hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetjojobet

Tag: Charges

  • Founder of failed crypto lending platform Celsius Network pleads guilty to fraud charges

    Founder of failed crypto lending platform Celsius Network pleads guilty to fraud charges

    NEW YORK — The founder and former CEO of the failed cryptocurrency lending platform Celsius Network could face decades in prison after pleading guilty Tuesday to federal fraud charges, admitting that he misled customers about the business.

    Alexander Mashinsky, 58, of Manhattan, entered the plea in New York federal court to commodities and securities fraud.

    He admitted illegally manipulating the price of Celsius’s proprietary crypto token while secretly selling his own tokens at inflated prices to pocket about $48 million before Celsius collapsed into bankruptcy in 2022.

    In court, he admitted that in 2021 he publicly suggested there was regulatory consent for the company’s moves because he knew that customers “would find false comfort” with that.

    And he said that in 2019, he was selling the crypto tokens even though he told the public that he was not. He said he knew customers would draw false comfort from that too.

    “I accept full responsibility for my actions,” Mashinsky said of crimes that stretched from 2018 to 2022 as the company pitched itself to customers as a modern-day bank where they could safely deposit crypto assets and earn interest.

    U.S. Attorney Damian Williams said in a release that Mashinsky “orchestrated one of the biggest frauds in the crypto industry” as his company’s assets purportedly grew to about $25 billion at its peak, making it one of the largest crypto platforms in the world.

    He said Mashinsky used catchy slogans like “Unbank Yourself” to entice prospective customers with a pledge that their money would be as safe in crypto accounts as money would be in a bank. Meanwhile, prosecutors said, Mashinsky and co-conspirators used customer deposits to fund market purchases of the Celsius token to prop up its value.

    Machinsky made tens of millions of dollars selling his own CEL tokens at artificially high prices, leaving his customers “holding the bag when the company went bankrupt,” Williams said.

    An indictment alleged that Mashinsky promoted Celsius through media interviews, his social media accounts and Celsius’ website, along with a weekly “Ask Mashinsky Anything” session broadcast that was posted to Celsius’ website and a YouTube channel.

    Celsius employees from multiple departments who noticed false and misleading statements in the sessions warned Mashinsky, but they were ignored, the indictment said.

    A plea agreement Mashinsky made with prosecutors calls for him to be sentenced to up to 30 years in prison and to forfeit over $48 million, which is the amount of money he allegedly made by selling his company’s token.

    Sentencing was scheduled for April 8.

    Source link

  • London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    Nick Corrigan has been living on a boat for the past eight years, and regularly moors on the Regent’s Canal.

    As an itinerant boater, he rarely stays in one place for more than a couple of weeks so relies on free moorings along London’s canals and rivers.

    But Nick has said his lifestyle is under threat after the Canal and River Trust, the charity that manages some of the capital’s waterways, rolled out charges for some moorings.

    These first appeared in Little Venice a couple of years ago, but have since been introduced around King’s Cross, as well as in other parts of Camden and Islington.

    Costing between £25 and £35 a night, a boater who used these moorings for a year could be set back more than £10,000.

    Nick said this is making central London’s waterways unaffordable for the average boater – pushing them off canals they have had free access to for hundreds of years.

    He fears that if more charges are introduced, it will be hard for him to stay close to his partner in Hackney, and his offices in Islington.

    The boater also moored near Homerton Hospital when he received treatment for cancer earlier this year, but said this would not have been possible if he had been charged.

    He added: “These moorings started by being bookable, which was really good when they were free.

    “But in the last 12 months, they’ve made them chargeable. What used to be really busy, safe, lovely areas are now deserted.”

    Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted (Image: National Bargee Travellers Association)

    The National Bargee Travellers Association has said Freedom of Information disclosures by the Canal and River Trust show that existing chargeable moorings were booked only 16.5% of the time in the first six months of this year.

    Nick added that the daily charges for some moorings followed a succession of other changes by the charity – including increasing boat licence fees – that seemed to penalise itinerant boaters.

    “The Canal and River Trust has been spending the last few years cooking up different ways to try to get rid of liveaboard boaters in central London,” he claimed.

    “But by closing all these free moorings it will make the River Lea even more congested, which they told us two years ago was unsustainably busy.”

    The Canal and River Trust has now said it has no plans to introduce charges for moorings in Hackney, and that it has recently removed fees from some moorings in Camden.

    A spokesperson for the charity said: “Over the past decade the number of boats on the capital’s waterways has more than doubled. 

    “The vast majority of mooring in London is still free, but the addition of a small number of pre-bookable moorings ensures visiting boaters who are worried they will have nowhere to stop are not excluded from being able to visit our very busy London waterways.

    “We’re doing all we can to increase the number of moorings where demand exists, and have added over one kilometre of free towpath moorings in central London over the past few years.”



    Source link

  • London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    Nick Corrigan has been living on a boat for the past eight years, and regularly moors on the Regent’s Canal.

    As an itinerant boater, he rarely stays in one place for more than a couple of weeks so relies on free moorings along London’s canals and rivers.

    But Nick has said his lifestyle is under threat after the Canal and River Trust, the charity that manages some of the capital’s waterways, rolled out charges for some moorings.

    These first appeared in Little Venice a couple of years ago, but have since been introduced around King’s Cross, as well as in other parts of Camden and Islington.

    Costing between £25 and £35 a night, a boater who used these moorings for a year could be set back more than £10,000.

    Nick said this is making central London’s waterways unaffordable for the average boater – pushing them off canals they have had free access to for hundreds of years.

    He fears that if more charges are introduced, it will be hard for him to stay close to his partner in Hackney, and his offices in Islington.

    The boater also moored near Homerton Hospital when he received treatment for cancer earlier this year, but said this would not have been possible if he had been charged.

    He added: “These moorings started by being bookable, which was really good when they were free.

    “But in the last 12 months, they’ve made them chargeable. What used to be really busy, safe, lovely areas are now deserted.”

    Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted (Image: National Bargee Travellers Association)

    The National Bargee Travellers Association has said Freedom of Information disclosures by the Canal and River Trust show that existing chargeable moorings were booked only 16.5% of the time in the first six months of this year.

    Nick added that the daily charges for some moorings followed a succession of other changes by the charity – including increasing boat licence fees – that seemed to penalise itinerant boaters.

    “The Canal and River Trust has been spending the last few years cooking up different ways to try to get rid of liveaboard boaters in central London,” he claimed.

    “But by closing all these free moorings it will make the River Lea even more congested, which they told us two years ago was unsustainably busy.”

    The Canal and River Trust has now said it has no plans to introduce charges for moorings in Hackney, and that it has recently removed fees from some moorings in Camden.

    A spokesperson for the charity said: “Over the past decade the number of boats on the capital’s waterways has more than doubled. 

    “The vast majority of mooring in London is still free, but the addition of a small number of pre-bookable moorings ensures visiting boaters who are worried they will have nowhere to stop are not excluded from being able to visit our very busy London waterways.

    “We’re doing all we can to increase the number of moorings where demand exists, and have added over one kilometre of free towpath moorings in central London over the past few years.”



    Source link

  • London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    Nick Corrigan has been living on a boat for the past eight years, and regularly moors on the Regent’s Canal.

    As an itinerant boater, he rarely stays in one place for more than a couple of weeks so relies on free moorings along London’s canals and rivers.

    But Nick has said his lifestyle is under threat after the Canal and River Trust, the charity that manages some of the capital’s waterways, rolled out charges for some moorings.

    These first appeared in Little Venice a couple of years ago, but have since been introduced around King’s Cross, as well as in other parts of Camden and Islington.

    Costing between £25 and £35 a night, a boater who used these moorings for a year could be set back more than £10,000.

    Nick said this is making central London’s waterways unaffordable for the average boater – pushing them off canals they have had free access to for hundreds of years.

    He fears that if more charges are introduced, it will be hard for him to stay close to his partner in Hackney, and his offices in Islington.

    The boater also moored near Homerton Hospital when he received treatment for cancer earlier this year, but said this would not have been possible if he had been charged.

    He added: “These moorings started by being bookable, which was really good when they were free.

    “But in the last 12 months, they’ve made them chargeable. What used to be really busy, safe, lovely areas are now deserted.”

    Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted (Image: National Bargee Travellers Association)

    The National Bargee Travellers Association has said Freedom of Information disclosures by the Canal and River Trust show that existing chargeable moorings were booked only 16.5% of the time in the first six months of this year.

    Nick added that the daily charges for some moorings followed a succession of other changes by the charity – including increasing boat licence fees – that seemed to penalise itinerant boaters.

    “The Canal and River Trust has been spending the last few years cooking up different ways to try to get rid of liveaboard boaters in central London,” he claimed.

    “But by closing all these free moorings it will make the River Lea even more congested, which they told us two years ago was unsustainably busy.”

    The Canal and River Trust has now said it has no plans to introduce charges for moorings in Hackney, and that it has recently removed fees from some moorings in Camden.

    A spokesperson for the charity said: “Over the past decade the number of boats on the capital’s waterways has more than doubled. 

    “The vast majority of mooring in London is still free, but the addition of a small number of pre-bookable moorings ensures visiting boaters who are worried they will have nowhere to stop are not excluded from being able to visit our very busy London waterways.

    “We’re doing all we can to increase the number of moorings where demand exists, and have added over one kilometre of free towpath moorings in central London over the past few years.”



    Source link

  • Two former Penn State football players are facing rape charges

    Two former Penn State football players are facing rape charges

    STATE COLLEGE, Pa. (AP) — Two former Penn State football players facing felony rape charges are free on bond while they await their next hearing.

    Kaveion Allen Keys and Jameial James Lyons, both 19, are accused of raping a 17-year-old Penn State student at their on-campus apartment in early July. A second student who was present that night said she awoke with her pants removed and that Lyons “digitally penetrated” her, according to the criminal complaint.

    Penn State coach James Franklin declined to answer questions about the charges against Lyons and Keys following practice Wednesday.

    Both players were placed on interim suspension over the summer to deal with what Penn State officials called a “personal matter.” By early August, both were removed from the roster. Franklin has declined to discuss their statuses.

    They were arraigned Wednesday by District Judge Don Hahn, who set Keys’ bail at $400,000 and Lyons’ at $500,000. Keys and Lyons were not required to post bail unless they violate bail conditions. Their next hearing is scheduled for Wednesday.

    According to the complaint, Keys denied knowing “Victim 1” and engaging in sexual contact with any of the women in the apartment that night.

    Lyons, according to the complaint, acknowledged having sex with Victim 1 and said he had Keys’ cellphone during the encounter, although he denied making a video recording. Lyons said the sex with Victim 1 was consensual but added that he believed Victim 1 would “likely report the situation to the police,” the complaint read.

    Both Lyons and Keys’ cellphones were examined. A short video showing “indecent contact” with Victim 1 was found on Keys’ camera roll, according to police. There also was a witness, referred to in the complaint as Witness 1, who was in the apartment that night.

    Keys was charged with forcible rape (first-degree felony), sexual assault (second-degree felony), aggravated assault without consent (second-degree felony) and indecent assault without consent (second-degree misdemeanor).

    Lyons was charged with forcible rape (first-degree felony), voluntary deviate sexual intercourse (second-degree felony), aggravated assault without consent (second-degree felony), indecent assault without consent (second-degree misdemeanor) and invasion of privacy (second-degree misdemeanor).

    ___

    Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football



    Source link

  • James Madison football kids need a talking to, not criminal charges

    James Madison football kids need a talking to, not criminal charges

    At Brooklyn’s James Madison High School, new JV football players face a ritual — the older players surround them, de-pant them and softly hit them.

    One parent tells The Post it’s been going on for years. He shared a video of one of the incidents, where the “victim” was laughing the entire time.

    Except this year, one student who was de-panted told his parents, and it set off a firestorm. Some players face criminal charges and have been suspended from school. The coach has been fired. And the football season is on the verge of being canceled

    What a stunning overreaction. What a terrible lesson. 

    Times have changed, we understand. Hazing, no matter how light-hearted, is no longer acceptable, and too often gets out of hand. But the answer to that is: Ban hazing.

    Suspending the students for something generations have done before? Cancel football games and punish the entire team for these actions? Have we lost all perspective?

    And most ridiculously: Calling the cops over this?

    This is a teachable moment for kids on the team, and at the school more broadly, if ever there was one. 

    Suspend the pantsters for a game. Have them write essays explaining why what they did was wrong. 

    Have the coach give them a talking to, making clear that even if it’s all fun and games, it has to stop and that respect for your teammates is as big a part of athletic life as scoring touchdowns.  

    Maybe even throw in a little community service time. 

    But rushing to criminalize them is insane. 

    Especially since it sure sounds like this was very likely a team-wide roughhousing game, of a kind extremely common among adolescent boys. 

    Not a violent gang assault, a robbery, a shooting or a real sex crime. 

    And yes, Madison has had major problems in the past. 

    The school is being sued for an actual alleged assault by a former football coach, who viciously slammed a kid’s head into a wall and was correctly later arrested and charged with felonies. 

    But a theatrical crackdown against an entire team of kids — who are guilty largely of just being kids — in the service of bolstering administrators’ rep to help win a lawsuit seems supremely ill-considered. 

    Kids will be kids. They need to learn to be adults. 

    Ruining their lives over trivialities won’t help them do that. 

    Source link

  • The US is preparing criminal charges in Iran hack targeting Trump, AP sources say

    The US is preparing criminal charges in Iran hack targeting Trump, AP sources say

    WASHINGTON — The Justice Department is preparing criminal charges in connection with an Iranian hack that targeted Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in a bid to shape the outcome of the November election, two people familiar with the matter said Thursday.

    It was not immediately clear when the charges might be announced or whom precisely they will target, but they are the result of an FBI investigation into an intrusion that investigators across multiple agencies quickly linked to an Iranian effort to influence American politics.

    The prospect of criminal charges comes as the Justice Department has raised alarms about aggressive efforts by countries including Russia and Iran to meddle in the presidential election between Trump and Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, including by hacking and covert social media campaigns designed to shape public opinion.

    Iran “is making a greater effort to influence this year’s election than it has in prior election cycles and that Iranian activity is growing increasingly aggressive as this election nears,” Assistant Attorney General Matthew Olsen, the Justice Department’s top national security official, said in a speech Thursday in New York City.

    “Iran perceives this year’s elections to be particularly consequential in impacting Iran’s national security interests, increasing Tehran’s inclination to try to shape the outcome,” he added.

    The Trump campaign disclosed on Aug. 10 that it had been hacked and said Iranian actors had stolen and distributed sensitive internal documents. At least three news outlets — Politico, The New York Times and The Washington Post — were leaked confidential material from inside the Trump campaign. So far, each has refused to reveal any details about what it received.

    Politico reported that it began receiving emails on July 22 from an anonymous account. The source — an AOL email account identified only as “Robert” — passed along what appeared to be a research dossier that the campaign had apparently done on the Republican vice presidential nominee, Ohio Sen. JD Vance. The document was dated Feb. 23, almost five months before Trump selected Vance as his running mate.

    The FBI, the office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency subsequently blamed that hack, as well as an attempted breach of the Biden-Harris campaign, on Iran.

    Those agencies issued a statement saying that the hacking and similar activities were meant to sow discord, exploit divisions within American society and influence the outcome of elections.

    The statement did not identify whether Iran has a preferred candidate, though Tehran has long appeared determined to seek retaliation for a 2020 strike Trump ordered as president that killed an Iranian general.

    The two people who discussed the looming criminal charges spoke on condition of anonymity to The Associated Press because they were not authorized to speak publicly about a case that had not yet been unsealed.

    The Washington Post first reported that charges were being prepared.

    Justice Department officials have been working to publicly call out and counter election interference efforts. The response is a contrast to 2016, when Obama administration officials were far more circumspect about Russian interference they were watching that was designed to boost Trump’s campaign.

    “We have learned that transparency about what we are seeing is critical,” Olsen, the Justice Department official, said Thursday.

    “It helps ensure that our citizens are aware of the attempts of foreign government to sow discord and spread falsehoods — all of which promotes resilience within our electorate,” he added. “It provides warnings to our private sector so they can better protect their networks. And it sends an unmistakable message to our adversaries — we’ve gained insight into your networks, we know what you’re doing, and we are determined to hold you accountable.”

    Last week, in an effort to combat disinformation ahead of the election, the Justice Department charged two employees of RT, a Russian state media company, with covertly funneling a Tennessee-based content creation company nearly $10 million to publish English-language videos on social media platforms with messages in favor of the Russia government’s interests and agenda.

    Source link

  • Telegram CEO defends himself against French charges in first public comments

    Telegram CEO defends himself against French charges in first public comments

    PARIS — Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov promised to step up efforts to fight criminality on the messaging app, his first public comments since French authorities handed him preliminary charges for allegedly allowing the platform’s use for criminal activity.

    In a Telegram post late Thursday, Durov defended himself against the French judicial investigation, suggesting that he shouldn’t have been targeted personally.

    “Using laws from the pre-smartphone era to charge a CEO with crimes committed by third parties on the platform he manages is a misguided approach,” the post said. “Building technology is hard enough as it is. No innovator will ever build new tools if they know they can be personally held responsible for potential abuse of those tools.”

    While insisting that Telegram is not “some sort of anarchic paradise,” Durov said surging numbers of Telegram users “caused growing pains that made it easier for criminals to abuse our platform.”

    “That’s why I made it my personal goal to ensure we significantly improve things in this regard. We’ve already started that process internally, and I will share more details on our progress with you very soon,” he said.

    French investigators detained Durov at Le Bourget airport outside Paris in late August and questioned him for four days as part of a sweeping probe opened earlier this year. Released on 5 million euros bail, Durov has to report to a police station twice a week. Russia-born, he has amassed multiple citizenships, including French.

    French allegations against Durov include that Telegram is used for child sexual abuse material and drug trafficking, and that the platform refused to share information or documents with investigators when required by law.

    In his post, Durov said that while in police detention, “I was told I may be personally responsible for other people’s illegal use of Telegram, because the French authorities didn’t receive responses from Telegram.”

    “This was surprising for several reasons,” he added.

    He said Telegram has an official representative in the European Union who replies to EU requests, with a public email address.

    Telegram’s website informs users that they can contact the app through a bot and includes a link to report illegal content. It also includes an email address and phone number for “competent authorities of the EU and EU members” to use. “If you are not a competent EU or EU member authority, your request will not be processed,” it says.

    In his post, Durov said “French authorities had numerous ways to reach me to request assistance.” He said he also had previously worked with them to “establish a hotline with Telegram to deal with the threat of terrorism in France.”

    “If a country is unhappy with an internet service, the established practice is to start a legal action against the service itself,” he said.

    Source link

  • With charges and sanctions, US takes aim at Russian disinformation ahead of November election

    With charges and sanctions, US takes aim at Russian disinformation ahead of November election

    WASHINGTON — The Biden administration seized Kremlin-run websites and charged two Russian state media employees in its most sweeping effort yet to push back against what it says are Russian attempts to spread disinformation ahead of the November presidential election.

    The measures, which in addition to indictments also included sanctions and visa restrictions, represented a U.S. government effort just weeks before the November election to disrupt a persistent threat from Russia that American officials have long warned has the potential to sow discord and create confusion among voters.

    Washington has said that Moscow, which intelligence officials have said has a preference for Republican Donald Trump, remains the primary threat to elections even as the FBI continues to investigate a hack by Iran this year that targeted the presidential campaigns of both political parties.

    “The Justice Department’s message is clear: We will have no tolerance for attempts by authoritarian regimes to exploit our democratic systems of government,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said.

    One criminal case disclosed by the Justice Department accuses two employees of RT, a Russian state media company, of covertly funding a Tennessee-based content creation company with nearly $10 million to publish English-language videos on social media platforms including TikTok and YouTube with messages in favor of the Russia government’s interests and agenda, including about the war in Ukraine.

    The nearly 2,000 videos posted by the company have gotten more than 16 million views on YouTube alone, prosecutors said.

    The two defendants, Kostiantyn Kalashnikov and Elena Afanasyeva, are charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering and violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act. They are at large. It was not immediately clear if they had lawyers.

    The Justice Department says the company did not disclose that it was funded by RT and that neither it nor its founders registered as required by law as an agent of a foreign principal.

    Though the indictment does not name the company, it describes it as a Tennessee-based content creation firm with six commentators and with a website identifying itself as “a network of heterodox commentators that focus on Western political and cultural issues.”

    That description exactly matches Tenet Media, an online company that hosts videos made by well-known conservative influencers Tim Pool, Benny Johnson and others.

    Johnson and Pool both responded with posts on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, calling themselves “victims.” Calling Russian President Vladimir Putin a “scumbag,” Pool wrote that “should these allegations prove true, I as well as the other personalities and commentators were deceived.”

    In his post, Johnson wrote that he had been asked a year ago to provide content to a “media startup.” He said his lawyers negotiated a “standard, arms length deal, which was later terminated.”

    Tenet Media’s shows in recent months have featured high-profile conservative guests, including RNC co-chair Lara Trump, former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and U.S. Senate candidate Kari Lake.

    In the other action, officials announced the seizure of 32 internet domains that were used by the Kremlin to spread Russian propaganda and weaken international support for Ukraine. The websites were designed to look like authentic news sites but were actually fake, with bogus social media personas manufactured to appear as if they belonged to American users.

    The Justice Department did not identify which candidate in particular the propaganda campaign was meant to boost. But internal strategy notes from participants in the effort released Wednesday by the Justice Department make clear that Trump was the intended beneficiary, even though the names of the candidates were blacked out.

    The proposal for one propaganda project, for instance, states that one of its objectives was to secure a victory for a candidate who is currently out of power and to increase the percentage of Americans who believe the U.S. has been doing too much to support Ukraine. President Joe Biden has strongly supported Ukraine during the invasion by Russia.

    Intelligence agencies have previously charged that Russia, which during the 2016 election launched a massive campaign of foreign influence and interference on Trump’s behalf, was using disinformation to try to meddle in this year’s election. The new steps show the depth of those concerns.

    “Today’s announcement highlights the lengths some foreign governments go to undermine American democratic institutions,” the State Department said. “But these foreign governments should also know that we will not tolerate foreign malign actors intentionally interfering and undermining free and fair elections.”

    The State Department announced it was taking action against several employees of Russian state-owned media outlets, designating them as “foreign missions,” and offering a cash reward for information provided to the U.S. government about foreign election interference.

    It also said it was adding media company Rossiya Segodnya and its subsidiaries RIA Novosti, RT, TV-Novosti, Ruptly, and Sputnik to its list of foreign missions. That will require them to register with the U.S. government and disclose their properties and personnel in the U.S.

    In a speech last month, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said Russia remained the biggest threat to election integrity, accusing Putin and his proxies of “targeting specific voter demographics and swing-state voters to in an effort to manipulate presidential and congressional election outcomes.” Russia, she said was “intent on co-opting unwitting Americans on social media to push narratives advancing Russian interests.”

    She struck a similar note Thursday, saying at an Aspen Institute event that the foreign influence threat is more diverse and aggressive than in past years.

    “More diverse and aggressive because they involve more actors from more countries than we have ever seen before, operating in a more polarized world than we have ever seen before, all fueled by more technology and accelerated by technology, like AI, and that is what we have exposed in the law enforcement actions we took today,” she said.

    Much of the concern around Russia centers on cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns designed to influence the November vote.

    The tactics include using state media like RT to advance anti-U.S. messages and content, as well as networks of fake websites and social media accounts that amplify the claims and inject them into Americans’ online conversations. Typically, these networks seize on polarizing political topics such as immigration, crime or the war in Gaza.

    In many cases, Americans may have no idea that the content they see online either originated or was amplified by the Kremlin.

    Groups linked to the Kremlin are increasingly hiring marketing and communications firms within Russia to outsource some of the work of creating digital propaganda while also covering their tracks, the officials said during the briefing with reporters.

    Two such firms were the subject of new U.S. sanctions announced in March. Authorities say the two Russian companies created fake websites and social media profiles to spread Kremlin disinformation.

    The ultimate goal, however, is to get Americans to spread Russian disinformation without questioning its origin. People are far more likely to trust and repost information that they believe is coming from a domestic source, officials said. Fake websites designed to mimic U.S. news outlets and AI-generated social media profiles are just two methods.

    Messages left with the Russian Embassy were not immediately returned.

    _____

    Associated Press writers Dan Merica and Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington, Ali Swenson in New York and Alan Suderman in Richmond, Va., contributed to this report.

    Source link