hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibom girişgalabetBakırköy Escortcasibom9018betgit casinomarsbahismatbet girişcasibomlink 5k depositjojobetonwinmatbetalobet

Tag: cracking

  • NCAA cracking down on weapon gestures toward opponents in college football

    NCAA cracking down on weapon gestures toward opponents in college football

    COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — College football is on high alert for players flashing make-believe guns at an opponent.

    That happened Saturday when freshman edge rusher Dylan Stewart, who sacked Mississippi quarterback Jaxson Dart for a loss of eight yards on third down, stood over him and pretended to shoot his opponent with a repeating firearm.

    Stewart was called for unsportsmanlike conduct and South Carolina was penalized 15 yards.

    The flag did not deter Stewart, who celebrated the same way — he got off three shots of his pretend shotgun — a few minutes later after stopping Rebels runner Matt Jones for a 4-yard loss. No penalty was called on that play.

    At Minnesota, defensive back Justin Walley broke up a pass in his team’s 24-17 win over then-No. 11 Southern California, then lifted up his shirt as if he were showing a handgun sticking out of his waistband.

    Walley was flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct for what the official said was “simulating brandishing a gun.”

    “There’s a list of automatic unsportsmanlike conduct fouls. One of them in our rule book is simulating firing of a weapon,” Steve Shaw, the NCAA’s national coordinator of officials, told The Associated Press by phone Tuesday. “That’s not really a judgement call.”

    It seems like a case of bad judgement by the players who consider those actions when they celebrate. The incidents show the NCAA sending a message to keep violence, even the pretend kind, out of its game.

    “We’re starting to see, I hate to say it, but more and more of it,” Shaw said. “We’re just trying to say that’s not acceptable. Gun violence is not acceptable in our game.”

    It can be difficult to get that message to young players like Stewart, who turned 19 last month and has had an immediate impact on the Gamecocks’ defense. He’s had 3.5 sacks and 5.5 tackles behind the line of scrimmage in his first five college games.

    Such displays are sometimes seen in the NFL. Jets receiver Allen Lazard was penalized for firing finger guns after a first-down catch against Denver two weeks ago. He was also fined $14,069 for “unsportsmanlike conduct for a violent gesture,” according to the NFL.

    South Carolina coach Shane Beamer said he spoke with Stewart after the penalty and he’s talked with all his players about reducing pre-snap and post-play infractions.

    The gesture was “unacceptable,” Beamer said “And Dylan Stewart feels awful about that play. Dylan Stewart’s a really good kid, and Dylan Stewart’s mom feels awful about that play.”

    Minnesota coach P.J. Fleck said at his weekly news conference that he tells his players to celebrate with teammates and not leave themselves open to an officials’ interpretation of their actions.

    “In our world right now, we’re talking about everybody should express themselves, rightfully so,” Fleck said. “Sometimes we’re flagging a particular move, sometimes we’re not. Our whole thing to counter that is don’t leave it up to somebody to interpret something the wrong way.”

    Dart, who leads the Southeastern Conference in passing, responded to Stewart’s fake shooting on social media, quoting late rapper Young Dolph’s song, “100 Shots.”

    “How the … you miss a whole hunnid shots?” Dart said, using a line from the song after the Rebels’ 27-3 victory.

    Shaw said players have to understand they can celebrate in creative ways after big plays. He after the NCAA penalized the throat slash gesture, some players turned to a simulated nose wipe, which is not against the rules.

    NCAA spokesman Greg Johnson said Shaw recently sent around a reminder in mid-September to conferences and their football officials to emphasize treating weapon gestures as penalties.

    “This was done with the goal of this rule being officiated consistently on a national basis,” Johnson said.

    Beamer said he’ll keep any punishment for Stewart inside South Carolina’s football building. Young people make mistakes, he said, and that’s when you help them make the right decisions going forward.

    “It’s our job to help,” Beamer said, “like a parent would do with a child.”

    ___

    Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football



    Source link

  • California law cracking down on election deepfakes by AI to be tested

    California law cracking down on election deepfakes by AI to be tested

    SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California now has some of the toughest laws in the United States to crack down on election deepfakes ahead of the 2024 election after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed three landmark proposals this week at an artificial intelligence conference in San Francisco.

    The state could be among the first to test out such legislation, which bans the use of AI to create false images and videos in political ads close to Election Day.

    State lawmakers in more than a dozen states have advanced similar proposals after the emergence of AI began supercharging the threat of election disinformation worldwide, with the new California law being the most sweeping in scope. It targets not only materials that could affect how people vote but also any videos and images that could misrepresent election integrity. The law also covers materials depicting election workers and voting machines, not just political candidates.

    Among the three law signed by Newsom on Tuesday, only one takes effect immediately to prevent deepfakes surrounding the 2024 election. It makes it illegal to create and publish false materials related to elections 120 days before Election Day and 60 days thereafter. It also allows courts to stop the distribution of the materials, and violators could face civil penalties. The law exempts parody and satire.

    The goal, Newsom and lawmakers said, is to prevent the erosion of public trust in U.S. elections amid a “fraught political climate.”

    The legislation is already drawing fierce criticism from free speech advocates and social media platform operators.

    Elon Musk, owner of the social media platform X, called the new California law unconstitutional and an infringement on the First Amendment.

    Hours after they were signed into law, Musk on Tuesday night elevated a post on X sharing an AI-generated video featuring altered audios of Vice President and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. His post of another deepfake featuring Harris prompted Newsom to vow to pass legislation cracking down on the practice in July.

    “The governor of California just made this parody video illegal in violation of the Constitution of the United States. Would be a shame if it went viral,” Musk wrote of the AI-generated video, which has the caption identifying the video as a parody.

    But it’s not clear how effective these laws are in stopping election deepfakes, said Ilana Beller of Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization. The group tracks state legislation related to election deepfakes.

    None of the law has been tested in a courtroom, Beller said.

    The law’s effectiveness could be blunted by the slowness of the courts against a technology that can produce fake images for political ads and disseminate them at warp speed.

    It could take several days for a court to order injunctive relief to stop the distribution of the content, and by then, damages to a candidate or to an election could have been already done, Beller said.

    “In an ideal world, we’d be able to take the content down the second it goes up,” she said. “Because the sooner you can take down the content, the less people see it, the less people proliferate it through reposts and the like, and the quicker you’re able to dispel it.”

    Still, having such a law on the books could serve as a deterrent for potential violations, she said.

    Newsom’s office didn’t immediately respond to questions about whether Musk’s post violated the new state law.

    Assemblymember Gail Pellerin, author of the law, wasn’t immediately available Wednesday to comment.

    Newsom on Tuesday also signed two other laws, built upon some of the first-in-the-nation legislation targeting election deepfakes enacted in California in 2019, to require campaigns to start disclosing AI-generated materials and mandate online platforms, like X, to remove the deceptive material. Those laws will take effect next year, after the 2024 election.

    Source link