hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetBakırköy Escortcasibom9018betgit casinojojobetmarsbahismatbet

Tag: Multiple

  • Amazon workers are striking at multiple delivery hubs. Here’s what you should know

    Amazon workers are striking at multiple delivery hubs. Here’s what you should know

    Amazon workers affiliated with the Teamsters union launched a strike at seven of the company’s delivery hubs less than a week before Christmas.

    The Teamsters said the workers, who voted to authorize strikes in recent days, joined picket lines on Thursday after Amazon ignored a Sunday deadline the union had set for contract negotiations.

    The company says it doesn’t expect the strike to impact holiday shipments.

    Amazon has a couple hundred employees at each delivery station. The Teamsters mainly have focused on organizing delivery drivers, who work for contractors that handle package deliveries for the company. But Amazon has rebuffed demands to come to the negotiating table since it doesn’t consider the drivers to be its employees.

    The International Brotherhood of Teamsters also says the union represents some Amazon warehouse workers.

    Here’s what else you need to know:

    The strikes are taking place at three delivery hubs in Southern California, and one each in San Francisco, New York City, Atlanta, Georgia, and Skokie, Illinois, according to the union’s announcement.

    The union hasn’t said how many workers are participating in the strike, nor how long it will go on. Vinnie Perrone, the president of a local Teamsters union in metro New York, said Thursday that the walkout would continue “as long as it takes.”

    The union, which claims to represent 10,000 Amazon workers at 10 facilities, said workers in more locations were prepared to join the fight.

    Employees at a company air hub in California have authorized a strike. So have workers at an Amazon warehouse in New York, which unionized with the nascent Amazon Labor Union in 2022 and has since affiliated with the Teamsters.

    The Teamsters says its local unions are also putting up picket lines at other Amazon warehouses. A company spokesperson said Thursday the strikers were “almost entirely outsiders, not Amazon employees or partners, and the suggestion otherwise is just another lie from the Teamsters.”

    The striking workers are fighting for higher wages, better benefits, and safer work conditions.

    The Teamsters have tried to get Amazon to come to the negotiating table since last year, when the labor organization first said it had unionized a group of delivery drivers in California who work for a contractor. Amazon — which denies it employs the workers — refused, leading the union to file unfair labor charges against the company at the National Labor Relations Board.

    In August, prosecutors at the federal labor agency classified Amazon as a “joint employer” of subcontracted drivers. In September, the company boosted hourly pay for the drivers amid the growing pressure.

    Amazon warehouse workers who voted to union in the New York City borough of Staten Island also have tried to get the company to engage in contract negotiations.

    The National Labor Relations Board certified the Amazon Labor Union election, but the company objected to the representation vote and refused to bargain. In the process, Amazon also filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the labor board, which it aaccused of tainting the vote.

    Some organizers involved with the unionization effort there have long believed Amazon would not come to the negotiating table unless workers went on strike.

    Amazon says it doesn’t expect the strike to impact its operations, but a walkout — especially one that lasts many days — could delay shipments in some metro areas.

    An Amazon spokesperson said Thursday that the company intentionally builds its sites close to where customers are, schedules shipping windows and works with other large carriers, such as UPS, to deliver products.

    “We believe in the strength of our network and plan for contingencies to minimize potential operational impact or costs,” the spokesperson said.

    Source link

  • Multiple Shepherd football transfers swarmed with early Division 1 offers | Journal-news

    Multiple Shepherd football transfers swarmed with early Division 1 offers | Journal-news

    SHEPHERDSTOWN — Over the past week a significant portion of Shepherd’s football stars entered the NCAA Transfer Portal with their sights set on a Division 1 roster spot now that the division is expanding roster sizes and scholarship amounts. Since then, the former Rams’ dreams have come true with heaps of Division 1 offers flooding their inboxes.

    Linebacker Brodie Carroll, who was recently named Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference Freshman of the Year, has become incredibly sought after. Since announcing his admission into the Transfer Portal on November 19, he has accumulated a total of six Division 1 offers. Those offers come from Western Illinois, Albany, New Hampshire, Stony Brook, Austin Peay and now Elon.

    Albany, New Hampshire, Stony Brook and Elon are all members of the Coastal Athletic Association Conference. Of the four schools New Hampshire has performed best within the conference this year, putting up a record of 6-2. Albany finished conference play 2-6 while Stony Brook and Elon both finished 5-3.

    Western Illinois is a member of the Missouri Valley Conference and Austin Peay is a member of the Ohio Valley Conference. Within their respective conferences both schools finished with a record of 3-5.

    Caroll’s fellow captains, Miles Greer and Cameron Dorner, have received a tsunami of early offers as well.

    Greer, a sophomore defensive back, has received a massive total of nine offers since announcing his admission into the Transfer Portal on November 20. The first offer he received was from Stony Brook, which was followed by Southern Utah, North Carolina A&T, Hampton, Maine, Campbell, Austin Peay, Morgan State and Tarleton State.

    This past year Southern Utah went 6-2 in the Big Sky Conference, North Carolina A&T went 0-8 in the Colonial Athletic Association Conference, Hampton went 2-6 in the Big South Conference, Maine went 3-5 in the Coastal Athletic Association Conference, Campbell went 1-7 in the Big South Conference, Morgan State went 3-2 in the Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference and Tarleton State went 6-2 in the United Athletic Conference.

    Dorner, a junior wide receiver, has accumulated five Division 1 offers since announcing his Transfer Portal admission on November 22. Dorner’s offers come from Tennessee Tech, Murray State, University of Tennessee at Martin, Maine and New Hampshire.

    Tennessee Tech, Murray State and University of Tennessee at Martin are all members of the Ohio Valley Conference. Tennessee Tech and UT Martin both finished conference play with 6-2 records and Murray State finished 0-8.

    Shepherd graduate defensive back Donte Harrsion has received two Division 1 offers. His offers come from Central Connecticut State and Furman.

    Central Connecticut State finished Northeast Conference play with a record of 5-1 and Furman finished Southern Conference play 2-5.

    Additionally, Shepherd’s starting quarterback this year, Lek Powell, has received one Division 1 offer from Charleston Southern.

    Charleston Southern concluded their Big South Conference season with a record of 0-8.

    Other Rams in the Transfer Portal who have yet to announce any offers they have received are linebacker JT Kouame-Yao, linebacker Harold O’Neal, wide receiver Will Patterson, running back Jahmari Nelson and wide receiver Asa Mayo.

    Source link

  • Racist text messages referencing slavery raise alarms in multiple states and prompt investigations

    Racist text messages referencing slavery raise alarms in multiple states and prompt investigations

    WASHINGTON — Racist text messages invoking slavery raised alarm across the country this week after they were sent to Black men, women and students, including middle schoolers, prompting inquiries by the FBI and other agencies.

    The messages, sent anonymously, were reported in several states, including New York, Alabama, California, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Tennessee. They generally used a similar tone but varied in wording.

    Some instructed the recipient to show up at an address at a particular time “with your belongings,” while others didn’t include a location. Some of them mentioned the incoming presidential administration.

    It wasn’t yet clear who was behind the messages and there was no comprehensive list of where they were sent, but high school and college students were among the recipients.

    The FBI said it was in touch with the Justice Department on the messages, and the Federal Communications Commission said it was investigating the texts “alongside federal and state law enforcement.” The Ohio Attorney General’s office also said it was looking into the matter.

    Tasha Dunham of Lodi, California, said her 16-year-old daughter showed her one of the messages Wednesday evening before her basketball practice.

    The text not only used her daughter’s name, but it directed her to report to a “plantation” in North Carolina, where Dunham said they’ve never lived. When they looked up the address, it was the location of a museum.

    “It was very disturbing,” Dunham said. “Everybody’s just trying to figure out what does this all mean for me? So, I definitely had a lot of fear and concern.”

    Her daughter initially thought it was a prank, but emotions are high following Tuesday’s presidential election. Dunham and her family thought it could be more nefarious and reported it to local law enforcement.

    “I wasn’t in slavery. My mother wasn’t in slavery. But we’re a couple of generations away. So, when you think about how brutal and awful slavery was for our people, it’s awful and concerning,” Dunham said.

    About six middle school students in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, received the messages too, said Megan Shafer, acting superintendent of the Lower Merion School District.

    “The racist nature of these text messages is extremely disturbing, made even more so by the fact that children have been targeted,” she wrote in a letter to parents.

    Students at some major universities, including Clemson in South Carolina and the University of Alabama, said they received the messages. The Clemson Police Department said in a statement that it been notified of the “deplorable racially motivated text and email messages” and encouraged anyone who received one to report it.

    Fisk University, a historically Black university in Nashville, Tennessee, issued a statement calling the messages that targeted some of its students “deeply unsettling.” It urged calm and assured students that the texts likely were from bots or malicious actors with “no real intentions or credibility.”

    Nick Ludlum, a senior vice president for the wireless industry trade group CTIA, said “wireless providers are aware of these threatening spam messages and are aggressively working to block them and the numbers that they are coming from.”

    David Brody, director of the Digital Justice Initiative at The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said that they aren’t sure who is behind the messages but estimated they had been sent to more than 10 states, including most Southern states, Maryland, Oklahoma and even the District of Columbia. The district’s Metropolitan Police force said in a statement that its intelligence unit was investigating the origins of the message.

    Brody said a number of civil rights laws can be applied to hate-related incidents. The leaders of several other civil rights organizations condemned the messages, including Margaret Huang, president and CEO of the Southern Poverty Law Center, who said, “Hate speech has no place in the South or our nation.”

    “The threat — and the mention of slavery in 2024 — is not only deeply disturbing, but perpetuates a legacy of evil that dates back to before the Jim Crow era, and now seeks to prevent Black Americans from enjoying the same freedom to pursue life, liberty, and happiness,” said NAACP President and CEO Derrick Johnson. “These actions are not normal. And we refuse to let them be normalized.”

    ___

    The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    Source link

  • Multiple Studies Reinforce the Emotional Well-Being of the RV Lifestyle for Kids

    Multiple Studies Reinforce the Emotional Well-Being of the RV Lifestyle for Kids

    WASHINGTON, DC / ACCESSWIRE / October 30, 2024 / Studies for years have revealed how RVing provides many physical and mental health benefits to living an active outdoor lifestyle, and two new research reports are demonstrating how those benefits extend to children.

    ‘Our recent surveys have shown that new RVers are younger and more diverse than ever before, and they are choosing RVing as a way to connect with nature and to counterbalance stress,’said Craig Kirby RV Industry Association President & CEO. ‘What these new studies show is that the physical and mental health benefits of outdoor recreation also extend to children.’

    According to the KOA 2024 Camping & Outdoor Hospitality Report on Outdoors and Wellness, campers who bring along their children say that spending time outdoors improves the children’s emotional well-being, relationships, and physical health. These findings confirm those uncovered in an earlier study, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, which shows the lifelong importance of childhood exposure to natural outdoor environments for physical, mental, and cognitive development.

    In its global study of 7,000 parents and children, the IKEA Play Report 2024noted that ‘children are less physically active and spend more time indoors. Most families spend a significant part of their everyday lives inside – and a lot of it in front of screens.’ The report continues, ‘The world faces unprecedented health, social, and ecological challenges – and intense global competition. This pressure has severe consequences in the form of decreasing wellbeing; mentally, emotionally, and physically.’

    Indeed, the increasingly indoor and sedentary lifestyles of children have been associated with ‘unfavorable behavioral conduct, lower self-esteem, poor concentration, and reduced psychological well-being, quality of life, and physical health,’ according to the International Journal study. This, it claims, has resulted in adults with significantly worse mental health.

    The health benefits of nature, it continues, have been attributed to ‘reduction in air pollution; increased physical activity, including walking and biking; and improved mental restoration through alleviation of anxiety and stress.’

    ‘This data does not come as a surprise to RV owners who grew up camping in their parents’ or grandparents’ RVs,’ added Kirby. ‘Not only do they value the myriad of benefits their children reap by spending time outdoors, they also experience a strengthening of family bonds by taking RV trips together.’

    This latter fact is born out in the KOA study by 93% of the respondents who agreed that camping strengthens family relationships. IKEA’s study found that the top parents’ emotional play priority is ‘having fun together as a family.’

    ‘Also among IKEA’s findings was that ‘making memories together’ was a top priority for parents – and that’s definitely what drives second- and third-generation RV buyers.’ said Kirby.

    Contact:

    Monika Geraci
    mgeraci@rvia.org

    Go RVing

    Go RVing’s mission is to inspire potential RVers, spark curiosity, and raise awareness about the benefits and accessibility of RVing through rich, authentic, and diverse storytelling. www.GoRVing.com.

    SOURCE: Go RVing

    View the original press release on accesswire.com

    Source link

  • Google’s moneymaking machine still pumping out massive profits despite multiple threats

    Google’s moneymaking machine still pumping out massive profits despite multiple threats

    SAN FRANCISCO — Google is still thriving while the company navigates through a pivotal shift to artificial intelligence and battles regulators trying to topple its internet empire.

    The latest evidence of Google’s prosperity emerged Tuesday with the release of its corporate parent Alphabet Inc.’s results for the July-September period. Both Alphabet’s profit and revenue increased at a brisker pace than industry analysts anticipated, thanks primarily to a moneymaking machine powered by Google’s ubiquitous search engine.

    Alphabet earned $26.3 billion, or $2.12 per share during the most recent quarter, a 34% increase from a year ago. Revenue rose 15% from the same time last year to $88.27 billion.

    The profits would have been even higher if Google wasn’t pouring so much money into building up its AI arsenal in a technological arms race that includes other industry heavyweights Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, Facebook parent Meta Platforms and rising star OpenAI. The AI investments are the primary reason Google’s capital expenditures in the past quarter soared 62% from the same time last year to $13.1 billion.

    Investors seemed pleased with the performance as Alphabet’s stock price climbed nearly 4% in extended trading after the numbers came out.

    But a 4-year-old antitrust case brought by the U.S. Department of Justice has cast a cloud of uncertainty over Google’s future.

    After weighing the evidence presented during a high-profile trial last year, a federal judge declared Google’s search engine is an illegal monopoly — a decision that has opened the door for a major shake-up. Earlier this month, the Justice Department suggested it might seek to break up Google as part of penalties that will be determined by U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta next summer.

    Besides the legal assault on its search engine, Google also has been ordered to tear down the barriers protecting its Play Store for Android smartphone apps. That ruling came earlier this month after a jury decided that operation also was an illegal monopoly. Google is also nearing the end of another antitrust trial in Virginia revolving around the technology underlying its digital ad network.

    As if the regulatory headaches aren’t enough, Google is also in the midst of a major makeover of its search engine that is putting an increasing emphasis on highlight results produced by artificial intelligence in response to competitive threats to alternative options relying on the same potentially revolutionary technology.

    For now, at least, Google remains a financial behemoth.

    “The momentum across the company is extraordinary,” Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said in a statement.

    Source link

  • 5-Star Recruit Brandon Arrington Announces College Football Team That Stood Out For Him Amid Multiple Options

    5-Star Recruit Brandon Arrington Announces College Football Team That Stood Out For Him Amid Multiple Options

    The 2026 recruiting class is packed with talent. Mount Miguel sophomore athlete Brandon Arrington, an elite football player and an outstanding track runner, is leading the pack. Various programs are competing to win the commitment of this elite player. But it looks like the two-way prospect already has his eyes locked on Mike Elko’s program. 

    As Josh Newberg reminded in his latest YouTube episode on On3 Recruits on October 24, Brandon Arrington is currently the nation’s No. 1 ATH of the 2026 recruiting class. The 6’2, 180-pounder hopped on the show to reveal the visits he’s taken so far which are Oklahoma, Alabama, USC, Texas A&M, and Nebraska. But when asked about his favorite program, he said, “I’ll say Texas A&M. Like their fan base is like insane. It was just insane just being there and watching everything.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Article continues below this ad

    Speed and versatility are the biggest strengths of Brandon Arrington, something college football teams need. In his last two high school seasons, he played and excelled on both sides of the football. Texas A&M is the first SEC school to make an offer to Brandon Arrington in January after a conversation with the Aggies co-DC Jordan Peterson. 

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Article continues below this ad

    Along with other offensive prospects, Brandon Arrington visited Texas A&M during their season opener against Notre Dame. The result may not have gotten in their favor as they were handed their first and only defeat of the season so far. But the impression has been made. In another interview with On3 Chad Simmons, Arrington said, “I like everything about Texas A&M. The staff and everybody is on me and they told me I’m their No. 1 target right now and they show it. I will be at Texas A&M a lot this year.” But we never know, his interest could change when he visits other schools. 

    Brandon Arrington is exploring his choices

    Brandon Arrington’s abilities as a track runner shone when he won the 150-meter title as a freshman in the 2023 California Winter Outdoor Championships in Arcadia. He knows that his agility is going to be a huge asset in college football as he said, “I feel like my track times benefit me for getting these big offers because colleges love speed.” Last season, he racked up 310 receiving yards and four offensive TDs. On defense, he made 25 tackles and also scored a punt return TD on special teams. Indeed, winning an explosive and versatile player with lightning speed could make a huge difference in a team. 

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Article continues below this ad

    Arrington has also confirmed that he has a good relationship with the coaching staff of several schools including Texas A&M, Alabama, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and more. He’ll be on the road to visit Texas A&M’s upcoming SEC clash with No. 8 LSU on October 27. The highly sought prospect also voiced his desire to visit other campuses he hasn’t visited yet which are Ohio State, Oregon, and Tennessee. But as of now, we can only let the suspense boil and wait for him to drop his decision at the end of his junior year.

    Source link

  • Multiple students report harassment, non-consensual filming by “Lifestyle Coach”, Minje Kim

    CW: This article contains discussion of harassment and non-consensual filming. For help contact 1800 RESPECT, and for the SCO: +61 2 8627 6808, and [email protected]

    Multiple women have come forward to report harassment and non-consensual filming on the University of Sydney Camperdown campus by an individual known as Minje Kim. 

    Kim runs a highly popular ‘personal coaching’ service via instagram, where he claims to “Guide Men to build social confidence” and provides instructional videos on how to approach women. 

    In many of his videos, Kim approaches women on the University of Sydney campus while recording the interaction on a pair of Rayban Meta Smart Glasses, which come with a discreet in-built camera. 

    Many women have claimed that content posted to Kim’s instagram page of 384,000 followers was both recorded and uploaded without their consent. In the past week, a Reddit post in r/usyd warning students about Kim was circulated around student communities and social media, prompting multiple women to come forward with victim statements against Kim.

    Statements provided to Honi allege Kim did not tell students about the nature of their interaction, in which he often requested phone numbers or social media contacts. One student reported they were told by Kim that he was not recording them, only to later find their conversation shared online.

    “When I asked if he was recording, he lied and said no”, the student stated. “We talked briefly, and he asked for my phone number, but he didn’t mention that his glasses could record video. Later, I found out he had posted our conversation on Instagram, where it got over 3,000 likes.”

    One victim told us that they attempted to bring the alleged harassment to the attention of NSW Police, stating “I reported this to the police, but they said filming in public is legal.”

    While in New South Wales, the Surveillance Devices Act (2007) prohibits the recording of a private conversation, the definition of private conversation under this act does not include conversation to which it can be reasonably expected might be overheard. 

    Due to the majority of Kim’s video’s being filmed in public spaces on the University campus, pursuit of legal action may be difficult for individuals recorded without consent. If the content, however, was being filmed for commercial purposes, consent likely needs to be obtained.

    In this incident, students claim they were not made aware that their conversations were being recorded until they were published and distributed on Kim’s social media.

    As with many popular male-oriented lifestyle coaches, Kim’s viewership seems to largely come from young men, who often take to the video’s comment section — or in some cases, the personal social media pages of individuals depicted — to comment on womens’ physical appearances. Comments on Kim’s videos make statements such as “women have it so easy”, “ask what is your body count” or express disapproval when women in the videos state they are in a relationship.

    Along with these allegations of non consensual filming, one student stated that Kim “asked if I was Chinese because of my clothing style, which made me really uncomfortable.” 

    Another student, who was also secretly recorded, stated that after the video was uploaded to social media, they faced online harassment, “Many derogatory comments attacking my appearance and making anti-Chinese remarks have appeared, causing me significant mental distress.” 

    One student reported an instance where Kim “started making me uncomfortable with small actions, like deliberately getting closer, putting his hand on the back of my chair, and even trying to hold my hand multiple times.” The student also stated that upon her leaving the situation, Kim asked where she lived and if he could come to her apartment.

    This student recounted ongoing harassment from Kim after the initial in-person interaction, stating that “Later, he sent me a few photos showing off his muscles, but I didn’t reply”.

    The majority of the women who have come forward against Kim are international students. Victim statements indicate that Kim’s behaviour has been taking place for over a year, with the earliest known instance dating back to September of 2023.

    It is unknown at the time whether Kim is a student at the University of Sydney. Victims state that Kim has claimed to be both a student of pharmacy and engineering at the University, though his actual student status remains unclear to Honi.

    A statement by the Sydney University Postgraduate Representative Association (SUPRA) Education Officer read, ““We strongly condemn any form of harassment and violations of students’ privacy. This week, SUPRA has written to the DVCE’s office, urging the university to take immediate steps to protect the safety of the community. We encourage any affected PG students to reach out to SUPRA’s legal service for support”

    Following the backlash of the Reddit post, Kim has taken down the videos of the students on campus in the last few days, but videos of Kim approaching women in other public settings around campus — such as Victoria Park and Broadway — remain.

    When contacted for comment, Kim denied the existence of the videos, stating, “There is no uni videos bro”.  

    When asked for comment, a University Spokesperson stated that, “We’re committed to creating a safe environment for our students and staff and are deeply concerned by these reports. We’re taking steps to investigate and protect our community, and have reported the matter to the relevant authorities.”

    The SRC Women’s Officers were contacted for comment but did not reply.

    If you have experienced any form of sexual misconduct online, offshore or on campus you can access University services here or in cases of emergencies or urgent help contact 000 immediately.

    Amendment: This article was amended to include comment from SUPRA and further safety resources (18/10/24, 11:54am).

    Source link

  • Multiple students report harassment, non-consensual filming by “Lifestyle Coach”, Minje Kim

    CW: This article contains discussion of harassment and non-consensual filming. For help contact 1800 RESPECT, and for the SCO: +61 2 8627 6808, and [email protected]

    Multiple women have come forward to report harassment and non-consensual filming on the University of Sydney Camperdown campus by an individual known as Minje Kim. 

    Kim runs a highly popular ‘personal coaching’ service via instagram, where he claims to “Guide Men to build social confidence” and provides instructional videos on how to approach women. 

    In many of his videos, Kim approaches women on the University of Sydney campus while recording the interaction on a pair of Rayban Meta Smart Glasses, which come with a discreet in-built camera. 

    Many women have claimed that content posted to Kim’s instagram page of 384,000 followers was both recorded and uploaded without their consent. In the past week, a Reddit post in r/usyd warning students about Kim was circulated around student communities and social media, prompting multiple women to come forward with victim statements against Kim.

    Statements provided to Honi allege Kim did not tell students about the nature of their interaction, in which he often requested phone numbers or social media contacts. One student reported they were told by Kim that he was not recording them, only to later find their conversation shared online.

    “When I asked if he was recording, he lied and said no”, the student stated. “We talked briefly, and he asked for my phone number, but he didn’t mention that his glasses could record video. Later, I found out he had posted our conversation on Instagram, where it got over 3,000 likes.”

    One victim told us that they attempted to bring the alleged harassment to the attention of NSW Police, stating “I reported this to the police, but they said filming in public is legal.”

    While in New South Wales, the Surveillance Devices Act (2007) prohibits the recording of a private conversation, the definition of private conversation under this act does not include conversation to which it can be reasonably expected might be overheard. 

    Due to the majority of Kim’s video’s being filmed in public spaces on the University campus, pursuit of legal action may be difficult for individuals recorded without consent. If the content, however, was being filmed for commercial purposes, consent likely needs to be obtained.

    In this incident, students claim they were not made aware that their conversations were being recorded until they were published and distributed on Kim’s social media.

    As with many popular male-oriented lifestyle coaches, Kim’s viewership seems to largely come from young men, who often take to the video’s comment section — or in some cases, the personal social media pages of individuals depicted — to comment on womens’ physical appearances. Comments on Kim’s videos make statements such as “women have it so easy”, “ask what is your body count” or express disapproval when women in the videos state they are in a relationship.

    Along with these allegations of non consensual filming, one student stated that Kim “asked if I was Chinese because of my clothing style, which made me really uncomfortable.” 

    Another student, who was also secretly recorded, stated that after the video was uploaded to social media, they faced online harassment, “Many derogatory comments attacking my appearance and making anti-Chinese remarks have appeared, causing me significant mental distress.” 

    One student reported an instance where Kim “started making me uncomfortable with small actions, like deliberately getting closer, putting his hand on the back of my chair, and even trying to hold my hand multiple times.” The student also stated that upon her leaving the situation, Kim asked where she lived and if he could come to her apartment.

    This student recounted ongoing harassment from Kim after the initial in-person interaction, stating that “Later, he sent me a few photos showing off his muscles, but I didn’t reply”.

    The majority of the women who have come forward against Kim are international students. Victim statements indicate that Kim’s behaviour has been taking place for over a year, with the earliest known instance dating back to September of 2023.

    It is unknown at the time whether Kim is a student at the University of Sydney. Victims state that Kim has claimed to be both a student of pharmacy and engineering at the University, though his actual student status remains unclear to Honi.

    A statement by the Sydney University Postgraduate Representative Association (SUPRA) Education Officer read, ““We strongly condemn any form of harassment and violations of students’ privacy. This week, SUPRA has written to the DVCE’s office, urging the university to take immediate steps to protect the safety of the community. We encourage any affected PG students to reach out to SUPRA’s legal service for support”

    Following the backlash of the Reddit post, Kim has taken down the videos of the students on campus in the last few days, but videos of Kim approaching women in other public settings around campus — such as Victoria Park and Broadway — remain.

    When contacted for comment, Kim denied the existence of the videos, stating, “There is no uni videos bro”.  

    When asked for comment, a University Spokesperson stated that, “We’re committed to creating a safe environment for our students and staff and are deeply concerned by these reports. We’re taking steps to investigate and protect our community, and have reported the matter to the relevant authorities.”

    The SRC Women’s Officers were contacted for comment but did not reply.

    If you have experienced any form of sexual misconduct online, offshore or on campus you can access University services here or in cases of emergencies or urgent help contact 000 immediately.

    Amendment: This article was amended to include comment from SUPRA and further safety resources (18/10/24, 11:54am).

    Source link

  • Multiple students report harassment, non-consensual filming by “Lifestyle Coach”, Minje Kim

    CW: This article contains discussion of harassment and non-consensual filming.

    Multiple women have come forward to report harassment and non-consensual filming on the University of Sydney Camperdown campus by an individual known as Minje Kim. 

    Kim runs a highly popular ‘personal coaching’ service via instagram, where he claims to “Guide Men to build social confidence” and provides instructional videos on how to approach women. 

    In many of his videos, Kim approaches women on the University of Sydney campus while recording the interaction on a pair of Rayban Meta Smart Glasses, which come with a discreet in-built camera. 

    Many women have claimed that content posted to Kim’s instagram page of 384,000 followers was both recorded and uploaded without their consent. In the past week, a Reddit post in r/usyd warning students about Kim was circulated around student communities and social media, prompting multiple women to come forward with victim statements against Kim.

    Statements provided to Honi allege Kim did not tell students about the nature of their interaction, in which he often requested phone numbers or social media contacts. One student reported they were told by Kim that he was not recording them, only to later find their conversation shared online.

    “When I asked if he was recording, he lied and said no”, the student stated. “We talked briefly, and he asked for my phone number, but he didn’t mention that his glasses could record video. Later, I found out he had posted our conversation on Instagram, where it got over 3,000 likes.”

    One victim told us that they attempted to bring the alleged harassment to the attention of NSW Police, stating “I reported this to the police, but they said filming in public is legal.”

    While in New South Wales, the Surveillance Devices Act (2007) prohibits the recording of a private conversation, the definition of private conversation under this act does not include conversation to which it can be reasonably expected might be overheard. 

    Due to the majority of Kim’s video’s being filmed in public spaces on the University campus, pursuit of legal action may be difficult for individuals recorded without consent. If the content, however, was being filmed for commercial purposes, consent likely needs to be obtained.

    In this incident, students claim they were not made aware that their conversations were being recorded until they were published and distributed on Kim’s social media.

    As with many popular male-oriented lifestyle coaches, Kim’s viewership seems to largely come from young men, who often take to the video’s comment section — or in some cases, the personal social media pages of individuals depicted — to comment on womens’ physical appearances. Comments on Kim’s videos make statements such as “women have it so easy”, “ask what is your body count” or express disapproval when women in the videos state they are in a relationship.

    Along with these allegations of non consensual filming, one student stated that Kim “asked if I was Chinese because of my clothing style, which made me really uncomfortable.” 

    Another student, who was also secretly recorded, stated that after the video was uploaded to social media, they faced online harassment, “Many derogatory comments attacking my appearance and making anti-Chinese remarks have appeared, causing me significant mental distress.” 

    One student reported an instance where Kim “started making me uncomfortable with small actions, like deliberately getting closer, putting his hand on the back of my chair, and even trying to hold my hand multiple times.” The student also stated that upon her leaving the situation, Kim asked where she lived and if he could come to her apartment.

    This student recounted ongoing harassment from Kim after the initial in-person interaction, stating that “Later, he sent me a few photos showing off his muscles, but I didn’t reply”.

    The majority of the women who have come forward against Kim are international students. Victim statements indicate that Kim’s behaviour has been taking place for over a year, with the earliest known instance dating back to September of 2023.

    It is unknown at the time whether Kim is a student at the University of Sydney. Victims state that Kim has claimed to be both a student of pharmacy and engineering at the University, though his actual student status remains unclear to Honi.

    Following the backlash of the Reddit post, Kim has taken down the videos of the students on campus in the last few days, but videos of Kim approaching women in other public settings around campus — such as Victoria Park and Broadway — remain.

    When contacted for comment, Kim denied the existence of the videos, stating, “There is no uni videos bro”.  

    When asked for comment, a University Spokesperson stated that, “We’re committed to creating a safe environment for our students and staff and are deeply concerned by these reports. We’re taking steps to investigate and protect our community, and have reported the matter to the relevant authorities.”

    The SRC Women’s Officers were contacted for comment but did not reply.

    If you have experienced any form of sexual misconduct online, offshore or on campus you can access University services here or in cases of emergencies or urgent help contact 000 immediately.

    Source link

  • Multiple students report harassment, non-consensual filming by “Lifestyle Coach”, Minje Kim

    CW: This article contains discussion of harassment and non-consensual filming.

    Multiple women have come forward to report harassment and non-consensual filming on the University of Sydney Camperdown campus by an individual known as Minje Kim. 

    Kim runs a highly popular ‘personal coaching’ service via instagram, where he claims to “Guide Men to build social confidence” and provides instructional videos on how to approach women. 

    In many of his videos, Kim approaches women on the University of Sydney campus while recording the interaction on a pair of Rayban Meta Smart Glasses, which come with a discreet in-built camera. 

    Many women have claimed that content posted to Kim’s instagram page of 384,000 followers was both recorded and uploaded without their consent. In the past week, a Reddit post in r/usyd warning students about Kim was circulated around student communities and social media, prompting multiple women to come forward with victim statements against Kim.

    Statements provided to Honi allege Kim did not tell students about the nature of their interaction, in which he often requested phone numbers or social media contacts. One student reported they were told by Kim that he was not recording them, only to later find their conversation shared online.

    “When I asked if he was recording, he lied and said no”, the student stated. “We talked briefly, and he asked for my phone number, but he didn’t mention that his glasses could record video. Later, I found out he had posted our conversation on Instagram, where it got over 3,000 likes.”

    One victim told us that they attempted to bring the alleged harassment to the attention of NSW Police, stating “I reported this to the police, but they said filming in public is legal.”

    While in New South Wales, the Surveillance Devices Act (2007) prohibits the recording of a private conversation, the definition of private conversation under this act does not include conversation to which it can be reasonably expected might be overheard. 

    Due to the majority of Kim’s video’s being filmed in public spaces on the University campus, pursuit of legal action may be difficult for individuals recorded without consent. If the content, however, was being filmed for commercial purposes, consent likely needs to be obtained.

    In this incident, students claim they were not made aware that their conversations were being recorded until they were published and distributed on Kim’s social media.

    As with many popular male-oriented lifestyle coaches, Kim’s viewership seems to largely come from young men, who often take to the video’s comment section — or in some cases, the personal social media pages of individuals depicted — to comment on womens’ physical appearances. Comments on Kim’s videos make statements such as “women have it so easy”, “ask what is your body count” or express disapproval when women in the videos state they are in a relationship.

    Along with these allegations of non consensual filming, one student stated that Kim “asked if I was Chinese because of my clothing style, which made me really uncomfortable.” 

    Another student, who was also secretly recorded, stated that after the video was uploaded to social media, they faced online harassment, “Many derogatory comments attacking my appearance and making anti-Chinese remarks have appeared, causing me significant mental distress.” 

    One student reported an instance where Kim “started making me uncomfortable with small actions, like deliberately getting closer, putting his hand on the back of my chair, and even trying to hold my hand multiple times.” The student also stated that upon her leaving the situation, Kim asked where she lived and if he could come to her apartment.

    This student recounted ongoing harassment from Kim after the initial in-person interaction, stating that “Later, he sent me a few photos showing off his muscles, but I didn’t reply”.

    The majority of the women who have come forward against Kim are international students. Victim statements indicate that Kim’s behaviour has been taking place for over a year, with the earliest known instance dating back to September of 2023.

    It is unknown at the time whether Kim is a student at the University of Sydney. Victims state that Kim has claimed to be both a student of pharmacy and engineering at the University, though his actual student status remains unclear to Honi.

    Following the backlash of the Reddit post, Kim has taken down the videos of the students on campus in the last few days, but videos of Kim approaching women in other public settings around campus — such as Victoria Park and Broadway — remain.

    When contacted for comment, Kim denied the existence of the videos, stating, “There is no uni videos bro”.  

    When asked for comment, a University Spokesperson stated that, “We’re committed to creating a safe environment for our students and staff and are deeply concerned by these reports. We’re taking steps to investigate and protect our community, and have reported the matter to the relevant authorities.”

    The SRC Women’s Officers were contacted for comment but did not reply.

    If you have experienced any form of sexual misconduct online, offshore or on campus you can access University services here or in cases of emergencies or urgent help contact 000 immediately.

    Source link