hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibom

Tag: couples

  • Royal expert slams Harry and Meghan for using their titles to earn ‘huge amounts of money’ – as bombshell German documentary exposes couple’s ‘elitist’ California lifestyle

    Royal expert slams Harry and Meghan for using their titles to earn ‘huge amounts of money’ – as bombshell German documentary exposes couple’s ‘elitist’ California lifestyle

    Harry and Meghan suffered a new blow tonight after a German documentary accused the couple of hypocrisy while enjoying an ‘elitist’ lifestyle in the United States.  

    The programme entitled ‘Harry: The Lost Prince’ includes damning criticism of the couple’s attempts to build a new life for themselves as charity activists and campaigners since leaving the Royal family. 

    MailOnline was given a preview of the documentary before it was screened to an audience of millions in Germany tonight. 

    The programme takes a dig at the couple by detailing how their much-publicised visits to poverty-stricken countries such as Nigeria and Colombia sits uneasily with Meghan’s love of expensive designer clothes. 

    One stinging voice in the documentary is former soldier Ben McBean, who lost his left arm and had his right leg amputated above the knee after being seriously injured by a landmine blast in Afghanistan in 2008. 

    McBean who shared a flight home from Afghanistan with Harry did not hold back in criticising the prince over his revelations about his family in his bombshell memoir Spare and in his Netflix show. 

    The veteran soldier says: ‘I just thought, with him kind of whinging about his family and he was saying something about his brother pushing him over or something like that, I was just like, “Mate, just leave it out”.

    ‘You and your brother had a little fisticuffs…but family’s family, you know. 

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle suffered a new blow tonight after a German documentary accused the couple of hypocrisy while enjoying an 'elitist' lifestyle in the United States

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle suffered a new blow tonight after a German documentary accused the couple of hypocrisy while enjoying an ‘elitist’ lifestyle in the United States

    The bombshell documentary that will be screened in Germany runs a fine-toothed comb through Harry and Meghan's work with their charity Archewell Foundation

    The bombshell documentary that will be screened in Germany runs a fine-toothed comb through Harry and Meghan’s work with their charity Archewell Foundation

    The film is titled 'Harry: The Lost Prince' and includes expert commentary on the allegations the Duke of Sussex made against his family in his book Spare

    The film is titled ‘Harry: The Lost Prince’ and includes expert commentary on the allegations the Duke of Sussex made against his family in his book Spare 

    ‘If one of my friends fell out with his partner and started posting things on social media and saying my ex is this and that, I’d have told him to shut up as well.’ 

    The German documentary also points the finger at Harry and Meghan for inevitably trading off their former Royal roles by seeking to make money to support their lifestyle. 

    It even pours scorn on them for ‘failing’ to mix with wealthy neighbours in the celebrity enclave of Montecito of California, where they have made their home with children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. 

    But Harry and Meghan may be most uncomfortable with the documentary reminding viewers that they had admitted spending just one hour a week working for their charity Archewell. 

    In another, the programme highlights how donations to Archewell dropped from $13million in 2021 to just $2million dollars in 2022. 

    The couple did face harsh criticism over ‘Megxit’ in some sections of the media in Germany when they announced their decision to step back as ‘senior members’ of the British Royal family in January 2020. 

    Their reputations soared, however, in Germany in September last year when they attended the Invictus games, featuring competing injured servicemen and women, in Dusseldorf.

    But the new documentary – the first TV analysis of the couple in Germany since ‘Megxit’ – even questions the cost of the Dusseldorf games by pointing out that they were funded by a €40million donation from Germany’s Ministry of Defence. 

    The documentary will no doubt leave the couple unimpressed as it extensively quotes British Royal reporters and experts, talking about the gulf between their supposedly noble work and their luxury lifestyle. 

    The programme takes a dig at the couple by detailing how their much-publicised visits to poverty-stricken countries such as Nigeria and Colombia sits uneasily with Meghan's love of expensive designer clothes. This picture was taken during the couple's visit to Bogota in August this year

    The programme takes a dig at the couple by detailing how their much-publicised visits to poverty-stricken countries such as Nigeria and Colombia sits uneasily with Meghan’s love of expensive designer clothes. This picture was taken during the couple’s visit to Bogota in August this year 

    The new documentary – the first TV analysis of the couple in Germany since 'Megxit' - even questions the cost of the Invictus Games that were held in Dusseldorf by pointing out that they were funded by a €40million donation from Germany's Ministry of Defence

    The new documentary – the first TV analysis of the couple in Germany since ‘Megxit’ – even questions the cost of the Invictus Games that were held in Dusseldorf by pointing out that they were funded by a €40million donation from Germany’s Ministry of Defence

    The film will no doubt leave the couple unimpressed as it extensively quotes British Royal reporters and experts, talking about the gulf between their supposedly noble work and their luxury lifestyle

    The film will no doubt leave the couple unimpressed as it extensively quotes British Royal reporters and experts, talking about the gulf between their supposedly noble work and their luxury lifestyle

    One reporter Russel Myers says on the show: ‘If you’re going to places like Nigeria, like Colombia, which have huge socio-economic problems, some of the world’s poorest communities in these countries, and you’re turning up wearing tens of thousands of pounds worth of designer clothes – it really doesn’t send the right message.’ 

    Jack Royston from the podcast The Royal Report also picked up on the couple’s desire to be ‘half in and half out’ of the Royal family which was dismissed by the late Queen. 

    He says: ‘If you have a situation where Harry and Meghan are earning huge amounts of money in Hollywood trading off their reputations, but then they’re also bolstering their reputations by working for the Queen – they’re able to present themselves on the world stage as being these working members of the royal family who are also available for a price.

    ‘That is a huge compromise to demand off the monarchy. If they were to be perceived to be promoting their commercial projects while representing the Queen, then that’s also… starting to border on corruption there because they should never be using the monarchy as a platform.’ 

    Royston adds: ‘The particular way in which Harry and Meghan crashed out of the Royal Family, firing hand grenades at Harry’s relatives, caused their reputation to be significantly damaged. 

    ‘And that has had a major impact on their capacity to make the world a better place because a lot of people just aren’t listening to them at all!’ 

    Royston also points out the huge cost of the Invictus games with the massive contribution by the German taxpayer and the expectation that public funds in the UK will have to support the games which are booked to be held in Birmingham in 2027.

    Describing it as ‘a huge amount of money and obviously falling on the taxpayer’, he said: ‘It’s going to be a big issue at the 2027 games which is in Birmingham, as Birmingham recently was driven to the verge of bankruptcy.’ 

    Experts have also called Harry and Meghan out for profiting off their royal reputation in the documentary. Pictured here is a grab from Harry: The Lost Prince

    Experts have also called Harry and Meghan out for profiting off their royal reputation in the documentary. Pictured here is a grab from Harry: The Lost Prince 

    Royston also refers to Harry and Meghan as now being ‘part of an elite in America’, leading lives which separate them even further from the Royal family. 

    Richard Mineards, one of the couple’s neighbours in Montecito, also appears, talking about the exclusive lifestyle that the couple enjoy in the area. 

    He says: ‘It doesn’t come cheap. I mean…most houses are about eight or nine million dollars.’ 

    But he added: ‘I personally don’t think that Meghan is an asset to our community… She doesn’t really go out or get involved with the community. 

    ‘Harry has to a certain extent, because he’s quite jolly…but Meghan doesn’t seem to get seen anywhere…. And you don’t see him either.’ 

    The documentary also features Royal biographer Angela Levin, talking about Harry’s dissatisfaction at ‘Megxit’, saying, ‘he didn’t get exactly what he wanted – that he could be half in the royal family and half out.’ 

    She explains in the programme: ‘But the late Queen who died said that actually doesn’t work and I don’t want you to use your position within the royal family to make money.’ 

    German journalist Dr Ulrike Grunewald, who directed the documentary, says: ‘What surprised me most was how ineffectively Harry and Meghan’s foundation is organised. 

    Harry and Meghan attended the 2023 Invictus Games - a paralympic tournament for wounded and injured veterans - that were held in Dusseldorf, Germany

    Harry and Meghan attended the 2023 Invictus Games – a paralympic tournament for wounded and injured veterans – that were held in Dusseldorf, Germany 

    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex pictured at the sitting volleyball final during day six of the Invictus Games in Dusseldorf on September 15, 2023

    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex pictured at the sitting volleyball final during day six of the Invictus Games in Dusseldorf on September 15, 2023

    ‘The amount of donations has fallen drastically in one year: from $13million in 2021 to $2million in 2022. According to their own documents, Harry and Meghan only work one hour a week for the Archewell Foundation.’ 

    Dai Davies, a former Head of Royal Protection and a Divisional Commander in the Metropolitan Police, also criticises Harry, accusing him of making others a target by detailing in his book how many Taliban fighters he had killed in his Apache helicopter.

    Davies says: ‘In his book, Spare, for him to disclose, as he did, that he had killed a number of Taliban was, in my opinion, totally unwise, because I was aware, as indeed he was, that the Taliban and various groups had put a price on his head.

     ‘And really, I think that price still remains, which could form a basis for him saying, well, I need security. 

    ‘If you open your big mouth, as he has collectively, that book, not just on that, but given away all kinds of secrets, then it’s not surprising that some people might regard you as a potential target.’ 

    Davies also accuses Harry of failing to mix much with ordinary people on what he describes as their ‘carefully orchestrated’ international trips. 

    He says: ‘In Colombia, although there are very rich people there, the vast majority, 85 per cent or 90 per cent, are very poor.

    ‘And what I’ve noticed of these tours, he mixes with the upper classes. He doesn’t really, apart from carefree orchestrated areas where he mixes with so-called the ‘normal people’ – well they’re not. 

    ‘These are carefully orchestrated campaigns as far as I can see… I look quite dispassionately at the evidence and the evidence I’ve seen is, it’s all about Harry and Meghan.   

    ‘It’s very little to do with an actual alleged rationale for going there.’ 

    Source link

  • Singaporean says, “It’s not just about the money but the lifestyle struggles in SG that’s making young couples think twice before having kids”

    Singaporean says, “It’s not just about the money but the lifestyle struggles in SG that’s making young couples think twice before having kids”

    SINGAPORE: A Singaporean took to social media to express why he thinks the birth rate in the country has been declining.

    In an anonymous post on the NUSWhispers Facebook page, the individual mentioned that while many people cite financial concerns as the main reason for not having children, he believes the issue goes beyond money.

    “Realistically, I feel that it’s not just about the money but the lifestyle in SG that’s making young couples think twice before having kids,” he said.

    He explained that while it is possible to have children on a modest budget, with a combined salary of around $4,000, it would require many sacrifices.

    Couples in this situation would struggle to provide their kids with a comfortable life, and managing everything without extra help would be a massive challenge, especially if both parents are working.

    “It is just logistically impossible or very challenging if both parents are working and do not have any external help, like no helper, not all have grandparents around to help or grandparents still working because retirement age has increased.”

    He also described the daily grind parents face nowadays: rushing to drop their kids off at childcare, working long hours, and then coming home to handle parenting duties, all while being sleep-deprived—especially with a baby who wakes up at night.

    He also pointed out how tough it is from the kid’s perspective.

    “Bringing them into the world only to spend 2-3 waking hours with parents on weekdays and then being left at infant care or childcare all day, especially when the child is not even 7 years old, [seems wrong] when they should be spending more time with family,” he opined.

    While he acknowledged the troubling decline in the birth rate, he expressed that it was even more disheartening to think about the lifestyle parents and children endure today.

    He also recognized that financial stability could make things easier—families with higher incomes can afford domestic help or a car—but he noted that most young couples don’t have such luxuries.

    “Some young couples may even have to delay childbirth because BTO takes 4+ years, or they have already drained their savings to buy resale flats and need to save before having kids,” he said.

    “Well, please try to convince me that I should have kids; I really need some reasons to,” he wrote, unconvinced that anyone even could.

    “Throughout human history, having kids has never been an economic decision.”

    In the comments section, many netizens weighed in with their thoughts, some agreeing with the Singaporean’s concerns and others offering different perspectives.

    One netizen, a father of four, said, “In my opinion, if you are not ready, then don’t. If you are ready, then do. I have seen people with all the right scores finding 1000 excuses not to.

    On the flip side, I have seen people seemingly not having the right score finding 1000 reasons to have children. To me, it is a matter of commitment.”

    Another commented, “Ultimately, it’s all about personal choice. Kids are just part of our life. Whatever reasons a person has to or does not have kids are personal. Others have no right to criticize their choice.

    So you be you, why bother about others? Just live your own life. Cheers.”

    A third said, “The excuse that there is not enough money to raise kids is untrue. Throughout human history, having kids has never been an economic decision.

    Otherwise, we would see that couples are more likely to have kids when income increases; this is not the case, and the trend is in fact the opposite.”

    Singapore’s fertility rate

    Singapore’s fertility rate has dropped below 1.0, and despite the government’s efforts to reverse this trend with a range of attractive incentives—including the Baby Bonus Cash worth up to S$13,000 and extended paternity leave—many locals are still on the fence or outright rejecting the idea of having kids.

    In an online forum, some locals have been vocal about why. Commonly cited factors include a lack of parental instinct, concerns about unstable career prospects, and the high cost of living.

    Read more: High cost of living listed as one of the reasons some Singaporeans don’t plan to have kids

    Featured image by Freepik (for illustration purposes only)







    Source link

  • Singaporean says, “It’s not just about the money but the lifestyle struggles in SG that’s making young couples think twice before having kids”

    Singaporean says, “It’s not just about the money but the lifestyle struggles in SG that’s making young couples think twice before having kids”

    SINGAPORE: A Singaporean took to social media to express why he thinks the birth rate in the country has been declining.

    In an anonymous post on the NUSWhispers Facebook page, the individual mentioned that while many people cite financial concerns as the main reason for not having children, he believes the issue goes beyond money.

    “Realistically, I feel that it’s not just about the money but the lifestyle in SG that’s making young couples think twice before having kids,” he said.

    He explained that while it is possible to have children on a modest budget, with a combined salary of around $4,000, it would require many sacrifices.

    Couples in this situation would struggle to provide their kids with a comfortable life, and managing everything without extra help would be a massive challenge, especially if both parents are working.

    “It is just logistically impossible or very challenging if both parents are working and do not have any external help, like no helper, not all have grandparents around to help or grandparents still working because retirement age has increased.”

    He also described the daily grind parents face nowadays: rushing to drop their kids off at childcare, working long hours, and then coming home to handle parenting duties, all while being sleep-deprived—especially with a baby who wakes up at night.

    He also pointed out how tough it is from the kid’s perspective.

    “Bringing them into the world only to spend 2-3 waking hours with parents on weekdays and then being left at infant care or childcare all day, especially when the child is not even 7 years old, [seems wrong] when they should be spending more time with family,” he opined.

    While he acknowledged the troubling decline in the birth rate, he expressed that it was even more disheartening to think about the lifestyle parents and children endure today.

    He also recognized that financial stability could make things easier—families with higher incomes can afford domestic help or a car—but he noted that most young couples don’t have such luxuries.

    “Some young couples may even have to delay childbirth because BTO takes 4+ years, or they have already drained their savings to buy resale flats and need to save before having kids,” he said.

    “Well, please try to convince me that I should have kids; I really need some reasons to,” he wrote, unconvinced that anyone even could.

    “Throughout human history, having kids has never been an economic decision.”

    In the comments section, many netizens weighed in with their thoughts, some agreeing with the Singaporean’s concerns and others offering different perspectives.

    One netizen, a father of four, said, “In my opinion, if you are not ready, then don’t. If you are ready, then do. I have seen people with all the right scores finding 1000 excuses not to.

    On the flip side, I have seen people seemingly not having the right score finding 1000 reasons to have children. To me, it is a matter of commitment.”

    Another commented, “Ultimately, it’s all about personal choice. Kids are just part of our life. Whatever reasons a person has to or does not have kids are personal. Others have no right to criticize their choice.

    So you be you, why bother about others? Just live your own life. Cheers.”

    A third said, “The excuse that there is not enough money to raise kids is untrue. Throughout human history, having kids has never been an economic decision.

    Otherwise, we would see that couples are more likely to have kids when income increases; this is not the case, and the trend is in fact the opposite.”

    Singapore’s fertility rate

    Singapore’s fertility rate has dropped below 1.0, and despite the government’s efforts to reverse this trend with a range of attractive incentives—including the Baby Bonus Cash worth up to S$13,000 and extended paternity leave—many locals are still on the fence or outright rejecting the idea of having kids.

    In an online forum, some locals have been vocal about why. Commonly cited factors include a lack of parental instinct, concerns about unstable career prospects, and the high cost of living.

    Read more: High cost of living listed as one of the reasons some Singaporeans don’t plan to have kids

    Featured image by Freepik (for illustration purposes only)







    Source link

  • When breastfeeding affects a couple’s sex life

    When breastfeeding affects a couple’s sex life

    It has been three years now. Agnes walked into the clinic with her husband carrying her new bundle of joy – Baby Barack. Her story crossed my mind as I reflected on October, which is breast cancer awareness month.

    “We are not sick, we just wanted your opinion on an important decision we have made,” declared Agnes as she took her seat, positioning the baby delicately on her lap as her husband, John, wiped a tinge of sweat from her face and positioned a small pillow he was carrying behind her back on the seat.

    “Are you comfortable, sweetie?” John asked with genuine concern, pecking her cheeks. This couple was truly in love. They had been married for 12 months. Baby Barack was their first and they were just beginning to come to terms with the responsibilities of parenthood. For the few days they had been with the baby at home following discharge from hospital, they made phone calls two to three times a day asking questions about the baby, as well as Agnes’ recovery.

    “So tell me about the important decision you have made Agnes to stop your job and care for the baby?” I asked to draw their attention back to the discussion.

    “Well, not really,” John answered. “It is about bolingo. We don’t want the baby to interfere.”

    “Bolingo? That sounds Congolese, and I am not sure what it means,” I said, looking at both of them in the face.

    “Doctor, he means that Barack is interfering with our sex life,” Agnes threw the bombshell. “And we have made some decisions to stop him.”

    The story was that the couple had tried to fondle and caress in the few days after coming from the hospital. Agnes had a lot of milk, and anytime John got close, he was washed in it. They both felt bad.

    “And if anything, continued breastfeeding is going to make her breasts sag, and that is not what we want,” said John.

    The couple had therefore decided to stop breastfeeding.

    “You can’t be serious!” I exclaimed spontaneously.

    For healthy growth, it is recommended that mothers commence breastfeeding within one hour of delivery and that they give nothing else, not even water, to the baby until six months of age. Weaning starts in the sixth month but goes hand in hand with breastfeeding until the baby is two years old. Mothers can stop breastfeeding at two years but are free to continue if they so wish.

    For working mothers, the recommendation is that they express their breast milk and leave it at home with the nanny to be given to the baby in her absence. Going back to work should therefore not deprive the baby of breast milk. In fact, good employers now have breastfeeding corners in the workplace, and mothers can take breastfeeding breaks.

    Recommendations for breastfeeding are based on solid scientific evidence that shows that breast milk, in addition to providing nutrients for growth, helps children fight common infections, reduces allergies in all stages of life, and helps mother and baby to bond, which is important in the social growth of the baby.

    Breastfed children also have lower incidences of obesity and diabetes later in life. Breastfeeding therefore not only gives the baby a good start in life but also determines the future well-being and productivity of individuals.

    The mother too has benefits. Women who breastfeed have a reduced incidence of breast cancer, a leading cause of death in women. Further, depression is less common in women who have breastfed. Brittle bones, also called osteoporosis, which is a common cause of fractures in old age, are more common in women who have not breastfed.

    “But doctor what about bolingo, or don’t you think it is important?” John asked, appearing disappointed.

    The importance of sex and intimacy in marriage cannot be overemphasised. It is not only healthy for the couple but also benefits and promotes good growth of the baby. Couples must, however, learn ways of enjoying romance that do not interfere with the well-being of the baby and the mother.

    One way to handle the flow of milk in intimacy is to put on a padded bra. The milk gets absorbed into the pad and the couple can have a good time.

    “Sir but the breasts will sag if Agnes breastfeeds,” insisted John.

    Well, with or without breastfeeding, the breasts will sag. It is a growth and age issue. Tissues loosen as age catches up with women and the breasts just sag. In fact, depending on a woman’s breast size, the sagging can happen very early in life. Men who love their wives look beyond the sagging of breasts.

    “John I think we can do with breastfeeding, I am ready to spice up things for you in other ways so that we protect the health of Barack,” Agnes said, reaching for John’s hand.

    “And just make sure you give yourself time to recover before active, penetrative sex,” I added. It is recommended that women wait for six weeks after delivery before resuming sex. This is important for the recovery of tissues around the birth canal that suffer trauma during delivery.

    Source link