hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobet

Tag: Debate

  • “Rs 430 For Coke, Rs 720 For Popcorn” – Viral Post On Cinema Food Prices Sparks Online Debate

    “Rs 430 For Coke, Rs 720 For Popcorn” – Viral Post On Cinema Food Prices Sparks Online Debate

    Over the past few years, the cost of food and drink at cinema halls seems to have risen sharply. This has often concerned moviegoers who remain loyal patrons of watching films on the big screen. Recently, an X post on the topic sparked a fresh debate online. X user Aditya Shah posted a screengrab of the prices of some items at an unnamed theatre, as listed on Book My Show. He wondered aloud about who was paying such high prices at these locations. In the caption, he wrote, “Book My Show has some crazy rates for food in theatres. Rs 430 for Coke, Rs 720 for Popcorn. I mean who orders this food at such obnoxious prices?”
    Also Read: This Company Serves You Food Shown In Films As You Watch Them

    The screenshot also shows the price of 80g of Nachos with 50g of Cheese Dip listed as Rs 400. The rate for Masala Coke goes up to Rs 540, for the 810 ml option. The Jumbo Cheese Popcorn (240g) is priced at Rs 720. Take a look below:

    The viral post has received a lot of interest online. A person pointed out that the base prices are not set by Book My Show but by the theatres themselves. Several people felt that the prices were steep. A few users claimed that they are responsible for lower footfall in cinemas. Others suggested possible reasons why some would be ready to pay whatever the cost. Check out some of the reactions from X below:

    NDTV Food reached out to Book My Show for a comment, but they have not yet responded.
    Also Read:How The Humble Popcorn Became The World’s Go-To Movie Snack



    Source link

  • John Oliver Scorches ‘Colossal Dips**t’ JD Vance Following ‘Civil’ Debate Talk

    John Oliver Scorches ‘Colossal Dips**t’ JD Vance Following ‘Civil’ Debate Talk

    Last Week Tonight” host John Oliver didn’t hold back on Sunday as he slammed JD Vance and questioned those “complimenting” the Ohio senator’s “civil tone” following his debate with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.

    Oliver pointed to special counsel Jack Smith’s 165-page brief describing the “ridiculous steps” Donald Trump took to avoid leaving office in 2020 before turning to the GOP nominee’s vice presidential pick.

    “If he loses next month, there is every reason to believe Trump will dispute the results again and Vance has made it clear he’s got no problem with that and that alone should be disqualifying,” Oliver argued.

    “For all the talk this week of his civility at the debate, let’s not forget deep down he’s the same colossal dipshit who spews right-wing hate with distressing ease and continues to defend the big lie that the last election was stolen.”

    Oliver, earlier in the program, tossed to clips of several commentators who described the tone of the debate as “polite” and “refreshing.”

    “Why do manners matter here? The debate included discussions on how to carry out mass deportations and whether women should have control over their own bodies. Etiquette is kind of besides the point,” Oliver said.

    “It’s like reading a ransom note and going, this cursive is just so lovely. Look at the capital Y in ‘You have 24 hours before he dies.’ There are still some people who were raised right.”

    He cited Vance spewing “bigoted bullshit” at an event hosted by far-right Christian nationalist Lance Wallnau and offering “revisionist history” on Trump toward the end of the debate.

    “Did he lose the 2020 election?” Walz asked Vance of Trump during the debate.

    “Tim, I’m focused on the future,” began Vance in a response that his opponent described as a “damning non-answer.”

    Support Free Journalism

    Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

    Support HuffPost

    Oliver later used Vance’s words against him.

    “I’m focused on the future, specifically, one in which in four weeks time, Trump hopefully loses this fucking election,” the host said.

    Support Free Journalism

    Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

    Support HuffPost

    Source link

  • The Great Veg Biryani Debate: Is It Truly Just A Fancy Pulao? Separating Facts From Fiction

    The Great Veg Biryani Debate: Is It Truly Just A Fancy Pulao? Separating Facts From Fiction

    “Veg Biryani – what a joke! It is just a fancy pulao.” Well, you are not alone. The battle for veg biryani’s existence has been there for years now, and people across India stand divided in their stance regarding vegetable biryani and pulao. If you have been confused your entire life, then dear reader, we are here to settle this once and for all. Veg biryani and pulao are not the same! In fact, in this article, we will delve deep to help you understand the differences between the two dishes, establishing them as entirely dissimilar delicacies. Read on.

    What Is Veg Biryani? Are Veg Biryani And Biryani The Same?

    As per historians, the word biryani comes from the Persian terms ‘birian’ and ‘birinj,’ which mean ‘fried before cooking’ and ‘rice,’ respectively. Over the years, biryani in India saw various regional modifications in terms of ingredients and spices. But what remained common was rice, sauteed meat, and a lot of flavours.

    With increasing popularity, another version of biryani that came into being is veg biryani, made with long-grain rice (preferably basmati), lots of vegetables, herbs, and the quintessential biryani masala.

    What Is Pulao? Can Pulao Be Non-Vegetarian?

    According to ‘Indian Food Tradition: A Historical Companion’ by food historian K.T Achaya, Mahabharata mentions an instance of rice and meat cooked together, which is referred to as ‘pulao’ or ‘pallao.’ The Oxford Dictionary weighs in; pulao is quite similar to the Turkish ‘pilaf,’ and this variant includes meat in the dish.

    However, in India, the vegetarian version of pulao gained more popularity, making it a staple in the cuisine. A traditional Indian pulao is a one-pot meal made using aromatic rice, ghee, spices, dry fruits, and vegetables of your choice.
    Also Read:6 Mouthwatering Veg Biryani Recipes Perfect For Your Festive Feasts

    Add image caption here

    Photo Credit: iStock

    Veg Biryani Vs. Pulao: What Are The Differences?

    1. Origin:

    As mentioned earlier, biryani has a Persian origin and comes from the terms ‘birian’ and ‘birinj.’ Whereas, if we go by historian K.T Achaya’s theory, pulao may find its origin in ancient India.

    2. Cooking Process:

    Pulao is a one-pot meal, where all the ingredients are cooked together and then boiled to perfection. Whereas to make biryani, you need to use the ‘dum’ technique to infuse all the flavours together. Here, the vegetables/meat and rice are cooked separately and then put on dum for flavour and texture. However, there’s a variation called kacchi biryani, where the rice is cooked with all other ingredients, following the one-pot cooking process.

    3. Ingredients:

    Both veg biryani and pulao need rice, spices, and vegetables. But if you dive in deep, you will find a huge difference in the spice concoction. While biryani spices are strong and aromatic, spices used for pulao are milder. Experts prefer using whole spices to prepare pulao.

    4. Taste:

    To put it simply, biryani makes for a wholesome meal by itself. You can have it as is or pair it with condiments like raita, salan, or burani to cleanse the palate. Whereas, for a traditional pulao, you need some gravy-based dish on the sides to put together a complete meal.

    5. Texture:

    Pulao typically has a more uniform texture, with the rice grains remaining separate from each other. Whereas, due to the heavy use of spices, biryani often gets mushier and binds together all the vegetables and spices.

    Now that you know the differences between veg biryani and pulao, we suggest savouring both dishes separately to enjoy the flavours to the fullest. Click here for a veg biryani recipe. Click here for a traditional pulao recipe.

    Source link

  • Walz Attends Michigan-Minnesota College Football Game Before Final Prep For Tuesday’s Debate

    Walz Attends Michigan-Minnesota College Football Game Before Final Prep For Tuesday’s Debate

    ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) — Tim Walz’s dual role as Minnesota’s governor and Vice President Kamala Harris’ running mate was on full display Saturday as he attended a tailgate with Michigan football fans before going on the field to meet with Minnesota’s coach.

    Walz visited Ann Arbor to watch the University of Michigan University of Minnesota teams play in what is expected to be his final major campaign appearance before Tuesday’s vice presidential debate.

    Earlier in the day, Walz was greeted at the airport by University of Michigan students, who had arrived in a bus donning a banner that read “Put Me In, Coach!” Michigan won the game against Walz’s homestate school. Walz has leaned into his background as a football coach and teacher while on the campaign trail as the Democrats look to drum up enthusiasm among young voters, with Walz having made multiple recent visits to university campuses.

    The visit comes before the debate on Tuesday between Walz and Donald Trump’s running mate, Republican Sen. JD Vance of Ohio. After Saturday’s game, Walz will travel to northern Michigan for final debate prep before the faceoff, according to a person familiar with his plans who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private preparations.

    Harris, meanwhile, held a fundraiser in San Francisco on Saturday, telling a crowd full of raucous supporters that “so much is on the line in this election,” as she talked about abortion bans in states and the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision that granted broad immunity to presidents.

    “I am convinced,” she said. “The American people are convinced that it is time to turn the page.”

    She said the American people were ready for “leadership that is optimistic,” and that’s why her supporters, including Republicans like Dick Cheney “are supporting our campaign because they want an American president who works for all the American people.”

    Trump held a rally Saturday in Wisconsin, and was also headed to attend a college football game, too — the prime-time matchup between Georgia and Alabama in Tuscaloosa. The Harris campaign launched a new ad to air during the game that needles Trump on the prospect of a second presidential debate. Harris has said she would; Trump has ruled it out.

    Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has been playing the role of Vance in Walz’s debate prep sessions, which so far have taken place at a downtown Minneapolis hotel, according to another person who also spoke on condition of anonymity.

    Michigan is one of the key battleground states in November’s presidential election. While Harris has made multiple visits to Detroit since launching her campaign in July, Walz has focused his efforts on other areas of the state, including a recent trip to Grand Rapids, Michigan’s second-largest city.

    “No one is winning this state right now,” Democratic Rep. Debbie Dingell of Michigan told reporters just before Walz’s arrival Saturday. “We are a purple state. Donald Trump hasn’t won this state and Kamala Harris hasn’t won this state.”

    Walz has continued to engage with young voters in the campaign, including a recent visit to Michigan State University. In 2022, Michigan saw the highest youth voter turnout rate nationwide as Democrats made historic gains in the state. Energizing similar voters could be crucial for Harris this year.

    Following the vice presidential debate, Walz and Harris will campaign together on a bus tour through central Pennsylvania.

    AP writers Will Weissert in San Francsico and Meg Kinnard in South Carolina contributed to this report.

    Support Free Journalism

    Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

    Support HuffPost

    Source link

  • Roland Duchatelet & Matt Southall name-dropped in Addicks regret debate

    Roland Duchatelet & Matt Southall name-dropped in Addicks regret debate

    This article is part of Football League World’s ‘Terrace Talk’ series, which provides personal opinions from our FLW Fan Pundits regarding the latest breaking news, teams, players, managers, potential signings and more…




    Charlton Athletic have made a promising start to the new League One season as they eye a push for promotion.

    The Addicks are in their fifth consecutive campaign in the third tier of English football, having suffered relegation in 2020 from the Championship.

    The south London outfit have spent eight of the last nine years at the level, having gone straight back down after their 2019 promotion to the Championship.

    It has been a difficult period of time for the club, with many ownership changes and off-field issues holding them back.

    Nathan Jones though will be hoping he is the man to bring the club back to the second tier this year, with the backing of current owners SE7 Partners, which includes ex-Sunderland chief Charlie Methven.


    Charlton Athletic: Past ownership groups seen as significant club regret

    roland duchatelet


    When asked what the club’s biggest regret to this day is, FLW’sCharlton fan pundit Ben Fleming claimed that sales to the wrong owners really set them back.

    He believes that the initial sale to Roland Duchatelet was the beginning of the string of bad ownership moves by the club, and that followed on with the likes of Matt Southall and East Street Investments.

    “It’s tough to pinpoint a transfer or a managerial appointment, we’ve had quite a few average managerial appointments in the year, so I’m not necessarily sure there’s one that sticks out as particularly bad or worse than the other,”Fleming told Football League World.

    “I think if you look at what’s held us back, it’s pretty obvious that it’s been off-field stuff – ownership issues and not doing our due diligence in terms of who took over the club.


    “So I would have to say that whether it’s Duchatelet coming in and not putting the funds into the club, or Tahnoon Nimer and Matt Southall coming in – East Street Investments and the absolute shambles that they were.

    “Even Thomas Sandgaard coming in and promising the world, and not being able to deliver and him moving on.

    “I think off-field things are going to be more what marred, or has marred our recent progress.

    “The owners are the club, so that’s something that the club regrets because each time the owner was looking to sell and they probably didn’t do their due diligence.

    “Maybe the original owners (Michael Slater) who sold to Duchatalet will come to regret that – maybe they do now.”

    Charlton Athletic ownership issues have held them back for too long

    Charlton’s biggest issues have all stemmed from mismanagement behind the scenes, with supporters really being put through it time and time again.


    Duchatelet offered promise when arriving in 2014, but it soon turned into disaster, relegation and claims from the Belgian that some fans wanted the club to fail – he eventually sold to East Street Investments after a six-year stint, which involved the aforementioned Nimer and Southall, but that also ended in disaster, and was doomed to fail after just a couple of months.

    Sandgaard meanwhile was an ambitious man, but he couldn’t get the best out of the Addicks either following his takeover in September 2020, but it’s hard to put him in the same bracket as the previous custodians.

    Now though, the signs are positive that Charlton are now finally back on the right track, but the path to get there was arduous and stressful.

    Jones was a strong appointment from SE7 Partners last season, with the Welshman having valuable experience in the EFL.

    But it will be a competitive League One season, so the push for promotion will require the team to be at their very best every week.



    Source link

  • How TikTok phenomenon “Ballerina Farm” sparked debate over “trad wife” lifestyle

    How TikTok phenomenon “Ballerina Farm” sparked debate over “trad wife” lifestyle

    TikTok, a popular social media app, has hosted its fair share of controversial videos uploaded by users, resulting in backlash, debates and criticism towards those individuals.

    Hannah Neeleman, more commonly known as “Ballerina Farm” on TikTok and other social media platforms, was no exception.

    Neeleman is known for being a content creator who uploads videos showcasing her life on her farm, raising her children and cooking meals for her family.

    However, after being interviewed by a journalist for The Times, a British newspaper, an article was released about her life and the number of Neeleman’s content views soared.

    Many users weren’t pleased with her lifestyle. They started to spread criticism and start controversies on her TikTok videos, creating immense backlash towards Neeleman and her family. 

    But why did Ballerina Farm suddenly become the center of controversy after the release of the article?

    Journalism sophomore Nanthana Chenthil said she thinks the backlash stems from new viewers who harbor different opinions on Neeleman’s lifestyle.

    “I think the reason it was such a big deal is because it kind of broke a look that they had, and it just kind of changed everything up,” Chenthil said. “Because they were like really famous and well known (before), I think it caused so much controversy because a lot of people who consumed Ballerina Farm’s content were people who were interested in that kind of lifestyle. This issue just brought a lot of more people with different opinions into the conversation as well.”

    Communication leadership and strategy senior Sumeya Osman said Ballerina Farm received much criticism on their videos because people view traditional, or “trad”, wives negatively. 

    “I think when she started to gain her popularity, people kind of start to see that as like ‘oh no, she’s trying to, like, destroy feminism and women being separate from men,’ compared to how she’s like, you know, trad wife, cooking for her kids” Osman said.

    Journalism graduate student Kaili Malts said that she believes there are multiple reasons why Ballerina Farm rapidly rose to fame, ultimately causing backlash from viewers. 

    Malts said Neeleman’s ability to create everything from scratch, holding traditional family values that are considered non-traditional today and uploading certain content are a few reasons why Neeleman has been the center of controversy.

    Although the concept of traditional “trad” wives has been around longer than Ballerina Farm, why has Neeleman’s content specifically sparked debate surrounding gender roles and the way of living?

    Chenthil said the controversy was fueled by Neeleman’s personal background.

    “I do think it’s a little different considering the lady (Neeleman’s) background because she was a professional dancer and she did have life goals, and she had a plan and a vision, and that whole family, they’re pretty open about how he (Daniel Neeleman) met her and how he, like, took her away from what her plan was and changed her entire life plan” Chenthil said. 

    For Malts, she said the controversy was caused by Neeleman’s way of living and the choice to upload videos showcasing her life.

    “In my opinion, it’s because it’s kind of glamorizing the idea that women need to be in the kitchen and women need to work and raise their children and all that instead of shedding light to the fact that this was the reality for so many women, so many for such a long time, and that women were oppressed into doing stuff like that” Malts said.

    However, with Neeleman sharing her day-to-day life on social media pages, Osman said that Ballerina Farm itself represents the negatives of the “trad” wife lifestyle.

    Chenthil said Ballerina Farm represents the expectations that society has for women.

    “I think it does represent, like while things are changing, what women are expected to do at the end of the day is to settle down,” Chentil said. “I do think that Ballerina Farm, she does kind of represent, like, how things are changing and growing and getting like better, in a sense, but at the end of the day, it’s still not as good as it should be.”

    Support student media!
    Please consider donating to The State News and help fund the future of journalism.

    Based on Neeleman’s content and way of living, Osman said the way individuals view gender roles are based on culture.

    “I think it goes back to culture and what we grew up on, what we grew up around,” Osman said. “Like, if you grew up with both your parents working, then you’re gonna have very different views compared to if you have a mom who stays home and a dad who works. If you just come from a culture where you have that dynamic, you’re from a completely different background than someone else who might (not).”

    Similarly, Chenthil said that personal views on gender roles are decided by the environment people are living in.

    “I think it’s based on the environment someone not only grew up around in, but also chooses like actively to put themselves in,” Chenthil said. “Everyone’s life experiences are very different; what they experience themselves, what they see other people experience, and how they take in what other people experience.”

    Ultimately, even with different lifestyles becoming popularized by social media apps, Malts said it’s up to the individual to choose how they want to live.

    “I don’t think there’s a right way of living,” Malts said. “I think that everyone should do what they want.”

    Discussion

    Share and discuss “How TikTok phenomenon “Ballerina Farm” sparked debate over “trad wife” lifestyle” on social media.

    Source link

  • How TikTok phenomenon “Ballerina Farm” sparked debate over “trad wife” lifestyle

    How TikTok phenomenon “Ballerina Farm” sparked debate over “trad wife” lifestyle

    TikTok, a popular social media app, has hosted its fair share of controversial videos uploaded by users, resulting in backlash, debates and criticism towards those individuals.

    Hannah Neeleman, more commonly known as “Ballerina Farm” on TikTok and other social media platforms, was no exception.

    Neeleman is known for being a content creator who uploads videos showcasing her life on her farm, raising her children and cooking meals for her family.

    However, after being interviewed by a journalist for The Times, a British newspaper, an article was released about her life and the number of Neeleman’s content views soared.

    Many users weren’t pleased with her lifestyle. They started to spread criticism and start controversies on her TikTok videos, creating immense backlash towards Neeleman and her family. 

    But why did Ballerina Farm suddenly become the center of controversy after the release of the article?

    Journalism sophomore Nanthana Chenthil said she thinks the backlash stems from new viewers who harbor different opinions on Neeleman’s lifestyle.

    “I think the reason it was such a big deal is because it kind of broke a look that they had, and it just kind of changed everything up,” Chenthil said. “Because they were like really famous and well known (before), I think it caused so much controversy because a lot of people who consumed Ballerina Farm’s content were people who were interested in that kind of lifestyle. This issue just brought a lot of more people with different opinions into the conversation as well.”

    Communication leadership and strategy senior Sumeya Osman said Ballerina Farm received much criticism on their videos because people view traditional, or “trad”, wives negatively. 

    “I think when she started to gain her popularity, people kind of start to see that as like ‘oh no, she’s trying to, like, destroy feminism and women being separate from men,’ compared to how she’s like, you know, trad wife, cooking for her kids” Osman said.

    Journalism graduate student Kaili Malts said that she believes there are multiple reasons why Ballerina Farm rapidly rose to fame, ultimately causing backlash from viewers. 

    Malts said Neeleman’s ability to create everything from scratch, holding traditional family values that are considered non-traditional today and uploading certain content are a few reasons why Neeleman has been the center of controversy.

    Although the concept of traditional “trad” wives has been around longer than Ballerina Farm, why has Neeleman’s content specifically sparked debate surrounding gender roles and the way of living?

    Chenthil said the controversy was fueled by Neeleman’s personal background.

    “I do think it’s a little different considering the lady (Neeleman’s) background because she was a professional dancer and she did have life goals, and she had a plan and a vision, and that whole family, they’re pretty open about how he (Daniel Neeleman) met her and how he, like, took her away from what her plan was and changed her entire life plan” Chenthil said. 

    For Malts, she said the controversy was caused by Neeleman’s way of living and the choice to upload videos showcasing her life.

    “In my opinion, it’s because it’s kind of glamorizing the idea that women need to be in the kitchen and women need to work and raise their children and all that instead of shedding light to the fact that this was the reality for so many women, so many for such a long time, and that women were oppressed into doing stuff like that” Malts said.

    However, with Neeleman sharing her day-to-day life on social media pages, Osman said that Ballerina Farm itself represents the negatives of the “trad” wife lifestyle.

    Chenthil said Ballerina Farm represents the expectations that society has for women.

    “I think it does represent, like while things are changing, what women are expected to do at the end of the day is to settle down,” Chentil said. “I do think that Ballerina Farm, she does kind of represent, like, how things are changing and growing and getting like better, in a sense, but at the end of the day, it’s still not as good as it should be.”

    Support student media!
    Please consider donating to The State News and help fund the future of journalism.

    Based on Neeleman’s content and way of living, Osman said the way individuals view gender roles are based on culture.

    “I think it goes back to culture and what we grew up on, what we grew up around,” Osman said. “Like, if you grew up with both your parents working, then you’re gonna have very different views compared to if you have a mom who stays home and a dad who works. If you just come from a culture where you have that dynamic, you’re from a completely different background than someone else who might (not).”

    Similarly, Chenthil said that personal views on gender roles are decided by the environment people are living in.

    “I think it’s based on the environment someone not only grew up around in, but also chooses like actively to put themselves in,” Chenthil said. “Everyone’s life experiences are very different; what they experience themselves, what they see other people experience, and how they take in what other people experience.”

    Ultimately, even with different lifestyles becoming popularized by social media apps, Malts said it’s up to the individual to choose how they want to live.

    “I don’t think there’s a right way of living,” Malts said. “I think that everyone should do what they want.”

    Discussion

    Share and discuss “How TikTok phenomenon “Ballerina Farm” sparked debate over “trad wife” lifestyle” on social media.

    Source link

  • China-linked ‘Spamouflage’ network mimics Americans to sway US political debate

    China-linked ‘Spamouflage’ network mimics Americans to sway US political debate

    WASHINGTON — When he first emerged on social media, the user known as Harlan claimed to be a New Yorker and an Army veteran who supported Donald Trump for president. Harlan said he was 29, and his profile picture showed a smiling, handsome young man.

    A few months later, Harlan underwent a transformation. Now, he claimed to be 31 and from Florida.

    New research into Chinese disinformation networks targeting American voters shows Harlan’s claims were as fictitious as his profile picture, which analysts think was created using artificial intelligence.

    As voters prepare to cast their ballots this fall, China has been making its own plans, cultivating networks of fake social media users designed to mimic Americans. Whoever or wherever he really is, Harlan is a small part of a larger effort by U.S. adversaries to use social media to influence and upend America’s political debate.

    The account was traced back to Spamouflage, a Chinese disinformation group, by analysts at Graphika, a New York-based firm that tracks online networks. Known to online researchers for several years, Spamouflage earned its moniker through its habit of spreading large amounts of seemingly unrelated content alongside disinformation.

    “One of the world’s largest covert online influence operations — an operation run by Chinese state actors — has become more aggressive in its efforts to infiltrate and to sway U.S. political conversations ahead of the election,” Jack Stubbs, Graphika’s chief intelligence officer, told The Associated Press.

    Intelligence and national security officials have said that Russia, China and Iran have all mounted online influence operations targeting U.S. voters ahead of the November election. Russia remains the top threat, intelligence officials say, even as Iran has become more aggressive in recent months, covertly supporting U.S. protests against the war in Gaza and attempting to hack into the email systems of the two presidential candidates.

    China, however, has taken a more cautious, nuanced approach. Beijing sees little advantage in supporting one presidential candidate over the other, intelligence analysts say. Instead, China’s disinformation efforts focus on campaign issues particularly important to Beijing — such as American policy toward Taiwan — while seeking to undermine confidence in elections, voting and the U.S. in general.

    Officials have said it’s a longer-term effort that will continue well past Election Day as China and other authoritarian nations try to use the internet to erode support for democracy.

    A message left with the Chinese Embassy in Washington was not immediately returned.

    Compared with armed conflict or economic sanctions, online influence operations can be a low-cost, low-risk means of flexing geopolitical power. Given the increasing reliance on digital communications, the use of online disinformation and fake information networks is only likely to increase, said Max Lesser, senior analyst for emerging threats at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a national security think tank in Washington.

    “We’re going to see a widening of the playing field when it comes to influence operations, where it’s not just Russia, China and Iran but you also see smaller actors getting involved,” Lesser said.

    That list could include not only nations but also criminal organizations, domestic extremist groups and terrorist organizations, Lesser said.

    When analysts first noticed Spamouflage five years ago, the network tended to post generically pro-China, anti-American content. In recent years, the tone sharpened as Spamouflage expanded and began focusing on divisive political topics like gun control, crime, race relations and support for Israel during its war in Gaza. The network also began creating large numbers of fake accounts designed to mimic American users.

    Spamouflage accounts don’t post much original content, instead using platforms like X or TikTok to recycle and repost content from far-right and far-left users. Some of the accounts seemed designed to appeal to Republicans, while others cater to Democrats.

    While Harlan’s accounts succeeded in getting traction — one video mocking President Joe Biden was seen 1.5 million times — many of the accounts created by the Spamouflage campaign did not. It’s a reminder that online influence operations are often a numbers game: the more accounts, the more content, the better the chance that one specific post goes viral.

    Many of the accounts newly linked to Spamouflage took pains to pose as Americans, sometimes in obvious ways. “I am an American,” one of the accounts proclaimed. Some of the accounts gave themselves away by using stilted English or strange word choices. Some were clumsier than others: “Broken English, brilliant brain, I love Trump,” read the biographical section of one account.

    Harlan’s profile picture, which Graphika researchers believe was created using AI, was identical to one used in an earlier account linked to Spamouflage. Messages sent to the person operating Harlan’s accounts were not returned.

    Several of the accounts linked to Spamouflage remain active on TikTok and X.

    Source link