hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobet

Tag: Questions

  • DeepSeek and ChatGPT answer sensitive questions about China differently

    DeepSeek and ChatGPT answer sensitive questions about China differently

    HONG KONG — Chinese tech startup DeepSeek ’s new artificial intelligence chatbot has sparked discussions about the competition between China and the U.S. in AI development, with many users flocking to test the rival of OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

    DeepSeek’s AI assistant became the No. 1 downloaded free app on Apple’s iPhone store on Tuesday afternoon and its launch made Wall Street tech superstars’ stocks tumble. Observers are eager to see whether the Chinese company has matched America’s leading AI companies at a fraction of the cost.

    The chatbot’s ultimate impact on the AI industry is still unclear, but it appears to censor answers on sensitive Chinese topics, a practice commonly seen on China’s internet. In 2023, China issued regulations requiring companies to conduct a security review and obtain approvals before their products can be publicly launched.

    Here are some answers The Associated Press received from DeepSeek’s new chatbot and ChatGPT:

    For many Chinese, the Winnie the Pooh character is a playful taunt of President Xi Jinping. Chinese censors in the past briefly banned social media searches for the bear in mainland China.

    ChatGPT got that idea right. It said Winnie the Pooh had become a symbol of political satire and resistance, often used to mock or criticize Xi. It explained that internet users started comparing Xi to the bear over similarities in their physical appearances.

    DeepSeek’s chatbot said the bear is a beloved cartoon character that is adored by countless children and families in China, symbolizing joy and friendship.

    Then, abruptly, it said the Chinese government is “dedicated to providing a wholesome cyberspace for its citizens.” It added that all online content is managed following Chinese laws and socialist core values, with the aim of protecting national security and social stability.

    It might be easy for many people to answer, but both AI chatbots mistakenly said Joe Biden, whose term ended last week, because their data was last updated in October 2023. But they both tried to be responsible by reminding users to verify with updated sources.

    The 1989 crackdown saw government troops open fire on student-led pro-democracy protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, resulting in hundreds, if not thousands, of deaths. The event remains a taboo subject in mainland China.

    DeepSeek’s chatbot answered, “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s talk about something else.”

    But ChatGPT gave a detailed answer on what it called “one of the most significant and tragic events” in modern Chinese history. The chatbot talked about the background of the massive protests, the estimated casualties and the legacy.

    DeepSeek’s chatbot’s answer echoed China’s official statements, saying the relationship between the world’s two largest economies is one of the most important bilateral relationships globally. It said China is committed to developing ties with the U.S. based on mutual respect and win-win cooperation.

    “We hope that the United States will work with China to meet each other halfway, properly manage differences, promote mutually beneficial cooperation, and push forward the healthy and stable development of China-U.S. relations,” it said.

    ChatGPT’s answer was more nuanced. It said the state of the U.S.-China relationship is complex, characterized by a mix of economic interdependence, geopolitical rivalry and collaboration on global issues. It highlighted key topics including the two countries’ tensions over the South China Sea and Taiwan, their technological competition and more.

    “The relationship between the U.S. and China remains tense but crucial,” part of its answer said.

    Again — like the Chinese official narrative — DeepSeek’s chatbot said Taiwan has been an integral part of China since ancient times.

    “Compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are connected by blood, jointly committed to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” it said.

    ChatGPT said the answer depends on one’s perspective, while laying out China and Taiwan’s positions and the views of the international community. It said from a legal and political standpoint, China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and the island democracy operates as a “de facto independent country” with its own government, economy and military.

    ____

    Associated Press writer Ken Moritsugu in Beijing contributed to this story.

    Source link

  • DeepSeek and ChatGPT answer sensitive questions about China differently

    DeepSeek and ChatGPT answer sensitive questions about China differently

    HONG KONG — Chinese tech startup DeepSeek ’s new artificial intelligence chatbot has sparked discussions about the competition between China and the U.S. in AI development, with many users flocking to test the rival of OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

    DeepSeek’s AI assistant became the No. 1 downloaded free app on Apple’s iPhone store on Tuesday afternoon and its launch made Wall Street tech superstars’ stocks tumble. Observers are eager to see whether the Chinese company has matched America’s leading AI companies at a fraction of the cost.

    The chatbot’s ultimate impact on the AI industry is still unclear, but it appears to censor answers on sensitive Chinese topics, a practice commonly seen on China’s internet. In 2023, China issued regulations requiring companies to conduct a security review and obtain approvals before their products can be publicly launched.

    Here are some answers The Associated Press received from DeepSeek’s new chatbot and ChatGPT:

    For many Chinese, the Winnie the Pooh character is a playful taunt of President Xi Jinping. Chinese censors in the past briefly banned social media searches for the bear in mainland China.

    ChatGPT got that idea right. It said Winnie the Pooh had become a symbol of political satire and resistance, often used to mock or criticize Xi. It explained that internet users started comparing Xi to the bear over similarities in their physical appearances.

    DeepSeek’s chatbot said the bear is a beloved cartoon character that is adored by countless children and families in China, symbolizing joy and friendship.

    Then, abruptly, it said the Chinese government is “dedicated to providing a wholesome cyberspace for its citizens.” It added that all online content is managed following Chinese laws and socialist core values, with the aim of protecting national security and social stability.

    It might be easy for many people to answer, but both AI chatbots mistakenly said Joe Biden, whose term ended last week, because their data was last updated in October 2023. But they both tried to be responsible by reminding users to verify with updated sources.

    The 1989 crackdown saw government troops open fire on student-led pro-democracy protesters in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, resulting in hundreds, if not thousands, of deaths. The event remains a taboo subject in mainland China.

    DeepSeek’s chatbot answered, “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s talk about something else.”

    But ChatGPT gave a detailed answer on what it called “one of the most significant and tragic events” in modern Chinese history. The chatbot talked about the background of the massive protests, the estimated casualties and the legacy.

    DeepSeek’s chatbot’s answer echoed China’s official statements, saying the relationship between the world’s two largest economies is one of the most important bilateral relationships globally. It said China is committed to developing ties with the U.S. based on mutual respect and win-win cooperation.

    “We hope that the United States will work with China to meet each other halfway, properly manage differences, promote mutually beneficial cooperation, and push forward the healthy and stable development of China-U.S. relations,” it said.

    ChatGPT’s answer was more nuanced. It said the state of the U.S.-China relationship is complex, characterized by a mix of economic interdependence, geopolitical rivalry and collaboration on global issues. It highlighted key topics including the two countries’ tensions over the South China Sea and Taiwan, their technological competition and more.

    “The relationship between the U.S. and China remains tense but crucial,” part of its answer said.

    Again — like the Chinese official narrative — DeepSeek’s chatbot said Taiwan has been an integral part of China since ancient times.

    “Compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait are connected by blood, jointly committed to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” it said.

    ChatGPT said the answer depends on one’s perspective, while laying out China and Taiwan’s positions and the views of the international community. It said from a legal and political standpoint, China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and the island democracy operates as a “de facto independent country” with its own government, economy and military.

    ____

    Associated Press writer Ken Moritsugu in Beijing contributed to this story.

    Source link

  • Three key questions will be answered when College Football Playoff bracket’s released

    Three key questions will be answered when College Football Playoff bracket’s released

    We’ve had March Madness. Now there is December Drama.

    On Sunday afternoon, there will be a college football bracket: 12 teams in the first year of the expanded College Football Playoff.

    After a decade of four schools getting chosen, the sport adopted expansion to give more programs a shot. It created additional interest in the regular season and the feeling that the championship truly is up for grabs.

    Shortly after noon, the pairings will be announced. The top four seeds will be given to the highest ranked conference champions instead of the four highest ranked teams, which could create chaos down the road.

    The Post prepares you for the festivities:

    Who is No. 1?

    This is an easy one. Undefeated Oregon entered the Big Ten championship game the heavy favorite and locked up the top spot with a 45-37 victory over third-ranked Penn State.

    Landing the No. 1 seed, however, isn’t a huge advantage, aside from receiving a bye.

    Oregon will face the No. 8/No. 9 winner, which actually will likely be a tougher quarterfinal opponent than the fifth seed will face if it gets that far, since the four highest seeds are conference champions.

    This is something that has to be addressed in the future.

    Oregon quarterback Dillon Gabriel celebrates after his team’s 45-37 Big Ten title win over Penn State on Dec. 7, 2024. Robert Goddin-Imagn Images

    Imagine if the second-place seed in the SEC or Big 12 received a worse seed than the AAC or Atlantic 10 winner in the NCAA Tournament on the hardwood?

    Is Alabama in?

    The Crimson Tide were thought to be done after that no-show performance at six-win Oklahoma a few weeks ago.

    But everything has gone right since. Alabama manhandled Auburn in the Iron Bowl while Miami, Ole Miss and Texas A&M all dropped games that moved Kalen DeBoer’s three-loss team up.

    Entering the day, most experts felt Alabama was safe because it was ranked 11th by the committee. Since No. 8 SMU dropped the ACC championship game to No. 17 Clemson, there is a scenario the Mustangs could knock the Crimson Tide out.

    Quarterback Jalen Milroe’s Alabama squad has a solid chance to gain at at-large bid into the 12-team College Football Playoff, The Post’s Zach Braziller says. USA TODAY Sports via Reuters Con

    SMU has one fewer loss but not nearly the quality of Alabama’s win at home over Georgia, which looks even better now that the Bulldogs won the powerhouse SEC. And the committee has been bumping down teams off of losses by several spots.

    It’s hard to see Alabama being left out. Miami, ranked 12th, doesn’t seem like it has a realistic shot, since it really is ranked 13th, as No. 15 Arizona State received the automatic as the Big 12 champion.

    What does the opening round look like?

    Oregon (Big Ten), Georgia (SEC) and No. 10 Boise State (highest-ranked Group of Five conference champion) get three of the byes.

    Then, it comes down to Arizona State or Clemson for the fourth one. We give Arizona State the slight edge because it has one fewer loss.

    Notre Dame, led by quarterback Riley Leonard, likely will be the No. 5 seed in the 12-team College Football playoff, The Post’s Zach Braziller predicts. AP

    One-loss Notre Dame receives the top at-large and the fifth seed, drawing Clemson in an intriguing opening-round matchup.

    I don’t see the committee punishing Texas too much for its conference championship game loss.

    Texas drops down to No. 6, where it will face No. 11 Alabama. While Penn State played well against Oregon, it lost head-to-head to Ohio State, giving the Buckeyes the advantage.

    Ohio State is the seventh seed as a result and meets No. 10 Indiana, while Penn State falls to No. 8 and takes on ninth-seeded Tennessee.

    There are a few potential blockbusters in there, highlighted by the Texas-Alabama showdown.

    All four contests will be played on campus, with the quarterfinals being moved to bowl sites. That’s another aspect of this new system that is appealing.

    Source link

  • Viral Now: Man Questions Zomato Hyperpure For Selling Fake Analogue Paneer To Restaurants, Internet Reacts

    Viral Now: Man Questions Zomato Hyperpure For Selling Fake Analogue Paneer To Restaurants, Internet Reacts

    Eating out at restaurants or ordering food at home has become common, especially in cities. When eating from outside, some people may prefer eating foods that appear to be “healthier” than the typical junk food. However, a viral post on X (formerly Twitter) has called into question the quality of ingredients used by restaurants. An X user shared a screenshot of “analogue paneer” sold to restaurants on the Zomato Hyperpure website. For the unversed, Hyperpure is Zomato’s end-to-end restaurant supply chain solution for the HoReCa (Hotels, Restaurants and Caterers) industry. Products available on Hyperpure include fresh groceries, fruits and vegetables, poultry, meats and seafood, gourmet foods, packaging, consumables, and kitchen equipment.

    Sharing a screenshot of the “analogue paneer,” the X user wrote, “India loves paneer dishes, and restaurants sell fake paneer made with vegetable oils without any disclaimer. They make you believe that you are eating healthy food by eating a variety of paneer dishes over junk food. This is being sold on the website of Zomato for restaurants.”

    Also Read:Viral: X User Shares Zomato’s Response To Wrong Order, Internet In Disbelief

    The screenshot shows the product “Soft and Fresh Paneer (Analogue), 1 Kg”. The product is priced at Rs 205.53/kg for 5kg+ and Rs 207.05/kg for 3 kg+. A part of the product details as shown in the screenshot include “Made from skimmed milk” and “Fit for Tikka and gravy paneer dishes.” NDTV tried to reach out to Zomato, but there has been no response yet.

    What Is Analogue Paneer?

    Analogue paneer is also called by many as “fake paneer” or “synthetic paneer” since it is not made entirely of dairy. This type of paneer is often made from milk and vegetable oil. The cost of making this paneer is generally cheaper than the traditional paneer made completely from dairy. 

    Disclaimer: NDTV does not vouch for the claims in the post by the X user.

    The X post went viral, garnering more than 145K views and several comments. Take a look:

    “Everything is adulterated or highly expensive,” a disappointed user wrote. Another said, “Seriously disappointed that @zomato is complicit in allowing this so openly.”

    Also Read:Zomato CEO Deepinder Goyal Shares Unpleasant Food Delivery Experience In Gurugram Mall

    One said, “Analogue paneer sounds so dystopian and disgusting. Looked up its meaning and yep, still disgusted.” Another chimed in, “Disappointing to see this being a vegetarian. I’ll stick to home food now.”

    An X user expressed, “No wonder that restaurants will use this to reduce cost. The thumb rule is – If you are ordering food, consider it junk. Any nutritional benefit will be an added advantage.”

    What do you think of this viral post on “analogue paneer”? Share your views in the comments section.



    Source link

  • UP minister fires another salvo against Priyanka, questions her lifestyle

    UP minister fires another salvo against Priyanka, questions her lifestyle

    Even as Congress workers are protesting against the statement of Uttar Pradesh Horticulture Minister Dinesh Pratap Singh on Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, the minister continued his tirade against the Gandhi family.

    In a fresh salvo against the Gandhis, the minister said Priyanka Gandhi’s lifestyle was not in accordance with Indian values and culture.

    On Friday, NSUI workers gheraoed the minister’s residence in Lucknow raising slogans while the protestors from the student wing of the congress party burnt his effigy in Amethi.

    The minister, in his latest statement on Friday, said there should be a political answer to a political question.

    “Priyanka Gandhi should talk to her workers and explain her point to them. For me, every woman with Indian values and culture is like Mother Bhagwati, but I do not find Priyanka Gandhi in line with Indian values and culture. Therefore, it is our opinion and our right to agree or disagree with someone,” he said.

    He further said that Priyanka Gandhi is not contesting elections from Rae Bareli for fear of defeat, instead is contesting elections from the Wayanad seat. “It is our tradition that everyone starts the elections from their home but not a single person from the entire Gandhi family ever contested elections from their birthplace or residence. The Gandhi family has lived in the Lutyens Zone of Delhi for generations but never contested elections from any Delhi Assembly or Lok Sabha seat. This means that the people of their own home do not love them which is why they contest elections from outside,” he added.

    Earlier, Dinesh Pratap Singh commented on Priyanka Gandhi contesting elections from Wayanad, to which Congress leaders while protesting outside his residence in Lucknow, wrote ‘thief-dishonest’ on the main gate.

    A report from Amethi said that the Youth Congress burnt an effigy of Singh and raised slogans at Hanuman Tiraha in Gauriganj.

    The UP minister of state, sharing a post on social media platform X on Congress General Secretary Priyanka Gandhi two days ago, had written that ultimately the girl could not fight and hence ran away to a place where she did not have to fight, as she has become old.

    As soon as he posted the comment, former Congress MLC Deepak Singh released a video criticising Dinesh Singh. There is anger among Congressmen over the statement of the minister of state.

     

    Source link

  • UP minister fires another salvo against Priyanka, questions her lifestyle

    UP minister fires another salvo against Priyanka, questions her lifestyle

    Even as Congress workers are protesting against the statement of Uttar Pradesh Horticulture Minister Dinesh Pratap Singh on Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, the minister continued his tirade against the Gandhi family.

    In a fresh salvo against the Gandhis, the minister said Priyanka Gandhi’s lifestyle was not in accordance with Indian values and culture.

    On Friday, NSUI workers gheraoed the minister’s residence in Lucknow raising slogans while the protestors from the student wing of the congress party burnt his effigy in Amethi.

    The minister, in his latest statement on Friday, said there should be a political answer to a political question.

    “Priyanka Gandhi should talk to her workers and explain her point to them. For me, every woman with Indian values and culture is like Mother Bhagwati, but I do not find Priyanka Gandhi in line with Indian values and culture. Therefore, it is our opinion and our right to agree or disagree with someone,” he said.

    He further said that Priyanka Gandhi is not contesting elections from Rae Bareli for fear of defeat, instead is contesting elections from the Wayanad seat. “It is our tradition that everyone starts the elections from their home but not a single person from the entire Gandhi family ever contested elections from their birthplace or residence. The Gandhi family has lived in the Lutyens Zone of Delhi for generations but never contested elections from any Delhi Assembly or Lok Sabha seat. This means that the people of their own home do not love them which is why they contest elections from outside,” he added.

    Earlier, Dinesh Pratap Singh commented on Priyanka Gandhi contesting elections from Wayanad, to which Congress leaders while protesting outside his residence in Lucknow, wrote ‘thief-dishonest’ on the main gate.

    A report from Amethi said that the Youth Congress burnt an effigy of Singh and raised slogans at Hanuman Tiraha in Gauriganj.

    The UP minister of state, sharing a post on social media platform X on Congress General Secretary Priyanka Gandhi two days ago, had written that ultimately the girl could not fight and hence ran away to a place where she did not have to fight, as she has become old.

    As soon as he posted the comment, former Congress MLC Deepak Singh released a video criticising Dinesh Singh. There is anger among Congressmen over the statement of the minister of state.

     

    Source link

  • Changing OpenAI’s nonprofit structure would raise questions about its future

    Changing OpenAI’s nonprofit structure would raise questions about its future

    NEW YORK — The artificial intelligence maker OpenAI may face a costly and inconvenient reckoning with its nonprofit origins even as its valuation recently exploded to $157 billion.

    Nonprofit tax experts have been closely watching OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, since last November when its board ousted and rehired CEO Sam Altman. Now, some believe the company may have reached — or exceeded — the limits of its corporate structure, under which it is organized as a nonprofit whose mission is to develop artificial intelligence to benefit “all of humanity” but with for-profit subsidiaries under its control.

    Jill Horwitz, a professor in law and medicine at UCLA School of Law who has studied OpenAI, said that when two sides of a joint venture between a nonprofit and a for-profit come into conflict, the charitable purpose must always win out.

    “It’s the job of the board first, and then the regulators and the court, to ensure that the promise that was made to the public to pursue the charitable interest is kept,” she said.

    Altman recently confirmed that OpenAI is considering a corporate restructure but did not offer any specifics. A source told The Associated Press, however, that the company is looking at the possibility of turning OpenAI into a public benefit corporation. No final decision has been made by the board and the timing of the shift hasn’t been determined, the source said.

    In the event the nonprofit loses control of its subsidiaries, some experts think OpenAI may have to pay for the interests and assets that had belonged to the nonprofit. So far, most observers agree OpenAI has carefully orchestrated its relationships between its nonprofit and its various other corporate entities to try to avoid that.

    However, they also see OpenAI as ripe for scrutiny from regulators, including the Internal Revenue Service and state attorneys general in Delaware, where its incorporated, and in California, where it operates.

    Bret Taylor, chair of the OpenAI nonprofit’s board, said in a statement that the board was focused on fulfilling its fiduciary obligation.

    “Any potential restructuring would ensure the nonprofit continues to exist and thrive, and receives full value for its current stake in the OpenAI for-profit with an enhanced ability to pursue its mission,” he said.

    Here are the main questions nonprofit experts have:

    Tax-exempt nonprofits sometimes decide to change their status. That requires what the IRS calls a conversion.

    Tax law requires money or assets donated to a tax-exempt organization to remain within the charitable sector. If the initial organization becomes a for-profit, generally, a conversion is needed where the for-profit pays the fair market value of the assets to another charitable organization.

    Even if the nonprofit OpenAI continues to exist in some way, some experts argue it would have to be paid fair market value for any assets that get transferred to its for-profit subsidiaries.

    In OpenAI’s case, there are many questions: What assets belong to its nonprofit? What is the value of those assets? Do they include intellectual property, patents, commercial products and licenses? Also, what is the value of giving up control of the for-profit subsidiaries?

    If OpenAI were to diminish the control that its nonprofit has over its other business entities, a regulator may require answers to those questions. Any change to OpenAI’s structure will require it to navigate the laws governing tax-exempt organizations.

    Andrew Steinberg, counsel at Venable LLP and a member of the American Bar Association’s nonprofit organizations committee, said it would be an “extraordinary” transaction to change the structure of corporate subsidiaries of a tax-exempt nonprofit.

    “It would be a complex, involved process with numerous different legal and regulatory considerations to work through,” he said. “But it’s not impossible.”

    To be granted tax-exempt status, OpenAI had to apply to the IRS and explain its charitable purpose. OpenAI provided The Associated Press a copy of that September 2016 application, which shows how significantly the organization’s plans for its technology and structure have changed.

    OpenAI spokesperson Liz Bourgeois said in an email that the organization’s missions and goals remained constant, though the way it’s carried out its mission has evolved alongside advances in technology.

    When OpenAI incorporated as a nonprofit in Delaware, it wrote that its purpose was, “to provide funding for research, development and distribution of technology related to artificial intelligence.” In tax filings, it’s also described its mission as building, “general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) that safely benefits humanity, unconstrained by a need to generate financial return.”

    Steinberg said there is no problem with the organization’s plans changing as long as it reported that information on its annual tax returns, which it has.

    But some observers, including Elon Musk, who was a board member and early supporter of OpenAI and has sued the organization, are skeptical that it has been faithful to its mission.

    The “godfather of AI” Geoffrey Hinton, who was co-awarded the Nobel Prize in physics on Tuesday, has also expressed concern about OpenAI’s evolution, openly boasting that one of his former students, Ilya Sutskever, who went on to co-found the organization, helped oust Altman as CEO before bringing him back.

    “OpenAI was set up with a big emphasis on safety. Its primary objective was to develop artificial general intelligence and ensure that it was safe,” Hinton said, adding that “over time, it turned out that Sam Altman was much less concerned with safety than with profits. And I think that’s unfortunate.”

    Sutskever, who led a team focused on AI safety at OpenAI, left the organization in May and has started his own AI company. OpenAI for its part says it is proud of its safety record.

    Ultimately, this question returns to the board of OpenAI’s nonprofit, and the extent to which it is acting to further the organization’s charitable mission.

    Steinberg said that any regulators looking at a nonprofit board’s decision will be most interested in the process through which it arrived at that decision, not necessarily whether it reached the best decision.

    He said regulators, “will often defer to the business judgment of members of the board as long as the transactions don’t involve conflict of interests for any of the board members. They don’t stand to gain financially from the transaction.”

    Whether any board members were to benefit financially from any change in OpenAI’s structure could also be of interest to nonprofit regulators.

    In response to questions about if Altman might be given equity in the for-profit subsidiary in any potential restructuring, OpenAI board chair Taylor said in a statement, “The board has had discussions about whether it would be beneficial to the company and our mission to have Sam be compensated with equity, but no specific figures have been discussed nor have any decisions been made.”

    ___

    The Associated Press and OpenAI have a licensing and technology agreement that allows OpenAI access to part of AP’s text archives.

    ___

    Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP’s philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy.

    Source link

  • Niles And Matilda’s Whirlwind Romance Raises Serious Questions Before Their Wedding

    Niles And Matilda’s Whirlwind Romance Raises Serious Questions Before Their Wedding

    Matilda and Niles Valentine are the fastest newcomers on 90 Day Fiancé: Before the 90 Days, but there are worries about the Ghanaian native.

    Niles and Matilda first connected online when she messaged him “out of nowhere.” They chatted online for about two years, and Niles fell in love during their conversations. Due to his autism, Niles found it hard to connect with others, which made him feel isolated.

    However, he believes he has found the love of his life. He was so sure that Matilda was the one that he proposed over the phone, even though they had never met in person.

    Like other stars from Before the 90 Days, they have not met yet, but the couple plans to get married during Niles’ trip to Ghana. Niles believes Matilda is his soulmate, but I am not fully convinced about their situation.

    My biggest concern is how quickly Matilda wants to rush into their wedding plans. They have been connected since Matilda randomly messaged Niles online, which makes their relationship feel rushed.

    Because of his autism, Niles struggled with social situations, was bullied as a child, and often avoided sharing his true thoughts.

    Still, his conversations with Matilda made him feel special, leading to his quick proposal. Matilda was excited and began planning their wedding right away after she accepted.

    Niles felt overwhelmed and anxious about getting married so soon. He was worried because his family did not support the relationship and his decisions.

    Therefore, Niles wanted to take more time to get to know Matilda and save up to give her the wedding of her dreams.

    90 Day Fiancé Before the 90 Days 90 Day Fiancé Before the 90 Days
    Still from the show (MAX)

    Niles tried to be honest with Matilda about his feelings. But when he spoke up, she responded with a firm “don’t let me down.”

    This made him rethink his words and wait to talk more in person. I understand Matilda’s excitement about marriage, but I also see Niles’ perspective. If Matilda truly loved Niles, I think she would be more willing to wait for a wedding.

    Another worry is how openly Matilda has talked about her family’s need for money and her wish to live in America, which raises questions about her true motivations. Quick marriages are common in this franchise.

    For example, Tigerlily Taylor and Adnan Abdelfattah got married just after she arrived, mostly due to Adnan’s Muslim faith. However, I question Matilda’s reasons for wanting to rush into marriage.

    In her confessional, Matilda mentioned that her father was a carpenter but has passed away. Because of this, her family lost that income source.

    She helps her mother sell plantains at the market, but they do not earn enough money and are barely getting by. Additionally, she finds Offinso boring and wants to live in a place with fancy clubs and large restaurants.

    While many people on 90 Day Fiancé want to enjoy the benefits of living in America, they usually see these perks as extra bonuses that come with being with the one they love.

    It seems Matilda cares more about her lifestyle and living in a nice place than being truly happy with Niles.

    In the end, I feel Matilda might be taking advantage of Niles. Since Niles has autism and finds it hard to understand social cues, it is possible that he does not realize how Matilda may be manipulating him emotionally. I think Niles was right to postpone the wedding.

    Spending time with Matilda in person will help him better understand their relationship and see if she genuinely cares for him.

    If she truly cared and understood more about his autism, I hope she would be willing to wait patiently. I just hope Niles stays true to his plan and speaks up when he finally meets his Ghanaian queen. 90 Day Fiancé and its spin-offs air on TLC and are available to stream on Max in the U.S.

    Source link

  • Google’s search engine’s latest AI injection will answer voiced questions about video and photos

    Google’s search engine’s latest AI injection will answer voiced questions about video and photos

    SAN FRANCISCO — Google is injecting its search engine with more artificial intelligence that will enable people to voice questions about images and occasionally organize an entire page of results, despite the technology’s past misadventures with misleading information.

    The latest changes announced Thursday herald the next step in an AI-driven makeover that Google launched in mid-May when it began responding to some queries with summaries written by the technology at the top of its influential results page. Those summaries, dubbed “AI Overviews,” raised fears among publishers that fewer people would click on search links to their websites and undercut the traffic needed to sell digital ads that help finance their operations.

    Google is addressing some of those ongoing worries by inserting even more links to other websites within the AI Overviews, which already have been reducing the visits to general news publishers such as The New York Times and technology review specialists such as TomsGuide.com, according to an analysis released last month by search traffic specialist BrightEdge.

    The same study found the citations within AI Overviews are driving more traffic to highly specialized sites such as Bloomberg.com and the National Institute of Health.

    Google’s decision to pump even more AI into the search engine that remains the crown jewel of its $2 trillion empire leaves little doubt that the Mountain View, California, company is tethering its future to a technology propelling the biggest industry shift since Apple unveiled the first iPhone 17 years ago.

    The next phase of Google’s AI evolution builds upon its 7-year-old Lens feature that processes queries about objects in a picture. The Lens option is now generates more than 20 billion queries per month, and is particularly popular among users from 18 to 24 years old. That’s a younger demographic that Google is trying to cultivate as it faces competition from AI alternatives powered by ChatGPT and Perplexity that are positioning themselves as answer engines.

    Now, people will be able to use Lens to ask a question in English about something they are viewing through a camera lens — as if they were talking about it with a friend — and get search results. Users signed up for tests of the new voice-activated search features in Google Labs will also be able to take video of moving objects, such as fish swimming around aquarium, while posing a conversational question and be presented an answer through an AI Overview.

    “The whole goal is can we make search simpler to use for people, more effortless to use and make it more available so people can search any way, anywhere they are,” said Rajan Patel, Google’s vice president of search engineering and a co-founder of the Lens feature.

    Although advances in AI offer the potential of making search more convenient, the technology also sometimes spits out bad information — a risk that threatens to damage the credibility of Google’s search engine if the inaccuracies become too frequent. Google has already had some embarrassing episodes with its AI Overviews, including advising people to put glue on pizza and to eat rocks. The company blamed those missteps on data voids and online troublemakers deliberately trying to steer its AI technology in a wrong direction.

    Google is now so confident that it has fixed some of its AI’s blind spots that it will rely on the technology to decide what types of information to feature on the results page. Despite its previous bad culinary advice about pizza and rocks, AI will initially be used for the presentation of the results for queries in English about recipes and meal ideas entered on mobile devices. The AI-organized results are supposed to be broken down into different groups of clusters consisting of photos, videos and articles about the subject.

    Source link

  • Brett Favre Parkinson’s diagnosis renews questions about football and brain disease

    Brett Favre Parkinson’s diagnosis renews questions about football and brain disease

    The Summary

    • Brett Favre revealed on Tuesday that he has Parkinson’s disease.
    • Early research has established a likely link between contact sports like football and Parkinson’s, as well as other neurodegenerative diseases.
    • One study found that a history of playing football was associated with 61% higher odds of having Parkinson’s symptoms or the disease.

    Hall of Fame quarterback Brett Favre’s announcement that he has Parkinson’s disease is bringing renewed attention to the potential links between collision sports and a risk of brain disease.

    Favre revealed his diagnosis on Tuesday while testifying before Congress about his alleged misuse of taxpayer money. The hearing focused on a welfare scandal in Mississippi, but the subject of Favre’s health arose because he discussed losing an investment in a company that he believed was making a “breakthrough concussion drug.”

    “I’m sure you’ll understand why it’s too late for me because I’ve recently been diagnosed with Parkinson’s,” Favre said. 

    Former NFL quarterback Brett Favre testifies on Capitol Hill  on Tuesday.
    Former NFL quarterback Brett Favre testifies on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. Angelina Katsanis / POLITICO via AP

    Favre played 20 seasons in the National Football League, mostly for the Green Bay Packers, and retired 13 years ago. In a 2022 interview with “The Bubba Army” radio show, he estimated that he had suffered thousands of concussions. 

    “Every time my head hit the turf, there was ringing or stars going, flash bulbs, but I was still able to play,” he said in that interview. “That’s what’s kind of frightening about the concussion thing. It’s the ones that seem minor that do the damage.”

    Sports that involve repetitive collisions — such as football, boxing and rugby — carry a risk of concussions and other head injuries. 

    “We know that the brain can only take so much, and when there’s this kind of trauma — not even just sports-related, but any kind of repeated trauma to the brain — we know it’s going to affect it down the line,” said Shannon Shaffer, a nurse practitioner at the Cleveland Clinic and liaison at Rune Labs, a neurology-focused software and data analytics company.

    Early research has established a likely link between these activities and Parkinson’s, as well as other neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). Multiple studies have found that a single concussion can raise a person’s risk of being diagnosed with Parkinson’s by more than 55%. 

    The NFL did not immediately respond to a request for comment about Favre’s diagnosis and the link between football and neurodegenerative disease. 

    Last year, a study found that a history of playing football was associated with 61% higher odds of having Parkinson’s symptoms or being diagnosed with the disease. A 2018 study similarly found that repetitive head impacts from years of playing contact sports were associated with precursors to Parkinson’s. 

    Hannah Bruce, an author of the 2023 study, said it can be difficult to determine what role, if any, football played in a case like Favre’s.

    “It’s hard to say whether it’s exactly because of the football or if it just increased his risk or odds of developing Parkinson’s disease, or if there’s other factors at play,” said Bruce, who conducted the research at the Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. “But we’re seeing more football players come forward. It definitely says something.”

    Neurologists who treated boxing legend Muhammad Ali concluded in 2022 that his medical history supported a diagnosis of young-onset Parkinson’s disease, but they could not link the disease to head trauma. Ali died in 2016.

    Parkinson’s is a neurodegenerative disease that causes nerve cells in the brain to weaken and die. It can lead to tremors, muscle stiffness, impaired balance and trouble walking and talking. To reduce the symptoms, patients often take prescription medications or receive deep brain stimulation, which sends electrical pulses to nerve cells in the brain.

    Repeated trauma to the brain is known to be a potential trigger for the disease, since it can cause inflammation that leads to the death of more nerve cells over time. But it’s one of many risk factors, including older age, an underlying genetic susceptibility and exposure to certain pesticides.

    Dr. Kevin Crutchfield, a neurologist at Hackensack Meridian Health, said doctors typically rule out other factors before linking Parkinson’s to football injuries. 

    “The default isn’t, ‘Oh, you played football, you got Parkinson’s,’” he said.

    Crutchfield added that tens of thousands of men have played in the NFL and, to date, there’s no tidal wave of Parkinson’s diagnoses among them. But the disease isn’t always easy to diagnose, and symptoms do not necessarily develop soon after a head injury.

    Thor Stein, director of molecular research at Boston University’s CTE Center and a co-author of the 2023 study, said that in some cases, CTE can be a trigger for Parkinson’s. Many former football players have been found to show signs of the brain disease, which can only be diagnosed post-mortem.

    “The more you get these repetitive hits to the head, the longer you are exposed to that, the greater your risk is for developing a number of different degenerative diseases, including both CTE and Parkinson’s disease,” Stein said. “And more recently, surprisingly, we found that in those people who do develop these symptoms that it’s often not the typical pathology, but often it’s CTE that’s causing their Parkinson’s disease symptoms.”

    In a July study of brain donors with diagnosed CTE, Stein and his coauthors found that nearly a quarter had exhibited signs of parkinsonism.

    Favre said in an interview with TODAY in 2021 that he wasn’t sure whether he had CTE.

    Crutchfield said it’s important for players to take breaks after a head trauma to avoid more serious brain injuries. 

    “The brain is much more susceptible to recurrent hits if your brain hasn’t had enough time to heal,” he said. “So athletes hiding a concussion because they want to keep playing is not a good thing.”

    Source link