hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetGorabetcasibom9018betgit casinojojobetmarsbahismatbetmatbet

Tag: slams

  • Paige Spiranac slams troll over tweet about women in sports

    Paige Spiranac slams troll over tweet about women in sports

    ‘As soon as you use your looks, you’re objectifying yourself and no one will take you seriously’

    Article content

    Paige Spiranac fired back at a viral tweet slandering female sports broadcasters while outlining the vicious double-standard that many women in sports face.

    Advertisement 2

    Article content

    Article content

    Article content

    The popular golf influencer posted a video on Monday, going off on X user T.J. Moe for his incendiary tweet about seeing a group of women giving pre-game analysis before a college football tilt on ESPN.

    “Who actually wants to watch three women stand around and talk about football? I do not,” Moe wrote with a screengrab of three women speaking during a segment on Saturday morning.

    “Let me clarify: No one wants to listen to 3 women talk football. Men are better at it– it’s like asking cats to bark,” he added. “I issue no apology and no retracts.

    “Most people agree with me, they’re just afraid to say it. Carry on with your outrage.”

    Advertisement 3

    Article content

    Among many others, Spiranac took issue with Moe’s comments.

    The former college golfer explained how plenty of successful broadcasters and coaches did not play the sports they cover or coach past the high school level.

    Then, she delved into the unfortunate cycle that women in sports must contend with.

    Advertisement 4

    Article content

    “So, let’s break it down, you’re a woman who wants to work in the sports industry and you have a deep understanding of sports and you have a right to be there,” Spiranac said.

    “However, you’ll never get the highest opportunities because men only wanna listen to other men talk about sports.”

    She explained that this often forces women in the industry to rely on their looks to get ahead and the criticism that brings.

    “So you use whatever else you have in your toolbox to get opportunities, maybe that’s your looks,” she added. “As soon as you use your looks, for example, you’re objectifying yourself and no one will take you seriously.”

    Spiranac brought up the double-standard of the situation, citing golf sensation Nelly Korda posing for the coming Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue – something the influencer also has done in the past – and saying that women often have to objectify themselves while marketing towards men.

    Advertisement 5

    Article content

    “Your counter is women can talk about women’s sports, but women’s sports don’t get the funding, which means they don’t get the eyeballs. And men wanna watch men play sports,” Spiranac said.

    “Women try to market themselves outside their sport. Nelly Korda doing (Sports Illustrated), they’re condemned for even though men do the (ESPN) Body issue.

    She closed the clip by encouraging women to be themselves, no matter what push back they receive.

    “Wear what you wanna wear, say what you wanna say, do what you wanna do because no matter what you do, how you do it, you will always get push back and someone will always have something to say.

    “So do what you want to do and keep pushing,” Spiranac closed the clip.

    Recommended from Editorial

    Advertisement 6

    Article content

    Spiranac hasn’t been shy about standing up for herself against those critical of her for embracing her sexuality.

    She recently fired back at critics for the double-standard and selective support of women.

    Spiranac reposted a tweet about Sabrina Carpenter from September which complimented the pop singer for embracing her sexuality while reaching a mainly female audience. 

    “Sabrina Carpenter is genius for how she embraces her sexuality but still keeps women as her target audience,” read the tweet by another X user named Paige.

    “Like how is she performing in lingerie and I still feel like it’s not for men at all? I can’t comprehend it, but I love it.” 

    Sabrina Carpenter performs at Outside Lands Music Festival on Saturday, Aug. 10, 2024.
    Sabrina Carpenter performs at Outside Lands Music Festival on Saturday, Aug. 10, 2024. AP Photo

    Spiranac, who aims more for a male audience with her social-media content, replied: “I dislike how women pick and choose when it’s okay to support other women for embracing their sexuality depending on if it appears to be for the female or male gaze. 

    “Women should be able to embrace their sexuality if that’s what makes them feel empowered,” she continued. “One shouldn’t be called a genius while the other is called an attention whore for doing the same exact thing.”

    Advertisement 7

    Article content

    In response to complimentary reply to the post, Spiranac added that her statement was about more than just own experience. 

    “This isn’t really even about me. It’s a constant theme I keep seeing with other women too,” she wrote. 

    Article content



    Source link

  • Dr. Cheyenne Bryant Slams Ne-Yo’s Polyamorous Lifestyle

    Dr. Cheyenne Bryant Slams Ne-Yo’s Polyamorous Lifestyle

    MadameNoire Featured Video

    Dr. Cheyenne Bryant has been on a roll lately, calling out celebrity men for their complicated love lives. Three months ago she went viral for her sit-down confrontation with former NFL player turned podcaster Cam Newton. Up next on the chopping block is Ne-Yo. 

    The “Champagne Life” singer has been embracing his polyamorous lifestyle lately but Dr. Bryant is calling it all cap. On Tuesday, Nov. 26 she sat with her Truth Talks co-hosts and explained why Ne-Yo is actually “a womanizer.”

    EBONY Power 100 Gala 2024 - Arrivals

    Cheyenne Bryant attends EBONY Power 100 Gala 2024 at Nya Studios on November 17, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. Source: Leon Bennett / Getty

     

    She said, “He cheated on his wife and that’s why she left him. He didn’t cheat once, he cheated over and over again. He’s a womanizer. And now what he’s doing is as a womanizer, he’s gaslighting himself and that wife to make it seem like he wants polyamorous when you never wanted polyamorous from the beginning. You wanted to be married, but didn’t have the discipline to do it and your wife left you because she didn’t tolerate that sh-t.”

    Bryant continued on and accused Ne-Yo of making other women pay for his “heartbreak” while calling it polyamory.

    “That’s B.S.,” she said. “You want to be married. You don’t have the discipline, you don’t have the tools to do it. So now you want to make sure you put out into the world, look at me I want to be polyamorous because I cheated. No you failed in your marriage, you F’d up and that’s the problem. Now you need to heal from that and not self project your pain onto these women about your messed up decision making.” 

    Vinny Watson Birthday And Art Ball Experience

    Ne-Yo attends Vinny Watson’s Birthday And Art Ball Experience at V12 Restaurant & Sports Bar on July 17, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia. Source: Carol Lee Rose / Getty

     

    It’s been over a year since he divorced his wife, Crystal Renee. And since their break-up, Ne-Yo has been openly dating multiple women at one time. 

    “Monogamy’s for you it’s not for me,” he said in his Nov. 14 appearance on Lemon Drop. “I spent a lot of time lying trying to be somebody that I was not. And now that I realize who I am, it’s like all of my relationships have improved. From friendships on down to my ex-wife. We’re actually at a place we can call each other friend again because now it’s, ‘This is me. This is who I am.’ Love it or leave it alone.”

    While Dr. Bryant may have doubts of Ne-Yo’s newly embraced relationship status, history shows the singer may truly not be fit for monogamy. In fact, this is not the first time he’s ever said that he didn’t want to be in a monogamous relationship.

    Back in 2009, he was dating a woman named Monyetta Shaw. Two years into their relationship, Shaw and Ne-Yo engaged and had two children. After the birth of their second child, they agreed to have Shaw’s tubes tied. But Shaw told NY Post in 2016 that Ne-Yo “agreed to undergo a vasectomy,” which evidently he did not go through with. 

    The couple’s wedding date was in 2013. However, Ne-Yo called off the wedding two months before the big day. She said Ne-Yo called her and said, “I don’t want to be monogamous anymore.” Then, two years later, he was in a monogamous relationship with Renee. 

    Although they married, Ne-Yo was not faithful to Renee. After six years of marriage and the birth of three children, Renee filed for divorce. The court documents cited that Ne-Yo “recently fathered a minor child.”

    In 2021, Ne-Yo welcomed a son with a woman named Sade just months after his daughter Renee was born. He and Sade welcomed another son, Brixton, in February 2023 — the same month he finalized his divorce from Renee.

    He now has seven children.

    RELATED CONTENT: 10 Celebrities Who Have Experimented With Polyamorous Relationships



    Source link

  • Dr. Cheyenne Bryant Slams Ne-Yo’s Polyamorous Lifestyle

    Dr. Cheyenne Bryant Slams Ne-Yo’s Polyamorous Lifestyle

    MadameNoire Featured Video

    Dr. Cheyenne Bryant has been on a roll lately, calling out celebrity men for their complicated love lives. Three months ago she went viral for her sit-down confrontation with former NFL player turned podcaster Cam Newton. Up next on the chopping block is Ne-Yo. 

    The “Champagne Life” singer has been embracing his polyamorous lifestyle lately but Dr. Bryant is calling it all cap. On Tuesday, Nov. 26 she sat with her Truth Talks co-hosts and explained why Ne-Yo is actually “a womanizer.”

    EBONY Power 100 Gala 2024 - Arrivals

    Cheyenne Bryant attends EBONY Power 100 Gala 2024 at Nya Studios on November 17, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. Source: Leon Bennett / Getty

     

    She said, “He cheated on his wife and that’s why she left him. He didn’t cheat once, he cheated over and over again. He’s a womanizer. And now what he’s doing is as a womanizer, he’s gaslighting himself and that wife to make it seem like he wants polyamorous when you never wanted polyamorous from the beginning. You wanted to be married, but didn’t have the discipline to do it and your wife left you because she didn’t tolerate that sh-t.”

    Bryant continued on and accused Ne-Yo of making other women pay for his “heartbreak” while calling it polyamory.

    “That’s B.S.,” she said. “You want to be married. You don’t have the discipline, you don’t have the tools to do it. So now you want to make sure you put out into the world, look at me I want to be polyamorous because I cheated. No you failed in your marriage, you F’d up and that’s the problem. Now you need to heal from that and not self project your pain onto these women about your messed up decision making.” 

    Vinny Watson Birthday And Art Ball Experience

    Ne-Yo attends Vinny Watson’s Birthday And Art Ball Experience at V12 Restaurant & Sports Bar on July 17, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia. Source: Carol Lee Rose / Getty

     

    It’s been over a year since he divorced his wife, Crystal Renee. And since their break-up, Ne-Yo has been openly dating multiple women at one time. 

    “Monogamy’s for you it’s not for me,” he said in his Nov. 14 appearance on Lemon Drop. “I spent a lot of time lying trying to be somebody that I was not. And now that I realize who I am, it’s like all of my relationships have improved. From friendships on down to my ex-wife. We’re actually at a place we can call each other friend again because now it’s, ‘This is me. This is who I am.’ Love it or leave it alone.”

    While Dr. Bryant may have doubts of Ne-Yo’s newly embraced relationship status, history shows the singer may truly not be fit for monogamy. In fact, this is not the first time he’s ever said that he didn’t want to be in a monogamous relationship.

    Back in 2009, he was dating a woman named Monyetta Shaw. Two years into their relationship, Shaw and Ne-Yo engaged and had two children. After the birth of their second child, they agreed to have Shaw’s tubes tied. But Shaw told NY Post in 2016 that Ne-Yo “agreed to undergo a vasectomy,” which evidently he did not go through with. 

    The couple’s wedding date was in 2013. However, Ne-Yo called off the wedding two months before the big day. She said Ne-Yo called her and said, “I don’t want to be monogamous anymore.” Then, two years later, he was in a monogamous relationship with Renee. 

    Although they married, Ne-Yo was not faithful to Renee. After six years of marriage and the birth of three children, Renee filed for divorce. The court documents cited that Ne-Yo “recently fathered a minor child.”

    In 2021, Ne-Yo welcomed a son with a woman named Sade just months after his daughter Renee was born. He and Sade welcomed another son, Brixton, in February 2023 — the same month he finalized his divorce from Renee.

    He now has seven children.

    RELATED CONTENT: 10 Celebrities Who Have Experimented With Polyamorous Relationships



    Source link

  • Dr. Cheyenne Bryant Slams Ne-Yo’s Polyamorous Lifestyle

    Dr. Cheyenne Bryant Slams Ne-Yo’s Polyamorous Lifestyle

    MadameNoire Featured Video

    Dr. Cheyenne Bryant has been on a roll lately, calling out celebrity men for their complicated love lives. Three months ago she went viral for her sit-down confrontation with former NFL player turned podcaster Cam Newton. Up next on the chopping block is Ne-Yo. 

    The “Champagne Life” singer has been embracing his polyamorous lifestyle lately but Dr. Bryant is calling it all cap. On Tuesday, Nov. 26 she sat with her Truth Talks co-hosts and explained why Ne-Yo is actually “a womanizer.”

    EBONY Power 100 Gala 2024 - Arrivals

    Cheyenne Bryant attends EBONY Power 100 Gala 2024 at Nya Studios on November 17, 2024 in Los Angeles, California. Source: Leon Bennett / Getty

     

    She said, “He cheated on his wife and that’s why she left him. He didn’t cheat once, he cheated over and over again. He’s a womanizer. And now what he’s doing is as a womanizer, he’s gaslighting himself and that wife to make it seem like he wants polyamorous when you never wanted polyamorous from the beginning. You wanted to be married, but didn’t have the discipline to do it and your wife left you because she didn’t tolerate that sh-t.”

    Bryant continued on and accused Ne-Yo of making other women pay for his “heartbreak” while calling it polyamory.

    “That’s B.S.,” she said. “You want to be married. You don’t have the discipline, you don’t have the tools to do it. So now you want to make sure you put out into the world, look at me I want to be polyamorous because I cheated. No you failed in your marriage, you F’d up and that’s the problem. Now you need to heal from that and not self project your pain onto these women about your messed up decision making.” 

    Vinny Watson Birthday And Art Ball Experience

    Ne-Yo attends Vinny Watson’s Birthday And Art Ball Experience at V12 Restaurant & Sports Bar on July 17, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia. Source: Carol Lee Rose / Getty

     

    It’s been over a year since he divorced his wife, Crystal Renee. And since their break-up, Ne-Yo has been openly dating multiple women at one time. 

    “Monogamy’s for you it’s not for me,” he said in his Nov. 14 appearance on Lemon Drop. “I spent a lot of time lying trying to be somebody that I was not. And now that I realize who I am, it’s like all of my relationships have improved. From friendships on down to my ex-wife. We’re actually at a place we can call each other friend again because now it’s, ‘This is me. This is who I am.’ Love it or leave it alone.”

    While Dr. Bryant may have doubts of Ne-Yo’s newly embraced relationship status, history shows the singer may truly not be fit for monogamy. In fact, this is not the first time he’s ever said that he didn’t want to be in a monogamous relationship.

    Back in 2009, he was dating a woman named Monyetta Shaw. Two years into their relationship, Shaw and Ne-Yo engaged and had two children. After the birth of their second child, they agreed to have Shaw’s tubes tied. But Shaw told NY Post in 2016 that Ne-Yo “agreed to undergo a vasectomy,” which evidently he did not go through with. 

    The couple’s wedding date was in 2013. However, Ne-Yo called off the wedding two months before the big day. She said Ne-Yo called her and said, “I don’t want to be monogamous anymore.” Then, two years later, he was in a monogamous relationship with Renee. 

    Although they married, Ne-Yo was not faithful to Renee. After six years of marriage and the birth of three children, Renee filed for divorce. The court documents cited that Ne-Yo “recently fathered a minor child.”

    In 2021, Ne-Yo welcomed a son with a woman named Sade just months after his daughter Renee was born. He and Sade welcomed another son, Brixton, in February 2023 — the same month he finalized his divorce from Renee.

    He now has seven children.

    RELATED CONTENT: 10 Celebrities Who Have Experimented With Polyamorous Relationships



    Source link

  • Royal expert slams Harry and Meghan for using their titles to earn ‘huge amounts of money’ – as bombshell German documentary exposes couple’s ‘elitist’ California lifestyle

    Royal expert slams Harry and Meghan for using their titles to earn ‘huge amounts of money’ – as bombshell German documentary exposes couple’s ‘elitist’ California lifestyle

    Harry and Meghan suffered a new blow tonight after a German documentary accused the couple of hypocrisy while enjoying an ‘elitist’ lifestyle in the United States.  

    The programme entitled ‘Harry: The Lost Prince’ includes damning criticism of the couple’s attempts to build a new life for themselves as charity activists and campaigners since leaving the Royal family. 

    MailOnline was given a preview of the documentary before it was screened to an audience of millions in Germany tonight. 

    The programme takes a dig at the couple by detailing how their much-publicised visits to poverty-stricken countries such as Nigeria and Colombia sits uneasily with Meghan’s love of expensive designer clothes. 

    One stinging voice in the documentary is former soldier Ben McBean, who lost his left arm and had his right leg amputated above the knee after being seriously injured by a landmine blast in Afghanistan in 2008. 

    McBean who shared a flight home from Afghanistan with Harry did not hold back in criticising the prince over his revelations about his family in his bombshell memoir Spare and in his Netflix show. 

    The veteran soldier says: ‘I just thought, with him kind of whinging about his family and he was saying something about his brother pushing him over or something like that, I was just like, “Mate, just leave it out”.

    ‘You and your brother had a little fisticuffs…but family’s family, you know. 

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle suffered a new blow tonight after a German documentary accused the couple of hypocrisy while enjoying an 'elitist' lifestyle in the United States

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle suffered a new blow tonight after a German documentary accused the couple of hypocrisy while enjoying an ‘elitist’ lifestyle in the United States

    The bombshell documentary that will be screened in Germany runs a fine-toothed comb through Harry and Meghan's work with their charity Archewell Foundation

    The bombshell documentary that will be screened in Germany runs a fine-toothed comb through Harry and Meghan’s work with their charity Archewell Foundation

    The film is titled 'Harry: The Lost Prince' and includes expert commentary on the allegations the Duke of Sussex made against his family in his book Spare

    The film is titled ‘Harry: The Lost Prince’ and includes expert commentary on the allegations the Duke of Sussex made against his family in his book Spare 

    ‘If one of my friends fell out with his partner and started posting things on social media and saying my ex is this and that, I’d have told him to shut up as well.’ 

    The German documentary also points the finger at Harry and Meghan for inevitably trading off their former Royal roles by seeking to make money to support their lifestyle. 

    It even pours scorn on them for ‘failing’ to mix with wealthy neighbours in the celebrity enclave of Montecito of California, where they have made their home with children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. 

    But Harry and Meghan may be most uncomfortable with the documentary reminding viewers that they had admitted spending just one hour a week working for their charity Archewell. 

    In another, the programme highlights how donations to Archewell dropped from $13million in 2021 to just $2million dollars in 2022. 

    The couple did face harsh criticism over ‘Megxit’ in some sections of the media in Germany when they announced their decision to step back as ‘senior members’ of the British Royal family in January 2020. 

    Their reputations soared, however, in Germany in September last year when they attended the Invictus games, featuring competing injured servicemen and women, in Dusseldorf.

    But the new documentary – the first TV analysis of the couple in Germany since ‘Megxit’ – even questions the cost of the Dusseldorf games by pointing out that they were funded by a €40million donation from Germany’s Ministry of Defence. 

    The documentary will no doubt leave the couple unimpressed as it extensively quotes British Royal reporters and experts, talking about the gulf between their supposedly noble work and their luxury lifestyle. 

    The programme takes a dig at the couple by detailing how their much-publicised visits to poverty-stricken countries such as Nigeria and Colombia sits uneasily with Meghan's love of expensive designer clothes. This picture was taken during the couple's visit to Bogota in August this year

    The programme takes a dig at the couple by detailing how their much-publicised visits to poverty-stricken countries such as Nigeria and Colombia sits uneasily with Meghan’s love of expensive designer clothes. This picture was taken during the couple’s visit to Bogota in August this year 

    The new documentary – the first TV analysis of the couple in Germany since 'Megxit' - even questions the cost of the Invictus Games that were held in Dusseldorf by pointing out that they were funded by a €40million donation from Germany's Ministry of Defence

    The new documentary – the first TV analysis of the couple in Germany since ‘Megxit’ – even questions the cost of the Invictus Games that were held in Dusseldorf by pointing out that they were funded by a €40million donation from Germany’s Ministry of Defence

    The film will no doubt leave the couple unimpressed as it extensively quotes British Royal reporters and experts, talking about the gulf between their supposedly noble work and their luxury lifestyle

    The film will no doubt leave the couple unimpressed as it extensively quotes British Royal reporters and experts, talking about the gulf between their supposedly noble work and their luxury lifestyle

    One reporter Russel Myers says on the show: ‘If you’re going to places like Nigeria, like Colombia, which have huge socio-economic problems, some of the world’s poorest communities in these countries, and you’re turning up wearing tens of thousands of pounds worth of designer clothes – it really doesn’t send the right message.’ 

    Jack Royston from the podcast The Royal Report also picked up on the couple’s desire to be ‘half in and half out’ of the Royal family which was dismissed by the late Queen. 

    He says: ‘If you have a situation where Harry and Meghan are earning huge amounts of money in Hollywood trading off their reputations, but then they’re also bolstering their reputations by working for the Queen – they’re able to present themselves on the world stage as being these working members of the royal family who are also available for a price.

    ‘That is a huge compromise to demand off the monarchy. If they were to be perceived to be promoting their commercial projects while representing the Queen, then that’s also… starting to border on corruption there because they should never be using the monarchy as a platform.’ 

    Royston adds: ‘The particular way in which Harry and Meghan crashed out of the Royal Family, firing hand grenades at Harry’s relatives, caused their reputation to be significantly damaged. 

    ‘And that has had a major impact on their capacity to make the world a better place because a lot of people just aren’t listening to them at all!’ 

    Royston also points out the huge cost of the Invictus games with the massive contribution by the German taxpayer and the expectation that public funds in the UK will have to support the games which are booked to be held in Birmingham in 2027.

    Describing it as ‘a huge amount of money and obviously falling on the taxpayer’, he said: ‘It’s going to be a big issue at the 2027 games which is in Birmingham, as Birmingham recently was driven to the verge of bankruptcy.’ 

    Experts have also called Harry and Meghan out for profiting off their royal reputation in the documentary. Pictured here is a grab from Harry: The Lost Prince

    Experts have also called Harry and Meghan out for profiting off their royal reputation in the documentary. Pictured here is a grab from Harry: The Lost Prince 

    Royston also refers to Harry and Meghan as now being ‘part of an elite in America’, leading lives which separate them even further from the Royal family. 

    Richard Mineards, one of the couple’s neighbours in Montecito, also appears, talking about the exclusive lifestyle that the couple enjoy in the area. 

    He says: ‘It doesn’t come cheap. I mean…most houses are about eight or nine million dollars.’ 

    But he added: ‘I personally don’t think that Meghan is an asset to our community… She doesn’t really go out or get involved with the community. 

    ‘Harry has to a certain extent, because he’s quite jolly…but Meghan doesn’t seem to get seen anywhere…. And you don’t see him either.’ 

    The documentary also features Royal biographer Angela Levin, talking about Harry’s dissatisfaction at ‘Megxit’, saying, ‘he didn’t get exactly what he wanted – that he could be half in the royal family and half out.’ 

    She explains in the programme: ‘But the late Queen who died said that actually doesn’t work and I don’t want you to use your position within the royal family to make money.’ 

    German journalist Dr Ulrike Grunewald, who directed the documentary, says: ‘What surprised me most was how ineffectively Harry and Meghan’s foundation is organised. 

    Harry and Meghan attended the 2023 Invictus Games - a paralympic tournament for wounded and injured veterans - that were held in Dusseldorf, Germany

    Harry and Meghan attended the 2023 Invictus Games – a paralympic tournament for wounded and injured veterans – that were held in Dusseldorf, Germany 

    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex pictured at the sitting volleyball final during day six of the Invictus Games in Dusseldorf on September 15, 2023

    The Duke and Duchess of Sussex pictured at the sitting volleyball final during day six of the Invictus Games in Dusseldorf on September 15, 2023

    ‘The amount of donations has fallen drastically in one year: from $13million in 2021 to $2million in 2022. According to their own documents, Harry and Meghan only work one hour a week for the Archewell Foundation.’ 

    Dai Davies, a former Head of Royal Protection and a Divisional Commander in the Metropolitan Police, also criticises Harry, accusing him of making others a target by detailing in his book how many Taliban fighters he had killed in his Apache helicopter.

    Davies says: ‘In his book, Spare, for him to disclose, as he did, that he had killed a number of Taliban was, in my opinion, totally unwise, because I was aware, as indeed he was, that the Taliban and various groups had put a price on his head.

     ‘And really, I think that price still remains, which could form a basis for him saying, well, I need security. 

    ‘If you open your big mouth, as he has collectively, that book, not just on that, but given away all kinds of secrets, then it’s not surprising that some people might regard you as a potential target.’ 

    Davies also accuses Harry of failing to mix much with ordinary people on what he describes as their ‘carefully orchestrated’ international trips. 

    He says: ‘In Colombia, although there are very rich people there, the vast majority, 85 per cent or 90 per cent, are very poor.

    ‘And what I’ve noticed of these tours, he mixes with the upper classes. He doesn’t really, apart from carefree orchestrated areas where he mixes with so-called the ‘normal people’ – well they’re not. 

    ‘These are carefully orchestrated campaigns as far as I can see… I look quite dispassionately at the evidence and the evidence I’ve seen is, it’s all about Harry and Meghan.   

    ‘It’s very little to do with an actual alleged rationale for going there.’ 

    Source link

  • German documentary maker slams Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s lifestyle

    German documentary maker slams Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s lifestyle

    As Thanksgiving passes in Montecito, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s glittering lifestyle faces new challenges. Meghan’s highly anticipated lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard, has requested a three-month extension to amend her trademark application, while her Netflix cooking series is set to release in early 2024.

    Additionally, the Sussexes’ charity, Archewell, is preparing to file its tax return, which will reveal its financials and likely attract public scrutiny.

    More immediately, the couple faces the release of Harry: The Lost Prince, a documentary airing in Germany this week. The film examines whether Harry and Meghan have truly achieved “freedom” and become globally influential figures.

    According to documentary filmmaker Ulrike Grunewald, the answer is “No.” She argues that despite their high aspirations to be global benefactors, they have not yet lived up to the image they’ve cultivated.

    What did Grunewald find?

    Grunewald, who traveled to Montecito for her documentary, found that the Sussexes have not integrated into the elite circles of their wealthy neighborhood. Despite their royal status, they remain largely isolated, seldom seen in town and rarely participating in social activities.

    Their charitable foundation, Archewell, also appears to be struggling. Donations dropped significantly in 2022, and Harry and Meghan reportedly work only one hour a week for the organization.

    Grunewald further explored the Invictus Games, which garnered positive attention during the 2023 event in Dsseldorf. However, reports revealed that it cost German taxpayers 40 million euros, undermining the goodwill.

    The next Invictus Games are scheduled for February 2024 in Vancouver, funded in part by the Canadian government, but leadership issues within the organization have raised concerns.

    Despite these setbacks, Harry remains committed to his charitable endeavors, particularly Invictus, which royal reporter Jack Royston believes is genuine work. However, Grunewald suggests that the Sussexes’ initial power duo image has shifted, with the couple now appearing separately and their influence waning.

    As their popularity drops-approval ratings in the UK and US are now below 30 percent-the couple must work hard to restore their public image. Nonetheless, Meghan recently continued her philanthropic efforts by hosting a dinner for Afghan women, and their Archewell Foundation remains active. But whether their ambitions will lead to lasting success remains uncertain.



    Source link

  • London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    Nick Corrigan has been living on a boat for the past eight years, and regularly moors on the Regent’s Canal.

    As an itinerant boater, he rarely stays in one place for more than a couple of weeks so relies on free moorings along London’s canals and rivers.

    But Nick has said his lifestyle is under threat after the Canal and River Trust, the charity that manages some of the capital’s waterways, rolled out charges for some moorings.

    These first appeared in Little Venice a couple of years ago, but have since been introduced around King’s Cross, as well as in other parts of Camden and Islington.

    Costing between £25 and £35 a night, a boater who used these moorings for a year could be set back more than £10,000.

    Nick said this is making central London’s waterways unaffordable for the average boater – pushing them off canals they have had free access to for hundreds of years.

    He fears that if more charges are introduced, it will be hard for him to stay close to his partner in Hackney, and his offices in Islington.

    The boater also moored near Homerton Hospital when he received treatment for cancer earlier this year, but said this would not have been possible if he had been charged.

    He added: “These moorings started by being bookable, which was really good when they were free.

    “But in the last 12 months, they’ve made them chargeable. What used to be really busy, safe, lovely areas are now deserted.”

    Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted (Image: National Bargee Travellers Association)

    The National Bargee Travellers Association has said Freedom of Information disclosures by the Canal and River Trust show that existing chargeable moorings were booked only 16.5% of the time in the first six months of this year.

    Nick added that the daily charges for some moorings followed a succession of other changes by the charity – including increasing boat licence fees – that seemed to penalise itinerant boaters.

    “The Canal and River Trust has been spending the last few years cooking up different ways to try to get rid of liveaboard boaters in central London,” he claimed.

    “But by closing all these free moorings it will make the River Lea even more congested, which they told us two years ago was unsustainably busy.”

    The Canal and River Trust has now said it has no plans to introduce charges for moorings in Hackney, and that it has recently removed fees from some moorings in Camden.

    A spokesperson for the charity said: “Over the past decade the number of boats on the capital’s waterways has more than doubled. 

    “The vast majority of mooring in London is still free, but the addition of a small number of pre-bookable moorings ensures visiting boaters who are worried they will have nowhere to stop are not excluded from being able to visit our very busy London waterways.

    “We’re doing all we can to increase the number of moorings where demand exists, and have added over one kilometre of free towpath moorings in central London over the past few years.”



    Source link

  • London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    Nick Corrigan has been living on a boat for the past eight years, and regularly moors on the Regent’s Canal.

    As an itinerant boater, he rarely stays in one place for more than a couple of weeks so relies on free moorings along London’s canals and rivers.

    But Nick has said his lifestyle is under threat after the Canal and River Trust, the charity that manages some of the capital’s waterways, rolled out charges for some moorings.

    These first appeared in Little Venice a couple of years ago, but have since been introduced around King’s Cross, as well as in other parts of Camden and Islington.

    Costing between £25 and £35 a night, a boater who used these moorings for a year could be set back more than £10,000.

    Nick said this is making central London’s waterways unaffordable for the average boater – pushing them off canals they have had free access to for hundreds of years.

    He fears that if more charges are introduced, it will be hard for him to stay close to his partner in Hackney, and his offices in Islington.

    The boater also moored near Homerton Hospital when he received treatment for cancer earlier this year, but said this would not have been possible if he had been charged.

    He added: “These moorings started by being bookable, which was really good when they were free.

    “But in the last 12 months, they’ve made them chargeable. What used to be really busy, safe, lovely areas are now deserted.”

    Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted (Image: National Bargee Travellers Association)

    The National Bargee Travellers Association has said Freedom of Information disclosures by the Canal and River Trust show that existing chargeable moorings were booked only 16.5% of the time in the first six months of this year.

    Nick added that the daily charges for some moorings followed a succession of other changes by the charity – including increasing boat licence fees – that seemed to penalise itinerant boaters.

    “The Canal and River Trust has been spending the last few years cooking up different ways to try to get rid of liveaboard boaters in central London,” he claimed.

    “But by closing all these free moorings it will make the River Lea even more congested, which they told us two years ago was unsustainably busy.”

    The Canal and River Trust has now said it has no plans to introduce charges for moorings in Hackney, and that it has recently removed fees from some moorings in Camden.

    A spokesperson for the charity said: “Over the past decade the number of boats on the capital’s waterways has more than doubled. 

    “The vast majority of mooring in London is still free, but the addition of a small number of pre-bookable moorings ensures visiting boaters who are worried they will have nowhere to stop are not excluded from being able to visit our very busy London waterways.

    “We’re doing all we can to increase the number of moorings where demand exists, and have added over one kilometre of free towpath moorings in central London over the past few years.”



    Source link

  • London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    London boater slams new Regent’s Canal mooring charges

    Nick Corrigan has been living on a boat for the past eight years, and regularly moors on the Regent’s Canal.

    As an itinerant boater, he rarely stays in one place for more than a couple of weeks so relies on free moorings along London’s canals and rivers.

    But Nick has said his lifestyle is under threat after the Canal and River Trust, the charity that manages some of the capital’s waterways, rolled out charges for some moorings.

    These first appeared in Little Venice a couple of years ago, but have since been introduced around King’s Cross, as well as in other parts of Camden and Islington.

    Costing between £25 and £35 a night, a boater who used these moorings for a year could be set back more than £10,000.

    Nick said this is making central London’s waterways unaffordable for the average boater – pushing them off canals they have had free access to for hundreds of years.

    He fears that if more charges are introduced, it will be hard for him to stay close to his partner in Hackney, and his offices in Islington.

    The boater also moored near Homerton Hospital when he received treatment for cancer earlier this year, but said this would not have been possible if he had been charged.

    He added: “These moorings started by being bookable, which was really good when they were free.

    “But in the last 12 months, they’ve made them chargeable. What used to be really busy, safe, lovely areas are now deserted.”

    Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted Nick claims some stretches of the canal are now deserted (Image: National Bargee Travellers Association)

    The National Bargee Travellers Association has said Freedom of Information disclosures by the Canal and River Trust show that existing chargeable moorings were booked only 16.5% of the time in the first six months of this year.

    Nick added that the daily charges for some moorings followed a succession of other changes by the charity – including increasing boat licence fees – that seemed to penalise itinerant boaters.

    “The Canal and River Trust has been spending the last few years cooking up different ways to try to get rid of liveaboard boaters in central London,” he claimed.

    “But by closing all these free moorings it will make the River Lea even more congested, which they told us two years ago was unsustainably busy.”

    The Canal and River Trust has now said it has no plans to introduce charges for moorings in Hackney, and that it has recently removed fees from some moorings in Camden.

    A spokesperson for the charity said: “Over the past decade the number of boats on the capital’s waterways has more than doubled. 

    “The vast majority of mooring in London is still free, but the addition of a small number of pre-bookable moorings ensures visiting boaters who are worried they will have nowhere to stop are not excluded from being able to visit our very busy London waterways.

    “We’re doing all we can to increase the number of moorings where demand exists, and have added over one kilometre of free towpath moorings in central London over the past few years.”



    Source link

  • Martha Stewart Netflix doc bombshells, she slams as unfair

    Martha Stewart Netflix doc bombshells, she slams as unfair

    As far as Martha Stewart is concerned, the new documentary about her life and career is not a good thing.

    The lifestyle guru and self-made former billionaire has slammed the film “Martha,” which started streaming Oct. 30 on Netflix, as “lazy” and “not the story that makes me, me” at the Retail CEO Influencer Forum in September. “It’s more about my stupid trial, which was so unfair.”

    And this week, Stewart doubled down in an interview with the Times, insisting that director RJ Cutler focuses too much on her 2004 insider trading trial in the movie’s second half. 

    “The trial and the actual incarceration was less than two years out of an 83-year life,” she said. “I considered it a vacation, to tell you the truth.”

    Indeed, those two years — from her troublesome phone call to her stockbroker as she was en route to Cabo San Lucas all the way to her final day in Alderson prison in West Virginia — take up nearly half of the two-hour doc.

    Despite doing press for it, Martha Stewart is not happy with the documentary about her life and career. Courtesy of Netflix

    Bitter Stewart is irate when she mentions the courtroom drama in the movie, which she participated in, saying the responsible parties, including eventual FBI director James Comey, deserve to be thrown into a blender.

    “It was so horrifying to me that I had to go through that to be a trophy for these idiots in the US Attorney’s office,” she says of the high-profile trial.

    “Those prosecutors should have been put in a Cuisinart and turned on high. I was a trophy — a prominent woman, the first billionaire woman in America. ‘We got her.’”

    When she begins serving her five-month prison sentence in 2004, actors read aloud her diary entries that criticize the food and staff.

    Stewart says the government lawyers who went after her in 2004 ” should have been put in a Cuisinart.” AP

    “Physical exam,” she says on an entry from her first day. “Stripped of all clothes. Squat, arms out, cough. Embarrassing.”

    Then she rails about the limited cafeteria fare available behind bars.

    “What worries me is the very poor quality of the food,” Stewart wrote from the clink. “And the unavailability of fresh anything, as there are many starches and many carbs and many fat foods. No pure anything.”

    In her first week in the joint — which forced her to hand over her contact lenses — she claims to have received a one-day stay in solitary confinement for accidentally touching a guard. (The Federal Bureau of Prisons disputes this.)

    Stewart claims that while in prison she was sent into solitary confinement for one day. Getty Images

    “Today I saw two very well dressed ladies walking, and I breezed by them, remarking on the beautiful morning and how nice they looked — when I realized from the big silver keychain that they were guards. I lightly brushed the chain,” Stewart wrote.

    “Later, I was called in to be told never, ever to touch a guard without expecting severe reprimand. Of course, I apologized but the incident was so minor when it occurred that I did not think about it for the rest of the day.”

    The “Martha Stewart Living” founder says she was severely punished for the faux pas.

    “I was dragged into solitary for touching an officer,” she recalls. “No food or water for a day. This was Camp Cupcake remember? That was the nickname. It was not a cupcake.”

    Martha Stewart’s boyfriend Charles Simonyi only visited her in prison one time. Courtesy of Netflix

    And her relationships suffered. While locked up, boyfriend Charles Simonyi, the wealthy creator of Microsoft Office, only visited her one time, the film reveals.

    “I don’t think he liked hanging out with somebody in jail,” she said. “He was out on his boat, floating around the world.”

    And soon after Stewart became a free woman, he unceremoniously dumped her — under the covers.

    “We were in bed and he said, ‘You know, Martha, I’m going to get married.’ He said, ‘I’m going to get married to Lisa.’ And I said, ‘Lisa who?!’” Stewart remembers. 

    “I mean he hasn’t told me a word. ‘And, by the way her parents don’t want me to ever speak to you again.’”

    “I thought that was the most horrible thing a person could do. How could a man who’s spent 15 years with me just do that? What a stupid thing to do to someone you actually cared about.”

    Stewart also goes into messy detail about her and her ex-husband Andrew Stewart’s extramarital affairs, and the resulting implosion of their marriage years before. 

    When Martha was 19, she kissed a stranger on her honeymoon to Italy. Courtesy of Netflix

    She first stepped out on Andrew — innocently, she says — when they were on their honeymoon in Italy and she was just 19 years old. 

    One day, Martha visited the Duomo in Milan alone while Andrew stayed back at the hotel, and there in the church she communed with a random gent.

    “It was very romantic place, crowded with tourists, and [I] met this very handsome guy,” she said. 

    “He didn’t know I was married. I was this waif of a girl hanging out in the cathedral on Easter eve. He was emotional, I was emotional. It’s just because it was an emotional place. It was unlike anything I had ever experienced.”

    She added: “It was like nothing I’d ever done before, so why not kiss a stranger?”

    Martha maintains the secret smooch “was neither naughty nor unfaithful, it was just emotional. Of the moment. That’s how I looked at it.”

    Martha Stewart and her ex-husband Andrew Stewart both engaged in extramarital affairs. Netflix

    That wasn’t the only indiscretion, though. She also owns up to cheating again later on in the marriage.

    “I had a very brief affair with a very attractive Irishman, and it was just nothing,” she says. “It was nothing. In terms of … I would have never broken up a marriage for it. It was nothing.”

    Andrew, meanwhile, allegedly messed around on Martha constantly.

    “He was not satisfied at home,” she said. “I don’t know how many different girlfriends he had during this time, but I think there were quite a few. Young women, listen to my advice: If you’re married and you think you’re happily married and your husband starts to cheat on you, he’s a piece of s – – t. And look at him as a piece of s – – t and get out of that marriage. But I couldn’t do that. I couldn’t walk away.”

    Eventually, Martha says, her hubby began sleeping with a female employee, assistant Robyn Fairclough, who lived on their Connecticut property.

    “Robyn worked for me, and she had lost her apartment or something. And I said, ‘You could move into the barn on the lower two acres.’ We had a little apartment down there. And when I was traveling Andy started up with her,” she said.

    “It was like I put out a snack for Andy.”

    Martha says Andrew slept with one of her employees. Netflix

    “I kicked her out immediately. ‘What the hell are you doing?!’ Andy betrayed me right on our property. Not nice.”

    A friend admitted that Stewart was so distraught during this turbulent period that “at one point she showed me where she tore the hair out of her own head.”

    Even as she achieved fame and boffo professional success, Martha wrote increasingly intense letters to her estranged husband who asked for a divorce.

    The notes are rawly emotional, with messages such as:

    “I cannot sleep. I cannot eat. My skin is worried and many lines that were not there are now there. I am agonizingly jealous of your other women.”

    “Maybe you are planning to marry her and keep her with my money so that she can paint herself in portraits in the nude. It is very titillating isn’t it? Maybe she will paint you in the nude also. I’d love to see that painting.”

    Even as she was becoming famous and her career was skyrocketing, she was tortured by the crumbling of her marriage. Courtesy of Netflix

    “I have to go to San Francisco and talk about weddings and my wonderful life. I hope you’re enjoying your freedom. And I hope my plane crashes.”

    She hasn’t spoken to Andrew, with whom she shares 59-year-old daughter Alexis, in 20 years.

    Clearly, “Martha” is a revealing portrait — sometimes painfully revealing — of an American icon that features a trove of eye-popping information.

    But its subject doesn’t see it that way.

    “RJ had total access, and he really used very little,” Stewart told the Times. “It was just shocking.”

    Cutler, meanwhile, has responded to her critique to the New York Times.

    “I am really proud of this film, and I admire Martha’s courage in entrusting me to make it,” Cutler said in a statement. “I’m not surprised that it’s hard for her to see aspects of it.”

    Source link