hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobet

News

Tag: report

  • Efforts by Russia, Iran and China to sway US voters may escalate, new Microsoft report says

    Efforts by Russia, Iran and China to sway US voters may escalate, new Microsoft report says

    NEW YORK — Foreign adversaries have shown continued determination to influence the U.S. election –- and there are signs their activity will intensify as Election Day nears, Microsoft said in a report Wednesday.

    Russian operatives are doubling down on fake videos to smear Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign, while Chinese-linked social media campaigns are maligning down-ballot candidates who are critical of China, the company’s threat intelligence arm said Wednesday.

    Meanwhile, Iranian actors who allegedly sent emails aimed at intimidating U.S. voters in 2020 have been surveying election-related websites and major media outlets, raising concerns they could be preparing for another scheme this year, the tech giant said.

    The report serves as a warning – building on others from U.S. intelligence officials – that as the nation enters this critical final stretch and begins counting ballots, the worst influence efforts may be yet to come. U.S. officials say they remain confident that election infrastructure is secure enough to withstand any attacks from American adversaries. Still, in a tight election, foreign efforts to influence voters are raising concern.

    Microsoft noted that some of the disinformation campaigns it tracks received little authentic engagement from U.S. audiences, but others have been amplified by unwitting Americans, exposing thousands to foreign propaganda in the final weeks of voting.

    Russia, China and Iran have all rejected claims that they are seeking to meddle with the U.S. election.

    “The presidential elections are the United States’ domestic affairs. China has no intention and will not interfere in the US election,” the Chinese Embassy said in a statement.

    “Having already unequivocally and repeatedly announced, Iran neither has any motive nor intent to interfere in the U.S. election; and, it therefore categorically repudiates such accusations,” read a statement from Iran’s mission to the United Nations.

    A message left with the Russian Embassy was not immediately returned on Wednesday.

    The report reveals an expanding landscape of coordinated campaigns to advance adversaries’ priorities as global wars and economic concerns raise the stakes for the U.S. election around the world. It details a trend also seen in the 2016 and 2020 elections of foreign actors covertly fomenting discord among American voters, furthering a divide in the electorate that has left the nation almost evenly split just 13 days before voting concludes.

    “History has shown that the ability of foreign actors to rapidly distribute deceptive content can significantly impact public perception and electoral outcomes,” Clint Watts, general manager of the Microsoft Threat Analysis Center, said in a news release. “With a particular focus on the 48 hours before and after Election Day, voters, government institutions, candidates and parties must remain vigilant to deceptive and suspicious activity online.”

    The report adds to previous findings from Microsoft and U.S. intelligence that suggest the Kremlin is committed to lambasting Harris’ character online, a sign of its preference for another Donald Trump presidency.

    Russian actors have spent recent months churning out both AI-generated content and more rudimentary spoofs and staged videos spreading disinformation about Harris, Microsoft’s analysts found.

    Among the fake videos were a staged clip of a park ranger impersonator claiming Harris killed an endangered rhinoceros in Zambia, as well as a video sharing baseless allegations about her running mate Tim Walz, which U.S. intelligence officials also attributed to Russia this week. Morgan Finkelstein, national security spokeswoman for the Harris campaign, condemned Russia’s efforts.

    Another Russian influence actor has been producing fake election-related videos spoofing American organizations from Fox News to the FBI and Wired magazine, according to the report.

    China over the last several months has focused on down-ballot races, and on general efforts to sow distrust and democratic dissatisfaction. A Chinese influence actor widely known as Spamouflage has been using fake social media users to attack down-ballot Republicans who have publicly denounced China, according to Microsoft’s analysts.

    Candidates targeted have included Rep. Barry Moore of Alabama, Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, and Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas, all of whom are running for reelection, the report said. The group also has attacked Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida.

    Moore, McCaul and Rubio sent emailed statements warning that China’s aggression against American political candidates and its efforts to weaken democracy need to be taken seriously. A spokesperson for Blackburn didn’t immediately provide comment.

    In its statement, the Chinese embassy said U.S. officials, politicians and media “have accused China of using news websites and social media accounts to spread so-called disinformation in the US. Such allegations are full of malicious speculations against China, which China firmly opposes.”

    Iran, which has spent the 2024 campaign going after Trump with disinformation as well as hacking into the former president’s campaign, hasn’t been stymied by ongoing tension in the Middle East, according to the Microsoft report.

    Quite the opposite, groups linked to Iran have weaponized divided opinions on the Israel-Hamas War to influence American voters, the analysts found. For example, an Iranian operated persona took to Telegram and X to call on Americans to sit out the elections due to the candidates’ support for Israel.

    Microsoft’s report also said it observed an Iranian group compromising an account of a notable Republican politician who had a different account targeted in June. The company would not name the individual but said it was the same person who it had referenced in August as a “former presidential candidate.”

    The report also warned that the same Iranian group that allegedly posed as members of the far-right Proud Boys in intimidating emails to voters in 2020 has been scouting swing-state election-related websites and media outlets in recent months. The behavior could “suggest preparations for more direct influence operations as Election Day nears,” Watts said.

    Iran’s mission to the United Nations said in a statement that the allegations in the report “are fundamentally unfounded, and wholly inadmissible.”

    Even as Russia, China and Iran try to influence voters, intelligence officials said Tuesday there is still no indication they are plotting significant attacks on election infrastructure as a way to disrupt the outcome.

    If they tried, improvements to election security means there is no way they could alter the results, Jen Easterly, director of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, told The Associated Press earlier this month.

    Intelligence officials on Tuesday also warned that Russia and Iran may try to encourage violent protests in the U.S. after next month’s election, setting the stage for potential complications in the post-election period.

    ___

    The Associated Press receives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP’s democracy initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

    Source link

  • Carbon removal industry calls on U.S. government for regulation in new industry report

    Carbon removal industry calls on U.S. government for regulation in new industry report

    The unregulated carbon dioxide removal industry is calling on the U.S. government to implement standards and regulations to boost transparency and confidence in the sector that’s been flooded with billions of dollars in federal funding and private investment.

    A report Wednesday by the Carbon Removal Alliance, a nonprofit representing the industry, outlined recommendations to improve monitoring, reporting, and verification. Currently the only regulations in the U.S. are related to safety of these projects. Some of the biggest industry players, including Heirloom and Climeworks, are alliance members.

    “I think it’s rare for an industry to call for regulation of itself and I think that is a signal of why this is so important,” said Giana Amador, executive director of the alliance. Amador said monitoring, reporting and verification are like “climate receipts” that confirm the amount of carbon removed as well as how long it can actually be stored underground.

    Without federal regulation, she said “it really hurts competition and it forces these companies into sort of a marketing arms race instead of being able to focus their efforts on making sure that there really is a demonstrable climate impact.”

    The nonprofit defines carbon removal as any solution that captures carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and stores it permanently. One of the most popular technologies is direct air capture, which filters air, extracts carbon dioxide and puts it underground.

    The Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law have provided around $12 billion for carbon management projects in the U.S. Some of this funding supports the development of four Regional Direct Air Capture Hubs at commercial scale that will capture at least 1 million tons of carbon dioxide annually. Two hubs are slated to be built in Texas and Louisiana.

    Some climate scientists say direct air capture is too expensive, far from being scaled and can be used as an excuse by the oil and gas industry to keep polluting.

    Gernot Wagner, a climate economist at Columbia Business School at Columbia University, said this is the “moral hazard” of direct air capture — removing carbon from the atmosphere could be utilized by the oil and gas industry to continue polluting.

    “It does not mean that the underlying technology is not a good thing,” said Wagner. Direct air capture “decreases emissions, but in the long run also extends the life of any one particular coal plant or gas plant.”

    In 2023, Occidental Petroleum Corporation purchased the direct air capture company, Carbon Engineering Ltd, for $1.1 billion. In a news release, Occidental CEO Vicki Hollub said, “Together, Occidental and Carbon Engineering can accelerate plans to globally deploy (the) technology at a climate-relevant scale and make (it) the preferred solution for businesses seeking to remove their hard-to-abate emissions.”

    Jonathan Foley, executive director of Project Drawdown, doesn’t consider carbon dioxide removal technologies to be a true climate solution.

    “I do welcome at least some interventions from the federal government to monitor and verify and evaluate the performance of these proposed carbon removal schemes, because it’s kind of the Wild West out there,” said Foley.

    “But considering it can cost ten to 100 times more to try to remove a ton of carbon rather than prevent it, how is that even remotely conscionable to spend public dollars on this kind of stuff?” he said.

    Katharine Hayhoe, chief scientist of The Nature Conservancy and a distinguished professor at Texas Tech University, said standards for the direct carbon capture industry “are very badly needed” because of the level of government subsidies and private investment. She said there’s no single fix for the climate crisis, and many strategies are needed.

    Hayhoe said these include improving the efficiency of energy systems, transitioning to clean energy, weaning the world off fossil fuels and maintaining healthy ecosystems to trap carbon dioxide. On the other hand, she said, carbon removal technologies are “very high hanging fruit.”

    “It takes a lot of money and a lot of energy to get to the top of the tree. That’s the carbon capture solution,” said Hayhoe. “Of course we need every fruit on the tree. But doesn’t it make sense to pick up the fruit on the ground to prioritize that?”

    Other climate scientists are entirely opposed to this technology.

    “It should be banned,” said Mark Z. Jacobson, professor of civil and environmental engineering at Stanford University.

    Carbon removal technologies indirectly increase the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, Jacobson said. The reason, he said, is that even in cases where direct air capture facilities are powered by renewable energy, the clean energy is being used for carbon removal instead of replacing a fossil fuel source.

    “When you just look at the capture equipment, you get a (carbon) reduction,” Jacobson said. “But when you look at the bigger system, you’re increasing.”

    ___

    The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

    Source link

  • Multiple students report harassment, non-consensual filming by “Lifestyle Coach”, Minje Kim

    CW: This article contains discussion of harassment and non-consensual filming. For help contact 1800 RESPECT, and for the SCO: +61 2 8627 6808, and [email protected]

    Multiple women have come forward to report harassment and non-consensual filming on the University of Sydney Camperdown campus by an individual known as Minje Kim. 

    Kim runs a highly popular ‘personal coaching’ service via instagram, where he claims to “Guide Men to build social confidence” and provides instructional videos on how to approach women. 

    In many of his videos, Kim approaches women on the University of Sydney campus while recording the interaction on a pair of Rayban Meta Smart Glasses, which come with a discreet in-built camera. 

    Many women have claimed that content posted to Kim’s instagram page of 384,000 followers was both recorded and uploaded without their consent. In the past week, a Reddit post in r/usyd warning students about Kim was circulated around student communities and social media, prompting multiple women to come forward with victim statements against Kim.

    Statements provided to Honi allege Kim did not tell students about the nature of their interaction, in which he often requested phone numbers or social media contacts. One student reported they were told by Kim that he was not recording them, only to later find their conversation shared online.

    “When I asked if he was recording, he lied and said no”, the student stated. “We talked briefly, and he asked for my phone number, but he didn’t mention that his glasses could record video. Later, I found out he had posted our conversation on Instagram, where it got over 3,000 likes.”

    One victim told us that they attempted to bring the alleged harassment to the attention of NSW Police, stating “I reported this to the police, but they said filming in public is legal.”

    While in New South Wales, the Surveillance Devices Act (2007) prohibits the recording of a private conversation, the definition of private conversation under this act does not include conversation to which it can be reasonably expected might be overheard. 

    Due to the majority of Kim’s video’s being filmed in public spaces on the University campus, pursuit of legal action may be difficult for individuals recorded without consent. If the content, however, was being filmed for commercial purposes, consent likely needs to be obtained.

    In this incident, students claim they were not made aware that their conversations were being recorded until they were published and distributed on Kim’s social media.

    As with many popular male-oriented lifestyle coaches, Kim’s viewership seems to largely come from young men, who often take to the video’s comment section — or in some cases, the personal social media pages of individuals depicted — to comment on womens’ physical appearances. Comments on Kim’s videos make statements such as “women have it so easy”, “ask what is your body count” or express disapproval when women in the videos state they are in a relationship.

    Along with these allegations of non consensual filming, one student stated that Kim “asked if I was Chinese because of my clothing style, which made me really uncomfortable.” 

    Another student, who was also secretly recorded, stated that after the video was uploaded to social media, they faced online harassment, “Many derogatory comments attacking my appearance and making anti-Chinese remarks have appeared, causing me significant mental distress.” 

    One student reported an instance where Kim “started making me uncomfortable with small actions, like deliberately getting closer, putting his hand on the back of my chair, and even trying to hold my hand multiple times.” The student also stated that upon her leaving the situation, Kim asked where she lived and if he could come to her apartment.

    This student recounted ongoing harassment from Kim after the initial in-person interaction, stating that “Later, he sent me a few photos showing off his muscles, but I didn’t reply”.

    The majority of the women who have come forward against Kim are international students. Victim statements indicate that Kim’s behaviour has been taking place for over a year, with the earliest known instance dating back to September of 2023.

    It is unknown at the time whether Kim is a student at the University of Sydney. Victims state that Kim has claimed to be both a student of pharmacy and engineering at the University, though his actual student status remains unclear to Honi.

    A statement by the Sydney University Postgraduate Representative Association (SUPRA) Education Officer read, ““We strongly condemn any form of harassment and violations of students’ privacy. This week, SUPRA has written to the DVCE’s office, urging the university to take immediate steps to protect the safety of the community. We encourage any affected PG students to reach out to SUPRA’s legal service for support”

    Following the backlash of the Reddit post, Kim has taken down the videos of the students on campus in the last few days, but videos of Kim approaching women in other public settings around campus — such as Victoria Park and Broadway — remain.

    When contacted for comment, Kim denied the existence of the videos, stating, “There is no uni videos bro”.  

    When asked for comment, a University Spokesperson stated that, “We’re committed to creating a safe environment for our students and staff and are deeply concerned by these reports. We’re taking steps to investigate and protect our community, and have reported the matter to the relevant authorities.”

    The SRC Women’s Officers were contacted for comment but did not reply.

    If you have experienced any form of sexual misconduct online, offshore or on campus you can access University services here or in cases of emergencies or urgent help contact 000 immediately.

    Amendment: This article was amended to include comment from SUPRA and further safety resources (18/10/24, 11:54am).

    Source link

  • Multiple students report harassment, non-consensual filming by “Lifestyle Coach”, Minje Kim

    CW: This article contains discussion of harassment and non-consensual filming. For help contact 1800 RESPECT, and for the SCO: +61 2 8627 6808, and [email protected]

    Multiple women have come forward to report harassment and non-consensual filming on the University of Sydney Camperdown campus by an individual known as Minje Kim. 

    Kim runs a highly popular ‘personal coaching’ service via instagram, where he claims to “Guide Men to build social confidence” and provides instructional videos on how to approach women. 

    In many of his videos, Kim approaches women on the University of Sydney campus while recording the interaction on a pair of Rayban Meta Smart Glasses, which come with a discreet in-built camera. 

    Many women have claimed that content posted to Kim’s instagram page of 384,000 followers was both recorded and uploaded without their consent. In the past week, a Reddit post in r/usyd warning students about Kim was circulated around student communities and social media, prompting multiple women to come forward with victim statements against Kim.

    Statements provided to Honi allege Kim did not tell students about the nature of their interaction, in which he often requested phone numbers or social media contacts. One student reported they were told by Kim that he was not recording them, only to later find their conversation shared online.

    “When I asked if he was recording, he lied and said no”, the student stated. “We talked briefly, and he asked for my phone number, but he didn’t mention that his glasses could record video. Later, I found out he had posted our conversation on Instagram, where it got over 3,000 likes.”

    One victim told us that they attempted to bring the alleged harassment to the attention of NSW Police, stating “I reported this to the police, but they said filming in public is legal.”

    While in New South Wales, the Surveillance Devices Act (2007) prohibits the recording of a private conversation, the definition of private conversation under this act does not include conversation to which it can be reasonably expected might be overheard. 

    Due to the majority of Kim’s video’s being filmed in public spaces on the University campus, pursuit of legal action may be difficult for individuals recorded without consent. If the content, however, was being filmed for commercial purposes, consent likely needs to be obtained.

    In this incident, students claim they were not made aware that their conversations were being recorded until they were published and distributed on Kim’s social media.

    As with many popular male-oriented lifestyle coaches, Kim’s viewership seems to largely come from young men, who often take to the video’s comment section — or in some cases, the personal social media pages of individuals depicted — to comment on womens’ physical appearances. Comments on Kim’s videos make statements such as “women have it so easy”, “ask what is your body count” or express disapproval when women in the videos state they are in a relationship.

    Along with these allegations of non consensual filming, one student stated that Kim “asked if I was Chinese because of my clothing style, which made me really uncomfortable.” 

    Another student, who was also secretly recorded, stated that after the video was uploaded to social media, they faced online harassment, “Many derogatory comments attacking my appearance and making anti-Chinese remarks have appeared, causing me significant mental distress.” 

    One student reported an instance where Kim “started making me uncomfortable with small actions, like deliberately getting closer, putting his hand on the back of my chair, and even trying to hold my hand multiple times.” The student also stated that upon her leaving the situation, Kim asked where she lived and if he could come to her apartment.

    This student recounted ongoing harassment from Kim after the initial in-person interaction, stating that “Later, he sent me a few photos showing off his muscles, but I didn’t reply”.

    The majority of the women who have come forward against Kim are international students. Victim statements indicate that Kim’s behaviour has been taking place for over a year, with the earliest known instance dating back to September of 2023.

    It is unknown at the time whether Kim is a student at the University of Sydney. Victims state that Kim has claimed to be both a student of pharmacy and engineering at the University, though his actual student status remains unclear to Honi.

    A statement by the Sydney University Postgraduate Representative Association (SUPRA) Education Officer read, ““We strongly condemn any form of harassment and violations of students’ privacy. This week, SUPRA has written to the DVCE’s office, urging the university to take immediate steps to protect the safety of the community. We encourage any affected PG students to reach out to SUPRA’s legal service for support”

    Following the backlash of the Reddit post, Kim has taken down the videos of the students on campus in the last few days, but videos of Kim approaching women in other public settings around campus — such as Victoria Park and Broadway — remain.

    When contacted for comment, Kim denied the existence of the videos, stating, “There is no uni videos bro”.  

    When asked for comment, a University Spokesperson stated that, “We’re committed to creating a safe environment for our students and staff and are deeply concerned by these reports. We’re taking steps to investigate and protect our community, and have reported the matter to the relevant authorities.”

    The SRC Women’s Officers were contacted for comment but did not reply.

    If you have experienced any form of sexual misconduct online, offshore or on campus you can access University services here or in cases of emergencies or urgent help contact 000 immediately.

    Amendment: This article was amended to include comment from SUPRA and further safety resources (18/10/24, 11:54am).

    Source link

  • Multiple students report harassment, non-consensual filming by “Lifestyle Coach”, Minje Kim

    CW: This article contains discussion of harassment and non-consensual filming.

    Multiple women have come forward to report harassment and non-consensual filming on the University of Sydney Camperdown campus by an individual known as Minje Kim. 

    Kim runs a highly popular ‘personal coaching’ service via instagram, where he claims to “Guide Men to build social confidence” and provides instructional videos on how to approach women. 

    In many of his videos, Kim approaches women on the University of Sydney campus while recording the interaction on a pair of Rayban Meta Smart Glasses, which come with a discreet in-built camera. 

    Many women have claimed that content posted to Kim’s instagram page of 384,000 followers was both recorded and uploaded without their consent. In the past week, a Reddit post in r/usyd warning students about Kim was circulated around student communities and social media, prompting multiple women to come forward with victim statements against Kim.

    Statements provided to Honi allege Kim did not tell students about the nature of their interaction, in which he often requested phone numbers or social media contacts. One student reported they were told by Kim that he was not recording them, only to later find their conversation shared online.

    “When I asked if he was recording, he lied and said no”, the student stated. “We talked briefly, and he asked for my phone number, but he didn’t mention that his glasses could record video. Later, I found out he had posted our conversation on Instagram, where it got over 3,000 likes.”

    One victim told us that they attempted to bring the alleged harassment to the attention of NSW Police, stating “I reported this to the police, but they said filming in public is legal.”

    While in New South Wales, the Surveillance Devices Act (2007) prohibits the recording of a private conversation, the definition of private conversation under this act does not include conversation to which it can be reasonably expected might be overheard. 

    Due to the majority of Kim’s video’s being filmed in public spaces on the University campus, pursuit of legal action may be difficult for individuals recorded without consent. If the content, however, was being filmed for commercial purposes, consent likely needs to be obtained.

    In this incident, students claim they were not made aware that their conversations were being recorded until they were published and distributed on Kim’s social media.

    As with many popular male-oriented lifestyle coaches, Kim’s viewership seems to largely come from young men, who often take to the video’s comment section — or in some cases, the personal social media pages of individuals depicted — to comment on womens’ physical appearances. Comments on Kim’s videos make statements such as “women have it so easy”, “ask what is your body count” or express disapproval when women in the videos state they are in a relationship.

    Along with these allegations of non consensual filming, one student stated that Kim “asked if I was Chinese because of my clothing style, which made me really uncomfortable.” 

    Another student, who was also secretly recorded, stated that after the video was uploaded to social media, they faced online harassment, “Many derogatory comments attacking my appearance and making anti-Chinese remarks have appeared, causing me significant mental distress.” 

    One student reported an instance where Kim “started making me uncomfortable with small actions, like deliberately getting closer, putting his hand on the back of my chair, and even trying to hold my hand multiple times.” The student also stated that upon her leaving the situation, Kim asked where she lived and if he could come to her apartment.

    This student recounted ongoing harassment from Kim after the initial in-person interaction, stating that “Later, he sent me a few photos showing off his muscles, but I didn’t reply”.

    The majority of the women who have come forward against Kim are international students. Victim statements indicate that Kim’s behaviour has been taking place for over a year, with the earliest known instance dating back to September of 2023.

    It is unknown at the time whether Kim is a student at the University of Sydney. Victims state that Kim has claimed to be both a student of pharmacy and engineering at the University, though his actual student status remains unclear to Honi.

    Following the backlash of the Reddit post, Kim has taken down the videos of the students on campus in the last few days, but videos of Kim approaching women in other public settings around campus — such as Victoria Park and Broadway — remain.

    When contacted for comment, Kim denied the existence of the videos, stating, “There is no uni videos bro”.  

    When asked for comment, a University Spokesperson stated that, “We’re committed to creating a safe environment for our students and staff and are deeply concerned by these reports. We’re taking steps to investigate and protect our community, and have reported the matter to the relevant authorities.”

    The SRC Women’s Officers were contacted for comment but did not reply.

    If you have experienced any form of sexual misconduct online, offshore or on campus you can access University services here or in cases of emergencies or urgent help contact 000 immediately.

    Source link

  • Multiple students report harassment, non-consensual filming by “Lifestyle Coach”, Minje Kim

    CW: This article contains discussion of harassment and non-consensual filming.

    Multiple women have come forward to report harassment and non-consensual filming on the University of Sydney Camperdown campus by an individual known as Minje Kim. 

    Kim runs a highly popular ‘personal coaching’ service via instagram, where he claims to “Guide Men to build social confidence” and provides instructional videos on how to approach women. 

    In many of his videos, Kim approaches women on the University of Sydney campus while recording the interaction on a pair of Rayban Meta Smart Glasses, which come with a discreet in-built camera. 

    Many women have claimed that content posted to Kim’s instagram page of 384,000 followers was both recorded and uploaded without their consent. In the past week, a Reddit post in r/usyd warning students about Kim was circulated around student communities and social media, prompting multiple women to come forward with victim statements against Kim.

    Statements provided to Honi allege Kim did not tell students about the nature of their interaction, in which he often requested phone numbers or social media contacts. One student reported they were told by Kim that he was not recording them, only to later find their conversation shared online.

    “When I asked if he was recording, he lied and said no”, the student stated. “We talked briefly, and he asked for my phone number, but he didn’t mention that his glasses could record video. Later, I found out he had posted our conversation on Instagram, where it got over 3,000 likes.”

    One victim told us that they attempted to bring the alleged harassment to the attention of NSW Police, stating “I reported this to the police, but they said filming in public is legal.”

    While in New South Wales, the Surveillance Devices Act (2007) prohibits the recording of a private conversation, the definition of private conversation under this act does not include conversation to which it can be reasonably expected might be overheard. 

    Due to the majority of Kim’s video’s being filmed in public spaces on the University campus, pursuit of legal action may be difficult for individuals recorded without consent. If the content, however, was being filmed for commercial purposes, consent likely needs to be obtained.

    In this incident, students claim they were not made aware that their conversations were being recorded until they were published and distributed on Kim’s social media.

    As with many popular male-oriented lifestyle coaches, Kim’s viewership seems to largely come from young men, who often take to the video’s comment section — or in some cases, the personal social media pages of individuals depicted — to comment on womens’ physical appearances. Comments on Kim’s videos make statements such as “women have it so easy”, “ask what is your body count” or express disapproval when women in the videos state they are in a relationship.

    Along with these allegations of non consensual filming, one student stated that Kim “asked if I was Chinese because of my clothing style, which made me really uncomfortable.” 

    Another student, who was also secretly recorded, stated that after the video was uploaded to social media, they faced online harassment, “Many derogatory comments attacking my appearance and making anti-Chinese remarks have appeared, causing me significant mental distress.” 

    One student reported an instance where Kim “started making me uncomfortable with small actions, like deliberately getting closer, putting his hand on the back of my chair, and even trying to hold my hand multiple times.” The student also stated that upon her leaving the situation, Kim asked where she lived and if he could come to her apartment.

    This student recounted ongoing harassment from Kim after the initial in-person interaction, stating that “Later, he sent me a few photos showing off his muscles, but I didn’t reply”.

    The majority of the women who have come forward against Kim are international students. Victim statements indicate that Kim’s behaviour has been taking place for over a year, with the earliest known instance dating back to September of 2023.

    It is unknown at the time whether Kim is a student at the University of Sydney. Victims state that Kim has claimed to be both a student of pharmacy and engineering at the University, though his actual student status remains unclear to Honi.

    Following the backlash of the Reddit post, Kim has taken down the videos of the students on campus in the last few days, but videos of Kim approaching women in other public settings around campus — such as Victoria Park and Broadway — remain.

    When contacted for comment, Kim denied the existence of the videos, stating, “There is no uni videos bro”.  

    When asked for comment, a University Spokesperson stated that, “We’re committed to creating a safe environment for our students and staff and are deeply concerned by these reports. We’re taking steps to investigate and protect our community, and have reported the matter to the relevant authorities.”

    The SRC Women’s Officers were contacted for comment but did not reply.

    If you have experienced any form of sexual misconduct online, offshore or on campus you can access University services here or in cases of emergencies or urgent help contact 000 immediately.

    Source link

  • Multiple students report harassment, non-consensual filming by “Lifestyle Coach”, Minje Kim

    CW: This article contains discussion of harassment and non-consensual filming.

    Multiple women have come forward to report harassment and non-consensual filming on the University of Sydney Camperdown campus by an individual known as Minje Kim. 

    Kim runs a highly popular ‘personal coaching’ service via instagram, where he claims to “Guide Men to build social confidence” and provides instructional videos on how to approach women. 

    In many of his videos, Kim approaches women on the University of Sydney campus while recording the interaction on a pair of Rayban Meta Smart Glasses, which come with a discreet in-built camera. 

    Many women have claimed that content posted to Kim’s instagram page of 384,000 followers was both recorded and uploaded without their consent. In the past week, a Reddit post in r/usyd warning students about Kim was circulated around student communities and social media, prompting multiple women to come forward with victim statements against Kim.

    Statements provided to Honi allege Kim did not tell students about the nature of their interaction, in which he often requested phone numbers or social media contacts. One student reported they were told by Kim that he was not recording them, only to later find their conversation shared online.

    “When I asked if he was recording, he lied and said no”, the student stated. “We talked briefly, and he asked for my phone number, but he didn’t mention that his glasses could record video. Later, I found out he had posted our conversation on Instagram, where it got over 3,000 likes.”

    One victim told us that they attempted to bring the alleged harassment to the attention of NSW Police, stating “I reported this to the police, but they said filming in public is legal.”

    While in New South Wales, the Surveillance Devices Act (2007) prohibits the recording of a private conversation, the definition of private conversation under this act does not include conversation to which it can be reasonably expected might be overheard. 

    Due to the majority of Kim’s video’s being filmed in public spaces on the University campus, pursuit of legal action may be difficult for individuals recorded without consent. If the content, however, was being filmed for commercial purposes, consent likely needs to be obtained.

    In this incident, students claim they were not made aware that their conversations were being recorded until they were published and distributed on Kim’s social media.

    As with many popular male-oriented lifestyle coaches, Kim’s viewership seems to largely come from young men, who often take to the video’s comment section — or in some cases, the personal social media pages of individuals depicted — to comment on womens’ physical appearances. Comments on Kim’s videos make statements such as “women have it so easy”, “ask what is your body count” or express disapproval when women in the videos state they are in a relationship.

    Along with these allegations of non consensual filming, one student stated that Kim “asked if I was Chinese because of my clothing style, which made me really uncomfortable.” 

    Another student, who was also secretly recorded, stated that after the video was uploaded to social media, they faced online harassment, “Many derogatory comments attacking my appearance and making anti-Chinese remarks have appeared, causing me significant mental distress.” 

    One student reported an instance where Kim “started making me uncomfortable with small actions, like deliberately getting closer, putting his hand on the back of my chair, and even trying to hold my hand multiple times.” The student also stated that upon her leaving the situation, Kim asked where she lived and if he could come to her apartment.

    This student recounted ongoing harassment from Kim after the initial in-person interaction, stating that “Later, he sent me a few photos showing off his muscles, but I didn’t reply”.

    The majority of the women who have come forward against Kim are international students. Victim statements indicate that Kim’s behaviour has been taking place for over a year, with the earliest known instance dating back to September of 2023.

    It is unknown at the time whether Kim is a student at the University of Sydney. Victims state that Kim has claimed to be both a student of pharmacy and engineering at the University, though his actual student status remains unclear to Honi.

    Following the backlash of the Reddit post, Kim has taken down the videos of the students on campus in the last few days, but videos of Kim approaching women in other public settings around campus — such as Victoria Park and Broadway — remain.

    When contacted for comment, Kim denied the existence of the videos, stating, “There is no uni videos bro”.  

    When asked for comment, a University Spokesperson stated that, “We’re committed to creating a safe environment for our students and staff and are deeply concerned by these reports. We’re taking steps to investigate and protect our community, and have reported the matter to the relevant authorities.”

    The SRC Women’s Officers were contacted for comment but did not reply.

    If you have experienced any form of sexual misconduct online, offshore or on campus you can access University services here or in cases of emergencies or urgent help contact 000 immediately.

    Source link

  • College Football Picks, Week 7 Odds And Top 25 Betting Report Including Ohio State-Oregon And Texas-Oklahoma

    College Football Picks, Week 7 Odds And Top 25 Betting Report Including Ohio State-Oregon And Texas-Oklahoma

    A major shakeup in the Associated Press Top 25 rankings following last week’s upsets that saw five of the top-11 teams lose including No. 1 Alabama in a 40-35 loss to Vanderbilt as a 23-point favorite. The SEC is wide open, and Texas is back on top at No. 1 and tackles No. 18 Oklahoma in the Red River Rivalry. The Big Ten battle of No. 2 Ohio State at No. 3 Oregon also headlines the most bet games with four Top 25 matchups in Week 7 on Saturday, Oct. 12.

    FanDuel is the official odds provider for The Associated Press, who selects voters for the AP Poll from sports reporters around the country who cover college football.

    AP Top 25 Week 7 Matchups and Odds

    College football odds from FanDuel Sportsbook refresh periodically and are subject to change, including on props and live betting. All times Eastern and betting favorites (-) listed.

    Friday, Oct. 11

    • No. 16 Utah (-6.5) at Arizona State | 10:30 p.m. | ESPN

    Saturday, Oct. 12

    • No. 1 Texas (-14.5) vs. No. 18 Oklahoma (in Dallas, Texas) | 3:30 p.m. | ABC/ESPN+
    • No. 2 Ohio State (-3.5) at No. 3 Oregon | 7:30 p.m. | NBC
    • No. 4 Penn State (-3.5) at USC | 3:30 p.m. | CBS
    • No. 5 Georgia (-33.5) vs. Mississippi State | 4:15 p.m. | SEC Network
    • No. 6 Miami | Bye
    • No. 7 Alabama (-21.5) vs. South Carolina | 12 p.m. | ABC/ESPN+
    • No. 8 Tennessee (-14.5) vs. Florida | 7 p.m. | ESPN
    • No. 9 Ole Miss (-3.5) at No. 13 LSU | 7:30 p.m. | ABC/ESPN+
    • No. 10 Clemson (-20.5) at Wake Forest | 12 p.m. | ESPN
    • No. 11 Notre Dame (-23.5) vs. Stanford | 3:30 p.m. | NBC
    • No. 12 (T11) Iowa State (-2.5) at West Virginia | 8 p.m. | FOX
    • No. 14 BYU (-3.5) vs. Arizona | 4 p.m. | FOX
    • No. 17 Boise State (-20.5) at Hawai’i | 11 p.m. | CBSSN
    • No. 18 Kansas State (-3.5) at Colorado | 10:15 p.m. | ESPN
    • No. 19 (T18) Indiana | Bye
    • No. 21 Missouri (-27.5) at UMass | 12 p.m. | ESPN2
    • No. 22 Pitt (-2.5) vs. Cal | 3:30 p.m. | ESPN
    • No. 23 Illinois (-21.5) vs. Purdue | 3:30 p.m. | FS1
    • No. 24 Michigan | Bye
    • No. 25 SMU | Bye

    Other receiving votes: Southern California 98, Nebraska 51, Navy 43, Army 33, Vanderbilt 26, Arkansas 17, Washington State 8, Iowa 8, Texas Tech 7, Syracuse 6, Washington 4, Louisville 4, Colorado 3, Kentucky 1.

    Notable Line Moves Week 7

    Circa Sports in Las Vegas opens the weekly college football lines on Sunday morning following each week’s NCAA football games. Here are the notable line moves with updates on FanDuel.

    • Clemson -23 to -20.5
    • Kentucky -10 to -13.5

    Ohio State at Oregon

    Something has to give Saturday in Eugene as both No. 2 Ohio State and No. 3 Oregon are 5-0 including 2-0 in Big Ten play. The Buckeye’s and Ducks are two of nine undefeated Power Four schools. The new conference foes last played in the 2024 national championship won by the Buckeyes. Oregon and Ohio State both rank in the top-25 for both rushing and passing defense. The Ducks defense will be put to the test as Ohio State has scored 20 touchdowns in 21 red zone trips this season.

    Oregon QB Dillon Gabriel opened the season as the Heisman favorite, and he’s now the fifth choice at +1400 odds, or 14/1. He’s passed for 1,449 yards and 11 touchdowns and leads the country with a 77.8 completion percentage. Ohio State QB Will Howard has thrown for 1,238 yards and 12 TD’s plus 4 rushing touchdowns.

    The Buckeye’s have arguably the best set of RB’s and WR’s in the country. They have played a softer schedule, but the Buckeye’s defense has dominated holding opponents to a nation-low 203 yards per game while registering 17 sacks. Ohio State buried both Michigan State (38-7) and last week Iowa (35-7) limiting the Hawkeyes to just 224 total yards offense.

    Pro Football Focus rates Ohio State as college football’s top team. The Buckeye’s lead the nation in overall team expected points added (EPA) per play, in EPA allowed, and EPA per play on offense.

    The most watched and wagered game is set to kickoff at 7:30 p.m. ET on NBC. Ohio State is taking more money, and Buckeyes backers have wagered more money on the spread and moneyline than any other team for Week 7 at the leading online sportsbooks.

    “Even on a loaded slate like this one, the action on Ohio State-Oregon stands out from the rest of the pack,” Fanatics Sportsbook staff reports. “If you combine spread and moneyline, Ohio State-Oregon has drawn over two times more handle than any other Week 7 game.”

    Oregon, along with LSU are the most popular moneyline underdog bets this week.

    Geoff Schwartz, an 8-year NFL offensive lineman who played right tackle at Oregon, chimed in on X with added insight on the Ohio State-Oregon matchup.

    Ohio State (+290) is currently the favorite to win the national championship with Oregon at +1000, according to national championship odds at FanDuel Sportsbook. The winner will have a leg up towards the Big Ten title and new 12-team College Football Playoff while the loser remains in the mix for the CFP.

    Penn State at USC

    Another key Big Ten battle also has the road team favored with undefeated Penn State (5-0) at Southern Cal (3-2). Lincoln Riley is 41-4 at home as a head coach in his career, and now USC is a home underdog. The Trojans have played a far tougher schedule (No. 4) while the Nittany Lions SOS ranks No. 80. Bob Stoll of Dr. Bob Sports is a notable and respected handicapper who uses dozens of stats and categories in formulating models and picks.

    Stoll notes that the Nittany Lions have moved the ball well on offense, averaging 7.3 yards per play against teams that would allow 6.0 yppl to an average offense. But Penn State has averaged just 24 points in two games against better than average defensive teams Illinois and UCLA, and USC’s defense (0.6 yppl better than average) rates about the same as those two defenses that held Penn State’s attack in check.

    “The Nittany Lions should not be favored by 3 points or more in Los Angeles,” Stoll says.

    Texas vs. Oklahoma

    The Cotton Bowl in Dallas hosts the Red River Rivalry, or Showdown between new SEC rivals Oklahoma (4-1) and Texas (5-0). Oklahoma has won four of the last five meetings including last season 34-30 as a 5-point underdog when the Sooners entered No. 12 and Texas ranked No. 3 in the country.

    FanDuel Research analysts pick Oklahoma (+14.5) to cover the spread in a higher scoring game (over 49.5). Sooners freshman QB Michael Hawkins Jr. is a Dallas native and plays in his fourth game while making his second start. He’ll be without a number of OU leading receivers on the injured list. Hawkins will become the first Oklahoma quarterback to start the Red River Showdown as a true freshman. Longhorns QB Quinn Ewers returns from an oblique injury suffered Sept. 14 vs. UT San Antonio. Texas is the largest favorite in the series since 2005, which was the last time the Longhorns won the national title. Texas ranks top-5 in yards per play offense, yards per game and points per game margin.

    Ole Miss at LSU

    Mixed picks on this SEC Saturday night showdown in Baton Rouge. Mississippi is No. 1 in yards per play and yards per game margin. LSU ranks No. 43 and No. 30 in those categories. However, Ole Miss is playing a 7th straight week and 3rd straight conference game while LSU is rested and ready off a bye. The Rebels and Tigers were both ranked top-20 last season as well and Ole Miss won a wild shootout over LSU, 55-49.

    Dr. Bob Sports notes that LSU fits a greater than 63% ATS situation for teams coming off a win and a bye playing a conference home game and either an underdog or favorite up to 3 points. Additional parameters apply in a large sample size of more than 200 games, and LSU will catch another break if the nation’s leading receiver doesn’t play, Ole Miss senior Tre Harris (885 yards). He suffered a lower-leg injury in the first half of last week’s win over South Carolina. Harris is questionable to play, along with at least 10 other Rebels players on the injury list.

    LSU’s strength has been its offense that has been 1.2 yards per play better than average (6.8 yppl against teams that would allow 5.6 yppl to an average team). Mississippi’s offense is better, as the Rebels have been 1.8 yppl better than average when they have the ball (7.9 yppl against 5 FBS teams that would allow 6.1 yppl to an average team.

    Dr. Bob has a strong Opinion on Ole Miss noting the math model, but the strong situation favors LSU.

    Playbook Sports adds an awesome angle that is 15-2 ATS favoring Oregon as a home underdog from game 6 forward if both teams own a 1.000 winning percentage and if the home ‘Dog scored 16 or more points in its last win.

    No team plays a tougher 4-game stretch than LSU, who battles Ole Miss and then two road games at Arkansas and Texas A&M before a bye week to tackle Alabama.

    Next week’s notable Top 25 games include:

    • Georgia at Texas (-2.5)
    • Alabama at Tennessee (-2.5)
    • Michigan (-1.5) at Illinois
    • Nebraska at Indiana (-4.5)

    More big game betting action ahead as college football’s biggest games draw the most watch and wager action.

    You can bet on it.

    MORE FROM FORBES

    ForbesStanley Cup Odds 2024/25: Avalanche-Golden Knights Open Season In Las VegasBy Jay GinsbachForbesMLB Playoffs Divisional Series Schedule, Odds And 2024 Betting PreviewBy Jay GinsbachForbesNBA Championship Odds And Toronto Raptors Center ‘Tanking’ Reference To 2024-25 SeasonBy Jay GinsbachForbesRed River Rivalry Headlines Week 7 Of College FootballBy Tom LaybergerForbesConference Realignment: What’s Next For The Pac-12 And Mountain West?By Erik Buchinger

    Source link

  • Indias Food Consumption Pattern Emerges As Most Sustainable, As Per WWF Report

    Indias Food Consumption Pattern Emerges As Most Sustainable, As Per WWF Report

    The way food is eaten in India has been ranked as the most sustainable, as per data from the Living Planet Report 2024, recently released by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). The report emphasises the need for climate-friendly food consumption patterns around the globe. It has specifically detailed the patterns for the G20 countries, highlighting how many of them exceed the “planetary climate boundary for food”. This boundary indicates the maximum amount of greenhouse gas emissions that food systems can emit to stay within 1.5 degrees C of warming.
    Also Read:What Is ‘Meaty Rice’? South Korea Develops Hybrid Rice For Sustainable Protein Kick

    “Any gains from more sustainable food production will count for little if we don’t also address food consumption. If everyone in the world adopted the current food consumption patterns of the world’s major economies by 2050, we exceed the 1.5 degrees C climate target for food-related greenhouse gas emissions by 263% and require one to seven Earths to support us,” the report predicts. However, two countries – India and Indonesia – have not exceeded the “planetary climate boundary for food”.

    If all nations followed the dietary patterns (in terms of consumption) of these two, the world would need less than “one Earth” to meet food demands, the report suggests. The figure for India is the lowest at 0.84 – implying that the planet’s resources would suffice for fulfilling food needs as per this system, without crossing the greenhouse gas emission limit. The report mentions the National Millet Campaign in India and underlines the role of local traditions in meeting global goals. It states, “Achieving healthy and nutritious diets will be heavily influenced by local cultural traditions, individual choice and available food… In some countries, promoting traditional foods will be an important lever to shift diets. For example, the National Millet Campaign in India is designed to increase national consumption of this ancient grain, which is good for health and highly resilient in the face of climate change.”

    Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

    Photo Credit: WWF Living Planet Report 2024

    The food consumption patterns of countries like Argentina, Australia, and the United States have been ranked as the least sustainable. The report has provided contextual suggestions that could help improve the situation. It explains, “For developed countries, dietary shifts need to include a greater proportion of plant-based foods and fewer animal products. At the same time, for countries facing significant burdens of undernutrition, hunger and food insecurity, achieving nutritious diets may require increasing consumption, including of animal-source foods.”
    Also Read:This Swedish Supermarket Has A Mini Farm Inside It! Take A Look At What Is Grown There

    Source link

  • What Food Indians Ordered The Most In 2023 – This And More In Swiggy Report

    What Food Indians Ordered The Most In 2023 – This And More In Swiggy Report

    2023 was a year of culinary adventures for India, and our food choices spoke volumes about our tastes, preferences, and maybe a bit about our cravings too. Swiggy, the online food delivery app, spilt the beans on what kept our taste buds busy throughout the year. Swiggy released its ‘Annual Trends Report: How India Swiggy’d 2023′ for the 8th consecutive year and revealed some interesting year-round-up facts about what foods Indians ordered the most, how much, from where and more.

    Who Ordered What and Where?

    From the bustling streets of Mumbai to the heart of Delhi, food lovers across India were busy placing orders. Over 6.6 million unique dishes were up for grabs on Swiggy’s menu nationwide. While some users were searching for “Swiggy” or “order” on Swiggy – a whopping 5028 and 1682, respectively, didn’t find what they were looking for.

    The Ordering Stars of 2023:

    One person in Mumbai managed to rack up food orders worth a staggering INR 42.3 lakh – now that’s an appetite! But it wasn’t just the big cities; even smaller towns like Jhansi ordered a lot of food with one user ordering a whopping 269 items in a single order for a party.

    Add image caption here

    Swiggy is a popular food delivery app in India.Image: iStock

    The Dishes That Stole The Show

    Gulab Jamuns triumphed over Roshogollas during Durga Pujo, with over 7.7 million orders. Masala Dosa stole the show as the top veg order for all nine days of Navaratri. In Hyderabad, Idli took the crown with a customer spending a whopping 6 lakhs on them. Biryani continued its reign as the most-ordered dish for the eighth straight year, with 2.5 biryanis ordered per second.

    The City That Emerged As ‘The Cake Capital’

    Bangalore claimed the title of ‘Cake Capital’ with a whopping 8.5 million orders for chocolate cake. During Valentine’s Day, India ordered 271 cakes per minute.
    Also Read:Top 10 Viral Recipes Of 2023 That Took The Internet By Storm

    New Surprise Cuisines:

    Vegans rejoiced, with a 146% rise in vegan orders on Swiggy Guiltfree. The battle between Japanese and Korean cuisine was won by Anime, with Japanese dishes scoring 2x more orders.

    Dining Out And Savings:

    Swiggy One and One Lite users enjoyed savings of over INR 900 crores, while Swiggy Dineout users saved a jaw-dropping INR 300 crores. Instamart enthusiasts ordered from the 17th most populated ‘Insta-pur’ in the world, and one user in Jaipur placed 67 orders in a single day. The delivery of instant noodles in Delhi took just 65 seconds!

    As we bid adieu to 2023, these stats and insights tell the story of a year celebrating the diverse palates and evolving food culture across India.

    Source link