hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetGorabetcasibom9018betgit casinojojobetmarsbahismatbetmatbet

Tag: Legal

  • Ex-OpenAI engineer who raised legal concerns about the technology has died

    Ex-OpenAI engineer who raised legal concerns about the technology has died

    Suchir Balaji, a former OpenAI engineer and whistleblower who helped train the artificial intelligence systems behind ChatGPT and later said he believed those practices violated copyright law, has died, according to his parents and San Francisco officials. He was 26.

    Balaji worked at OpenAI for nearly four years before quitting in August. He was well-regarded by colleagues at the San Francisco company, where a co-founder this week called him one of OpenAI’s strongest contributors who was essential to developing some of its products.

    “We are devastated to learn of this incredibly sad news and our hearts go out to Suchir’s loved ones during this difficult time,” said a statement from OpenAI.

    Balaji was found dead in his San Francisco apartment on Nov. 26 in what police said “appeared to be a suicide. No evidence of foul play was found during the initial investigation.” The city’s chief medical examiner’s office confirmed the manner of death to be suicide.

    His parents Poornima Ramarao and Balaji Ramamurthy said they are still seeking answers, describing their son as a “happy, smart and brave young man” who loved to hike and recently returned from a trip with friends.

    Balaji grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area and first arrived at the fledgling AI research lab for a 2018 summer internship while studying computer science at the University of California, Berkeley. He returned a few years later to work at OpenAI, where one of his first projects, called WebGPT, helped pave the way for ChatGPT.

    “Suchir’s contributions to this project were essential, and it wouldn’t have succeeded without him,” said OpenAI co-founder John Schulman in a social media post memorializing Balaji. Schulman, who recruited Balaji to his team, said what made him such an exceptional engineer and scientist was his attention to detail and ability to notice subtle bugs or logical errors.

    “He had a knack for finding simple solutions and writing elegant code that worked,” Schulman wrote. “He’d think through the details of things carefully and rigorously.”

    Balaji later shifted to organizing the huge datasets of online writings and other media used to train GPT-4, the fourth generation of OpenAI’s flagship large language model and a basis for the company’s famous chatbot. It was that work that eventually caused Balaji to question the technology he helped build, especially after newspapers, novelists and others began suing OpenAI and other AI companies for copyright infringement.

    He first raised his concerns with The New York Times, which reported them in an October profile of Balaji.

    He later told The Associated Press he would “try to testify” in the strongest copyright infringement cases and considered a lawsuit brought by The New York Times last year to be the “most serious.” Times lawyers named him in a Nov. 18 court filing as someone who might have “unique and relevant documents” supporting allegations of OpenAI’s willful copyright infringement.

    His records were also sought by lawyers in a separate case brought by book authors including the comedian Sarah Silverman, according to a court filing.

    “It doesn’t feel right to be training on people’s data and then competing with them in the marketplace,” Balaji told the AP in late October. “I don’t think you should be able to do that. I don’t think you are able to do that legally.”

    He told the AP that he gradually grew more disillusioned with OpenAI, especially after the internal turmoil that led its board of directors to fire and then rehire CEO Sam Altman last year. Balaji said he was broadly concerned about how its commercial products were rolling out, including their propensity for spouting false information known as hallucinations.

    But of the “bag of issues” he was concerned about, he said he was focusing on copyright as the one it was “actually possible to do something about.”

    He acknowledged that it was an unpopular opinion within the AI research community, which is accustomed to pulling data from the internet, but said “they will have to change and it’s a matter of time.”

    He had not been deposed and it’s unclear to what extent his revelations will be admitted as evidence in any legal cases after his death. He also published a personal blog post with his opinions about the topic.

    Schulman, who resigned from OpenAI in August, said he and Balaji coincidentally left on the same day and celebrated with fellow colleagues that night with dinner and drinks at a San Francisco bar. Another of Balaji’s mentors, co-founder and chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, had left OpenAI several months earlier, which Balaji saw as another impetus to leave.

    Schulman said Balaji had told him earlier this year of his plans to leave OpenAI and that Balaji didn’t think that better-than-human AI known as artificial general intelligence “was right around the corner, like the rest of the company seemed to believe.” The younger engineer expressed interest in getting a doctorate and exploring “some more off-the-beaten path ideas about how to build intelligence,” Schulman said.

    Balaji’s family said a memorial is being planned for later this month at the India Community Center in Milpitas, California, not far from his hometown of Cupertino.

    —————-

    EDITOR’S NOTE — This story includes discussion of suicide. If you or someone you know needs help, the national suicide and crisis lifeline in the U.S. is available by calling or texting 988.

    —————–

    The Associated Press and OpenAI have a licensing and technology agreement allowing OpenAI access to part of the AP’s text archives.

    Source link

  • OpenAI’s legal battle with Elon Musk reveals internal turmoil over avoiding AI ‘dictatorship’

    OpenAI’s legal battle with Elon Musk reveals internal turmoil over avoiding AI ‘dictatorship’

    A 7-year-old rivalry between tech leaders Elon Musk and Sam Altman over who should run OpenAI and prevent an artificial intelligence “dictatorship” is now heading to a federal judge as Musk seeks to halt the ChatGPT maker’s ongoing shift into a for-profit company.

    Musk, an early OpenAI investor and board member, sued the artificial intelligence company earlier this year alleging it had betrayed its founding aims as a nonprofit research lab benefiting the public good rather than pursuing profits.

    Musk has since escalated the dispute, adding new claims and asking for a court order that would stop OpenAI’s plans to convert itself into a for-profit business more fully.

    The world’s richest man, whose companies include Tesla, SpaceX and social media platform X, last year started his own rival AI company, xAI. Musk says it faces unfair competition from OpenAI and its close business partner Microsoft, which has supplied the huge computing resources needed to build AI systems such as ChatGPT.

    “OpenAI and Microsoft together exploiting Musk’s donations so they can build a for-profit monopoly, one now specifically targeting xAI, is just too much,” says Musk’s filing that alleges the companies are violating the terms of Musk’s foundational contributions to the charity.

    OpenAI is filing a response Friday opposing Musk’s requested order, saying it would cripple OpenAI’s business and mission to the advantage of Musk and his own AI company. A hearing is set for January before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland.

    At the heart of the dispute is a 2017 internal power struggle at the fledgling startup that led to Altman becoming OpenAI’s CEO.

    Musk also wanted the job, according to emails revealed as part of the court case, but grew frustrated after two other OpenAI co-founders said he would hold too much power as a major shareholder and chief executive if the startup succeeded in its goal to achieve better-than-human AI known as artificial general intelligence, or AGI. Musk has long voiced concerns about how advanced forms of AI could threaten humanity.

    “The current structure provides you with a path where you end up with unilateral absolute control over the AGI,” said a 2017 email to Musk from co-founders Ilya Sutskever and Greg Brockman. “You stated that you don’t want to control the final AGI, but during this negotiation, you’ve shown to us that absolute control is extremely important to you.”

    In the same email, titled “Honest Thoughts,” Sutskever and Brockman also voiced concerns about Altman’s desire to be CEO and whether he was motivated by “political goals.” Altman eventually succeeded in becoming CEO, and has remained so except for a period last year when he was fired and then reinstated days later after the board that ousted him was replaced.

    OpenAI published the messages Friday in a blog post meant to show its side of the story, particularly Musk’s early support for the idea of making OpenAI a for-profit business so it could raise money for the hardware and computer power that AI needs.

    It was Musk, through his wealth manager Jared Birchall, who first registered “Open Artificial Technologies Technologies, Inc.”, a public benefit corporation, in September 2017. Then came the “Honest Thoughts” email that Musk described as the “final straw.”

    “Either go do something on your own or continue with OpenAI as a nonprofit,” Musk wrote back. OpenAI said Musk later proposed merging the startup into Tesla before resigning as the co-chair of OpenAI’s board in early 2018.

    Musk didn’t immediately respond to emailed requests for comment sent to his companies Friday.

    Asked about his frayed relationship with Musk at a New York Times conference last week, Altman said he felt “tremendously sad” but also characterized Musk’s legal fight as one about business competition.

    “He’s a competitor and we’re doing well,” Altman said. He also said at the conference that he is “not that worried” about the Tesla CEO’s influence with President-elect Donald Trump. OpenAI said Friday that Altman plans to make a $1 million personal donation to Trump’s inauguration fund, joining a number of tech companies and executives who are working to improve their relationships with the incoming administration.

    ——————————

    The Associated Press and OpenAI have a licensing and technology agreement allowing OpenAI access to part of the AP’s text archives.

    Source link

  • Drake makes another legal move against Universal over Kendrick Lamar diss track ‘Not Like Us’

    Drake makes another legal move against Universal over Kendrick Lamar diss track ‘Not Like Us’

    For the second straight day, Drake has taken legal action against Universal Music Group, this time in Texas, over Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us.”

    It follows a similar filing in New York on Monday, in which Drake alleges UMG falsely pumped up the popularity of “Not Like Us” on Spotify and other streaming services.

    The two court moves have taken the bitter beef between the two hip-hop superstars to a whole new level, with the parent company of the labels for both men now pulled directly into the fight.

    Tuesday’s filing in Bexar County alleges UMG engaged in “irregular and inappropriate business practices” to get radio airplay for “Not Like Us,” including making illegal payments to San Antonio-based iHeartMedia. The petition, a precursor to a potential lawsuit, seeks depositions from corporate representatives of both companies.

    The filing takes aim at UMG for allegedly knowing that “the song itself, as well as its accompanying album art and music video, attacked the character of another one of UMG’s most prominent artists, Drake, by falsely accusing him of being a sex offender, engaging in pedophilic acts, harboring sex offenders, and committing other criminal sexual acts.”

    The filing points out that “the song calls Drake a ‘certified pedophile,’ a ‘predator,’ and someone whose name should ‘be registered and placed on neighborhood watch.’”

    The petition says Drake could sue UMG for defamation, among other claims.

    A UMG representative did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the new filing. In a Monday statement in response to the New York filing, the company said the “suggestion that UMG would do anything to undermine any of its artists is offensive and untrue. We employ the highest ethical practices in our marketing and promotional campaigns.”

    An email to an iHeartMedia representative seeking comment was also not immediately answered.

    The New York petition is also a precursor to a potential lawsuit, and alleges UMG fired employees seen as loyal to Drake “in an apparent effort to conceal its schemes.”

    The back-to-back legal maneuvers represent a major and possibly unprecedented escalation of a hip-hop feud, especially with the label representing two of the biggest stars in music sitting at the center of it.

    Drake, a 38-year-old Canadian rapper and singer and five-time Grammy winner, and Lamar, a 37-year-old Pulitzer Prize winner who is set to headline the next Super Bowl halftime, were occasional collaborators more than a decade ago.

    That changed when Lamar began taking public jabs at Drake starting in 2013. The fight escalated steeply earlier this year.

    “Not Like Us,” the wildly popular Lamar single released in May, was an especially vicious moment in a flurry of dueling tracks from the two artists.

    Source link

  • Adam Johnson manslaughter case: Explaining the legal delays

    Adam Johnson manslaughter case: Explaining the legal delays

    It’s almost one year since Nottingham Panthers ice hockey player Adam Johnson died after he was cut in the neck by a skate worn by an opponent.

    His death, which occurred on October 28 last year in a cup match against the Sheffield Steelers at the city’s Utilita Arena in front of 8,000 spectators, left the ice hockey world in shock and prompted changes around the sport’s safety measures, specifically on the use of neck guards.

    But while the sport has tried to move on while honouring Johnson’s memory, in Britain, the legal case surrounding the 29-year-old’s death has made little progress.

    On November 14, a man was arrested on suspicion of manslaughter and then bailed by South Yorkshire Police, who did not name him. Since then, his bail has been extended on five separate occasions by police, but he has not been charged with any offence.

    As the anniversary of Johnson’s death draws near, where exactly has the case got to? What could be the reason for such delays? And when might we expect a resolution?


    What happened after the initial arrest?

    After his initial arrest on November 14, the unnamed man — in the UK, those arrested are not normally named until they are charged — was released on police bail until February.

    Speaking to The Athletic at the time, South Yorkshire Police said the man had to remain in the United Kingdom.

    In a statement issued on November 15, detective chief superintendent Becs Horsfall explained the complex nature of the case and how the force had been “speaking to highly specialised experts in their field” to aid their investigation.

    Meanwhile, an inquest into Johnson’s death was opened on November 3 but suspended on January 26 by Sheffield coroner Tanyka Rawden as the police investigation was still active.


    Fans queue to sign a book of condolence at Nottingham Panthers’ Motorpoint Arena (Zac Goodwin/PA Images via Getty Images)

    She said that suspension would last until July unless South Yorkshire Police decided they would not charge the man.

    She did, however, call for all ice hockey players to wear neck guards in a report she wrote on the prevention of future deaths.

    In the wake of the tragedy, the English Ice Hockey Association (all levels of ice hockey in the United Kingdom below the top league) made use of neck guards mandatory from January 1, 2024. The International Ice Hockey Federation (which oversees tournaments, including at the Olympics) and the Elite League (the UK’s top flight) followed suit.

    However, as The Athletic reported in December 2023, that does not apply to the NHL.

    go-deeper

    GO DEEPER

    What are hockey neck guard rules around the world?

    What came next?

    Since then, the man arrested has been bailed five times by South Yorkshire Police: on February 9, April 25, May 14, June 26 and September 2. His current bail extends until November 11.

    On the last bail announcement, a spokesperson for South Yorkshire Police said: “Our investigation is ongoing and our thoughts remain with Adam’s family.”

    What could be the cause of delays? Are they common in cases of this nature?

    This case is particularly unusual.

    It is rare for the British police and legal authorities to get involved in sporting matters — Matt Slater looked at this question in detail for The Athletic in January — and that is likely to be one of the reasons for the continual delays.

    “This is an unusual set of circumstances,” Patrick Maguire, a partner and head of the London office of law firm Horwich Cohen Coghlan, told The Athletic. “It’s not something the police will be used to dealing with and given the unusual nature of the circumstances, I suspect as part of their investigation they are seeking some sort of expert evidence on whether the incident which resulted in Adam’s death was reckless to a criminal standard.

    “So I suspect that is causing the delay because getting that expert evidence won’t be straightforward.”


    Adam Johnson playing for Pittsburgh Penguins in 2019 (John Russell/NHLI via Getty Images)

    According to Maguire, these experts would involve people in the field of ice hockey, such as a former referee, those involved on the rules committee or someone connected to English ice hockey’s governing body.

    Mark Jones, a professor of sports law at Manchester Metropolitan University, agreed with Maguire’s assessment.

    “It’s a really unusual case in just about every aspect,” Jones told The Athletic. “The difficulty here is trying to actually find anything that could prove this beyond reasonable doubt.

    “My assumption is the police are simply finding it almost impossible to get a clear-cut answer on any of this and can’t get anything approaching consistency from the experts.”

    Hannah Kent, a senior associate in the dispute resolution team at Onside Law, told The Athletic it’s very uncommon to see cases like this within a sporting context.

    “It’s quite extreme and obviously a very tragic case that someone’s actually passed away as a result of something that’s happened on the ice,” she said. “It will be a question (for the police) of reviewing footage, interpreting what happened, speaking to witnesses and consulting experts — all of that can take time. There are lots of different moving parts.”

    “It is unusual for someone to be bailed on this many occasions, but that has to be balanced with the complexity of the case,” Adam Pendlebury, a senior lecturer in law at Edge Hill University, told The Athletic. “The key point will be around the consent (that by playing sport, participants ‘implicitly consent’ to a certain level of risk) but to understand that, you have to understand the culture of ice hockey.

    “What is the point where it goes beyond consent to the point it becomes criminal?”

    What is the process being followed?

    Once the police have finished their investigation, they will decide whether there is sufficient evidence to hand it over to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

    As a death is involved, it will normally be down to the CPS to decide whether to charge and bring a prosecution. They will look at two things — first, whether there is sufficient evidence for there to be a realistic prospect of success and, second, if the prosecution is in the public interest.

    “I imagine that the public interest will be quite a big factor they will need to think through because of how rare it is in sport that something like this happens,” Kent said.


    Tributes to Johnson at Madison Square Garden in November (Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

    Can the arrested man be rebailed indefinitely?

    No. In general, an arrested person can be bailed for three-month periods by the police for up to nine months. This can be extended to 12 months if police make an application to a magistrates’ court.

    Beyond that, the court can make an order for a further extension to bail.

    When is a resolution most likely?

    “There’s no time limit on it,” Maguire said. “Some of the cases that I’ve been involved in, non-sports related but involving fatalities, have taken three to four years to get to a final trial. And obviously they won’t be able to be in a position to consider whether to pursue the manslaughter charge until such time as all the evidence is available and the investigation has been completed.

    “My experience is the more complex the circumstances, the longer the criminal proceedings take to run their course.”

    Kent agrees a definite end date is impossible to pin down and makes the point that the UK legal system is currently facing a huge backlog of cases as a legacy of the Covid-19 pandemic. The UK’s National Audit Office said in May 2024 that there were 67,573 Crown Court cases waiting to be heard.

    “Without being involved in the investigation, you just can’t say when, or even if, the charge will come,” Kent added. “The criminal justice system is pretty much on its knees at the moment in terms of the courts so, if there is a charge, it would likely then take some time before a trial would take place.”

    (Top photo: Bradley Collyer/PA Images via Getty Images)

    Source link

  • Student-athletes find more power in the changing legal landscape of college sports

    Student-athletes find more power in the changing legal landscape of college sports

    Ever since the NCAA permitted college athletes to get paid by companies that use their names, images and likenesses, athletes have tested the limits of their increasing power.

    One of the latest examples is Matthew Sluka, the starting quarterback for UNLV’s first three games of the 2024 season. After helping lead UNLV to three wins and potential contention for a prestigious College Football Playoff bid, Sluka announced on Sept. 24, 2024, he would sit out the rest of the season. His decision is the result of a dispute over compensation for use of his name, image and likeness, commonly referred to as NIL.

    While the decision sent shock waves through college athletics, it also shines light on the changing balance of power that favors athletes over their coaches and universities.

    As a former lawyer and college athletics compliance administrator – and also as a current university faculty member who has authored several law review articles on legal issues related to NIL – I suggest that Sluka’s situation exemplifies how collegiate athletes can use recent NCAA rules changes to improve their financial situation in the NIL era of college athletics.

    Promises and denials

    Sluka’s NIL agent claims a UNLV assistant coach failed to fulfill a promise he made Sluka during the recruiting process. That promise, according to Sluka’s agent, was that Sluka would receive US$100,000 of NIL compensation from an NIL collective should he attend UNLV. NIL collectives are generally formed to pool individuals’ and businesses’ funds to provide NIL opportunities and compensation for athletes.

    Any such promise by a UNLV assistant coach would violate current NCAA policy. That’s because NCAA policy prohibits coaches from making NIL compensation offers contingent on whether a student enrolls. NIL collectives, on the other hand, may negotiate with athletes during the recruiting process as the result of a U.S. District Court ruling. That ruling prohibits the NCAA from penalizing collectives that negotiate NIL compensation with athletes during the recruiting process.

    In a forthcoming BYU Law Review article, however, I suggest that a university whose star athlete transfers because another school’s collective recruited the athlete possesses a viable legal claim against the collective. That claim would be for inducing the athlete to transfer and violate their athletics scholarship agreement.

    UNLV denies Sluka’s version of events. The university asserts that Sluka’s representative demanded more compensation from UNLV and its NIL collective in order for Sluka to continue playing. UNLV says it then refused, as such a “pay-for-play” agreement violates NCAA policy, which states that athletes may not accept NIL compensation based on “play” or on-field results.

    Perceptions and ‘pay-to-play’

    In Sluka’s case, further complicating things is the issue of whether Sluka’s NIL representative is properly registered with the state as an agent, as required by Nevada law. The state may be interested in pursuing enforcement, given the Nevada secretary of state’s relationship with UNLV’s NIL collective. More specifically, Nevada Secretary of State Francisco V. Aguilar co-founded Blueprint Sports, which operates the collective.

    NCAA rules allow a football player to retain a year of eligibility if they play in four or fewer games in a season. Sluka exercised this ability by leaving his team. There is little that UNLV can do about it beyond taking away Sluka’s athletic scholarship for leaving the team.

    Universities, however, must be increasingly sensitive to providing the necessary procedures, such as hearings and appeal opportunities, before disciplining athletes in the NIL era. As I explain in a forthcoming SMU Law Review article, a recent U.S. District Court decision involving then-University of Illinois men’s basketball player Terrence Shannon Jr. precluded the university from enforcing its suspension of Shannon without providing appropriate processes, lest he lose out on NIL compensation, which the court classified as a constitutionally protected interest.

    A referee makes a ruling on a football field.
    Issues of fairness linger in the era of NIL deals for college athletes.
    David Madison via Getty Images

    A slew of lawsuits

    Before it granted college athletes the ability to get paid through NIL deals, the NCAA faced long-standing criticism that its policies were unfair to athletes. The argument was that athletes benefited relatively little compared with the NCAA, conferences and universities, even though it was the athletes who provided the product. Along those lines, former college football stars Terrelle Pryor, Reggie Bush and Denard Robinson all recently filed separate lawsuits against the NCAA over denied NIL compensation opportunities.

    Some college football luminaries are now questioning whether the pendulum of power has swung too far in favor of athletes in the NIL era. Examples include former Alabama head coach Nick Saban and former Ohio State quarterback and longtime ESPN commentator Kirk Herbstreit. Saban has openly wondered whether the current college football model is sustainable. Herbstreit has lamented “the players having all the control” without any accountability to their coaches and universities.

    High-profile college football players, such as quarterbacks Kelly Bryant and D’Eriq King and receiver Gary Bryant Jr., previously exploited NCAA rules permitting them to play in four games and then transfer to another university without sacrificing a season of competition eligibility.

    At least publicly, their decisions were due to on-field considerations such as playing time. Sluka’s decision to forgo playing the rest of the season and transfer was different. It is the first time – but likely not the last – a college athlete has publicly based their decision to leave their team mid-season on an NIL dispute.

    Sluka’s departure from UNLV makes clear that collegiate athletes’ power to move freely between universities in pursuit of their best financial situation has greatly increased. Meanwhile, their coaches’ and universities’ power to keep them on the team and participating has significantly decreased.

    Source link

  • Libya threatens legal action after Nigeria pulls out of football qualifier

    Libya threatens legal action after Nigeria pulls out of football qualifier

    The Libyan Football Federation (LFF) is criticizing Nigeria’s decision to withdraw from the 2025 AFCON qualifier in Libya and is threatening to take legal action.

    On Monday, Nigeria’s national football team the Super Eagles walked off the fixture citing safety concerns after being stranded at a local airport in Libya without food and internet access for more than 16 hours.

    Tuesday’s statement by the LFF accused its Nigerian counterpart, the Nigerian Football Federation (NFF) of not cooperating with local organizers.

    LFF said the flight diversion was possibly caused by routine aircraft protocols, security checks or logistical problems beyond their control, adding that Libyan players faced similar challenges in last week’s reverse fixture in Nigeria.

    LFF said it will “take all legal measures to preserve the interests of the Libyan national football team.”

    The Nigerian Super Eagles had been scheduled to take on the Mediterranean Knights of Libya on Tuesday to seal their qualification for the 2025 AFCON finals in Morocco.

    However, the Nigerian men’s team pulled out of its Confederation of African Football, or CAF, qualifier in Libya and returned home in protest at being abandoned at an airport after their plane was diverted.

    The NFF said the team was taken to Al-Abraq International Airport three hours away from the venue of the match and that local authorities did not make alternative travel plans for the team.

    “It is consistent with their … hostile attitude toward other Africans,” said Ademola Olajire, spokesperson of the NFF. “We have filed a formal letter, the whole world is aware of what happened and how everything went, and we expect a reasonable and justifiable decision from CAF.”

    Libyan authorities also have rejected allegations of foul play or willful attempt to dampen the morale of the Nigerian players ahead of Tuesday’s match.

    However, Nigerian sports analyst Daniel Aderiye said Libya has faltered many times in the past.

    “Historical antecedents have put them in a very bad spot,” Aderiye said. “It’s the most hostile environment anybody can play football in. They should go ahead and threaten because as far as we’re concerned, we will not be dimwitted. CAF has said they’re going to intervene — a disciplinary board has been set up to that effect.”

    On Monday, the CAF said it was talking to both Nigeria and Libya and would take action if a member violated its rules.

    Local football club coach Fred Tebit said Nigeria’s diminishing positive public image is to blame.

    “We should not forget where we belong in the ranks of Africa — a national team of such caliber with players playing all over the top clubs in Europe will be treated as such, and I think CAF should take a tough stance on this,” he said. “Our government is not helping matters, our country is full of corruption, embezzlement, so that’s why the Libyans [think] they can measure shoulders with us.”

    Last Friday, Nigeria defeated Libya 1-0, securing seven points over three games in their group. The top two teams in each group will advance to the 24-team finals.

    Source link

  • Mbappé’s lawyer says footballer to take legal action for libel over rape claims

    Mbappé’s lawyer says footballer to take legal action for libel over rape claims

    Kylian Mbappé was “shocked” to see his name linked to a Swedish rape investigation, his lawyer told Agence Frane-Presse (AFP) on Tuesday, October 15. The France captain, however, is “at ease” because “he has done nothing wrong,” lawyer Marie-Alix Canu-Bernard said.

    A Swedish prosecutor said Tuesday that a rape investigation had been opened without mentioning Mbappé, following media reports that the Real Madrid and France star was the suspect following a visit with friends to Stockholm.

    Swedish newspapers Aftonbladet and Expressen, and public broadcaster SVT all reported that 25-year-old Mbappé was the target of the investigation, following his two-day visit to the Nordic capital last week.

    Mbappé’s lawyer Canu-Bernard said on Tuesday the player was “not aware of the extent of the media frenzy, but is completely calm and does not understand what he could be accused of.” “He is stunned to hear that it could concern him. He preferred to go to training and asked my office not to leave things as they are because it is impossible to let yourself be slandered and defamed in this way. This is the reason why we are going to file a complaint for libel.”

    Sweden’s Prosecution Authority said that the alleged rape had occurred at a hotel on October 10 but did not name a suspect and said no further information could be shared for the moment. “In response to media reports about a suspected rape in Stockholm, the prosecutor can confirm that a criminal report has been submitted to the police,” a statement said.

    Expressen on Monday identified Mbappé as the suspect, citing anonymous sources, while Aftonbladet and SVT said Tuesday they had also obtained information confirming Mbappé was the suspect. Expressen said Mbappé was “reasonably suspected” of rape and sexual assault, the lower of two degrees of suspicion in the Swedish legal system. According to the Prosecution Authority, the higher degree of suspicion, “probable cause,” is usually a prerequisite for a suspect to be remanded in custody prior to a formal charge.

    Mbappé’s lawyer said she could neither confirm nor deny claims that her client was the suspect. “We read the press,” Canu-Bernard said. “The Stockholm prosecutor’s office issued a statement, but it does not allow us to know whether Kylian Mbappe is the target. I therefore have no information allowing me to confirm whether this is indeed a complaint filed against him.”

    Mbappé denounces ‘fake news’

    The French star was not selected for his country’s latest round of UEFA Nations League matches, and so visited the Swedish capital with a group of people from last Wednesday. According to Aftonbladet, they dined at a restaurant before going to a nightclub. Mbappe and the group left Sweden on Friday.

    Aftonbladet said the complaint was filed on Saturday after the alleged victim had sought medical attention. Expressen reported Tuesday that police had seized some clothing as evidence, saying it consisted of women’s underwear, a pair of black trousers and a black top. Photographs showed police officers leaving the Bank Hotel, where Mbappé and his entourage stayed, with brown bags on Monday.

    New

    Le Monde’s app

    Get the most out of your experience: download the app to enjoy Le Monde in English anywhere, anytime

    Download

    Mbappé claimed in a post on X on Monday there was a link between the report and the hearing before a French league committee on Tuesday over his bitter dispute with his former club Paris Saint-Germain over what he says is €55 million ($60 million) in unpaid wages. “FAKE NEWS !!!!. It’s becoming so predictable, on the eve of the hearing, as if by chance,” he wrote. After the hearing, a source close to Qatari-owned PSG said the league would give its decision on October 25.

    Le Monde with AFP

    Reuse this content

    Source link

  • TikTok was aware of risks kids and teens face on its platform, legal document alleges

    TikTok was aware of risks kids and teens face on its platform, legal document alleges

    TikTok was aware that its design features are detrimental to its young users and that publicly touted tools aimed at limiting kids’ time on the site were largely ineffective, according to internal documents and communications exposed in lawsuit filed by the state of Kentucky.

    The details are among redacted portions of Kentucky’s lawsuit that contains the internal communications and documents unearthed during a more than two year investigation into the company by various states across the country.

    Kentucky’s lawsuit was filed this week, alongside separate complaints brought forth by attorneys general in a dozen states as well as the District of Columbia. TikTok is also facing another lawsuit from the Department of Justice and is itself suing the Justice Department over a federal law that could ban it in the U.S. by mid-January.

    The redacted information — which was inadvertently revealed by Kentucky’s attorney general’s office and first reported by Kentucky Public Radio — touches on a range of topics, most importantly the extent to which TikTok knew how much time young users were spending on the platform and how sincere it was when rolling out tools aimed at curbing excessive use.

    Beyond TikTok use among minors, the complaint alleges the short-form video sharing app has prioritized “beautiful people” on its platform and has noted internally that some of the content-moderation metrics it has publicized are “largely misleading.”

    The unredacted complaint, which was seen by The Associated Press, was sealed by a Kentucky state judge on Wednesday after state officials filed an emergency motion to seal it.

    When reached for comment, TikTok spokesperson Alex Haurek said: “It is highly irresponsible of the Associated Press to publish information that is under a court seal. Unfortunately, this complaint cherry-picks misleading quotes and takes outdated documents out of context to misrepresent our commitment to community safety.”

    “We have robust safeguards, which include proactively removing suspected underage users, and we have voluntarily launched safety features such as default screentime limits, family pairing, and privacy by default for minors under 16,” Haurek said in a prepared statement. “We stand by these efforts.”

    The complaint alleges that TikTok has quantified how long it takes for young users to get hooked on the platform, and shared the findings internally in presentations aimed at increasing user-retention rates. The “habit moment,” as TikTok calls it, occurs when users have watched 260 videos or more during the first week of having a TikTok account. This can happen in under 35 minutes since some TikTok videos run as short as 8 seconds, the complaint says.

    Kentucky’s lawsuit also cites a spring 2020 presentation from TikTok that concluded that the platform had already “hit a ceiling” among young users. At that point, the company’s estimates showed at least 95% of smartphone users under 17 used TikTok at least monthly, the complaint notes.

    TikTok tracks metrics for young users, including how long young users spend watching videos and how many of them use the platform every day. The company uses the information it gleans from these reviews to feed its algorithm, which tailors content to people’s interests, and drives user engagement, the complaint says.

    TikTok does its own internal studies to find out how the platform is impacting users. The lawsuit cites one group within the company, called “TikTank,” which noted in an internal report that compulsive usage was “rampant” on the platform. It also quotes an unnamed executive who said kids watch TikTok because the algorithm is “really good.”

    “But I think we need to be cognizant of what it might mean for other opportunities. And when I say other opportunities, I literally mean sleep, and eating, and moving around the room, and looking at somebody in the eyes,” the unnamed executive said, according to the complaint.

    TikTok has a 60-minute daily screen time limit for minors, a feature it rolled out in March 2023 with the stated aim of helping teens manage their time on the platform. But Kentucky’s complaint argues that the time limit — which users can easily bypass or disable — was intended more as a public relations tool than anything else.

    The lawsuit says TikTok measured the success of the time limit feature not by whether it reduced the time teens spent on the platform, but by three other metrics — the first of which was “improving public trust in the TikTok platform via media coverage.”

    Reducing screen time among teens was not included as a success metric, the lawsuit said. In fact, it alleged the company had planned to “revisit the design” of the feature if the time-limit feature had caused teens to reduce their TikTok usage by more than 10%.

    TikTok ran an experiment and found the time-limit prompts shaved off just a minute and a half from the average time teens spent on the app — from 108.5 to 107 minutes per day, according to the complaint. But despite the lack of movement, TikTok did not try to make the feature more effective, Kentucky officials say. They allege the ineffectiveness of the feature was, in many ways, by design.

    The complaint says a TikTok executive named Zhu Wenjia gave approval to the feature only if its impact on TikTok’s “core metrics” were minimal.

    TikTok — including its CEO Shou Chew — have talked about the app’s various time management tools, including videos TikTok sends users to encourage them to get off the platform. But a TikTok executive said in an internal meeting those videos are “useful” talking points, but are “not altogether effective.”

    In a section that details the negative impacts TikTok’s facial filters can have on users, Kentucky alleges that TikTok’s algorithm has “prioritized beautiful people” despite knowing internally that content on the platform could “perpetuate a narrow beauty norm.”

    The complaint alleges TikTok changed its algorithm after an internal report noted the app was showing a high “volume of … not attractive subjects” in the app’s main “For You” feed.

    “By changing the TikTok algorithm to show fewer ‘not attractive subjects’ in the For You feed, Defendants took active steps to promote a narrow beauty norm even though it could negatively impact their young users,” the complaint says.

    The lawsuit also takes aim at TikTok’s content-moderation practices.

    It cites internal communication where the company notes its moderation metrics are “largely misleading” because “we are good at moderating the content we capture, but these metrics do not account for the content that we miss.”

    The complaint notes that TikTok knows it has — but does not disclose — significant “leakage” rates, or content that violates the site’s community guidelines but is not removed or moderated. Other social media companies also face similar issues on their platforms.

    For TikTok, the complaint notes the “leakage” rates include roughly 36% of content that normalizes pedophilia and 50% of content that glorifies minor sexual assault.

    The lawsuit also accuses the company of misleading the public about its moderation and allowing some popular creators who were deemed to be “high value” to post content that violates the site’s guidelines.

    Source link

  • Explainer: Lassana Diarra and the legal case which could rock football’s transfer market

    Explainer: Lassana Diarra and the legal case which could rock football’s transfer market

    Here, we take a closer look.

    How did we get here?

    This case stems from a contract dispute between Diarra and Russian club Lokomotiv Moscow. The Frenchman and his legal team sued FIFA for damages, arguing its rules which hold clubs jointly liable for compensation and open to sanction if they sign a player who breaches contract prevented him moving to Belgian side Charleroi

    The challenge, which was upheld in a Belgian court in 2017, said the rules were contrary to EU law because they restricted Diarra’s freedom of movement and were anti-competitive. FIFA appealed against the 2017 judgement and the case was referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for a ruling.

    Why could this be significant?

    Any ruling that finds the contested rules disproportionate or restrictive will likely mean the regulations need to be rewritten.

    It could ultimately mean greater, if not total, freedom for players to terminate a contract without just cause. Union sources say the current rules treat players as assets rather than employees and want a player’s rights brought closer to, if not completely in line with, those of a regular person looking to change jobs.

    What was the last big change in the transfer market?

    The most significant shift occurred after the 1995 Bosman ruling, which effectively gave out-of-contract players total freedom over their next move and removed their former club’s entitlement to any fee once the contract had expired.

    Is this as significant?

    Any change here is likely to be more subtle, certainly at first. The question is whether the challenge to this specific aspect of the rules – the joint liability of an engaging club – leads to the whole system toppling.

    Dr Borja Garcia, an EU sports law expert at Loughborough University, believes this case is probably “as close as we have come” to Bosman but believes any changes will be less dramatic, with Bosman having already shifted the power to players.

    What is the likely outcome?

    ECJ rulings often, but not always, go in line with the non-binding opinion of the Advocate General (AG) in the case. The AG in this case said in April that the rules “may be contrary” to EU law. He described the current consequences for a player of breaching contract without just cause as “draconian” and said the rules were designed to “send a chill down each player’s spine”.

    What has FIFA said?

    FIFA has declined to comment while the case is ongoing but in its earlier court submissions it argued the rules were a necessary part of ensuring contractual stability.

    Sources close to the governing body also point out a player would still be liable for compensation where a contract is breached without just cause, only the joint liability of an engaging club is being contested.

    What could the other impacts be?

    If there are fewer obstacles and deterrents to a player breaking contract, it follows that transfer fees could trend downwards if clubs feel they have less security in the event of an in-contract player walking away.

    Contracts might also shorten if they become less stable, but Dr Garcia points out clubs are “between a rock and a hard place” on this one. On one hand they might be more reluctant to commit to a long-term deal, but equally such contracts are preferable to comply with financial rules around profit and loss.

    What do clubs think?

    A senior source within the European club game told PA the Diarra ruling had the potential to be a “dangerous one”, adding: “The transfer market is the glue that holds the pyramid together.

    “(The Diarra ruling) could have seismic implications, because if that glue starts to deteriorate, then that polarisation (between the big leagues and the rest) will get worse.”

    Source link

  • Rise of legal gambling helping fuel fans’ ugly behavior toward athletes

    Rise of legal gambling helping fuel fans’ ugly behavior toward athletes

    Welcome to our annual Labor Day weekend brunch buffet. And don’t forget to stop by our three-cheese omelet station. …

    What do you suppose has driven the escalation of “social” media putdowns, threats and unfettered hatred that has been aimed at pro tennis players?What do you suppose has driven the escalation of “social” media putdowns, threats and unfettered hatred that has been aimed at pro tennis players?

    Well, is it logical to note that the hatred has coincided with the rise in legal gambling on sports? All sports have reported increased incivilities from “fans” as per their lack of success through the growth and promotion of gambling. Why should tennis be different from golf, basketball and football?

    Fans pack Arthur Ashe Stadium for the U.S. Open. REUTERS

    Tennis is the easiest sport to fix, as all one needs is one person — himself or herself — plus, perhaps, one other to place the bets.

    Regardless, easily outraged nuts will always be among us, but digital instant messaging plus legalized wagering from which the sports financially benefit help unscrew the nuts from their bolts.

    Speaking of legalized sports gambling, Bob Costas, calling Thursday night’s Braves-Phillies on MLB Network, continues to refuse to narrate any gambling come-ons, in game or between half innings. He insists that someone else handle that, often in a remote or recorded insert.

    Costas was raised in a household that was afflicted and conflicted by excessive gambling. He knows the scene and the sickness.

    He’s the opposite of “Everyone Loves” Charles Barkley, an admitted big-problems gambler who compiled staggering casino debt, yet still took the cash to star in commercials encouraging young male adult suckers to gamble. What a guy!

    A fan places a bet that New Jersey’s Ocean Casino. AP
    David Banks-USA TODAY Sports

    Apparently there was at least a modicum of internal shame within the Mets following that Camp Day afternoon disgrace when the Mets honored a young, TikTok oral sex “advisor” by having her throw out the ceremonial first pitch.

    Reader and Mets’ fan Henry Conte contacted team owner Steve Cohen to express his dismay. Cohen responded:

    “Henry — I’m sorry you feel that way. I’ve taken the appropriate remedial actions to ensure that this situation doesn’t occur again.

    Viral internet personality Haliey Welch throws the ceremonial first pitch of a game between the New York Mets and the Oakland Athletics at Citi Field on August 15, 2024. Getty Images

    “Poor judgment was exercised here and I’m as upset as you are. Thanks for the feedback. Best, Steve.”

    Not bad. No attempt to excuse the inexcusable. Though a fully public, unsolicited apology would have closed the case.

    Regardless, it sure beat Rob Manfred’s usual Sgt. Schultz act.

    Stephen A. can’t keep Yanks’ lineup order in order

    OK, so now after Stephen A. Smith’s latest self-revealment as an $18 million per (plus commercial endorsements) fake — last week’s blowhard, expert on-air assertion that “Bro” Aaron Judge benefits from batting behind Juan Soto when the reverse has been in place all season — was further proof that ESPN’s center stage voice, face and presence has a credibility rating of zero.

    Smith offers nothing better than his transparent bad-guess “facts,” his race hustles and ignorance of the sports he addresses from his self-constructed and ESPN-secured mountaintop throne.

    And it’s totally inconceivable that ESPN can any longer play stupid to Smith’s fakery. It’s certainly not as if ESPN viewers and subscribers weren’t years ago unaware of Smith’s bogus presence as ESPN execs increased his pay and presence.

    Stephen A. Smith Getty Images

    So what does ESPN, this time, do about it? The track record guess is nothing. ESPN’s double standard is granitized. Then wait until next time — it’s due sooner than later — for Smith to make more perverse comedy of himself and ESPN — then do nothing, again.


    If college players are academically deficient, why shouldn’t their schools’ partner networks?

    Near the top of Fox’s North Carolina-Minnesota on Thursday, a large graphic appeared suggesting that a key to the game was for UNC to “Play Complimentary Football.”

    Reader Ken Mortenson: “Apparently victory for UNC is based on saying only nice things to the Gophers during the game.”

    We’ll take a wild guess here: Fox meant “Complementary” and not “Complimentary.”


    For all the boring, repeatedly empty, expensive and unentertaining national TV MLB pregame shows, has it struck any production exec that a return to some form of “This Week in Baseball” might actually both attract and hold an audience?

    What baseball fan ever turned off TWIB? So why not produce one from a network’s studios?

    Of course, if such a show were resurrected, the producers might stuff it with bat-flips and all forms of me-dancing.


    Maybe the college can no longer afford a janitorial staff or to heat the dorms, but there’s always plenty of money for sports.

    Thursday, Monmouth opened at Eastern Washington. Oddly enough there is no direct flight from West Long Branch, N.J., to Cheney, Wa.


    Seems everything we watched on national network prime time TV last month was stuffed with empty-headed cheerleading: NBC’s Olympics, the Republican National Convention, the Democratic National Convention. Same sell, same smell.


    I suppose this is the week when NFL head coaches gather their fabulously paid troops to demand that not one of them cause the team 15 yards, let alone a win, for post-play, all-about-me misconduct.

    Then again, if that were the case, we wouldn’t be beginning another season when such impudence among professionals hasn’t grown worse.

    Tickets not all UK fans buying

    In this age of “more transparency” more and more seems attached to a con.

    The University of Kansas recently announced payment rules on season’s tickets for football and basketball. In addition to must-pay-for-tickets, there is a “required donation.” Required donation? Is that anything like a mob shakedown?

    Then there’s the National Football Foundation, which last week announced that there are a “Record-Breaking 3,534 Graduates Suiting Up For College Football This Season.”

    kansas head coach Lance Leipold AP

    The news release added that all of them will be in the quest for “additional diplomas,” as if they’re all both enrolled in active pursuit of graduate degrees — a masters or doctorate — in addition to playing football.

    Malarkey in pail! These are football players who have slipped through eligibility loopholes under the laughable guise of grad students, and the universities are complicit in the scheme and scam.

    The NFF would be taxed to find a tiny fraction of these 3,534 post-grad players in any campus structure outside the athletic department.

    And the TV and radio announcers, who wouldn’t dare ask what these players’ specific academic goals are, will obediently play this bogus game, continuing to identity them only as “graduate transfers.”

    Standards? What standards? Where?


    Despite a career as a slugger predicated on admitted steroid use, an arrest for domestic assault and incarceration for violation of a drug distribution probation, Jose Canseco last week was inducted into the A’s Hall of Fame.

    Athletics former outfielder Jose Canseco prepares to throw the ceremonial first pitch before the game against the San Francisco Giants at Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum. USA TODAY Sports via Reuters Con

    Al Attles, the Newark-born career-long Warriors — Philly, San Francisco, Oakland — player, coach and GM died Aug. 20, at 87.

    I was surprised to read in his obit that he was just 6-foot, as he played tall and tough.

    Attles also had a thoughtful way with words. Asked about comparing apples to oranges, he said, “They’re both good fruit.”


    I wonder how many employees of just sold-out WCBS News Radio 880 — committed, valued, news professionals — will enjoy, if possible, their first Labor Day off from labor in decades.

    Source link