Meghan Markle is all set to make a comeback in the public domain in 2025. The Duchess of Sussex was rarely spotted out and about in the city or on occasion as she was busy prepping up for her grand comeback with the New Year. According to Page Six reports, she will launch her “cooking, gardening and entertaining” based show on Netflix in “early 2025.” In addition, she will also draw curtains on her much-anticipated lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard.
Meghan Markle is set for a public comeback in 2025 with the launch of a Netflix show and her own lifestyle brand, marking an exciting new chapter in her career. (Photo by Raul ARBOLEDA / AFP)(AFP)
The news of her brand’s launch comes amid speculations that the developments of her new project were not very impressive. The brand promotions so far include sending baskets of homemade jams to Markle’s best friends such as Kris Jenner, Chrissy Teigen and Abigail Spencer. There were also questions about the team working on the brand as the jams were not made in collaboration with local factories or jam makers near her home in Southern California.
A Hollywood insider even told Page Six that they had heard rumours of the brand turning into a “sh** show”. However, another source told the news outlet, “She’s been keeping her cards close to her chest. But I can tell you that she is the CEO of American Riviera Orchard, so all these rumours about her having a hard time finding a CEO are false.”
To get the brand up and running, a source revealed, she has been working with people outside the Archwell Foundation but some staff workers are involved.
“As far as Meghan being quiet, she’s been in the background working on her entrepreneurial efforts,” said an industry insider, “both the Netflix project and her brand will come out within the same timeline in the New Year.”
The comparison draws between Markle and Martha Stewart
Markle is set to follow in Martha Stewart’s footsteps with her new Netflix show, which focuses on “the joys of cooking, gardening, entertaining, and friendship.” The series was filmed in California, including at the luxurious Montecito estate of philanthropists Tom and Sherrie Cipolla, well-known figures in the local social scene. Promotional clips have featured Markle in the kitchen, showcasing her personal style and approach to lifestyle topics.
A close friend of Stewart shared her thoughts about Markle emerging as a potential competition, they told the news outlet, “We’ve joked that she doesn’t even think twice about Meghan Markle…she doesn’t even consider her to be on her radar!” Talking about Stewart’s hit Netflix documentary, titled Martha, the friend sniffed, “Martha’s documentary was celebrated, but what Meghan and Prince Harry do is mocked. They’re in two separate universes when it comes to public opinion.”
Similarly, former Snap Chat executive and writer of the Highly Flammable Trends newsletter, Rachel Richardson said, “Meghan should sit down and watch the Netflix doc ‘Martha’ and make notes, as it lays out the pitfalls and opportunities afforded to women who run lifestyle brands.”
She added, “What Martha has aced her whole career is understanding how to go viral and what platforms help her do that. TV, of course, is a powerful medium and the Netflix show will help her reach millions. But Meghan needs savvy strategies for social media.”
She continued that the Duchess should “eschew her buttoned-up vibe, If she is forward thinking then she’ll be strategizing about live streaming as that’s really having a moment.”
Meanwhile, Markle has been seeking guidance from influential friends like Claire Waight Keller, the former Givenchy designer behind her wedding dress, who recently secured a major deal with Uniqlo. She’s also been collaborating with Victoria Jackson, a QVC star and makeup entrepreneur, as she navigates her new projects and ventures.
Talking about Markle’s legal troubles, her brand has faced some trademark challenges. Her legal team recently requested an extension from the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to finalize the trademark for the yet-to-launch brand. The request came after a luxury retailer, Harry & David, raised concerns that the brand name is too similar to its “Royal Riviera” line.
Additionally, the USPTO previously denied Markle’s trademark application in September, citing issues with geographical location names. Markle’s team is addressing these hurdles, and the process is expected to take more time.
Meanwhile, Markle will be attending the Paley Honors Fall Gala next week, while Prince Harry will be speaking at The New York Times DealBook Conference. There were rumours of trouble in paradise as Markle and Harry were not spotted together in a long time. However, a source with knowledge about the couple sighed as they told the news outlet, “They are going to be criticized no matter what. When they’re together, there’s headlines that Meghan is too controlling or trying to be the star of the show.”
The source continued, “The Duke and Duchess are a married couple and in a normal relationship, you don’t do every single thing together…they also have to raise a 5 and a 3-year-old and somebody has to remain in California while the other person is out of state.”
They added, “It also wouldn’t make sense for Meghan to be the focal point for Harry’s patronages, and the same goes for Meghan’s philanthropic efforts, for example if it’s something to do with women, which is near and dear to her heart. “But you do see an appropriate overlap — for example when they went to Columbia to further the work of their foundation, then you see them work as a unit.”
The couple’s Netflix documentary, Polo will stream on the platform on December 10.
But it’s likely that Netflix executives won’t care about the quality (or lack thereof) of the pugilism.
All that was ringing in their ears was the size of the audience (an impressive 65 million concurrent streams at peak), that the servers held up under the enormous demand (only just … at one stage they were creaking more than Tyson) and that every ad was sold.
Jake Paul throws a punch at Mike Tyson. Photo / Getty Images
Its success told senior executives at the world’s biggest movie and TV subscription service – and its Big Tech rivals like Amazon and Apple – that Netflix can be a major player in live sport.
Of the five established tech players circling live sports rights – Apple, Amazon, YouTube, TikTok and Netflix – until now it has been the latter that has been perceived to be dragging the chain.
But it’s Johnny-come-lately Netflix who is making the biggest moves.
For close to a decade, the subscription platform scoffed at the idea of buying sports rights.
While its phenomenally successful Drive to Survive Formula One series and Michael Jordan’s brilliant The Last Dance cemented its reputation as the master of the fast-emerging fly-on-the-wall doco genre, Netflix seemed indifferent to live sport.
Instead, it baffled us with weird and offbeat plays like its “Netflix Cup” golf tournament, a “crossover” event featuring F1 drivers and professional golfers, including Lando Norris and Rickie Fowler, and dropped it after only one year.
In hindsight, we can now see that Netflix was slowly but surely building livestreaming capability while also testing its audience’s appetite for personality-driven live sports.
And in May this year, the world’s biggest subscription-based streaming service suddenly shifted gears and jumped all-in to live sport with the first of three big plays – a live comedy roast of retiring NFL superstar Tom Brady.
NFL Xmas Day to come followed by wrestling and UFC
While the three-hour Brady show was cringeful and as painful to watch as Tyson-Paul, it’s likely that the Netflix bosses were only interested in two things … did people watch and did the servers hold up?
It was “yes” on both counts.
Netflix revealed the The Roast of Tom Brady was the 26th-most-watched show in the platform’s history, drawing more than 22 million viewers in the US alone.
Executives could sense a growing appetite for sport among its subscriber base.
Former NFL star Tom Brady whispers in the ear of comedian Jeff Ross during the Netflix show The Roast of Tom Brady.
Paul-Tyson was the next test, one made easier by being able to deal directly with the pair rather than a major sports organisation.
Part of the US$60 million ($102m) that the boxers reportedly earned was their participation in a build-up series called Countdown, which drew massive male audiences ahead of the fight.
It was another example of Netflix changing the sports content landscape. Produce a Drive to Survive-style series that then culminates in a major live event.
Crucially, the servers largely stood up to the capacity test last weekend and the blowback over the fight’s poor quality was manageable for Netflix because it did not charge subscribers extra (had it done so, fury levels would have been much higher).
By selling out its entire advertising inventory, Netflix also took a giant step towards entrenching a cheaper (or free) ad-supported tier as an option to its subscription service, a move it needs to make to secure its long-term future.
Netflix can now swing into its third and biggest sports play of this year – two headlining Christmas Day NFL matches – with confidence its streaming infrastructure will cope under intense demand.
The NFL (American National Football League) deal is a more conventional one. Netflix paid US$150m for the two games. At US$75m each, that sounds expensive but the production of an original mid-tier movie costs the streaming service about the same figure. And ad spots for Christmas Day – at US$5m a pop – are already sold out.
Netflix won’t charge a pay-per-view (PPV) fee for the Christmas Day NFL extravaganza and has added further popular appeal for viewers by securing Beyoncé as halftime entertainment in the Houston Texans-Baltimore Ravens game.
In that sense, its approach is similar to Amazon, which is using high profile one-off sports encounters from the Champions League and English Premier League (EPL) football as part of its Prime programming to persuade users to retain their annual sub to the online shopping giant.
Netflix thinks you’re less likely to dump your subscription if you know that next month’s treats include some high profile sport as well as the new season of Bridgerton.
Already, Netflix has an industry-leading churn figure of only 2% and occasional monthly sporting treats will only aid subscriber retention, while offering big audiences for advertisers on any lower-tier offering.
But Netflix’s biggest sports play is still to come.
World Wrestling Entertainment and Dana White’s UFC, both now owned by the same company, are expected to make Netflix infinitely more powerful by doing deals where content from the two combat sport juggernauts features regularly on the platform.
That will raise the stakes substantially in sport’s battle of the streamers.
YouTube and its ‘we’re your friends’ sports strategy
Once upon a time, YouTube was considered the mortal enemy of sports bodies. Now it is the No 1 destination for online sports content.
Gone are the days when organisations like New Zealand Rugby and broadcasters Sky TV would comb the Google-owned platform for “illegal” content such as game highlights posted by fans.
Now no marketing executive from Barcelona FC to the Blues could hold down their job without an effective strategy for using the video-sharing platform.
How did this happen? And is it a sustainable strategy in the face of the other tech players?
The attitude of rights holders has shifted due to the sheer size and reach of YouTube’s global audience of 2.5 billion active monthly users. Sports teams and leagues (and some broadcasters) now see livestreaming and digital highlights on YouTube as just as vital as linear broadcasts.
There are several reasons why.
Firstly, people are lazy and don’t search for sports content online anymore. Instead, YouTube has become their default destination. Google long ago recognised this and created a dedicated business unit to attract rights-holders and help monetise and protect their content.
For smaller sports and competitions who can’t afford the cost of creating and marketing their own digital channels, this has been a godsend.
It’s cheaper than building your own platform and while Google takes a decent slice of the ad or subscription revenue, the trade-off is a massively increased viewing audience which grows in popularity and, ultimately, other commercial opportunities.
This is the lesson New Zealand Rugby learned the hard way and why it ran up the white flag and made YouTube the primary home of its specialised behind-the-scenes content, when it was originally planned solely for the national union’s new app, NZR+.
YouTube now holds deals with everybody from Sky Sports UK for Premier League content to the International Olympic Committee, UFC, NBA and Formula One, who all run partnership channels.
“Google is the largest search engine in the world and YouTube is the second-largest,” said YouTube’s head of sport, Rob Pilgrim.
“People expect highlights when they come to the site. People come to YouTube to search after major sporting events and there is a 97% chance you will find the moment on YouTube legitimately.
“The days where a highlights video might be posted 24 hours later are gone. Organisations are putting up highlights in minutes, not hours now.”
YouTube holds deals with everyone from Sky Sports UK for Premier League content to the Olympics and more. Pictured is goalscoring Nottingham Forest and All Whites striker Chris Wood. Photo / Getty Images
Increasingly, YouTube is adding subscriber channels driven by individual sporting stars and live coverage itself as a powerful means of seducing viewers into spending even more time on the platform.
Cristiano Ronaldo’s channel has 68 million viewers. Jake Paul’s has about 22 million. The NBA’s channel draws a similar number.
It’s why the organising body of the UK’s women’s professional football league threw out its strategy of creating an exclusive OTT (over-the-top terrestrial) platform to instead screen selected matches live on YouTube.
Those games are regularly drawing an audience that’s five times bigger now.
It’s a strategy markedly different to Apple, Amazon and Netflix but one that continues to strike paydirt and keep Google in the game.
Time’s ticking: Will Tiktok eat everyone’s lunch?
TikTok is the outlier keeping rival tech executives awake at night.
With a billion active monthly users (more than three times YouTube’s audience), the maverick Chinese app attracts one in eight people living on the planet.
And that’s causing the sports world to take notice. There’s now not an athlete of substance or sporting team or league of consequence not on TikTok.
TikTok says 57% of its users watch sports content on the app every week, which is why it’s making an aggressive push into sport, including live broadcasting rights.
With its emphasis on “co-creation”, TikTok believes it’s best placed among the BigTech players to secure younger fans, top athletes and progressive sports bodies.
An ability to partner with individual stars as well as leading teams and brands to showcase their personalities (think the recent Fast5 netball team pre-match dances) is TikTok’s secret sauce.
By also encouraging “creators” to further augment and share that content, it only amplifies the message and reaches more people.
To encourage “user activity”, TikTok spends millions on developing “content tools” making it easy for fans to add special effects, music and graphics to clips.
These sit in its newly-introduced “SportsTok” area within its app.
“SportsTok is powered by the community-driven nature of the platform,” says TikTok’s marketing spiel. “62% of TikTok users watch major sports events to be part of cultural conversations.”
TikTok is trying to eat the lunch of YouTube, which operates in a similar ecosystem but with longer-form clips and premium product often behind a paywall.
Its strategy draws existing sports fans by working with athletes, but also attracts passive viewers, by partnering with sports-adjacent creators and communities, and new viewers attracted by relatable content.
No other tech platform can match this.
It’s why Hyundai used TikTok exclusively to launch its new electric car in collaboration with the NFL, which drew 2.3 billion video views.
TikTok’s latest big sporting experiment launched this month.
It has partnered with David Beckham’s Inter Miami Major League Soccer (MLS) franchise and its star player Lionel Messi to provide exclusive player-focused content during key playoff matches this month.
The “Player Spotlight: Messi” taps into Messi’s immense global fanbase, taking viewers behind the scenes before, during and after matches and is a play by the MLS to capture younger viewers.
Despite short-form content being the platform’s lifeblood, TikTok has also been buying selected live sports rights and its global head of sports partnerships Rollo Goldstaub confirmed placing itself in a nexus of both types of content is the app’s sweet spot.
“We think official rights are brilliant and they do really well on TikTok, but it’s about all of the different behind-the-scenes stuff, the characters of the athletes involved in the sports, the diets, how the training facilities work, the chef making the meals. It’s all of that really interesting rich information that can perform so well,” Goldstaub said.
“Sports is a key vertical for the business. It’s a top-five category.”
Next week: In the final part of this Sports Insider feature on sport’s big tech players, we reveal how Sky TV New Zealand can ward off its cashed-up international rivals and remain a dominant player in Kiwi sport.
Jeff McTainsh:Grant Nisbett and Tony Johnson get to rest their tonsils as Sky’s rookie commentator makes his debut as a television test match caller when the All Blacks face Italy this weekend.
Chris Wood: The new sheriff of Nottingham Forest can’t stop scoring. Five goals in two games for the All Whites while on international duty continued his hot streak. So does the EPL star now rate ahead of Wynton Rufer as our greatest striker?
As far as Martha Stewart is concerned, the new documentary about her life and career is not a good thing.
The lifestyle guru and self-made former billionaire has slammed the film “Martha,” which started streaming Oct. 30 on Netflix, as “lazy” and “not the story that makes me, me” at the Retail CEO Influencer Forum in September. “It’s more about my stupid trial, which was so unfair.”
And this week, Stewart doubled down in an interview with the Times, insisting that director RJ Cutler focuses too much on her 2004 insider trading trial in the movie’s second half.
“The trial and the actual incarceration was less than two years out of an 83-year life,” she said. “I considered it a vacation, to tell you the truth.”
Indeed, those two years — from her troublesome phone call to her stockbroker as she was en route to Cabo San Lucas all the way to her final day in Alderson prison in West Virginia — take up nearly half of the two-hour doc.
Despite doing press for it, Martha Stewart is not happy with the documentary about her life and career. Courtesy of Netflix
Bitter Stewart is irate when she mentions the courtroom drama in the movie, which she participated in, saying the responsible parties, including eventual FBI director James Comey, deserve to be thrown into a blender.
“It was so horrifying to me that I had to go through that to be a trophy for these idiots in the US Attorney’s office,” she says of the high-profile trial.
“Those prosecutors should have been put in a Cuisinart and turned on high. I was a trophy — a prominent woman, the first billionaire woman in America. ‘We got her.’”
When she begins serving her five-month prison sentence in 2004, actors read aloud her diary entries that criticize the food and staff.
Stewart says the government lawyers who went after her in 2004 ” should have been put in a Cuisinart.” AP
“Physical exam,” she says on an entry from her first day. “Stripped of all clothes. Squat, arms out, cough. Embarrassing.”
Then she rails about the limited cafeteria fare available behind bars.
“What worries me is the very poor quality of the food,” Stewart wrote from the clink. “And the unavailability of fresh anything, as there are many starches and many carbs and many fat foods. No pure anything.”
In her first week in the joint — which forced her to hand over her contact lenses — she claims to have received a one-day stay in solitary confinement for accidentally touching a guard. (The Federal Bureau of Prisons disputes this.)
Stewart claims that while in prison she was sent into solitary confinement for one day. Getty Images
“Today I saw two very well dressed ladies walking, and I breezed by them, remarking on the beautiful morning and how nice they looked — when I realized from the big silver keychain that they were guards. I lightly brushed the chain,” Stewart wrote.
“Later, I was called in to be told never, ever to touch a guard without expecting severe reprimand. Of course, I apologized but the incident was so minor when it occurred that I did not think about it for the rest of the day.”
The “Martha Stewart Living” founder says she was severely punished for the faux pas.
“I was dragged into solitary for touching an officer,” she recalls. “No food or water for a day. This was Camp Cupcake remember? That was the nickname. It was not a cupcake.”
Martha Stewart’s boyfriend Charles Simonyi only visited her in prison one time. Courtesy of Netflix
And her relationships suffered. While locked up, boyfriend Charles Simonyi, the wealthy creator of Microsoft Office, only visited her one time, the film reveals.
“I don’t think he liked hanging out with somebody in jail,” she said. “He was out on his boat, floating around the world.”
And soon after Stewart became a free woman, he unceremoniously dumped her — under the covers.
“We were in bed and he said, ‘You know, Martha, I’m going to get married.’ He said, ‘I’m going to get married to Lisa.’ And I said, ‘Lisa who?!’” Stewart remembers.
“I mean he hasn’t told me a word. ‘And, by the way her parents don’t want me to ever speak to you again.’”
“I thought that was the most horrible thing a person could do. How could a man who’s spent 15 years with me just do that? What a stupid thing to do to someone you actually cared about.”
Stewart also goes into messy detail about her and her ex-husband Andrew Stewart’s extramarital affairs, and the resulting implosion of their marriage years before.
When Martha was 19, she kissed a stranger on her honeymoon to Italy. Courtesy of Netflix
She first stepped out on Andrew — innocently, she says — when they were on their honeymoon in Italy and she was just 19 years old.
One day, Martha visited the Duomo in Milan alone while Andrew stayed back at the hotel, and there in the church she communed with a random gent.
“It was very romantic place, crowded with tourists, and [I] met this very handsome guy,” she said.
“He didn’t know I was married. I was this waif of a girl hanging out in the cathedral on Easter eve. He was emotional, I was emotional. It’s just because it was an emotional place. It was unlike anything I had ever experienced.”
She added: “It was like nothing I’d ever done before, so why not kiss a stranger?”
Martha maintains the secret smooch “was neither naughty nor unfaithful, it was just emotional. Of the moment. That’s how I looked at it.”
Martha Stewart and her ex-husband Andrew Stewart both engaged in extramarital affairs. Netflix
That wasn’t the only indiscretion, though. She also owns up to cheating again later on in the marriage.
“I had a very brief affair with a very attractive Irishman, and it was just nothing,” she says. “It was nothing. In terms of … I would have never broken up a marriage for it. It was nothing.”
Andrew, meanwhile, allegedly messed around on Martha constantly.
“He was not satisfied at home,” she said. “I don’t know how many different girlfriends he had during this time, but I think there were quite a few. Young women, listen to my advice: If you’re married and you think you’re happily married and your husband starts to cheat on you, he’s a piece of s – – t. And look at him as a piece of s – – t and get out of that marriage. But I couldn’t do that. I couldn’t walk away.”
Eventually, Martha says, her hubby began sleeping with a female employee, assistant Robyn Fairclough, who lived on their Connecticut property.
“Robyn worked for me, and she had lost her apartment or something. And I said, ‘You could move into the barn on the lower two acres.’ We had a little apartment down there. And when I was traveling Andy started up with her,” she said.
“It was like I put out a snack for Andy.”
Martha says Andrew slept with one of her employees. Netflix
“I kicked her out immediately. ‘What the hell are you doing?!’ Andy betrayed me right on our property. Not nice.”
A friend admitted that Stewart was so distraught during this turbulent period that “at one point she showed me where she tore the hair out of her own head.”
Even as she achieved fame and boffo professional success, Martha wrote increasingly intense letters to her estranged husband who asked for a divorce.
The notes are rawly emotional, with messages such as:
“I cannot sleep. I cannot eat. My skin is worried and many lines that were not there are now there. I am agonizingly jealous of your other women.”
“Maybe you are planning to marry her and keep her with my money so that she can paint herself in portraits in the nude. It is very titillating isn’t it? Maybe she will paint you in the nude also. I’d love to see that painting.”
Even as she was becoming famous and her career was skyrocketing, she was tortured by the crumbling of her marriage. Courtesy of Netflix
“I have to go to San Francisco and talk about weddings and my wonderful life. I hope you’re enjoying your freedom. And I hope my plane crashes.”
She hasn’t spoken to Andrew, with whom she shares 59-year-old daughter Alexis, in 20 years.
Clearly, “Martha” is a revealing portrait — sometimes painfully revealing — of an American icon that features a trove of eye-popping information.
But its subject doesn’t see it that way.
“RJ had total access, and he really used very little,” Stewart told the Times. “It was just shocking.”
“I am really proud of this film, and I admire Martha’s courage in entrusting me to make it,” Cutler said in a statement. “I’m not surprised that it’s hard for her to see aspects of it.”
As far as Martha Stewart is concerned, the new documentary about her life and career is not a good thing.
The lifestyle guru and self-made former billionaire has slammed the film “Martha,” which started streaming Oct. 30 on Netflix, as “lazy” and “not the story that makes me, me” at the Retail CEO Influencer Forum in September. “It’s more about my stupid trial, which was so unfair.”
And this week, Stewart doubled down in an interview with the Times, insisting that director R.J. Cutler focuses too much on her 2004 insider trading trial in the movie’s second half.
“The trial and the actual incarceration was less than two years out of an 83-year life,” she said. “I considered it a vacation, to tell you the truth.”
Indeed, those two years — from her troublesome phone call to her stockbroker as she was en route to Cabo San Lucas all the way to her final day in Alderson prison in West Virginia — take up nearly half of the two-hour doc.
Despite doing press for it, Martha Stewart is not happy with the documentary about her life and career. Courtesy of Netflix
Bitter Stewart is irate when she mentions the courtroom drama in the movie, which she participated in, saying the responsible parties, including eventual FBI director James Comey, deserve to be thrown into a blender.
“It was so horrifying to me that I had to go through that to be a trophy for these idiots in the US Attorney’s office,” she says of the high-profile trial.
“Those prosecutors should have been put in a Cuisinart and turned on high. I was a trophy — a prominent woman, the first billionaire woman in America. ‘We got her.’”
When she begins serving her five-month prison sentence in 2004, actors read aloud her diary entries that criticize the food and staff.
Stewart says the government lawyers who went after her in 2004 ” should have been put in a Cuisinart.” AP
“Physical exam,” she says on an entry from her first day. “Stripped of all clothes. Squat, arms out, cough. Embarrassing.”
Then she rails about the limited cafeteria fare available behind bars.
“What worries me is the very poor quality of the food,” Stewart wrote from the clink. “And the unavailability of fresh anything, as there are many starches and many carbs and many fat foods. No pure anything.”
In her first week in the joint — which forced her to hand over her contact lenses — she claims to have received a one-day stay in solitary confinement for accidentally touching a guard. (The Federal Bureau of Prisons disputes this).
Stewart claims that while in prison she was sent into solitary confinement for one day. Getty Images
“Today I saw two very well dressed ladies walking, and I breezed by them, remarking on the beautiful morning and how nice they looked — when I realized from the big silver keychain that they were guards. I lightly brushed the chain,” Stewart wrote.
“Later, I was called in to be told never, ever to touch a guard without expecting severe reprimand. Of course, I apologized but the incident was so minor when it occurred that I did not think about it for the rest of the day.”
The “Martha Stewart Living” founder says she was severely punished for the faux pas.
“I was dragged into solitary for touching an officer,” she recalls. “No food or water for a day. This was Camp Cupcake remember? That was the nickname. It was not a cupcake.”
Martha Stewart’s boyfriend Charles Simonyi only visited her in prison one time. Courtesy of Netflix
And her relationships suffered. While locked up, boyfriend Charles Simonyi, the wealthy creator of Microsoft Office, only visited her one time, the film reveals.
“I don’t think he liked hanging out with somebody in jail,” she said. “He was out on his boat, floating around the world.”
And soon after Stewart became a free woman, he unceremoniously dumped her — under the covers.
“We were in bed and he said, ‘You know, Martha, I’m going to get married.’ He said, ‘I’m going to get married to Lisa.’ And I said, ‘Lisa who?!’,” Stewart remembers.
“I mean he hasn’t told me a word. ‘And, by the way her parents don’t want me to ever speak to you again.’”
“I thought that was the most horrible thing a person could do. How could a man who’s spent 15 years with me just do that? What a stupid thing to do to someone you actually cared about.”
Stewart also goes into messy detail about her and her ex-husband Andrew Stewart’s extra-marital affairs, and the resulting implosion of their marriage years before.
When Martha was 19, she kissed a stranger on her honeymoon to Italy. Courtesy of Netflix
She first stepped out on Andrew — innocently, she says — when they were on their honeymoon in Italy and she was just 19 years old.
One day, Martha visited the Duomo in Milan alone while Andrew stayed back at the hotel, and there in the church she communed with a random gent.
“It was very romantic place, crowded with tourists, and [I] met this very handsome guy,” she said.
“He didn’t know I was married. I was this waif of a girl hanging out in the cathedral on Easter eve. He was emotional, I was emotional. It’s just because it was an emotional place. It was unlike anything I had ever experienced.”
She added: “It was like nothing I’d ever done before, so why not kiss a stranger?”
Martha maintains the secret smooch “was neither naughty nor unfaithful, it was just emotional. Of the moment. That’s how I looked at it.”
Martha Stewart and her ex-husband Andrew Stewart both engaged in extra-marital affairs. Netflix
That wasn’t the only indiscretion, though. She also owns up to cheating again later on in the marriage.
“I had a very brief affair with a very attractive Irishman, and it was just nothing,” she says. “It was nothing. In terms of … I would have never broken up a marriage for it. It was nothing.”
Andrew, meanwhile, allegedly messed around on Martha constantly.
“He was not satisfied at home,” she said. “I don’t know how many different girlfriends he had during this time, but I think there were quite a few. Young women, listen to my advice: If you’re married and you think you’re happily married and your husband starts to cheat on you, he’s a piece of s–t. And look at him as a piece of s–t and get out of that marriage. But I couldn’t do that. I couldn’t walk away.”
Eventually, Martha says, her hubby began sleeping with a female employee, assistant Robyn Fairclough, who lived on their Connecticut property.
“Robyn worked for me, and she had lost her apartment or something. And I said, ‘You could move into the barn on the lower two acres.’ We had a little apartment down there. And when I was traveling Andy started up with her,” she said.
“It was like I put out a snack for Andy.”
Martha says Andrew slept with one of her employees. Netflix
“I kicked her out immediately. ‘What the hell are you doing?!’ Andy betrayed me right on our property. Not nice.”
A friend admitted that Stewart was so distraught during this turbulent period that “at one point she showed me where she tore the hair out of her own head.”
Even as she achieved fame and boffo professional success, Martha wrote increasingly intense letters to her estranged husband who asked for a divorce.
The notes are rawly emotional, with messages such as:
“I cannot sleep. I cannot eat. My skin is worried and many lines that were not there are now there. I am agonizingly jealous of your other women.”
“Maybe you are planning to marry her and keep her with my money so that she can paint herself in portraits in the nude. It is very titillating isn’t it? Maybe she will paint you in the nude also. I’d love to see that painting.”
Even as she was becoming famous and her career was skyrocketing, she was tortured by the crumbling of her marriage. Courtesy of Netflix
“I have to go to San Francisco and talk about weddings and my wonderful life. I hope you’re enjoying your freedom. And I hope my plane crashes.”
She hasn’t spoken to Andrew, with whom she shares 59-year-old daughter Alexis, in 20 years.
Clearly, “Martha” is a revealing portrait — sometimes painfully revealing — of an American icon that features a trove of eye-popping information.
But its subject doesn’t see it that way.
“R.J. had total access, and he really used very little,” Stewart told the Times. “It was just shocking.”
“I am really proud of this film, and I admire Martha’s courage in entrusting me to make it,” Cutler said in a statement. “I’m not surprised that it’s hard for her to see aspects of it.”
LeBron James may be entering his 21st NBA season, but the King is far from slowing down. While the basketball world braces for the new season to kick off, James is already captivating audiences off the court. With the offseason quiet and fans itching for some hoops-related excitement, LeBron is serving up a different kind of entertainment-this time through Netflix.
In collaboration with his production company, The SpringHill Company, LeBron has taken a seat behind the camera, producing Rez Ball, a sports drama that is quickly gaining traction. The film, directed by Sydney Freeland, delves into the world of Native American high school basketball in New Mexico, following the underdog Chuska Warriors. Released on September 27, Rez Ball has garnered positive reviews, boasting a 7.7 IMDb rating and an impressive 94% on Rotten Tomatoes. But for LeBron, the movie’s success is about more than numbers-it’s about storytelling.
Lebron James new amazing Tattoo from the Olympics in Paris
Taking to social media, LeBron expressed his pride in the project. “I’m incredibly proud of the team at @makespringhill and so grateful to @netflix for helping us tell this story,” James posted on X. He also gave a nod to the families out there who love sports dramas, calling it a perfect “Netflix and chill” weekend pick. This isn’t just a film for the casual viewer; it’s a heartfelt narrative crafted by a team including LeBron himself, Jamal Henderson, Mauricio Mota, and Spencer Beighley, among others.
While Rez Ball is already making waves, LeBron isn’t stopping there. The NBA legend recently appeared at the red carpet event for another upcoming Netflix project, Starting 5. The highly anticipated documentary series promises to offer fans an exclusive look into the lives of five of the league’s top stars. Among them, of course, is James, but he’ll be joined by Anthony Edwards, Jimmy Butler, Jayson Tatum, and Domantas Sabonis.
LeBron James’ ‘Starting 5′ on Netflix: A behind-the-scenes look at NBA stars’ lives off the court
Following the success of Netflix’s Quarterback series last year, which chronicled the lives of NFL stars like Patrick Mahomes, LeBron’s new series aims to bring that same level of behind-the-scenes insight to the NBA. Directed by Susan Ansman and Peter J. Scalettar, Starting 5 offers an “intense, behind-the-scenes look” at the 2023-24 season, diving deep into the personal and professional lives of its featured athletes.
LeBron himself hinted at the kind of moments fans can expect. “Just see what we do before we even get on the floor,” he said at the premiere. “See off days, spending time with family and friends, and life outside of the game. The human side of us will be showing a lot on this, and I think people will appreciate that.”
With the first episode set to premiere on October 9, fans won’t have to wait long to see their favorite NBA stars in action-this time, off the court. As the preseason looms, LeBron James is once again proving that he’s not just a player but a storyteller, ready to take fans deeper into the world of basketball.
Why is Netflix annoyed with Martha Stewart? Netflix made a documentary on the businesswoman. However, things seem to have taken a turn, leaving people buzzing.
The Recipe Of Martha Stewart
Martha Stewart is an American businesswoman, writer, and television personality. People look to her for lifestyle and cooking information. The 83-year-old media figure is the founder of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. This company is centered around home and hospitality.
Additionally, she made her name through business decisions, merchandising, publishing, and more. She has one daughter, Alexis Stewart who she had with her ex-husband, Andrew.
She has garnered so much recognition and fame that she has been on multiple TV shows such as the Kelly Clarskon Show, The Ellen DeGeneres Show, and more. Furthermore, Netflix is making a documentary about her titled, Martha.
Martha Stewart | YouTube
What Happened Between Martha And Netflix?
Reportedly, Martha Stewart is not happy with the documentary and made the decision to make her opinion on it known. Even though Netflix flew Stewart out on a private jet to the 2024 Telluride Film Festival, Stewart still has her complaints.
In addition to a source revealing how angry Netflix is, they toldPage Six, “Martha was seen arriving to – and departing – the Telluride Film Festival in Colorado via private jet courtesy of Netflix.”
It seemed that the showing of the documentary was what set Stewart off. She called it “lazy” and that it wasn’t “the story that makes me, me.” She shared this at the 2024 Retain Influencer CEO Forum.
Martha Stewart | YouTube
Were Martha’s Requests Denied?
On September 10th, Stewart allegedly told Daily Beast‘s Joanna Coles that when asking the director of her documentary to make the changes to reflect what she wanted, he “refused.”
Additionally, she reportedly revealed to Coles, “I try not to talk publicly about the things I don’t like, [as] its not good business.” Despite her saying this, she added, “I can talk a little bit badly about that.”
Also, she shared with Coles that the documentary seems to be “more about my stupid trial, which was so unfair.” Furthermore she “had a collaboration contract.”
Despite this, in regards to the trial and sentencing, the creator “wouldn’t change anything.” This also included the approach of the former Manhattan U.S. Attorney and FBI Director, James Comey.
Martha Stewart | YouTube
In 2004 West Virginia, the TV personality was required to go to a minimum-security federal prison. Her lock-up was due to the lies she told detectives when they were investigating stock sales for the ImClone company.
Stewart may get to do another documentary as she reportedly told Coles that “Netflix has already asked me if I’d do another one.”
Martha Stewart’s Netflix documentary, Martha, will be released on October 30th. Then, fans will be able to see everything she did not like and wanted to be removed.
What do you think about the Martha Stewart and Netflix disagreement? Let us know in the comments below.
Of course, many fans are still reeling after Jenn sent Jonathon home last week instead of Marcus, especially since Marcus wasn’t able to tell Jenn he loves her or show much of a commitment. Also…Jonathon was just fantastic, period. And there’s the fact that Jenn’s mom and brother have concerns about the whole thing now that Jenn is days away from potentially getting engaged. Regardless, we’ll be sitting down with the Bachelorette after the finale to talk about everything that goes down.
While The Bachelorette is the biggest finale of the week, The Perfect Couple on Netflix is about to be the most-talked-about premiere. Starring Nicole Kidman, Liev Schreiber, Eve Hewson, Dakota Fanning, Meghann Fahy, and others, the six-episode series is based on the best-selling book by Elin Hilderbrand and is visually stunning (Nantucket will do that), juicy, and exactly what our White Lotus–deprived souls need. It will be all anyone is talking about later this week, so don’t miss it. And check out the trailer below.
On the sports front, the US Open continues on ESPN and ESPN2, and the NFL season kicks off Thursday night on NBC with the Super Bowl champion Chiefs taking on the Baltimore Ravens in Kansas City. Taylor Swift will no doubt be in the house, as will Donna Kelce, and I couldn’t be more excited.
English Teacher(FX): This new comedy series premieres tonight with two episodes. The rest—there are eight total—will stream the next day on Hulu. Brian Jordan Alvarez created the series and also stars as the leadz—Evan Marquez, a high school teacher in Austin. Evan wants to be a principled person but often runs into trouble because of it. As Evan navigates his relationships, both personal and professional, he tries to answer the question: Can you really be your full self at your job? 10 p.m. ET/PT on FX and streaming the next day on Hulu