hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetBakırköy Escortcasibom9018betgit casinojojobet

Tag: governance

  • Football Governance Bill will tackle ‘majority of fans’ concerns’

    Football Governance Bill will tackle ‘majority of fans’ concerns’

    The government introduced a “strengthened” Football Governance Bill in the House of Lords yesterday, Thursday, to address significant issues facing financial sustainability of elite men’s football in England.

    Bury FC is among a number of clubs that has faced ownership difficulties with the two-time FA Cup champions expelled from the Football League in 2019.

    The Bill will establish an independent football regulator and a new set of rules to protect clubs, empower fans and keep clubs at the “heart of their communities”.

    Read more: Hundreds pay respects at funeral of Radcliffe FC chairman Paul Hilton

    The regulator, will tackle rogue owners and directors, implement a club licensing regime to help ensure a more consistent approach in how clubs are run, monitor club finances and improve fan engagement throughout the football pyramid from the Premier League to the National League.

    It will also have a “backstop” measure to mediate a fair financial distribution down the Leagues should the Premier League and the EFL (English Football League) not be able to come to an agreement.

    Some other major changes to the previous draft of the Football Governance Bill are that the regulator will now require clubs to provide effective engagement with their supporters on changes to ticket prices, and any proposals to relocate their home ground.

    Read more: Bury FC boss McNabb on busy schedule and league goal

    There will also be a “clear commitment to do more to improve equality, diversity and inclusion within the game”.

    The regulator will have the power to compel clubs to democratically select the fan representatives the club must engage with.

    This will be instead of clubs making a “unilateral decision”, and the regulator will no longer be required to consider government foreign and trade policy when approving club takeovers.

    The new legislation “echoes the sentiment from fans on the need for systemic change in football”, which was set out in Dame Tracey Crouch’s Fan Led Review of Football.

    Chair of the Football Supporters Society of Bury, Phil Young, said: “Football supporters in Bury need no reminders of the damage rogue owners playing roulette with football clubs can cause.

    “We’ve worked with government and across parties, from Tracey Crouch to Lisa Nandy, to represent Bury and provide positive, proactive advice on how to prevent similar problems from happening in future.

    “I managed to get this point across to Premier League CEO, Richard Masters, this week who seemed to accept the bill would make its way into legislation despite resistance from many Premier League clubs.

    “Without Bury’s very public failure, and the shock it caused, I doubt this bill would have seen the light of day.

    “No legislation is perfect but we think the bill addresses the vast majority of concerns football supporters should have.

    “It won’t reverse what happened in 2019 but we should take some pride in that our plight has been used to make football better for all.”

    Bury North MP James Frith, who has recently been given a position on the Culture, Media, and Sport Select Committee, backs the incoming law.

    He said: “We know all too well here in Bury the cost of financial mismanagement of football clubs.

    “The ejection of Bury FC from the football league was a no-fan-fault eviction and this must not be allowed to happen anywhere ever again.

    “This new and improved legislation will tackle this, putting fans back at the heart of the game, taking on rogue owners and helping to put clubs across the country on a sound financial footing.”

    Read more: Charnock Richard 0-2 Bury: Shakers return to winning ways

    Bury-born Manchester United legend and football pundit Gary Neville, who co-owns Salford City FC, welcomes the legislation too.

    He said: “Football is undoubtedly one of our country’s greatest assets, but now more than ever we need an independent regulator to act as a guardian for our game, to make sure that clubs and their fans are protected for the long term.

    “I’ve had the honour of experiencing football as a fan, player, pundit and now as a club co-owner, but I know my role is to act as a temporary custodian of an institution that belongs to its fans and community which will last forever.

    “Football is too important in this country to be left solely in the hands of individual owners to design its future.

    “We’ve seen inequality across the game grow, but now independent regulation can act as a catalyst to create a thriving and sustainable game for future generations.”



    Source link

  • Football Governance Bill revisions – EFL official statement released in response

    Football Governance Bill revisions – EFL official statement released in response

    The EFL have welcomed changes to the upcoming Football Governance Bill, which will deliver the Independent Football Regulator.

    The bill still needs to go through the full legislative process ahead of becoming law, however, new changes to the planned legislation have seen a major shift.

    Newcastle United and Saudi Arabia have been heavily referenced, due to the news that the clause has been dropped in the football regulator legislation, that it would have to take UK foreign policy into account, when deciding on club takeovers. With the requirement “to consider government foreign policy dropped to cement regulator’s full independence.”

    Another big change, which is of significant importance to the EFL, is that now the planned legislation will now give the independent football regulator power over Premier League parachute payments.

    This has been the official EFL response to the new reframed Football Governance Bill legislation.

    EFL Statement on Football Governance Bill – 23 October 2024:

    EFL Statement: Football Governance Bill

    EFL Chair Rick Parry said:

    “The EFL welcomes the new Football Governance Bill, and thanks the Secretary of State, Lisa Nandy MP for the genuine commitment and openness she has displayed towards the EFL and its Clubs on this matter since coming into Government. We also appreciate the time which she and her team have taken to consider and understand many of our concerns with the previous iteration of the Bill.

    “It has been our long-held view that there is a requirement for Independent Regulation, and we believe the Bill has been framed in a way that will enable the new Regulator to protect and achieve the sustainability of Clubs across the entire football pyramid.

    “It is also pleasing that the State of the Game report, which will provide the objective and independent basis for the new Regulator’s work, will be delivered within 18 months. We look forward, in collaboration with our Clubs, to making a significant contribution to this important piece of work.

    “Alongside the issue of financial reform, the EFL also recognises the key and leading role it has to play across other areas the Bill addresses, including the role of fan consultation, heritage protection and the commitments made to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion.

    “As the Bill now begins its passage through Parliament, we will first take time to scrutinise its full detail and implications for Clubs across the pyramid, including the key issue around the Regulator’s backstop powers in respect of financial redistribution, while at the same time continuing to offer our support and insight to MPs and Peers.

    “The EFL’s core purpose is to safeguard the sustainability of our Clubs for future generations of supporters, and the social value they deliver in the communities they serve. We know how much our Clubs matter, but too many face or have faced financial trauma due to their over-reliance on owner funding and overstretching in their attempts to bridge growing financial gaps.

    “We have always been clear throughout this process that our intention is not to harm or hinder the strength of the Premier League, and the value which it generates for the wider pyramid, including the EFL and our competitions. Rather, this is about creating a framework for a sustainable and competitive pyramid which fosters sporting jeopardy without financial catastrophe, underpinned by better regulation and fairer redistribution.”


    Source link

  • UN experts urge United Nations to lay foundations for global governance of artificial intelligence

    UN experts urge United Nations to lay foundations for global governance of artificial intelligence

    UNITED NATIONS — A high-powered U.N. advisory body said Thursday that global governance of artificial intelligence is “imperative” and urged the United Nations to lay the foundations for the first inclusive global institutions to regulate the fast-growing technology.

    In a 100-page report, the group said AI “is transforming our world,” offering tremendous potential for good from opening new areas of science and accelerating economic growth to improving public health, agriculture and optimizing energy grids.

    But left ungoverned, it said, AI’s benefits could be limited to a handful of countries, companies and individuals, while even more powerful systems than exist today “could upend the world of work,” create autonomous weapons, and pose risks to peace and security.

    The advisory body outlined principles that should guide formation of new institutions to govern AI including international law, and especially human rights law. It calls on all governments and parties involved in AI to work together to protect human rights.

    The group made wide-ranging recommendations including establishing an international scientific panel on AI to create a global understanding of its capabilities and risks, and a global dialogue on AI governance at the U.N. to anchor future institutions on human rights principles and international law.

    The recommendations also call for a global AI fund to ensure that the technology bridges the divide between rich and poor nations and promotes achievement of U.N. development goals for 2030, and a “Standards Exchange” to foster technical compatibility.

    At present, the report said, only seven of the 193 U.N. member nations are party to seven recent prominent AI governance initiatives while 118 countries, primarily in the global South, “are missing entirely” from any conversation.

    Among the initiatives are the European Union’s first-ever legal framework to regulate AI, which entered into force on Aug. 1. This month,. the Group of 20 leading world economies agreed to establish guidelines for developing artificial intelligence, calling for “ethical, transparent, and accountable use of AI,” with human oversight and compliance with privacy and human rights laws. And lawmakers in California — home to many of the world’s biggest AI companies — recently adopted legislation to regulate AI which is before the governor.

    The advisory board’s report concluded on a positive but cautious note.

    “As experts, we remain optimistic about the future of AI and its potential for good,” the report said. “That optimism depends, however, on realism about the risks and the inadequacy of structures and incentives currently in place.”

    The board stressed that “The technology is too important, and the stakes are too high, to rely only on market forces and a fragmented patchwork of national and multilateral action.”

    U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres appointed the advisory body last October, saying coordinated action is needed to keep the threat of artificial intelligence from becoming an uncontrolled “monster.”

    The group comprises 39 prominent AI leaders from 33 countries — chosen from over 2,000 nominations. They represent all regions of the world, are serving in their personal capacity, and include experts from government, the private sector and civil society.

    Guterres commended the group’s work Thursday, expressing full support for its recommendations “which provide a blueprint to build on existing efforts and together, shape an international AI architecture that is inclusive, agile and effective – for today and the future.”

    When the secretary-general told reporters last year that he planned to appoint the advisory body, Guterres said he would react favorably to a new U.N. agency on artificial intelligence and suggested as a model the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is knowledge-based and has some regulatory powers.

    But the advisory body said it wasn’t recommending establishment of an agency.

    Amandeep Singh Gill, the secretary-general’s chief’s envoy on technology and a member of the advisory body, told a news conference launching the report that for now an agency isn’t needed, “but it’s not saying that we would never need something like that.” The board wants that possibility to be studied, he said.

    The report was issued ahead of the Summit of the Future starting Sunday which Guterres has called to try to unite the world’s divided nations and address the challenges and threats confronting humanity from conflicts and climate change to artificial intelligence and reforming the U.N.

    Source link