hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobet

Tag: claim

  • Scientists claim they’ve found the cause of mystery colon cancers in young people – and the lifestyle factors that are to blame

    Scientists claim they’ve found the cause of mystery colon cancers in young people – and the lifestyle factors that are to blame

    Colon cancers may be surging in under 50s because some young people’s bodies are ageing faster than they should be, experts have claimed.

    Researchers at the University of Miami have discovered the phenomenon — dubbed accelerated ageing — may increase the risk of developing the disease.

    Accelerated ageing is said to have occurred when a person’s biological age is greater than their actual — or chronological — age.

    While chronological age refers to years lived, biological age is based on physiological markers that reflect the impact of genetics, lifestyle choices and environmental factors on the body.

    It can be determined through sophisticated DNA analysis saliva or blood tests.

    In the latest series of The Kardashians, Kim, mum Kris and sister Khloe, all took biological ageing tests. 

    They discovered Khloe’s biological age was 28 — 11 years younger than her actual age, 39.

    Kim, 43, meanwhile, was given a biological age of 34, with Kris six years younger than her actual age. 

    If a person is 50, but their biological age is 55, their ageing has accelerated by five years, said Dr Shria Kumar, a colorectal cancer specialist behind the new research

    If a person is 50, but their biological age is 55, their ageing has accelerated by five years, said Dr Shria Kumar, a colorectal cancer specialist behind the new research

    If a person is 50, but their biological age is 55, their ageing has accelerated by five years, said Dr Shria Kumar, a colorectal cancer specialist behind the new research.

    ‘That might be reflected in overall body functioning,’ she added. 

    ‘It sounds pretty theoretical, but actually accelerated aging has been shown to be predictive of time to death and even of multiple cancers.

    Colorectal cancer rates in people under 50, called early-onset colorectal cancer, are on the rise.

    The finding comes amid a worldwide explosion of colon cancers in younger patients that has baffled doctors.

    While it is most common in over-50s, the disease has surged by 50 per cent in the younger age-groups over the past three decades, recent data suggests.

    For this reason in the US, health chiefs now recommended colon cancer screening — also known as bowel cancer screening — starts at 45.

    Some doctors now say this needs to be moved even younger, because half of early-onset colorectal cancers occur in people under 45, according to the latest statistics from the National Cancer Institute. 

    In the latest series of The Kardashians, Kim, mum Kris and sister Khloe, all took biological ageing tests

    In the latest series of The Kardashians, Kim, mum Kris and sister Khloe, all took biological ageing tests 

    While chronological age refers to years lived, biological age is based on physiological markers that reflect the impact of genetics, lifestyle choices and environmental factors on the body. It can be determined through sophisticated DNA analysis saliva or blood tests

    While chronological age refers to years lived, biological age is based on physiological markers that reflect the impact of genetics, lifestyle choices and environmental factors on the body. It can be determined through sophisticated DNA analysis saliva or blood tests

    In the UK, however, NHS screening is only available to those aged 54 to 74.

    The exact reason for the link between accelerated ageing and colon cancer isn’t fully understood. 

    However, some factors that raise a person’s risk of early-onset colorectal cancer also elevate biological age. 

    These include poor diets — including diets high in ultra-processed foods — obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption and other lifestyle habits.

    Other key factors in accelerated ageing are pollution and stress. 

    Earlier this year, separate research found young people diagnosed with certain types of cancer – especially lung, gastrointestinal and uterine cancers – were more likely to suffer accelerated ageing.

    Intriguingly, the US researchers involved in the study said there was ‘strong evidence’ that the risk of accelerated ageing, and therefore of developing cancer, increased with each successive generation born after 1965.

    And that may mean Gen Z – those born between 1997 and 2012 who are becoming young adults today – are at a far greater risk of developing potentially deadly diseases such as cancer at a much earlier stage than their parents or grandparents.

    Professor Ilaria Bellantuono, co-director of the Healthy Lifespan Institute at the University of Sheffield, told MailOnline: ‘We don’t know enough to say for certain that younger generations are ageing faster or why,’ she says. 

    ‘That research hasn’t been done. But it’s not impossible. We are seeing more disease in younger people, the kinds of diseases we might normally expect to be developing in older adults.

    ‘And biological ageing is a risk factor for those diseases. In the same way that smokers increase their risk of lung cancer, does accelerated ageing increase the risk of developing more multiple long-term chronic conditions?’

    Dr Kumar suggested that testing for accelerated ageing could help flag up younger individuals who need to be offered regular screening and colonoscopies. 

    Colon cancer screening comes in the form of convenient stool-sample tests carried out at home. 

    It is offered as early detection of the disease has been shown to improve both treatment options and outcomes for this disease.

    A positive screening test result is typically followed by a colonoscopy, during which any polyps found can be removed. 

    ‘It sounds pretty theoretical, but accelerated aging has been shown to be predictive of time to death and even of multiple cancers,’ Dr Kumar continued. 

    ‘What’s really exciting about the opportunity in colorectal cancer is that we have a clear prevention tactic. 

    ‘Colonoscopy is not only early detection, but also cancer prevention.’

    Source link

  • The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    middle-class battle is brewing between country folk and an apparent city elite – including Londoners – over wood burners after a report branded them Britain’s biggest source of dangerous air pollution.

    They have become one of the latest must-have status symbols for many, following on from how Aga cookers and Smeg fridges were seen by earlier generations.

    And yet neighbours across the UK seem bitterly divided over whether wood burners should be something to celebrate and keep firing up, or else cool it for the sake of people’s health. 

    MailOnline has heard a wide-ranging variety of opinions about the trendy domestic appliances, amid surging popularity in the shops but also threatened bans by local councils.

    Many defiant Britons insisted they would continue using wood burners, despite last week’s critical research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Some 1.5million homes across the UK are estimated to now have them installed – although the welcome for wood burners is not an entirely new phenomenon.

    Cockney pub rockers Chas and Dave sang in a 1982 track, later incongruously covered by US piano balladeer Tori Amos: ‘Home baked loaves and wood burning stoves, Shirley MacLaine and Petticoat Lane … that’s what I like.’

    But they have been highlighted as a newly surging trend especially among middle-class areas both urban and rural – but fellow householders, including those with existing health conditions, have raised new objections in an array of responses to MailOnline. 

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as 'off grid in the gas sense'

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’

    James Dixon

    James Dixon's wood burner

    James Dixon (left) said he relied on wood burners to keep the sitting room and a spare bedroom (right) ‘habitable’ at his home near Lyme Regis in Dorset 

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    Homeowners living ‘off grid’ in parts of the countryside told how they needed the devices to efficiently heat their homes – while others have accused Londoners of making an indulgent ‘lifestyle choice’ by buying the stoves, suggesting they have no ‘need’ to burn wood.

    One wood burner fan is James Dixon, who lives in a rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘We rely on a modicum of oil for hot water and central heating. We cannot afford to heat the house electrically. We had an electric Aga that was on all day but that was costing the earth both, literally and metaphorically.

    ‘The central heating comes on for an hour at 6am and 6pm, when the oil burner works. We rely on our wood burners to keep the sitting room and one – slightly damp – spare bedroom habitable. 

    ‘We are contemplating a biomass – log – boiler when it comes to replacing the ageing oil boiler so will be producing more of the particulate.

    ‘I am confident a heat pump will not suit unless we spend a fortune upgrading the house. I don’t imagine we are in a “smoke control” zone yet.’

    But other MailOnline readers were quick to point out their pollution concerns relating to wood burners.

    Mandy Cairns, who suffers from long Covid, said: ‘One of my symptoms is a severe allergic reaction to wood smoke whereby the muscles in my body go weak and I collapse to the ground and struggle to breathe.

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    ‘I live in a rural town where one in three houses have wood burners and I have to move out for three months of the year because the air is so bad I can’t live here.

    ‘I can’t afford to move. Everyone around me has more than enough money to pay for their gas central heating as it’s a very affluent small town that I live in – even the local cafe-bookshop has installed one.’

    Ms Cairns, from Dollar in Clackmannshire, Scotland, added: ‘I tried going back to stay at my parents’ house last year but then their neighbours put in a wood burning stove, so that option has been taken away from me.

    ‘I know I’m not alone and that there are many people being affected out there by their neighbours’ wood burning stoves.

    ‘But everyone I speak to always says the same thing – that they don’t want to fall out with their neighbours who are using a wood burner so they don’t say anything and that they don’t think the council will do anything about it if they complain.’

    Meanwhile, Dr Shona Minelly, from Kingston-upon-Thames in south-west London, said: ‘I have suffered asthma attacks resulting in hospital visits because of the “Ecodesign” stove.

    ‘My husband suffered a heart attack last year after a neighbour burned their stove every day for a week and he was struggling to breathe.

    ‘Putting neighbours’ lives at risk in this way just so that a selfish family can stare at a pretty flame is morally wrong.’

    What are the rules on wood burners and how much can you be fined for breaking them? 

    The Government is trying to reduce air pollution by issuing fines for illegal log burner use, in an attempt to reduce harmful pollutants such as tiny particles called particulate matter being released straight into the home as well as into the air outside.

    Domestic wood burning is the UK’s largest single source of particulate matter known as PM2.5, which is linked to health problems such as heart disease, strokes and lung cancer.

    While wood burners are not banned outright anywhere in the UK, there are regulations withing ‘smoke control areas’ which mean certain wood burners cannot emit more than 3g of smoke per hour.

    But if the log burner is on a list of Defra-exempt appliances that produce fewer smoke emissions, the owner can apply for an exemption.

    People must also use an approved fuel, which varies depending on their location – with a list provided on the Defra website.

    Owners are also advised to look for the ‘Ready to Burn’ logo on fuel packaging, which means the fuel has less than 20 per cent moisture and therefore complies with Defra rules.

    All new log burners must also adhere to ‘Ecodesign’ rules to reduce smoke and pollutant emissions.

    Homeowners are also advised that wet wood is less efficient than naturally dried or ‘unseasoned’ wood, because more energy is wasted in turning the moisture in the wood into vapour.

    Anyone with wet or unseasoned wood, should dry it out for at least a year before using it – and wait until it has less than 20 per cent moisture.

    Local authorities in England can issue fines of between £175 and £300 for people breaking the rules – or up to £1,000 for using unauthorised fuel in an appliance not on the Defra-exempt list.

    This could go up to £5,000 for repeat offenders if the situation goes to court.

    She added: ‘None of the homes in London ‘need’ to burn wood, it’s a lifestyle choice. The exempt stoves are expensive and used by wealthy people with central heating.

    ‘Many of these burners have electric cars in their drive and solar panels on their roofs, so they obviously think they are being ‘green’ and are oblivious to the public health dangers.

    ‘It is only a matter of time before someone dies because of these stoves – we had a very close call.’

    Facing a similar situation is Mike Hinford, who lives in a residential area near Bristol where there are ‘a lot of wood burners’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘My health is badly affected by wood smoke pollution. If I go near wood smoke for only a few minutes my breathing is affected for hours.

    ‘We have no need to burn wood. It’s not cheaper. Unless the wood is free, and then it could be treated wood which contains arsenic. I really wish people realised how much harm they are doing with burning wood. They should never be seen as cosy.’  

    Sharon Brown, from Chipping Norton in Oxfordshire, said: ‘When the road I live in was built, most of the houses had no chimneys.

    ‘Now an awful lot of people have wood burning stoves – in the evenings my utility room and downstairs toilet smell really badly of wood smoke.’

    But supporters of the devices have also been singing their praises and pointing out possible ways to avoid any problems.

    Wendy Finney remarked ironically: ‘Our entire family were brought up with wood burners – we should all be dead from lung cancer.’

    She went on to suggest: ‘Provided proper well seasoned fuel is used and lit fast with wooden firelighters, and plenty of really dry kindling to get a good flame going to warm the flue fast, there is not a problem.

    ‘Many people don’t know how to light a fire and use stinky stuff like paper. It takes experience. My chimney never smokes.’

    A drop in particulate pollution from road transport and heavy industry such as steel has meant parts of the UK have now got the cleanest air for decades.

    But the use of wood burning stoves pumping out particulate pollution known as PM2.5 is rising, according to the recent study by the IFS – and local authorities are cracking down  in the air pollution fight, with some owners threatened with £300 fines for breaking rules.

    Reading and Oxford’s local authorities ban the use of fuel or appliances not approved by the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).

    Penalties of up to £300 could be issued to anyone breaking the rules after the new policy replacing existing so-called ‘smoke control areas’ was brought in on December 1.

    Exceptions are given for Defra-approved appliances and government-approved fuels – while outdoor barbecues, chimeneas, garden fireplaces or pizza ovens are also permitted as long as smoke is not released from them through a building chimney.

    The rules have been brought in amid growing concern over the stoves increasing the risk of lung cancer and being one of the UK’s main drivers of harmful air pollutants.

    Among those sticking up for rural-based wood burners is Philip Knowles, from Somerset, who said: ‘Wood burners may be “trendy” in London, where air pollution is reportedly 15 to 30 per cent higher than the rest of the country, but here in the countryside many people use wood burners to heat their homes.

    ‘We are paying through the nose for gas and electricity – please don’t take away the little bit of self-sufficiency that our wood burners provide.

    ‘Using properly seasoned timber, which is in plentiful supply in the countryside, wood burners are an efficient and relatively inexpensive form of heating.’

    Mr Knowles was referring to IFS data in last Friday’s report which found air pollution exposure in London has been 15 to 30 per cent higher than the average for each other region of England between 2003 and 2023.

    Andy Hill, chair of the Stove Industry Association, pointed out to MailOnline that the data referenced by the IFS report ‘clearly shows that modern closed stoves using quality, dry wood fuel account for just under 0.3 per cent of total UK PM2.5 emissions’.

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: 'Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves'

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves’ 

    He added that wood fuel is a ‘very low carbon domestic heating fuel’ and has been defined by the Scottish Government as being net zero emissions at the point of use.

    Mr Hill also said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves as an effective way of heating their homes and keeping their families warm and cosy, with the added advantage that they also offer a sense of energy grid security, a means of keeping warm in the event of a power cut and a way of managing fluctuating heating fuel costs.’  

    Particulate pollution is widely agreed to be the air pollutant with the biggest impact on human health, increasing the risk of respiratory and heart conditions, and increasing hospital admissions.

    Children growing up exposed to particulate pollution are more likely to have reduced lung function and can develop asthma as the tiny particles penetrate the lungs and enter into the bloodstream.

    The IFS said in its report: ‘The three largest sources of primary PM2.5 in the UK are domestic burning of wood and other fuels (29 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), road transport (17.9 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), and industrial processes and product use (16.5 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022) such as construction and steel manufacturing.

    ‘The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased over the period is domestic combustion. Three-quarters of the domestic combustion emissions of PM2.5 came from woodburning in 2022.’

    Only stoves officially given the ‘Ecodesign’ mark are allowed for sale in the UK and any wood for sale must be certified ‘Ready to burn’. 

    But in practice councils carry out minimal regulation of woodburning at home – with just 1 prosecution by a local authority in England in 2022, despite 10,600 complaints by residents, according to research carried out by pressure group Mums for Lungs.

    Overall, the IFS report said that in most parts of the UK levels of PM2.5 pollution had fallen to below the government’s 2040 target for PM2.5 although not below the more stringent limit set out by the World Health Organisation.

    ‘The share of the English population exposed to levels of PM2.5 above England’s 2040 target fell from 99 per cent in 2003 to less than 0.1 per cent in 2023.’

    Air pollution fell steeply during the pandemic but has remained at lower levels since. Between 2003 and 2023, average levels of PM2.5 in England fell by 54 per cent.

    A 2022 study cited by Sir Chris Whitty, chief medical officer for England, showed that even ‘Eco-design’ stoves generated 450 times more toxic air pollution than gas central heating, while older stoves now banned from sale produced 3,700 times more.

    Bobbie Upton, Research Economist at IFS and an author of the report, said: ‘There is growing evidence that fine particulate air pollution is extremely damaging for health, particularly for children and the elderly. It is hard to fully explain the striking drop in air pollution that started in 2020, during the COVID pandemic.

    ‘New clean air zones in several of England’s largest cities and reduced steel production may have both played a role.

    ‘It is important for the nation’s health, and for reducing health inequalities, that progress continues to be made on reducing air pollution.’

    The IFS report also found that ethnic minorities were now also less exposed to pollution, down to just 6 per cent more than average levels for white populations in 2023, down from 13 per cent in 2023.

    The report said that this fall in the ‘ethnic pollution gap’ was initially down to ethnic minorities moving to less polluted parts of the country (largely moving out of London to a smaller city), while cities with large ethnic minority populations chiefly London and Birmingham have also experienced drops in air pollution.

    But the report found that lower-income areas have persistently higher levels of air pollution than richer areas.

    In 2023, individuals in the top 20 per cent most deprived areas experienced 8 per cent higher average PM2.5 concentrations than those in the bottom 20 per cent.

    Speaking about the new rules in Oxford – where there is an exemption for moored vessels, including canal boats – the city council’s deputy leader Anna Railton said: ‘Fine particulate pollution from smoke poses serious health risks, and tackling it is crucial for public health.

    ‘Until now, Oxford’s Smoke Control Areas covered only 48 per cent of the city, leaving gaps in protection. From December 1, we’re unifying the city under a single Smoke Control Area, ensuring every part of Oxford benefits from improved safeguards against harmful pollution.

    ‘This expansion targets the reduction of both indoor and outdoor fine particulate emissions by restricting the use of high-polluting and inefficient solid fuels. I am proud that we’re taking this key public health intervention to protect our residents and reduce pollution across the city.’

    In February this year, official figures showed increases in wood burners in homes and the use of biomass in industry had offset drops in pollution from cars and electricity generation.

    Statistics revealed that pollutants known as particulate matter (PM) fell significantly since the 1970s but emissions have been relatively steady in recent years.

    PMs are small particles made up of a variety of materials, some of which can be toxic, and some of which can enter the bloodstream and be transported round the body with serious impact on health.

    And in July 2023, Sir Chris Whitty told MPs that air fresheners and wood burners contribute to air pollution despite many people believing the reverse to be true.

    The Chief Medical Officer for England said he would have ‘no problem’ telling someone with an asthmatic child not to use air freshener.

    He also said people who use wood burners should only do so ‘when it really matters to them for aesthetic reasons’ rather than as the main way of heating their home.

    Sir Chris said the risks from indoor air pollution are sometimes underappreciated because substantial progress has been made improving outdoor air quality in recent decades.

    The Commons Environmental Audit Committee was told products that can raise the risk inside include air freshener as well as candles and joss sticks.

    Source link

  • The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    middle-class battle is brewing between country folk and an apparent city elite – including Londoners – over wood burners after a report branded them Britain’s biggest source of dangerous air pollution.

    They have become one of the latest must-have status symbols for many, following on from how Aga cookers and Smeg fridges were seen by earlier generations.

    And yet neighbours across the UK seem bitterly divided over whether wood burners should be something to celebrate and keep firing up, or else cool it for the sake of people’s health. 

    MailOnline has heard a wide-ranging variety of opinions about the trendy domestic appliances, amid surging popularity in the shops but also threatened bans by local councils.

    Many defiant Britons insisted they would continue using wood burners, despite last week’s critical research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Some 1.5million homes across the UK are estimated to now have them installed – although the welcome for wood burners is not an entirely new phenomenon.

    Cockney pub rockers Chas and Dave sang in a 1982 track, later incongruously covered by US piano balladeer Tori Amos: ‘Home baked loaves and wood burning stoves, Shirley MacLaine and Petticoat Lane … that’s what I like.’

    But they have been highlighted as a newly surging trend especially among middle-class areas both urban and rural – but fellow householders, including those with existing health conditions, have raised new objections in an array of responses to MailOnline. 

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as 'off grid in the gas sense'

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’

    James Dixon

    James Dixon's wood burner

    James Dixon (left) said he relied on wood burners to keep the sitting room and a spare bedroom (right) ‘habitable’ at his home near Lyme Regis in Dorset 

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    Homeowners living ‘off grid’ in parts of the countryside told how they needed the devices to efficiently heat their homes – while others have accused Londoners of making an indulgent ‘lifestyle choice’ by buying the stoves, suggesting they have no ‘need’ to burn wood.

    One wood burner fan is James Dixon, who lives in a rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘We rely on a modicum of oil for hot water and central heating. We cannot afford to heat the house electrically. We had an electric Aga that was on all day but that was costing the earth both, literally and metaphorically.

    ‘The central heating comes on for an hour at 6am and 6pm, when the oil burner works. We rely on our wood burners to keep the sitting room and one – slightly damp – spare bedroom habitable. 

    ‘We are contemplating a biomass – log – boiler when it comes to replacing the ageing oil boiler so will be producing more of the particulate.

    ‘I am confident a heat pump will not suit unless we spend a fortune upgrading the house. I don’t imagine we are in a “smoke control” zone yet.’

    But other MailOnline readers were quick to point out their pollution concerns relating to wood burners.

    Mandy Cairns, who suffers from long Covid, said: ‘One of my symptoms is a severe allergic reaction to wood smoke whereby the muscles in my body go weak and I collapse to the ground and struggle to breathe.

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    ‘I live in a rural town where one in three houses have wood burners and I have to move out for three months of the year because the air is so bad I can’t live here.

    ‘I can’t afford to move. Everyone around me has more than enough money to pay for their gas central heating as it’s a very affluent small town that I live in – even the local cafe-bookshop has installed one.’

    Ms Cairns, from Dollar in Clackmannshire, Scotland, added: ‘I tried going back to stay at my parents’ house last year but then their neighbours put in a wood burning stove, so that option has been taken away from me.

    ‘I know I’m not alone and that there are many people being affected out there by their neighbours’ wood burning stoves.

    ‘But everyone I speak to always says the same thing – that they don’t want to fall out with their neighbours who are using a wood burner so they don’t say anything and that they don’t think the council will do anything about it if they complain.’

    Meanwhile, Dr Shona Minelly, from Kingston-upon-Thames in south-west London, said: ‘I have suffered asthma attacks resulting in hospital visits because of the “Ecodesign” stove.

    ‘My husband suffered a heart attack last year after a neighbour burned their stove every day for a week and he was struggling to breathe.

    ‘Putting neighbours’ lives at risk in this way just so that a selfish family can stare at a pretty flame is morally wrong.’

    What are the rules on wood burners and how much can you be fined for breaking them? 

    The Government is trying to reduce air pollution by issuing fines for illegal log burner use, in an attempt to reduce harmful pollutants such as tiny particles called particulate matter being released straight into the home as well as into the air outside.

    Domestic wood burning is the UK’s largest single source of particulate matter known as PM2.5, which is linked to health problems such as heart disease, strokes and lung cancer.

    While wood burners are not banned outright anywhere in the UK, there are regulations withing ‘smoke control areas’ which mean certain wood burners cannot emit more than 3g of smoke per hour.

    But if the log burner is on a list of Defra-exempt appliances that produce fewer smoke emissions, the owner can apply for an exemption.

    People must also use an approved fuel, which varies depending on their location – with a list provided on the Defra website.

    Owners are also advised to look for the ‘Ready to Burn’ logo on fuel packaging, which means the fuel has less than 20 per cent moisture and therefore complies with Defra rules.

    All new log burners must also adhere to ‘Ecodesign’ rules to reduce smoke and pollutant emissions.

    Homeowners are also advised that wet wood is less efficient than naturally dried or ‘unseasoned’ wood, because more energy is wasted in turning the moisture in the wood into vapour.

    Anyone with wet or unseasoned wood, should dry it out for at least a year before using it – and wait until it has less than 20 per cent moisture.

    Local authorities in England can issue fines of between £175 and £300 for people breaking the rules – or up to £1,000 for using unauthorised fuel in an appliance not on the Defra-exempt list.

    This could go up to £5,000 for repeat offenders if the situation goes to court.

    She added: ‘None of the homes in London ‘need’ to burn wood, it’s a lifestyle choice. The exempt stoves are expensive and used by wealthy people with central heating.

    ‘Many of these burners have electric cars in their drive and solar panels on their roofs, so they obviously think they are being ‘green’ and are oblivious to the public health dangers.

    ‘It is only a matter of time before someone dies because of these stoves – we had a very close call.’

    Facing a similar situation is Mike Hinford, who lives in a residential area near Bristol where there are ‘a lot of wood burners’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘My health is badly affected by wood smoke pollution. If I go near wood smoke for only a few minutes my breathing is affected for hours.

    ‘We have no need to burn wood. It’s not cheaper. Unless the wood is free, and then it could be treated wood which contains arsenic. I really wish people realised how much harm they are doing with burning wood. They should never be seen as cosy.’  

    Sharon Brown, from Chipping Norton in Oxfordshire, said: ‘When the road I live in was built, most of the houses had no chimneys.

    ‘Now an awful lot of people have wood burning stoves – in the evenings my utility room and downstairs toilet smell really badly of wood smoke.’

    But supporters of the devices have also been singing their praises and pointing out possible ways to avoid any problems.

    Wendy Finney remarked ironically: ‘Our entire family were brought up with wood burners – we should all be dead from lung cancer.’

    She went on to suggest: ‘Provided proper well seasoned fuel is used and lit fast with wooden firelighters, and plenty of really dry kindling to get a good flame going to warm the flue fast, there is not a problem.

    ‘Many people don’t know how to light a fire and use stinky stuff like paper. It takes experience. My chimney never smokes.’

    A drop in particulate pollution from road transport and heavy industry such as steel has meant parts of the UK have now got the cleanest air for decades.

    But the use of wood burning stoves pumping out particulate pollution known as PM2.5 is rising, according to the recent study by the IFS – and local authorities are cracking down  in the air pollution fight, with some owners threatened with £300 fines for breaking rules.

    Reading and Oxford’s local authorities ban the use of fuel or appliances not approved by the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).

    Penalties of up to £300 could be issued to anyone breaking the rules after the new policy replacing existing so-called ‘smoke control areas’ was brought in on December 1.

    Exceptions are given for Defra-approved appliances and government-approved fuels – while outdoor barbecues, chimeneas, garden fireplaces or pizza ovens are also permitted as long as smoke is not released from them through a building chimney.

    The rules have been brought in amid growing concern over the stoves increasing the risk of lung cancer and being one of the UK’s main drivers of harmful air pollutants.

    Among those sticking up for rural-based wood burners is Philip Knowles, from Somerset, who said: ‘Wood burners may be “trendy” in London, where air pollution is reportedly 15 to 30 per cent higher than the rest of the country, but here in the countryside many people use wood burners to heat their homes.

    ‘We are paying through the nose for gas and electricity – please don’t take away the little bit of self-sufficiency that our wood burners provide.

    ‘Using properly seasoned timber, which is in plentiful supply in the countryside, wood burners are an efficient and relatively inexpensive form of heating.’

    Mr Knowles was referring to IFS data in last Friday’s report which found air pollution exposure in London has been 15 to 30 per cent higher than the average for each other region of England between 2003 and 2023.

    Andy Hill, chair of the Stove Industry Association, pointed out to MailOnline that the data referenced by the IFS report ‘clearly shows that modern closed stoves using quality, dry wood fuel account for just under 0.3 per cent of total UK PM2.5 emissions’.

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: 'Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves'

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves’ 

    He added that wood fuel is a ‘very low carbon domestic heating fuel’ and has been defined by the Scottish Government as being net zero emissions at the point of use.

    Mr Hill also said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves as an effective way of heating their homes and keeping their families warm and cosy, with the added advantage that they also offer a sense of energy grid security, a means of keeping warm in the event of a power cut and a way of managing fluctuating heating fuel costs.’  

    Particulate pollution is widely agreed to be the air pollutant with the biggest impact on human health, increasing the risk of respiratory and heart conditions, and increasing hospital admissions.

    Children growing up exposed to particulate pollution are more likely to have reduced lung function and can develop asthma as the tiny particles penetrate the lungs and enter into the bloodstream.

    The IFS said in its report: ‘The three largest sources of primary PM2.5 in the UK are domestic burning of wood and other fuels (29 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), road transport (17.9 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), and industrial processes and product use (16.5 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022) such as construction and steel manufacturing.

    ‘The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased over the period is domestic combustion. Three-quarters of the domestic combustion emissions of PM2.5 came from woodburning in 2022.’

    Only stoves officially given the ‘Ecodesign’ mark are allowed for sale in the UK and any wood for sale must be certified ‘Ready to burn’. 

    But in practice councils carry out minimal regulation of woodburning at home – with just 1 prosecution by a local authority in England in 2022, despite 10,600 complaints by residents, according to research carried out by pressure group Mums for Lungs.

    Overall, the IFS report said that in most parts of the UK levels of PM2.5 pollution had fallen to below the government’s 2040 target for PM2.5 although not below the more stringent limit set out by the World Health Organisation.

    ‘The share of the English population exposed to levels of PM2.5 above England’s 2040 target fell from 99 per cent in 2003 to less than 0.1 per cent in 2023.’

    Air pollution fell steeply during the pandemic but has remained at lower levels since. Between 2003 and 2023, average levels of PM2.5 in England fell by 54 per cent.

    A 2022 study cited by Sir Chris Whitty, chief medical officer for England, showed that even ‘Eco-design’ stoves generated 450 times more toxic air pollution than gas central heating, while older stoves now banned from sale produced 3,700 times more.

    Bobbie Upton, Research Economist at IFS and an author of the report, said: ‘There is growing evidence that fine particulate air pollution is extremely damaging for health, particularly for children and the elderly. It is hard to fully explain the striking drop in air pollution that started in 2020, during the COVID pandemic.

    ‘New clean air zones in several of England’s largest cities and reduced steel production may have both played a role.

    ‘It is important for the nation’s health, and for reducing health inequalities, that progress continues to be made on reducing air pollution.’

    The IFS report also found that ethnic minorities were now also less exposed to pollution, down to just 6 per cent more than average levels for white populations in 2023, down from 13 per cent in 2023.

    The report said that this fall in the ‘ethnic pollution gap’ was initially down to ethnic minorities moving to less polluted parts of the country (largely moving out of London to a smaller city), while cities with large ethnic minority populations chiefly London and Birmingham have also experienced drops in air pollution.

    But the report found that lower-income areas have persistently higher levels of air pollution than richer areas.

    In 2023, individuals in the top 20 per cent most deprived areas experienced 8 per cent higher average PM2.5 concentrations than those in the bottom 20 per cent.

    Speaking about the new rules in Oxford – where there is an exemption for moored vessels, including canal boats – the city council’s deputy leader Anna Railton said: ‘Fine particulate pollution from smoke poses serious health risks, and tackling it is crucial for public health.

    ‘Until now, Oxford’s Smoke Control Areas covered only 48 per cent of the city, leaving gaps in protection. From December 1, we’re unifying the city under a single Smoke Control Area, ensuring every part of Oxford benefits from improved safeguards against harmful pollution.

    ‘This expansion targets the reduction of both indoor and outdoor fine particulate emissions by restricting the use of high-polluting and inefficient solid fuels. I am proud that we’re taking this key public health intervention to protect our residents and reduce pollution across the city.’

    In February this year, official figures showed increases in wood burners in homes and the use of biomass in industry had offset drops in pollution from cars and electricity generation.

    Statistics revealed that pollutants known as particulate matter (PM) fell significantly since the 1970s but emissions have been relatively steady in recent years.

    PMs are small particles made up of a variety of materials, some of which can be toxic, and some of which can enter the bloodstream and be transported round the body with serious impact on health.

    And in July 2023, Sir Chris Whitty told MPs that air fresheners and wood burners contribute to air pollution despite many people believing the reverse to be true.

    The Chief Medical Officer for England said he would have ‘no problem’ telling someone with an asthmatic child not to use air freshener.

    He also said people who use wood burners should only do so ‘when it really matters to them for aesthetic reasons’ rather than as the main way of heating their home.

    Sir Chris said the risks from indoor air pollution are sometimes underappreciated because substantial progress has been made improving outdoor air quality in recent decades.

    The Commons Environmental Audit Committee was told products that can raise the risk inside include air freshener as well as candles and joss sticks.

    Source link

  • The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    middle-class battle is brewing between country folk and an apparent city elite – including Londoners – over wood burners after a report branded them Britain’s biggest source of dangerous air pollution.

    They have become one of the latest must-have status symbols for many, following on from how Aga cookers and Smeg fridges were seen by earlier generations.

    And yet neighbours across the UK seem bitterly divided over whether wood burners should be something to celebrate and keep firing up, or else cool it for the sake of people’s health. 

    MailOnline has heard a wide-ranging variety of opinions about the trendy domestic appliances, amid surging popularity in the shops but also threatened bans by local councils.

    Many defiant Britons insisted they would continue using wood burners, despite last week’s critical research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Some 1.5million homes across the UK are estimated to now have them installed – although the welcome for wood burners is not an entirely new phenomenon.

    Cockney pub rockers Chas and Dave sang in a 1982 track, later incongruously covered by US piano balladeer Tori Amos: ‘Home baked loaves and wood burning stoves, Shirley MacLaine and Petticoat Lane … that’s what I like.’

    But they have been highlighted as a newly surging trend especially among middle-class areas both urban and rural – but fellow householders, including those with existing health conditions, have raised new objections in an array of responses to MailOnline. 

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as 'off grid in the gas sense'

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’

    James Dixon

    James Dixon's wood burner

    James Dixon (left) said he relied on wood burners to keep the sitting room and a spare bedroom (right) ‘habitable’ at his home near Lyme Regis in Dorset 

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    Homeowners living ‘off grid’ in parts of the countryside told how they needed the devices to efficiently heat their homes – while others have accused Londoners of making an indulgent ‘lifestyle choice’ by buying the stoves, suggesting they have no ‘need’ to burn wood.

    One wood burner fan is James Dixon, who lives in a rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘We rely on a modicum of oil for hot water and central heating. We cannot afford to heat the house electrically. We had an electric Aga that was on all day but that was costing the earth both, literally and metaphorically.

    ‘The central heating comes on for an hour at 6am and 6pm, when the oil burner works. We rely on our wood burners to keep the sitting room and one – slightly damp – spare bedroom habitable. 

    ‘We are contemplating a biomass – log – boiler when it comes to replacing the ageing oil boiler so will be producing more of the particulate.

    ‘I am confident a heat pump will not suit unless we spend a fortune upgrading the house. I don’t imagine we are in a “smoke control” zone yet.’

    But other MailOnline readers were quick to point out their pollution concerns relating to wood burners.

    Mandy Cairns, who suffers from long Covid, said: ‘One of my symptoms is a severe allergic reaction to wood smoke whereby the muscles in my body go weak and I collapse to the ground and struggle to breathe.

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    ‘I live in a rural town where one in three houses have wood burners and I have to move out for three months of the year because the air is so bad I can’t live here.

    ‘I can’t afford to move. Everyone around me has more than enough money to pay for their gas central heating as it’s a very affluent small town that I live in – even the local cafe-bookshop has installed one.’

    Ms Cairns, from Dollar in Clackmannshire, Scotland, added: ‘I tried going back to stay at my parents’ house last year but then their neighbours put in a wood burning stove, so that option has been taken away from me.

    ‘I know I’m not alone and that there are many people being affected out there by their neighbours’ wood burning stoves.

    ‘But everyone I speak to always says the same thing – that they don’t want to fall out with their neighbours who are using a wood burner so they don’t say anything and that they don’t think the council will do anything about it if they complain.’

    Meanwhile, Dr Shona Minelly, from Kingston-upon-Thames in south-west London, said: ‘I have suffered asthma attacks resulting in hospital visits because of the “Ecodesign” stove.

    ‘My husband suffered a heart attack last year after a neighbour burned their stove every day for a week and he was struggling to breathe.

    ‘Putting neighbours’ lives at risk in this way just so that a selfish family can stare at a pretty flame is morally wrong.’

    What are the rules on wood burners and how much can you be fined for breaking them? 

    The Government is trying to reduce air pollution by issuing fines for illegal log burner use, in an attempt to reduce harmful pollutants such as tiny particles called particulate matter being released straight into the home as well as into the air outside.

    Domestic wood burning is the UK’s largest single source of particulate matter known as PM2.5, which is linked to health problems such as heart disease, strokes and lung cancer.

    While wood burners are not banned outright anywhere in the UK, there are regulations withing ‘smoke control areas’ which mean certain wood burners cannot emit more than 3g of smoke per hour.

    But if the log burner is on a list of Defra-exempt appliances that produce fewer smoke emissions, the owner can apply for an exemption.

    People must also use an approved fuel, which varies depending on their location – with a list provided on the Defra website.

    Owners are also advised to look for the ‘Ready to Burn’ logo on fuel packaging, which means the fuel has less than 20 per cent moisture and therefore complies with Defra rules.

    All new log burners must also adhere to ‘Ecodesign’ rules to reduce smoke and pollutant emissions.

    Homeowners are also advised that wet wood is less efficient than naturally dried or ‘unseasoned’ wood, because more energy is wasted in turning the moisture in the wood into vapour.

    Anyone with wet or unseasoned wood, should dry it out for at least a year before using it – and wait until it has less than 20 per cent moisture.

    Local authorities in England can issue fines of between £175 and £300 for people breaking the rules – or up to £1,000 for using unauthorised fuel in an appliance not on the Defra-exempt list.

    This could go up to £5,000 for repeat offenders if the situation goes to court.

    She added: ‘None of the homes in London ‘need’ to burn wood, it’s a lifestyle choice. The exempt stoves are expensive and used by wealthy people with central heating.

    ‘Many of these burners have electric cars in their drive and solar panels on their roofs, so they obviously think they are being ‘green’ and are oblivious to the public health dangers.

    ‘It is only a matter of time before someone dies because of these stoves – we had a very close call.’

    Facing a similar situation is Mike Hinford, who lives in a residential area near Bristol where there are ‘a lot of wood burners’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘My health is badly affected by wood smoke pollution. If I go near wood smoke for only a few minutes my breathing is affected for hours.

    ‘We have no need to burn wood. It’s not cheaper. Unless the wood is free, and then it could be treated wood which contains arsenic. I really wish people realised how much harm they are doing with burning wood. They should never be seen as cosy.’  

    Sharon Brown, from Chipping Norton in Oxfordshire, said: ‘When the road I live in was built, most of the houses had no chimneys.

    ‘Now an awful lot of people have wood burning stoves – in the evenings my utility room and downstairs toilet smell really badly of wood smoke.’

    But supporters of the devices have also been singing their praises and pointing out possible ways to avoid any problems.

    Wendy Finney remarked ironically: ‘Our entire family were brought up with wood burners – we should all be dead from lung cancer.’

    She went on to suggest: ‘Provided proper well seasoned fuel is used and lit fast with wooden firelighters, and plenty of really dry kindling to get a good flame going to warm the flue fast, there is not a problem.

    ‘Many people don’t know how to light a fire and use stinky stuff like paper. It takes experience. My chimney never smokes.’

    A drop in particulate pollution from road transport and heavy industry such as steel has meant parts of the UK have now got the cleanest air for decades.

    But the use of wood burning stoves pumping out particulate pollution known as PM2.5 is rising, according to the recent study by the IFS – and local authorities are cracking down  in the air pollution fight, with some owners threatened with £300 fines for breaking rules.

    Reading and Oxford’s local authorities ban the use of fuel or appliances not approved by the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).

    Penalties of up to £300 could be issued to anyone breaking the rules after the new policy replacing existing so-called ‘smoke control areas’ was brought in on December 1.

    Exceptions are given for Defra-approved appliances and government-approved fuels – while outdoor barbecues, chimeneas, garden fireplaces or pizza ovens are also permitted as long as smoke is not released from them through a building chimney.

    The rules have been brought in amid growing concern over the stoves increasing the risk of lung cancer and being one of the UK’s main drivers of harmful air pollutants.

    Among those sticking up for rural-based wood burners is Philip Knowles, from Somerset, who said: ‘Wood burners may be “trendy” in London, where air pollution is reportedly 15 to 30 per cent higher than the rest of the country, but here in the countryside many people use wood burners to heat their homes.

    ‘We are paying through the nose for gas and electricity – please don’t take away the little bit of self-sufficiency that our wood burners provide.

    ‘Using properly seasoned timber, which is in plentiful supply in the countryside, wood burners are an efficient and relatively inexpensive form of heating.’

    Mr Knowles was referring to IFS data in last Friday’s report which found air pollution exposure in London has been 15 to 30 per cent higher than the average for each other region of England between 2003 and 2023.

    Andy Hill, chair of the Stove Industry Association, pointed out to MailOnline that the data referenced by the IFS report ‘clearly shows that modern closed stoves using quality, dry wood fuel account for just under 0.3 per cent of total UK PM2.5 emissions’.

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: 'Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves'

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves’ 

    He added that wood fuel is a ‘very low carbon domestic heating fuel’ and has been defined by the Scottish Government as being net zero emissions at the point of use.

    Mr Hill also said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves as an effective way of heating their homes and keeping their families warm and cosy, with the added advantage that they also offer a sense of energy grid security, a means of keeping warm in the event of a power cut and a way of managing fluctuating heating fuel costs.’  

    Particulate pollution is widely agreed to be the air pollutant with the biggest impact on human health, increasing the risk of respiratory and heart conditions, and increasing hospital admissions.

    Children growing up exposed to particulate pollution are more likely to have reduced lung function and can develop asthma as the tiny particles penetrate the lungs and enter into the bloodstream.

    The IFS said in its report: ‘The three largest sources of primary PM2.5 in the UK are domestic burning of wood and other fuels (29 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), road transport (17.9 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), and industrial processes and product use (16.5 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022) such as construction and steel manufacturing.

    ‘The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased over the period is domestic combustion. Three-quarters of the domestic combustion emissions of PM2.5 came from woodburning in 2022.’

    Only stoves officially given the ‘Ecodesign’ mark are allowed for sale in the UK and any wood for sale must be certified ‘Ready to burn’. 

    But in practice councils carry out minimal regulation of woodburning at home – with just 1 prosecution by a local authority in England in 2022, despite 10,600 complaints by residents, according to research carried out by pressure group Mums for Lungs.

    Overall, the IFS report said that in most parts of the UK levels of PM2.5 pollution had fallen to below the government’s 2040 target for PM2.5 although not below the more stringent limit set out by the World Health Organisation.

    ‘The share of the English population exposed to levels of PM2.5 above England’s 2040 target fell from 99 per cent in 2003 to less than 0.1 per cent in 2023.’

    Air pollution fell steeply during the pandemic but has remained at lower levels since. Between 2003 and 2023, average levels of PM2.5 in England fell by 54 per cent.

    A 2022 study cited by Sir Chris Whitty, chief medical officer for England, showed that even ‘Eco-design’ stoves generated 450 times more toxic air pollution than gas central heating, while older stoves now banned from sale produced 3,700 times more.

    Bobbie Upton, Research Economist at IFS and an author of the report, said: ‘There is growing evidence that fine particulate air pollution is extremely damaging for health, particularly for children and the elderly. It is hard to fully explain the striking drop in air pollution that started in 2020, during the COVID pandemic.

    ‘New clean air zones in several of England’s largest cities and reduced steel production may have both played a role.

    ‘It is important for the nation’s health, and for reducing health inequalities, that progress continues to be made on reducing air pollution.’

    The IFS report also found that ethnic minorities were now also less exposed to pollution, down to just 6 per cent more than average levels for white populations in 2023, down from 13 per cent in 2023.

    The report said that this fall in the ‘ethnic pollution gap’ was initially down to ethnic minorities moving to less polluted parts of the country (largely moving out of London to a smaller city), while cities with large ethnic minority populations chiefly London and Birmingham have also experienced drops in air pollution.

    But the report found that lower-income areas have persistently higher levels of air pollution than richer areas.

    In 2023, individuals in the top 20 per cent most deprived areas experienced 8 per cent higher average PM2.5 concentrations than those in the bottom 20 per cent.

    Speaking about the new rules in Oxford – where there is an exemption for moored vessels, including canal boats – the city council’s deputy leader Anna Railton said: ‘Fine particulate pollution from smoke poses serious health risks, and tackling it is crucial for public health.

    ‘Until now, Oxford’s Smoke Control Areas covered only 48 per cent of the city, leaving gaps in protection. From December 1, we’re unifying the city under a single Smoke Control Area, ensuring every part of Oxford benefits from improved safeguards against harmful pollution.

    ‘This expansion targets the reduction of both indoor and outdoor fine particulate emissions by restricting the use of high-polluting and inefficient solid fuels. I am proud that we’re taking this key public health intervention to protect our residents and reduce pollution across the city.’

    In February this year, official figures showed increases in wood burners in homes and the use of biomass in industry had offset drops in pollution from cars and electricity generation.

    Statistics revealed that pollutants known as particulate matter (PM) fell significantly since the 1970s but emissions have been relatively steady in recent years.

    PMs are small particles made up of a variety of materials, some of which can be toxic, and some of which can enter the bloodstream and be transported round the body with serious impact on health.

    And in July 2023, Sir Chris Whitty told MPs that air fresheners and wood burners contribute to air pollution despite many people believing the reverse to be true.

    The Chief Medical Officer for England said he would have ‘no problem’ telling someone with an asthmatic child not to use air freshener.

    He also said people who use wood burners should only do so ‘when it really matters to them for aesthetic reasons’ rather than as the main way of heating their home.

    Sir Chris said the risks from indoor air pollution are sometimes underappreciated because substantial progress has been made improving outdoor air quality in recent decades.

    The Commons Environmental Audit Committee was told products that can raise the risk inside include air freshener as well as candles and joss sticks.

    Source link

  • ‘Can Become One of the Best Athletes’- Emma Raducanu’s Staggering Claim After Teaming Up With Maria Sharapova’s Ex-Trainer

    ‘Can Become One of the Best Athletes’- Emma Raducanu’s Staggering Claim After Teaming Up With Maria Sharapova’s Ex-Trainer

    The tennis season might be over, but the excitement is just heating up as players gear up for their preseason campaigns. With fans eagerly awaiting the action-packed season ahead, the buzz is already palpable. And speaking of buzz, Emma Raducanu has just dropped a mega claim that’s got everyone talking! In a move that screams ambition, Raducanu has brought Maria Sharapova’s former teammate, Yutaka Nakamura, into her camp. This sensational hire is raising eyebrows and expectations as the young Brit looks to turn the tide on her on-court challenges. 

    The British tennis sensation played her last match at the Korea Open and was forced to play on the off owing to injuries. She faced a foot injury during her quarterfinal clash against Daria Kasatkina and failed to continue her momentum since then. In fact, she managed to play only 34 matches throughout the season with her health creating continuous trouble for her. But now, she is looking forward to overcoming her challenges by partnering with strength and conditioning coach Nakamura.

    Speaking about her partnership, Raducanu said, “I think he is going to help me just really explore how far I can go athletically.” Continuing further, she highlighted her ambitions of becoming one of the brightest players. “It’s a big strength of mine that I have nowhere near fulfilled. I think I can become one of the best athletes out there in tennis and I’m just looking forward to seeing how much I can do. And I think he’s really going to help with that. The way I’m working with him and Nick [Cavaday, her coach], it’s a lot more integrated,” she said per The Guardian. This comes after the tennis arena had been already buzzing with such rumors. 

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Article continues below this ad

     

    For the unversed, the discussions started to gain momentum after Telegraph Sport reported that a long-time partnership between Raducanu and Nakamura is being discussed. But Emma Raducanu remained tight-lipped over the matter for a long. When quizzed about the same during the BJK Cup, Raducanu shared a skeptical answer and said, “We are having discussions. Yeah, we’ll see. I’m looking forward for 2025 regardless.” But this move is expected to help the star player overcome her woes. 

    Nakamura boasts a strong CV having worked with  Maria Sharapova for eight years. He has also been the teammate of other players like Naomi Osaka, Tommy Haas, Kei Nishikori, and Denis Shapovalov. Now, he is training with Raducanu and her coach Nick Cavaday at the National Tennis Centre in London as she gears up to start the season in Auckland at the end of December. Reportedly, the Brit is also desiring to play in Adelaide before starting her Australian Open Campaign.

    Meanwhile, the 22-year-old has remained excited for the next season highlighting her determination to win more accolades going forward.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Article continues below this ad

    When Emma Raducanu expressed her determination to play sensationally next season

    Emma Raducanu started her season as No. 285 but managed to rise up the table and is closing the year as World No. 59. After coming back from a troublesome season in 2023 where she witnessed multiple surgeries on her wrist and ankle, the star player depicted some true resilience. And it is for this reason, that despite a rocky season in 2024 as well, she is excited and determined to win more the next year. 

    In an interaction with the press at the Billie Jean King Cup, where she won all five matches she played, Raducanu said, “I’m really pleased with how I fought and how I’m faring up against these top girls. I feel like I’m in a pretty good spot with my tennis right now.” She also highlighted how excited she is to be back on the courts as she looks forward to preparing for the next season.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Article continues below this ad

    If anything, I’m excited and just itchy to get on the practice court, and of course seeing some of my performances this week, it just incentivizes me to do more work,” she shared. Now, it would be interesting to see how her upcoming season unfolds and if she manages to do wonders with the new addition to her team.



    Source link

  • Josh Allen’s Ex Makes Bold Claim After ‘Brain Dead CTE Athlete’ Comment

    Josh Allen’s Ex Makes Bold Claim After ‘Brain Dead CTE Athlete’ Comment

    Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek’s network of contributors

    Josh Allen’s ex-girlfriend Brittany Williams is claiming her Instagram account has been hacked in the wake of the quarterback’s engagement to Hailee Steinfeld.

    “My accounts have been hacked several times tonight,” Williams, 28, wrote in her Instagram Stories on Friday, November 29. “Trying to get it resolved. If anyone has any tips please Imk 🙏🏻🥹.”

    The Instagram Stories — which were posted the same day as Allen’s engagement announcement — came after a since-deleted comment from Williams’ account calling Allen a “brain dead CTE athlete” began making the rounds on social media.

    Josh Allen
    Josh Allen #17 of the Buffalo Bills looks on as he walks the field before a game against the San Francisco 49ers at Highmark Stadium on December 01, 2024 in Orchard Park, New York. In…


    Timothy T Ludwig/Getty Images

    In a screenshot, Williams is asked by one commenter, “Haven’t found the next pro athlete yet?? 😮.” The since-deleted reply from her account read, “luckily my boyfriend owns a team and doesn’t play for one. 🙏🏻 don’t have to be with another brain dead CTE athlete.” CTE — chronic traumatic encephalopathy — is a brain disorder believed to be caused by repeated head injuries, like concussions, per the Mayo Clinic.

    Though the comment was deleted, fans captured it and shared it on social media, wondering if Allen’s recent engagement news had inspired the negativity. “So Brittany Williams is clearly not taking the Josh and Hailee news well..? #BillsMafia,” one fan posted on X (formerly Twitter) with a screenshot of Williams’ deleted comment.

    Eagle-eyed fans noted that the brusque response from Williams’ account was posted three days after the initial comment — which made them question the timeline of when her account could have been hacked.

    One commenter on the Reddit post called it a “poorly attempted cover up,” while another wondered, “How did she sign back in to post about the hackers, if her account was hacked? Does she think the public is genuinely that dumb?”

    The same day that Williams said she had been hacked, her ex Allen, 28, announced his engagement to Steinfeld, 27. He and the Pitch Perfect 3 actress shared a joint post featuring an image from the proposal with the simple caption, “♾️ 11•22•24 ♾️.” The celebrity couple have kept pretty private about their relationship, but were first linked in May 2023.

    Williams and the Buffalo Bills star broke up in early 2023 after dating “on and off for like 10 years,” the former shared on the Martinis and Bikinis podcast in February.



    Source link

  • Watch: Diners Claim To Find Half-Burnt Cigarette In Chicken Biryani At Hyderabad Restaurant

    Watch: Diners Claim To Find Half-Burnt Cigarette In Chicken Biryani At Hyderabad Restaurant

    A group of friends dining at a popular restaurant in Hyderabad made a shocking discovery when they allegedly found a half-burnt cigarette in their chicken biryani. According to the video posted on X (formerly Twitter), the incident seemingly occurred at Bawarachi, a well-known restaurant in Hyderabad, sparking concern over food safety. The video of the incident was posted on the social media platform by user Vineeth K on November 25. In the footage, a group of nearly 10 men can be seen sitting at the table, with half-eaten food in front of them. One of them lifts a plate of biryani to show the burnt cigarette, while the others angrily shout at the restaurant staff.

    Also Read:Pune Man Claims He Found Chicken In Veg Biryani, Zomato Responds

    As the video continues, the situation escalates with staff members surrounding the table while the men continue to voice their complaints. The heated exchange caught the attention of other diners, who watched in shock. The group can be heard expressing their disgust and frustration.

    Disclaimer: NDTV does not vouch for the claims made in the X post. 

    Also Read: Viral Now: Customer Claims To Find Dead Rat In Sambar At Ahmedabad Restaurant

    Other social media users reacted to the video post. One user remarked, “This is why I hire a cook at home,” while another humorously wrote, “They added it for additional taste.” Others, however, suggested that some customers might be staging such incidents to get a free meal, with one commenting, “All restaurants should have CCTV to track these situations.”

    Here are some of the reactions left on the post:

    The video has raised questions about food safety and cleanliness at restaurants. 

    About Neha GroverLove for reading roused her writing instincts. Neha is guilty of having a deep-set fixation with anything caffeinated. When she is not pouring out her nest of thoughts onto the screen, you can see her reading while sipping on coffee.



    Source link

  • Australia rejects Elon Musk’s claim that it plans to control access to the internet

    Australia rejects Elon Musk’s claim that it plans to control access to the internet

    MELBOURNE, Australia — An Australian Cabinet minister on Friday rejected X Corp. owner Elon Musk’s allegation that the government intended to control all Australians’ access to the internet through legislation that would ban young children from social media.

    Treasurer Jim Chalmers said Musk’s criticism was “unsurprising” after the government introduced to Parliament on Thursday legislation that would fine platforms including X up to 150 million Australian dollars ($133 million) if they allow children under age 16 to hold social media accounts.

    “The idea that Elon Musk is not delighted with our steps to try and protect kids online is not an especially big surprise to us, nor does it trouble us greatly,” Chalmers told reporters.

    The spat continues months of open hostility between the Australian government and the tech billionaire over regulators’ efforts to reduce public harm from social media.

    Parliament could pass legislation as soon as next week that would oblige X, TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit and Instagram to ban young children from their platforms.

    The legislation introduced on Thursday will be debated by lawmakers in Parliament on Monday.

    Musk responded to the legislation’s introduction by posting on his platform, “Seems like a backdoor way to control access to the Internet by all Australians.”

    Asked if that was the government’s intention, Chalmers replied, “Of course not.”

    “Elon Musk having that view about protecting kids online is entirely unsurprising to us. He’s expressed similar views before,” Chalmers said.

    “Our job is not to come up with a social media policy to please Elon Musk. Our job is to put in place the necessary protection for kids online,” Chalmers added.

    In April, Musk accused Australia of censorship after an Australian judge temporarily ruled that X must block users worldwide from accessing a video of a bishop being stabbed in a Sydney church.

    Prime Minister Anthony Albanese responded by describing Musk as an “arrogant billionaire” who considered himself above the law and was out of touch with the public.

    Australian eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, the online safety watchdog who brought the court case against X, has said the legal battle led to online attacks against her and her family, including the release online of personal information without her permission, known as doxxing.

    She said Musk had “issued a dog whistle to 181 million users around the globe” which resulted in her receiving death threats.

    Source link

  • ‘Surreal’: New Heights travels to St. Charles, looks to claim Class 1 soccer title | Local Sports

    ‘Surreal’: New Heights travels to St. Charles, looks to claim Class 1 soccer title | Local Sports

    New Heights Christian Academy, formerly College Heights Christian School, hadn’t reached the final four in the state soccer tournament for 20 years.

    The Cougars and head coach Aaron Dogotch have taken the program back there and they’re looking to do more than just arrive in St. Charles on Wednesday as one of the top four soccer teams in Missouri.

    “It feels surreal. It’s a bit of a ‘Why us? Why now?’ I mean, I get it. We’re a talented team and we’ve overcome some obstacles, but there’s been other teams like that,” Dogotch said. “We’re just grateful to be a part of it.”

    “It’s super exciting. It’s kind of surreal,” senior midfielder/striker Hudson Clevenger said.

    “Every team we’ve lost to (prior to 2024) in the playoffs has gone on and gotten at least fourth place,” senior midfielder/striker Michael Parrigon said. “Now it’s our turn to go do it.”

    But their goal is to go and accomplish more than fourth place.

    “Oh, heck yeah,” Dogotch said.

    NHCA joins St. Pius X (Kansas City), Missouri Military Academy and New Heights’ semifinal opponent, Valley Park. Of the four teams, New Heights has the lowest winning percentage of .520. St. Pius’ win percentage is .648 (17-9-1). MMA has a win percentage of .800 (16-4). Valley Park is sporting an .884 win percentage (23-3).

    ‘Chip on our shoulder’

    “I think we’d like to take first. … Our first opponent looks really good on paper, and if my memory serves me right, I think they just haven’t played a lot of big schools,” NHCA’s second-year head coach said. “Our record looks like trash, and we look like we’re coming from the sticks. I think it would be fun to take that chip on our shoulder and go down there and get in the championship.”

    Dogotch is correct. Valley Park has played a schedule consisting almost exclusively of Class 1 and Class 2 schools. It played one Class 3 school in Festus, which finished the year 5-16 and was eliminated in the first round of district playoffs.

    Most of the Hawks’ wins over Class 2 schools were ones with a losing record during the 2024 season.

    In terms of the other two schools, the Colonels of Missouri Military Academy faced just two Class 3 schools and one from Class 4. The Warriors from St. Pius faced three opponents from Class 3 and two from Class 4.

    The Cougars started the year 0-7 but had a forfeited loss to Class 2 Monett in there as well as losing to three Class 4 schools and two Class 3 schools in the rough start. There was a loss to Class 2 Logan-Rogersville, which is in the semifinals of the Class 2 state tournament right now.

    “When we play a Class 4 team, they replace seniors with juniors or juniors with seniors off the bench,” Dogotch said. “We started with freshmen on the pitch. It’s a little overwhelming for them. … But now they’re able to hang, even against the best in Class 1.”

    Those key freshmen pieces are starters Nixon Maningas and Brandon Schumacher. A key sophomore is Cason Hamlin.

    Parrigon talked about the importance of having those underclassmen alongside himself and the other veteran leaders on the team.

    “Beginning of the year, freshmen are obviously going to have a little bit of nerves. But throughout the year they’ve gotten better and better and better. They’ve improved a bunch,” Parrigon said. “Us starting the year 0-6 and now being 13-12, they played a big part in that.”

    Clevenger added that during that rough start to the season, he, Parrigon and other leaders had to be sure and remind them that the team was not bad. It was just going up against tough competition and things would change eventually.

    The Cougars were 2-10 when the calendar turned to October and had not found themselves yet. They rattled off four straight wins from Oct. 8-15 to improve to 6-11.

    Then they closed the regular season with another four-game streak from Oct. 24 to Oct. 31. That win on Halloween was a big confidence boost. The team record was up to 10-12, but it was more about the team it defeated. New Heights ended the regular season with a 1-0 win over Class 3 Hillcrest.

    “It was pivotal for us because you could tell we snapped out of it mentally,” Dogotch said. “I don’t think we lacked in skill. I think we just had this mental thing that hadn’t clicked over and now we have a different mentality.”

    “That was super encouraging for our team,” Clevenger said.

    “It made it click that we can do this,” Parrigon added.

    The Cougars are meeting the Hawks of Valley Park at 10 a.m. Wednesday in St. Charles for the semifinal game at Lindenwood University’s Hunter Stadium.

    The last three trips to the final four ended in fourth-place finishes. A strong offensive team will look to change that trend.

    They’re led offensively by Parrigon and Clevenger. Parrigon notched 32 goals in 21 games and 20 assists to add to the offensive effort. He missed some games as a dual-sport athlete in the fall running cross country as well.

    Clevenger scored 26 goals in 25 games and registered 23 assists.

    “It’s a team sport. We’re the ones who end up with all the goals, but it doesn’t mean that all the other guys aren’t contributing,” Clevenger said.

    Some of those other key contributors have been Liam Nelson with 14 goals, Ben Schumacher with 10 and 20 assists.

    “We have some others that maybe aren’t as skilled as those two (Parrigon and Clevenger) that, if they’re left alone, they’ll burn you,” Dogotch added.

    He also noted that Sacred Heart probably had its eyes on Clevenger before Saturday’s game because of his hat trick in the district title game against Greenwood.

    But then, it had to deal with Parrigon delivering the hat trick in the state quarterfinal matchup.

    “It’s nice to have that monster. … (Teammates) open up that space and those two guys (Parrigon and Clevenger) don’t need much space,” Dogotch said.

    Another key sophomore is goalie Rush Stewart. His competitive nature has driven him to success late in the year.

    “The mental toughness that he has … to go back out there and work when you feel like you’ve let your team down, and he hasn’t, but he takes it personal when a goal is scored,” Dogotch said.

    Stewart has played “flawless” in the last seven games, Dogotch added. The Cougars are in the midst of a seven-game win streak now and look to extend it to eight Wednesday morning.

    New Heights is seeking that first state title in school history. More importantly, there’s one thing the team wants to make sure and do.

    “I press home that we’re doing this because we want to honor our savior in Jesus Christ. We get to give 100%, it doesn’t matter, win or lose. They’re giving 100% and we’re winning right now, so it’s a lot of fun,” Dogotch added.

    Source link

  • Football roundup: Four local teams claim big victories | Local Sports

    Football roundup: Four local teams claim big victories | Local Sports

    North Forney 62

    Royse City 23

    FORNEY — North Forney rushed for 553 yards on the way to a District 10-6A win over Royse City.

    Andikan Asuquo led the Falcons with 200 yards and three touchdowns on just five carries, including a 95-yard run. Legend Bey ran for 184 yards and three scores on six carries and was 1-of-2 passing with a 55-yard touchdown pass to Elijah Otieno.

    Royse City quarterback Peyton Peoples was 16-of-29 passing for 267 yards and two TDs. Bryalon Chapman passed for a 2-yard touchdown and placekicker Emilio Brito passed for a 41-yard completion as the Bulldogs finished with 310 yards passing.

    Kemarion Clarke led the Royse City receivers with 202 yards and one TD on six catches.

    Also catching passes for the Bulldogs were Cross Joplin (5-62, 1 TD), Xavier Watson (1-41), Zavier Brown (4-22), Hudson Hays (3-14) and Thomas Neaville (1-2, 1 TD).

    Royse City finished with 38 yards rushing, led by Daniel Jenkins (9-26) and Watson (11-14).

    Royse City dropped to 2-7 for the season and 0-5 in district play. North Forney, which is 6-2 overall, remained tied for the district lead with Longview at 4-0.

     

    Caddo Mills 43

    Bonham 10

    BONHAM — In his second game back from an injury, Alfonso Gonzales was 18-of-25 passing for 287 yards and two TDs in Caddo Mills’ victory over Bonham.

    The Foxes’ top receivers cluded Tristan Hardwell (4-85), Kollin Heath (4-72, 1 TD), Steve Stiggers (2-64), Camerin Chase (4-40, 1 TD), Wade Bowen (2-15) and Mikey Grant (1-8).

    Wyatt Watson led the Caddo Mills rushers with 63 yards and two TDs on 13 carries. Joshua Moses ran for 48 yards and a TD on seven carries and Gonzales ran for 24 yards and a score on four carries.

    Caddo Mills improved to 6-3 for the season and 3-2 in District 5-2A-II play. Bonham dropped to 1-7 and 0-4.

     

    Sunnyvale 41

    Quinlan Ford 14

    SUNNYVALE — Sunnyvale won a battle for first place in District 6-4A-II with Quinlan Ford.

    The victorious Raiders are now 3-0 in district play and 5-3 overall. 

    Ford dropped to 6-2 and 2-1.

    Ford rushed for 276 yards, led by Raythen Capps (3-59), Trevin Sisco (8-43), Timmy Phifer (2-36), Zander Sharp (4-35), Payton Wallen (7-27), Devon Williams (6-25), Landon Edwards (7-21), Mason Tigue (7-21), James Barker (2-5) and Ray Haider (1-4, 1 TD).

    Wallen was 5-of-14 passing for 51 yards and a 13-yard TD to Austin States.

    Tigue led the Panther receivers with two catches for 25 yards.

    Sunnyvale quarterback Cayson Maupin was 13-of-23 passing for 175 yards and four TDs and ran for 48 yards on five carries.

    Ford lost two fumbles and an interception.

     

    Commerce 38

    Eustace 8

    COMMERCE — Commerce upped its District 7-3A-I record to 2-2 with the win over Eustace, which dropped to 0-5.

    Commerce running back Jordan McMurray rushed for 128 yards and a TD on 14 carries.

    Malik Garcia ran for 31 yards on two carries and K.D. Ford ran for 26 yards on three carries

    Ford was 2-of-2 passing for 31 yards and two TDs and Grant Sherley was 6-of-10 passing for 75 yards and a TD.

    Te’dreiyon Nash caught four passes for 64 yards for Commerce and Jordan McMurray caught one for eight yards as Commerce improved to 3-5 for the season.

     

    Grand Saline 28

    Lone Oak 7

    LONE OAK — No. 6 state-ranked Grand won a battle with Lone Oak for first place in District 9-3A-II.

    Grand Saline led only 13-7 through three quarters but outscored the Buffaloes 15-0 in the final five minutes.

    The victorious Indians mproved to 8-0 for the season and 3-1 in district play. Lone Oak dropped to 7-1 and 3-1.

    Lone Oak’s passers were 4-of-26 for 36 yards and four interceptions.

    Wyatt Marker led the Lone Oak rushers with 39 yards and a TD on six carries and Moi Perez ran for 13 yards on nine carries.

    Lone Oak’s top receivers were Aiden Holder (1-27) and Corbin Johnson (1-20).

    Jett Taylor paced the Grand Saline rushers with 168 yards and two TDs on 20 carries and Colt Boyd ran for 84 yards.

    Wolfe City 70

    Whitewright 28

    WHITEWRIGHT — H.D. Davis rushed for 350 yards and four TDs on 25 carries to lead Wolfe City over Whitewright.

    Davis, named the Herald-Banner Athlete of the Week, leads the state in rushing with 2,143 yards and 27 touchdowns on 168 carries. He’s averaging 12.8 yards per carry and 267.9 yards rushing per game.

    Wolfe City finished with 609 total yards, including 211 yards passing by Noah Adams, who was 13-of-21 with five touchdowns and no interceptions.

    Jory Young also ran for 43 yards and a TD on seven carries for Wolfe City.

    Wolfe City’s top receivers included Brennon Russell (3-94, 3 TDs), Carson Herron (4-67, 2 TDs), Chris Herron (3-22) and Casen Pessel (2-18) and Daniel Guillen (1-10).

    Gage Walker ran for 193 yards and three scores on 16 carries for Whitewright and Easton Helgren ran for 64 yards and one score on five carries.

    Wolfe City improved to 7-1 for the season and 4-0 in district play. Whitewright dropped to 5-3 and 1-3.

     

    Boles 27

    Como-Pickton 20

    QUINLAN — Boles claimed its first District 9-2A-I win to go 1-3 in district play and 4-4 for the season.

    Como-Pickton dropped to 1-8 overall and 0-5 in district play.

    Layton Morgan threw for a 21-yard touchdown for Boles and ran for 102 yards and a TD on 14 carries.

    Ethan Selden also rushed for 93 yards and a TD for Boles and returned a kickoff 85 yards for a score.

    Noah Davis caught the 21-yard TD pass.

     

    James Bowie 38

    Cumby 32

    SIMMS — Chett Vaughan ran for 118 yards and was 11-of-17 passing for 140 yards and two TDs in Cumby’s loss to James Bowie.

    Braylon Boggs led the Cumby receivers with three catches for 38 yards. Chayton Vaughan caught two passes for 35 yards and a TD and Dakari Johnson caught two passes for 38 yards. Johnson also rushed for 37 yards on six carries.

    Cumby is now 4-4 for the season and 2-2 in District 9-2A-II while James Bowie is 1-7 and 1-3.



    Source link