publishing Football Leaks documents in 2018 and City stand accused of funnelling money from the club’s owners through sponsors in the United Arab Emirates.  

    Many thought the sternest punishment lying in wait would be relegation, with points deductions and fines also potential penalties, but it has now been claimed, as per The Telegraph, that they could be kicked out of every tournament they compete in.

    Manchester City reportedly face being 'expelled from all competitions', not just the Premier League , if they are found guilty of breaking financial rules

    Manchester City reportedly face being ‘expelled from all competitions’, not just the Premier League , if they are found guilty of breaking financial rules 

    Clause 31 of FA Cup rules states: 'Where a club has been admitted to participate in the competition but is then removed from the league in which it competes (or its league fixtures are suspended), the Professional Game Board may remove the club from the competition'

    Clause 31 of FA Cup rules states: ‘Where a club has been admitted to participate in the competition but is then removed from the league in which it competes (or its league fixtures are suspended), the Professional Game Board may remove the club from the competition’

    To make matters worse their involvement in the Champions League, should they be found guilty of rule breaches, seems far from assured

    To make matters worse their involvement in the Champions League, should they be found guilty of rule breaches, seems far from assured

    It has previously been reported that most Premier League sides would not accept a one-off points deduction if City were found guilty, with many demanding an eviction from the division.

    Now a look into the rules of English football’s two domestic tournaments has shown that their future participation in these competitions could be in doubt.

    Clause 31 of the FA Cup rules states: ‘Where a club has been admitted to participate in the competition but is then removed from the league in which it competes (or its league fixtures are suspended), the Professional Game Board [PGB] may remove the club from the competition.’ 

    The PGB consists of representatives from the Premier League and English Football League.

    EFL Cup rules similarly define participating clubs as ‘each member from time to time of the league and each member from time to time of the Premier League’. 

    To make matters worse their involvement in the Champions League, should they be found guilty of rule breaches, seems far from assured – although the competition’s rules are slightly more complicated.

    Sides need a Uefa club licence in order to take part in the tournament and the Premier League, Uefa, and the FA all have a voice in the administration of these licences.

    As for Fifa’s expanded Club World Cup, starting this summer, regulations do not seem to be publicly available – but involvement in either that competition or the Champions League would be tricky if they were kicked out of domestic football entirely.

    EFL Cup rules similarly define participating clubs as 'each member from time to time of the league and each member from time to time of the Premier League'

    EFL Cup rules similarly define participating clubs as ‘each member from time to time of the league and each member from time to time of the Premier League’

    As for Fifa's expanded Club World Cup, starting this summer, regulations do not seem to be publicly available

    As for Fifa’s expanded Club World Cup, starting this summer, regulations do not seem to be publicly available

    City have won all five trophies at various stages over a successful few years at the Etihad

    City have won all five trophies at various stages over a successful few years at the Etihad

    City deny wrongdoing and are defending their case at an independent inquiry.

    City won the Premier League three times between 2009 and 2018, lifting the top division title in 2012, 2014 and 2018.

    They are on a four-season league-winning streak, while they are also looking to regain the Champions League after winning it in the 2022-23 season.

    Source link

  • A robot begins removal of melted fuel from the Fukushima nuclear plant. It could take a century

    A robot begins removal of melted fuel from the Fukushima nuclear plant. It could take a century

    TOKYO — A long robot entered a damaged reactor at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant on Tuesday, beginning a two-week, high-stakes mission to retrieve for the first time a tiny amount of melted fuel debris from the bottom.

    The robot’s trip into the Unit 2 reactor is a crucial initial step for what comes next — a daunting, decades-long process to decommission the plant and deal with large amounts of highly radioactive melted fuel inside three reactors that were damaged by a massive earthquake and tsunami in 2011. Specialists hope the robot will help them learn more about the status of the cores and the fuel debris.

    Here is an explanation of how the robot works, its mission, significance and what lies ahead as the most challenging phase of the reactor cleanup begins.

    Nuclear fuel in the reactor cores melted after the magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami in March 2011 caused the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant’s cooling systems to fail. The melted fuel dripped down from the cores and mixed with internal reactor materials such as zirconium, stainless steel, electrical cables, broken grates and concrete around the supporting structure and at the bottom of the primary containment vessels.

    The reactor meltdowns caused the highly radioactive, lava-like material to spatter in all directions, greatly complicating the cleanup. The condition of the debris also differs in each reactor.

    Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, or TEPCO, which manages the plant, says an estimated 880 tons of molten fuel debris remains in the three reactors, but some experts say the amount could be larger.

    Workers will use five 1.5-meter-long (5-foot-long) pipes connected in sequence to maneuver the robot through an entry point in the Unit 2 reactor’s primary containment vessel. The robot itself can extend about 6 meters (20 feet) inside the vessel. Once inside, it will be maneuvered remotely by operators at another building at the plant because of the fatally high radiation emitted by the melted debris.

    The front of the robot, equipped with tongs, a light and a camera, will be lowered by a cable to a mound of melted fuel debris. It will then snip off and collect a bit of the debris — less than 3 grams (0.1 ounce). The small amount is meant to minimize radiation dangers.

    The robot will then back out to the place it entered the reactor, a roundtrip journey that will take about two weeks.

    The mission takes that long because the robot must make extremely precise maneuvers to avoid hitting obstacles or getting stuck in passageways. That has happened to earlier robots.

    TEPCO is also limiting daily operations to two hours to minimize the radiation risk for workers in the reactor building. Eight six-member teams will take turns, with each group allowed to stay maximum of about 15 minutes.

    Sampling the melted fuel debris is “an important first step,” said Lake Barrett, who led the cleanup after the 1979 disaster at the U.S. Three Mile Island nuclear plant for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and is now a paid adviser for TEPCO’s Fukushima decommissioning.

    While the melted fuel debris has been kept cool and has stabilized, the aging of the reactors poses potential safety risks, and the melted fuel needs to be removed and relocated to a safer place for long-term storage as soon as possible, experts say.

    An understanding of the melted fuel debris is essential to determine how best to remove it, store it and dispose of it, according to the Japan Atomic Energy Agency.

    Experts expect the sample will also provide more clues about how exactly the meltdown 13 years ago played out, some of which is still a mystery.

    The melted fuel sample will be kept in secure canisters and sent to multiple laboratories for more detailed analysis. If the radiation level exceeds a set limit, the robot will take the sample back into the reactor.

    “It’s the start of a process. It’s a long, long road ahead,” Barrett said in an online interview. “The goal is to remove the highly radioactive material, put it into engineered canisters … and put those in storage.”

    For this mission, the robot’s small tong can only reach the upper surface of the debris. The pace of the work is expected to pick up in the future as more experience is gained and robots with additional capabilities are developed.

    TEPCO will have to “probe down into the debris pile, which is over a meter (3.3 feet) thick, so you have to go down and see what’s inside,” Barrett said, noting that at Three Mile Island, the debris on the surface was very different from the material deeper inside. He said multiple samples from different locations must be collected and analyzed to better understand the melted debris and develop necessary equipment, such as stronger robots for future larger-scale removal.

    Compared to collecting a tiny sample for analysis, it will be a more difficult challenge to develop and operate robots that can cut larger chunks of melted debris into pieces and put that material into canisters for safe storage.

    There are also two other damaged reactors, Unit 1 and Unit 3, which are in worse condition and will take even longer to deal with. TEPCO plans to deploy a set of small drones in Unit 1 for a probe later this year and is developing even smaller “micro” drones for Unit 3, which is filled with a larger amount of water.

    Separately, hundreds of spent fuel rods remain in unenclosed cooling pools on the top floor of both Unit 1 and 2. This is a potential safety risk if there’s another major quake. Removal of spent fuel rods has been completed at Unit 3.

    Removal of the melted fuel was initially planned to start in late 2021 but has been delayed by technical issues, underscoring the difficulty of the process. The government says decommissioning is expected to take 30-40 years, while some experts say it could take as long as 100 years.

    Others are pushing for an entombment of the plant, as at Chernobyl after its 1986 explosion, to reduce radiation levels and risks for plant workers.

    That won’t work at the seaside Fukushima plant, Barrett says.

    “You’re in a high seismic area, you’re in a high-water area, and there are a lot of unknowns in those (reactor) buildings,” he said. “I don’t think you can just entomb it and wait.”

    Source link