hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetjojobet

Tag: Competition

  • Trump will end unfair trans competition in women’s sports

    Trump will end unfair trans competition in women’s sports

    Young women and girls should never be placed in a position where their safety is at risk. They should never be pushed out of activities and spaces intentionally designed for them.

    Yet we are increasingly seeing biological men competing in women’s sports, creating not only unfair challenges but posing a danger to biologically female athletes’ safety.

    Time and again, opportunities that rightfully belong only to female athletes are slipping away.

    Across America, women and girls are seeing their countless early morning drives to practice, hours spent on the field, and devotion to becoming the best athletes they can be, spent in vain as men with highly unfair physical advantages dominate their sports.

    The integrity of girls’ sports is under attack.

    Men on average are bigger, faster and stronger than women — an undeniable biological fact.

    The competitive advantages these factors give to male athletes, as well as the great risks such factors mean for young girls, are being ignored in the name of pushing a political agenda.


    Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures during a rally in State College, Pennsylvania, U.S. October 26, 2024. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
    Trump at a rally in State College, Pennsylvania, U.S. October 26, 2024. REUTERS

    Female athletes are losing opportunities to compete, earn scholarships and enjoy the activities they once loved.

    And reversing this dangerous trend will require strong national leadership.

    Former President Donald Trump has proven himself to be the right leader to take on this challenge.

    His unwavering stance on defending the rights of women and young girls in sports has set the standard for what must be done on the national level, as well as right here in our local communities.

    We stand united on this issue as two individuals with vastly different backgrounds.

    As an athlete who has competed at the highest levels, and as an elected official who has heard from countless concerned mothers, fathers and students of all backgrounds, we understand the importance of fairness in sports — and the urgency of addressing it now.

    This should not be a red issue or a blue issue. Protecting the physical safety of women and girls, and ensuring they have access to the best opportunities to get ahead in life, should be something that unites all of us.

    In Nassau County, we could not, and would not, sit idly by and wait until a young girl loses an athletic scholarship — or is shattered by a life-changing injury on the field — to take action.

    That’s why Nassau County passed a first-in-the-nation law that banned biological males from competing in women’s or girls’ sports at county facilities.

    Transgender female athletes are still welcome and encouraged to play on co-ed teams, but under our law they cannot compete against all-women or all-girls’ teams.


    Former collegiate swimmers Kaitlynn Wheeler, from third left, Riley Gaines, and Grace Countie, who competed in Georgia but aren't from the state, prepare to testify in opposition to transgender athletes in women's sports in front of the state senate's Special Committee on Protecting Women's Sports at the Capitol in Atlanta, Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2024. (Arvin Temkar/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP)
    Former collegiate swimmers Kaitlynn Wheeler, from third left, Riley Gaines, and Grace Countie, who competed in Georgia but aren’t from the state, prepare to testify in opposition to transgender athletes in women’s sports in front of the state senate’s Special Committee on Protecting Women’s Sports at the Capitol in Atlanta, Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2024. AP

    This law ensures that female athletes in Nassau County can compete on a level playing field, without the inherent disadvantages or threats of bodily harm that come with facing off against males.

    While we’ve taken decisive action locally, both through policy and raising awareness, we know that the fight must be taken to the national level to protect women and girls across the country.

    This issue isn’t just about sports — it’s about protecting the future of young women across America. The achievements and success of generations of female athletes are at risk if we don’t act now.

    With President Trump back in office, we can ensure that the protections we’ve enacted in Nassau County become national law and safeguard women and girls everywhere.

    President Trump will continue to stand up for fairness in sports and to defend the rights of female athletes.

    For the future of women’s sports and the preservation of fairness and opportunity, we urge you to vote for Donald Trump. Together, we can protect the rights of women and girls to compete fairly and safely in sports across the United States.

    Bruce Blakeman serves as county executive in Nassau County, Long Island. Caitlyn Jenner is an Olympic gold medal-winning decathlete.

    Source link

  • Google has finally stepped up to the competition with Pixel Buds Pro 2

    Google has finally stepped up to the competition with Pixel Buds Pro 2

    For a company that’s ahead of the curb when offering a refined Android experience for Pixel users, Google has been slow to move in the hyper-competitive space for truly wireless earbuds.

    Attempts to distinguish the Pixel Buds from other earbuds, like the high-performance Sony WF series and Apple’s paradigm-shifting Airpods, have led Google to rely heavily on software without appropriate hardware.

    That tendency has made the Pixel Buds product line fall short of the mark over the past few years. So has Google finally got things right the Pixel Buds Pro 2?

    If you want a quick answer, yes. There are some faults I’d like to see addressed as the product line continues, but for the most part, it seems Google has finally started to focus more heavily on supporting Pixel products like its smartwatch (we’ll have a review of that up soon as well) and these buds.

    Thee buds play are a largely iterative update over the original Pixel Buds Pro, which was released two years ago. That’s not a bad thing. I’d much rather Google truly refine the identity of these buds before the product line grows alongside the company’s Gemini AI product, which is becoming a core focus for Pixel products.

    Design

    The most notable thing about the design is a significant size reduction. These are 27% smaller than the original Pixel Buds Bro which makes it all the more impressive that Google managed to include the highly efficient Tensor A1 audio chip along with 11mm drivers with a new high-frequency chamber. Also under the hood are the new Bluetooth 5.4 standard, IR proximity sensors, motion-detecting accelerometers, and a 3-mic beamforming array responsible for Google’s signature Silent Seal 2.0 ANC technology.

    There’s a lot of tech stuffed into these tiny earbuds.

    Physically, you’ve got a very tiny wing stabiliser to help with fit and a smooth touchpad on each bud with capacitive touch controls which more or less works as you’d expect and isn’t annoyingly overly sensitive. You’ll notice these slightly textured wind-blocking mesh covers and the design also complements an active in-ear pressure relief system that dials in for better comfort over longer periods.

    Out of the box, you’ve got a simple row of options (S, M, L) so you can get the best fit for your ears. As with all earbuds, fit is important as that will be one of the major factors deciding both how your music sounds, and how solid the noise cancelling is.

    Google’s software attempts to further find the perfect seal as a function of how well your ear tips fit. It’s effective, but it’s also not a fast as Google would hope. Each time you shift the earbuds inside your ear, you’ll be able to notice a lag as the software works to further seal your ear from outside noise, optimising the ANC constantly.

    The designers have worked in an IP54 rating for dust and water resistance, which is sufficient for runners who may want to take these to the gym. They are certainly stable enough for such an activity, although I still would view these as a lifestyle offering rather than anything better suited to active lifestyles.

    Features

    Like all high-end earbuds on the market, the Pixel Buds Pro 2 does much more than just play music and block as much external noise as possible.

    They also feature several technological advancements that further play with things such as ANC to try and deliver a seamless lifestyle experience.

    Basically, this has served two purposes in the past few years: to prevent you from having to get out your phone each and every time you need to control the earbuds and also to ensure that you don’t even need to take them out of your ears to do things like hold a conversation or power through a work call.

    Google has features that speak to both purposes.

    The ANC is so nuanced and detailed that the A1 audio chip is constantly working to adapt to a listener’s surroundings and situations. Much like the Sonys, they are a conversational awareness feature that can detect when you are speaking and adjust the music to facilitate a good, clear conversation. There’s also future-proofing with support for Auracast technology.

    This will mean that the earbuds can connect directly to an audio stream in the immediate environment. For example, you can listen to broadcasts at a sporting game without having to struggle over the roar of the crowds.

    The Pixel Buds Pro 2 are some of the only modern earbuds (that I know of) that have support for Bluetooth’s Auracast standard, but by the time it’s properly integrated into modern society I would imagine this would have to be quite standard.

    Support for Bluetooth’s new Low Complexity Communication Codec is also included but, again, this is more future-proofing rather than anything relevant now. Once the technology is more common, LC3 should be a great development for anything concerned with battery life.

    LC3 is able to scale from 345kbps down to 160kbps, which makes it much more powerful than standards like SBC and aptX. LC3 is the more compact Bluetooth codec to date, which will translate to prolonged battery life as it puts less pressure on the connection without compromising audio quality.

    Audio

    Audio quality is mostly fine but I’ve had a few moments where the volume is muted. I assume this is because the AI is over-engineered and sometimes reduces the volume in an attempt to dial in the perfect amount of ANC. It’s strange and something I’ve encountered a few times. It usually requires a few shifts of the bud in my ear before it sounds great again.

    The default sound signature seems to prefer those brighter, more forward mids and highs while moving away from that overengineered low-end you’d get from so many other earbuds playing around in this price range. That positions Google quite well so Pixel users don’t need to reach for an Apple product and can stick to the Google ecosystem without putting up with inferior sound.

    Even when you find the right fit, the volume isn’t nearly as loud as some other earbuds I’ve tested over the past year from the likes of Sennheiser and Sony. Some prefer this, but those who like deeply immersive, aggressively loud sounds may be a bit disappointed. However, this means you’ll find good balance even at the highest volume with the Pixel Buds Pro 2; there’s no toppling that arrangement the more you push, maintaining a very mature, rich sound at all times.

    With AI powering these futuristic buds, they can adapt to the environment up to 3 million times per second. However, this doesn’t work as fast and seamlessly as Google would have hoped. If I shift the earbuds in my ear even just a few inches, I’ll actually hear Gemini’s attempt to continually optimise audio performance because it takes a short second the adjust. It can get annoying if you’re struggling to find the right fit, but noticing the calibration isn’t too big of a deal.

    Source link

  • Federal judge orders Google to open its Android app store to competition

    Federal judge orders Google to open its Android app store to competition

    SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge on Monday ordered Google to tear down the digital walls shielding its Android app store from competition as punishment for maintaining an illegal monopoly that helped expand the company’s internet empire.

    The injunction issued by U.S. District Judge James Donato will require Google to make several changes that the Mountain View, California, company had been resisting. Those include a provision that will require its Play Store for Android apps to distribute rival third-party app stores so consumers can download them to their phones, if they so desire.

    The judge’s order will also make the millions of Android apps in the Play Store library accessible to rivals, allowing them to offer up a competitive selection.

    Donato is giving Google until November to make the revisions dictated in his order. The company had insisted it would take 12 to 16 months to design the safeguards needed to reduce the chances of potentially malicious software making its way into rival Android app stores and infecting millions of Samsung phones and other mobile devices running on its free Android software.

    The court-mandated overhaul is meant to prevent Google from walling off competition in the Android app market as part of an effort to protect a commission system that has been a boon for one of the world’s most prosperous companies and helped elevate the market value of its corporate parent Alphabet Inc. to $2 trillion.

    Google said in a blog post that it will ask the court to pause the pending changes, and will appeal the court’s decision.

    Donato also ruled that, for a period of three years ending Nov. 1, 2027, Google won’t be able to share revenue from its Play Store with anyone who distributes Android apps or is considering launching an Android app distribution platform or store. It also won’t be allowed to pay developers, or share revenue, so that they will launch an app in the Google Play Store first or exclusively, and can’t make deals with manufacturers to preinstall the Google Play store on any specific location on an Android device. It also won’t be able to require apps to use its billing system or tell customers that they can download apps elsewhere and potentially for cheaper.

    The Play Store has been earning billions of dollars annually for years, primarily through 15% to 30% commissions that Google has been imposing on digital transactions completed within Android apps. It’s a similar fee structure to the one that Apple deploys in its iPhone app store — a structure that prompted video game maker Epic Games to file antitrust lawsuits four years ago in an effort to foster competition that could help drive down prices for both app makers and consumers.

    A federal judge mostly sided with Apple in a September 2021 decision that was upheld by an appeals court. Still, a jury favored Epic Games after the completion of a four-week trial completed last year and delivered a verdict that tarred the Play Store as an illegal monopoly.

    That prompted another round of hearings this year to help Donato determine what steps should be taken to restore fair competition. Google argued that Epic Games was seeking some extreme changes, saddling the company with costs that could run as high as $600 billion. Epic contended Google could level the playing field for as little as $1 million. It’s unclear how much the changes ordered by Donato will cost Google.

    Although Epic lost its antitrust case against Apple, Donato’s ruling could still have ripple effects on the iPhone app store as another federal judge weighs whether Apple is making it easy enough to promote different ways that consumers can pay for digital transactions. Apple was ordered to allow in-app links to alternative payment systems as part of U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers’ decision in that case, but Epic contends the provision is being undermined with the creation of another commission system that stifles consumer choice.

    The forthcoming Play Store shakeup could be just the first unwelcome shock that antitrust law delivers to Google. In the biggest antitrust case brought by the U.S. Justice Department in a quarter century, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in August declared Google’s dominant search engine to be an illegal monopoly, too, and is now getting ready to start hearings on how to punish Google for that bad behavior. Google is appealing Mehta’s ruling in the search engine case in hopes of warding off a penalty that could hurt its business even more than the changes being ordered in the Play Store.

    “Provided the ruling survives the appeals process, Google will almost certainly take a revenue hit,” said Emarketer analyst Evelyn Mitchell-Wolf. “No doubt some of the largest app developers like Epic Games will start encroaching on Google Play Store’s market share, meaning Google will lose out on its usual cut of subscription and in-app purchases.”

    The analyst added that, while the Google Play Store will likely continue to benefit from brand recognition since it was the default Android app store for so long, “some consumers may defect if they can get better deals on their favorite apps elsewhere.” And app developers will likely take advantage of the opportunity to let consumers know about direct downloads.

    “So Google may see fewer Play Store revenues even among the Android users that stick to the default,” Mitchell-Wolf said.

    Alphabet’s shares fell $4.08, or 2.4%, to close Monday at $162.98.

    Source link

  • Google expert at antitrust trial says government underestimates competition for online ad dollars

    Google expert at antitrust trial says government underestimates competition for online ad dollars

    ALEXANDRIA, Va, — Federal regulators who say Google holds an illegal monopoly over the technology that matches online advertisers to publishers are vastly underestimating the competition the tech giant faces, an expert hired by Google testified Thursday.

    Mark Israel, an economist who prepared an expert report on Google’s behalf, said the government’s claims that Google holds a monopoly over advertising technology are improperly focused on a narrow market the government defines as “open web display advertising,” essentially the rectangular ads that appear on the top and along the right hand side of a web page when a consumer browses the web on a desktop computer.

    But the government’s case fails to account for a variety of competition that occurs beyond those rectangular boxes, Israel said. In the real world, advertisers have dramatically shifted where they spend money to social media companies like Facebook and TikTok, and online retailers like Amazon.

    When you account for all online display advertising, not just the narrow segment defined by the government’s case, Google gets just 10% of the U.S. market share as of 2022, he said. That’s down from roughly 15% a decade ago.

    In addition, advertisers have moved away from placing their ads on the screens of desktop and laptop computers where Google is alleged to control the market, with money migrating to ads placed on apps and mobile device screens. Israel cited marketing data showing display ad spending on desktop and laptop devices has decreased from 71% in 2013 to 17% in 2022.

    The government’s case “seems to miss where the competition is today,” Israel said.

    His testimony comes as Google wraps up its defense in the third week of an antitrust trial that began earlier this month in Alexandria, Virginia. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema has said she expects the government will put on a short rebuttal case Friday. Then the trial will go on hiatus, with both sides submitting proposed findings of fact in November and returning to court to make closing arguments in December. She said she expects to make a ruling by the end of the year.

    The government’s case alleges Google has built and maintained an illegal monopoly that restricts choices and inflates costs for online publishers and advertisers. Its control of the market has allowed Google to keep 36 cents on the dollar for every ad bought and sold through its ad tech stack, the government claims.

    The government says Google controls advertising tech at every step of the process, including the predominant technology used by publishers to sell their ad space, the predominant technology used by advertisers looking to purchase ad space, and the ad exchanges in the middle that conduct auctions in a matter of milliseconds to match advertiser to publisher.

    The government’s case contends that Google illegally ties those markets together, forcing publishers to use Google’s technology if they want access to Google’s large cache of advertisers.

    The government, using more narrow market definitions than those used by Israel, has claimed that Google controls 91% of the market for publisher ad servers and 87% of the market for advertising ad networks.

    Google says the government’s case also fails to account for the billions the company has invested to ensure its products, working together, generate better value for publishers and advertisers by matching the right advertisers to the right consumers.

    Israel cited data showing publishers working with Google are generating more revenue for each bit of ad space they make available, while advertisers are paying less for each click their ads generate.

    That only occurs, Israel said, because Google’s technology is continually improving the quality of the ads by matching advertisers to consumers based on their interests and purchase history.

    Israel also disputed the government’s claims that Google gets 36 cents on the dollar for the ad sales it facilitates. He said data shows that percentage has dropped to 31% or 32% in recent years. More importantly, he said, competitors have even higher take rates, with an industry average of 42 cents on the dollar.

    The Virginia trial is separate from another case brought by the government alleging that Google’s ubiquitous search engine constitutes an illegal monopoly. In that case, a judge in the district of Columbia ruled in favor of the government and declared the search engine a monopoly, but no decision has yet been made on any potential remedies. The government is scheduled to offer suggestions of proposed remedies next month. those could include restricting Google from paying tech companies to lock in Google as the default search engine for gadgets like cellphones, or even seeking to force google to sell off parts of its business.

    Source link

  • ‘Why am I in tears?’ Father-daughter duo dance at competition together, leaving the internet emotional, Lifestyle News

    ‘Why am I in tears?’ Father-daughter duo dance at competition together, leaving the internet emotional, Lifestyle News

    When children perform on the big stage, their parents would often come down to watch and show their love. 

    But Jay Sng didn’t want to just be supportive by sitting in the audience — he wanted to join his daughter, 7-year-old Jaylee, on stage. 

    So, he practised hard with her and together, they competed in the 25th Singapore Regional Competition on Sept 5.

    This was organised by The Commonwealth Society of Teachers of Dancing Singapore and held at Anglo-Chinese Junior College’s Faith Centre for Performing Arts. 

    @jaysng8 Dancing with my daughter on stage in a competition! #danceuncle #sissonnedanceart #sissonne #daughterfatherdance ♬ original sound – Jay SNg

    Jay shared their performance on TikTok on Sept 7. 

    “Our first competition as father and daughter!” he captioned proudly. 

    In the viral video, which at the time of writing has more than 891,000 views and 111,000 likes, Jay and Jaylee danced to the song A Whole New World from Disney movie Aladdin. 

    Jay himself was decked out in a costume to look like Aladdin while little Jaylee wore a beautiful red outfit, similar to something Princess Jasmine wore in the show. 

    Apart from prancing around on stage, the pair shocked the audience with several tricky dance moves. 

    Near the start of the performance, Jaylee did a cartwheel on her father’s back. 

    And later on, Jay joined his daughter and did several cartwheels across the stage — an impressive feat. 

    Needless to say, the crowd went wild and cheered the father-daughter duo on. 

    Other impressive moves include Jay flipping Jaylee onto his shoulders and swinging her around as she held a dance pose. 

    In the comments, several emotional netizens shared that the dance performance had left them with tears in their eyes. 

    “Oh my gosh, why am I in tears?” one said. 

    Several others said that Jaylee was a lucky girl to have a father like Jay. 

    One netizen said that the performance was a “huge core memory” for Jaylee. 

    To that, Jay replied saying he had told Jaylee before that if he were to “leave this world suddenly”, she can remember that “daddy will always be dancing with [her] in [her] heart”. 

    In response to another comment, Jay revealed that he was actually the oldest contestant on stage in the history of their dance competition.

    There was also one netizen who urged Jay to recreate this when Jaylee was older and married. 

    To that, he jokingly said: “But my back!”

    AsiaOne has reached out to Jay for more details. 

    ALSO READ: For this dad, cochlear implants help amplify whispers of fatherly love

    melissateo@asiaone.com



    Source link

  • Why the Champions League is Football’s Most Important Competition

    Why the Champions League is Football’s Most Important Competition

    Key Takeaways

    • The Champions League is Europe’s top club competition & elevates winning teams into football elite.
    • Real Madrid leads with 15 titles, followed by AC Milan with 7. Spain dominates the most wins.
    • The Champions League attracts a global audience, generates high revenue, & remains a lucrative sporting event.

    The Champions League is considered to be the most prestigious club competition in world football and is contested between the best clubs from around Europe.

    The annual tournament in its current format sees 36 teams from across Europe’s top leagues compete to be crowned the champions of European club football. Winning the distinguished trophy writes teams and players alike into the annals of history as they can hold their accomplishments up against the very best that the sport of football has to offer.

    Seeing the best of the best face each other head-to-head never fails to capture the imagination of football fans across the world with some of the tournament’s most historic moments forever etched into the minds of supporters from across multiple generations and becoming part of football folklore.

    Both the financial and sporting rewards that the Champions League offers mean that success in the competition will immediately elevate any club that wins it into the upper echelon of club football and cement their name among the elite teams in the sport’s history.

    Champions League Origins

    How the illustrious competition was born

    Liverpool celebrate with the European Cup

    The first tournament of its kind was introduced in 1955 and was named the ‘Coupe des Clubs Champions Européens’ (which means European Champion Clubs’ Cup in French), commonly known as the European Cup among football fans. Originally, the competition only included the champions of Europe’s top domestic leagues, who competed in a straight knockout-style tournament to determine the best club on the continent.

    From the original tournament in the 1955/56 season to the 1959/60 edition, Real Madrid lifted the trophy on five consecutive occasions, a record that still stands to this day.

    In 1992 the competition was rebranded as the Champions League and introduced a round-robin group stage that took place before the knockout stages of the tournament. The new-look competition also allowed multiple teams from certain countries to compete for the first time, a choice that has remained to this day with some of Europe’s top leagues now having up to four Champions League representatives.

    The most successful nation in the tournament is Spain, who have had a club from their nation win the tournament on 20 occasions (Real Madrid winning 15 and Barcelona winning 5). England lead the way with the most winning teams, with six different clubs lifting the trophy (Liverpool, Man Utd, Chelsea, Nottingham Forest, Aston Villa and Manchester City). An elusive list of Champions League winners.

    Football Club

    Champions League/European Cup Titles

    Real Madrid

    15

    AC Milan

    7

    Bayern Munich

    6

    Liverpool

    6

    Barcelona

    5

    In the 2019/20 season, Bayern Munich became the first, and only (at the time of writing), team to win the Champions League with a perfect record. The German giants won each of their six group stage matches and all five of their knockout games, eventually defeating Paris Saint Germain in the final, thanks to a goal from Kingsley Coman.

    The World is Watching

    2013 Champions League Final Bayern Lifting Trophy

    The Champions League has become one of the most-watched sporting events in the world. In terms of football, it is the most-watched club competition in the world and third overall, only behind the UEFA European Championships and FIFA World Cup tournaments.

    The tournament transcends the continent in which it is competed and pulls in a huge worldwide audience each year. Over the last few years, it has become the most-watched annual sporting competition in the world. The 2012/13 tournament, which was won by Bayern Munich, pulled in an approximate viewership of 360 million television viewers – this remains the Champions League’s highest TV rating to date.

    Player

    Champions League Goals

    Cristiano Ronaldo

    140

    Lionel Messi

    129

    Robert Lewandowski

    94

    Karim Benzema

    90

    Raúl

    71

    Prize Money

    The key factor in the competition’s prestige

    Champions League football

    The prize money and distributed revenue associated with the competition are big money-makers for the clubs involved and are determined by the television market value of each country, skyrocketing the prestige and importance of the Champions League as a whole. During the 2019/20 season, PSG (the runners-up) earned more money overall than the eventual winners Bayern Munich. PSG earned a total of €126.8 million (€101.3 million in prize money) while Bayern received €125.46 million (€112.96 million in prize money).

    The global success of the Champions League has seen it become one of the most lucrative football tournaments on the planet. The prize money for the 2024/25 competition will see clubs earn €2,100,000 for each victory in the league phase of the tournament with the overall winners earning €25,000,000 just from winning the final.

    Real Madrid, the most successful in the competition’s history, have continued their dominance in recent years, adding five titles to their collection between 2016 and 2024, giving them a total of 15 Champions League victories and putting them far out in front of second place AC Milan, who have won the competition on seven occasions.

    Data sourced by UEFA.

    Source link