hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabet

Tag: TikToks

  • Content creators respond to TikTok’s uncertain future in the US

    Content creators respond to TikTok’s uncertain future in the US

    TikTok content creators who make a living promoting their businesses and personal brands on the app were afraid Sunday that they would have to find new ways to engage consumers and make money as the app’s future in the United States remained uncertain.

    TikTok told U.S. users that it was beginning to restore service just hours after the popular video-sharing platform went dark in response to a federal ban, which President-elect Donald Trump said he would try to pause by executive order on his first day in office.

    Some users reported Sunday that the app was working again, but it remained unavailable for download in Apple and Google’s app stores. Others remained locked out of accessing their profiles and the communities they had built online.

    Here’s how content creators are reacting:

    On a typical morning, esthetician and social media personality Lee Zavorskas scrolls on TikTok while she sips coffee. Sunday morning was different – she scribbled a to-do list instead, which included playing with her cats and dog and plotting how to bolster her presence on other platforms like YouTube since TikTok went dark for her Saturday night.

    “I’m a 58-year-old content creator that found a seat at the table that’s not available on Instagram,” Zavorskas said.

    While Zavorskas has more followers on Instagram, she found a large crowd of people over the age of 40 on TikTok, making it easier to build her audience. She held out some hope that she would be able to return to the community she found on the app.

    “It’s like going to your favorite restaurant and ordering your favorite food, and they’re like, ‘You know what? We took it away,’” she said.

    Tiffany Cianci, a Maryland-based content creator who owns small businesses, stopped posting on Twitter and Instagram and cut her advertising with Meta and Google out of frustration.

    “It’s TikTok or nothing for me,” she said.

    She thinks lawmakers unfairly punished TikTok for succeeding alongside its profitable competitors. And they played “political football” with an app that millions of small businesses rely on to survive, she said.

    “I spoke to small businesses in the last three days that have sobbed on my livestreams, afraid they’ll have to lay their employees off tomorrow morning,” Cianci said. “They are so afraid because they have other people’s lives in their hands.”

    Tiffany Watson, a 20-year-old beauty content creator, had been making videos since the days of Musical.ly, and was just starting to figure out the kind of content she was passionate about when TikTok went dark.

    “The community on TikTok is like nothing else, so it’s weird to not have that anymore,” she said.

    With spare time on her hands, Watson plans to focus on bolstering her presence on Instagram and YouTube. She also wants to devote more time to school as the psychology major and criminal justice minor prepares to graduate from Wingate University in North Carolina and enter “the real world.” But being a content creator remains her “main dream,” she said.

    If Trump lifts the ban, Watson plans to return to TikTok, but said she will “probably be more tuned into my YouTube since this ban has kinda spooked me.”

    Source link

  • TikTok’s fate arrives at Supreme Court in collision of free speech, security

    TikTok’s fate arrives at Supreme Court in collision of free speech, security

    WASHINGTON — In one of the most important cases of the social media age, free speech and national security collide at the Supreme Court on Friday in arguments over the fate of TikTok, a wildly popular digital platform that roughly half the people in the United States use for entertainment and information.

    TikTok says it plans to shut down the social media site in the U.S. by Jan. 19 unless the Supreme Court strikes down or otherwise delays the effective date of a law aimed at forcing TikTok’s sale by its Chinese parent company.

    Working on a tight deadline, the justices also have before them a plea from President-elect Donald Trump, who has dropped his earlier support for a ban, to give him and his new administration time to reach a “political resolution” and avoid deciding the case. It’s unclear if the court will take the Republican president-elect’s views — a highly unusual attempt to influence a case — into account.

    TikTok and China-based ByteDance, as well as content creators and users, argue the law is a dramatic violation of the Constitution’s free speech guarantee.

    “Rarely if ever has the court confronted a free-speech case that matters to so many people,” lawyers for the users and content creators wrote. Content creators are anxiously awaiting a decision that could upend their livelihoods and are eyeing other platforms.

    The case represents another example of the court being asked to rule about a medium with which the justices have acknowledged they have little familiarity or expertise, though they often weigh in on meaty issues involving restrictions on speech.

    The Biden administration, defending the law that President Joe Biden signed in April after it was approved by wide bipartisan majorities in Congress, contends that “no one can seriously dispute that (China’s) control of TikTok through ByteDance represents a grave threat to national security.”

    Officials say Chinese authorities can compel ByteDance to hand over information on TikTok’s U.S. patrons or use the platform to spread or suppress information.

    But the government “concedes that it has no evidence China has ever attempted to do so,” TikTok told the justices, adding that limits on speech should not be sustained when they stem from fears that are predicated on future risks.

    In December, a panel of three appellate judges, two appointed by Republicans and one by a Democrat, unanimously upheld the law and rejected the First Amendment speech claims.

    Adding to the tension, the court is hearing arguments just nine days before the law is supposed to take effect and 10 days before a new administration takes office.

    In language typically seen in a campaign ad rather than a legal brief, lawyers for Trump have called on the court to temporarily prevent the TikTok ban from going into effect but refrain from a definitive resolution.

    “President Trump alone possesses the consummate dealmaking expertise, the electoral mandate, and the political will to negotiate a resolution to save the platform while addressing the national security concerns expressed by the Government — concerns which President Trump himself has acknowledged,” D. John Sauer, Trump’s choice to be his administration’s top Supreme Court lawyer, wrote in a legal brief filed with the court.

    Trump took no position on the underlying merits of the case, Sauer wrote. Trump’s campaign team used TikTok to connect with younger voters, especially male voters, and Trump met with TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida, in December. He has 14.7 million followers on TikTok.

    The justices have set aside two hours for arguments, and the session likely will extend well beyond that. Three highly experienced Supreme Court lawyers will be making arguments. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar will present the Biden administration’s defense of the law, while Trump’s solicitor general in his first administration, Noel Francisco, will argue on behalf of TikTok and ByteDance. Stanford Law professor Jeffrey Fisher, representing content creators and users, will be making his 50th high court argument.

    If the law takes effect, Trump’s Justice Department will be charged with enforcing it. Lawyers for TikTok and ByteDance have argued that the new administration could seek to mitigate the law’s most severe consequences.

    But they also said that a shutdown of just a month would cause TikTok to lose about one-third of its daily users in the U.S. and significant advertising revenue.

    As it weighs the case, the court will have to decide what level of review it applies to the law. Under the most searching review, strict scrutiny, laws almost always fail. But two judges on the appellate court that upheld the law said it would be the rare exception that could withstand strict scrutiny.

    TikTok, the app’s users and many briefs supporting them urge the court to apply strict scrutiny to strike down the law.

    But the Democratic administration and some of its supporters cite restrictions on foreign ownership of radio stations and other sectors of the economy to justify the effort to counter Chinese influence in the TikTok ban.

    A decision could come within days.

    ___

    Follow the AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.

    Source link

  • Court denies TikTok’s request to halt enforcement of potential US ban until Supreme Court review

    Court denies TikTok’s request to halt enforcement of potential US ban until Supreme Court review

    A federal appeals court on Friday left in place a mid-January deadline in a federal law requiring TikTok to be sold or face a ban in the United States, rejecting a request made by the company to halt enforcement until the Supreme Court reviews its challenge of the statute.

    Attorneys for TikTok and its China-based parent company, ByteDance, are expected to appeal to the Supreme Court.

    It’s unclear if the nation’s highest court will take up the case, though some legal experts have said they expect the justices to weigh in due to the types of novel questions it raises about social media, national security and the First Amendment. TikTok is also looking for a potential lifeline from President-elect Donald Trump, who promised to “save” the short-form video platform during the presidential campaign.

    Attorneys for TikTok and ByteDance had requested the injunction after a panel of three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sided with the U.S. government and rejected their challenge to the law.

    The statute, which was signed by President Joe Biden earlier this year, requires ByteDance to sell TikTok to an approved buyer due to national security concerns or face a ban in the U.S.

    The U.S. has said it sees TikTok as a national security risk because ByteDance could be coerced by Chinese authorities to hand over U.S. user data or manipulate content on the platform for Beijing’s interests. TikTok has denied those claims and has argued that the government’s case rests on hypothetical future risks instead of proven facts.

    In the request filed last week, attorneys for TikTok and ByteDance had asked for a “modest delay” in enforcement of the law so that the Supreme Court could review the case and the incoming Trump administration could “determine its position” on the matter.

    If the law is not overturned, the two companies have said that the popular app will shut down by Jan. 19, just a day before Trump takes office again. More than 170 million American users would be affected, the companies have said.

    The Justice Department had opposed TikTok’s request for a pause, saying in a court filing last week that the parties had already proposed a schedule that was “designed for the precise purpose” of allowing Supreme Court review of the law before it took effect.

    The appeals court issued its Dec. 6 ruling on the matter in line with that schedule, the Justice Department filing said.

    Source link

  • The European Union demands TikTok’s response to Romanian files suggesting Moscow’s role in vote

    The European Union demands TikTok’s response to Romanian files suggesting Moscow’s role in vote

    LONDON — The European Union said Friday it sent TikTok an urgent request for more information about Romanian intelligence files suggesting that Moscow coordinated influencers on its platform to promote an election candidate who became the front-runner in the presidential election.

    The 27-nation bloc’s executive branch is using its sweeping digital rulebook to scrutinize the video sharing platform’s role in the election, which ended with the far-right populist Calin Georgescu coming from out of nowhere to take top spot in the first round of voting.

    Declassified files released by Romanian authorities earlier this week suggest that a pro-Russia campaign used the messaging app Telegram to recruit thousands of TikTok users to promote Georgescu.

    It is unclear from the intelligence release whether Georgescu was aware of the alleged campaign or assisted in it.

    European Commission officials said they asked the video sharing platform to comment on the files and to provide information on actions that it’s taking in response. It’s the second time the commission has asked TikTok for information since the election’s first round of voting on Nov. 24, and comes a day after it ordered the Chinese-owned platform to retain all election-related files and evidence.

    TikTok did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

    “We are concerned about mounting indications of coordinated foreign online influence operation targeting ongoing Romanian elections, especially on TikTok,” Henna Virkkunen, the commission’s executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security and democracy, said in a post on X.

    TikTok has 24 hours to respond to the EU request, officials told a press briefing in Brussels. Georgescu will face pro-EU reformist Elena Lasconi of the Save Romania Union party in a final vote on Sunday.

    “TikTok needs to step up resources to counter information operations ahead of the election weekend,” Virkkunen said.

    Georgescu’s unexpected rise in the polls has plunged the European Union and NATO country into turmoil and spurred the authorities to release the files.

    Romania’s intelligence services alleged that one TikTok user paid $381,000 to influencers on the platform to promote content about Georgescu. They said they obtained information that “revealed an aggressive promotion campaign” to increase and accelerate the candidate’s popularity.

    Some of the thousands of social media accounts used in the campaign were allegedly created years ago but were only activated in the weeks leading up to the first round vote, the files indicated.

    ___

    AP writer Stephen McGrath in Bucharest contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • The Secret Lives Of Mormon Wives’ Jen Affleck Is Ringless In New TikToks

    The Secret Lives Of Mormon Wives’ Jen Affleck Is Ringless In New TikToks

    Season 1 of The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives showcased a lot more than just a group of Mormon wives and influencers freaking out over a “soft-swinging” scandal. The season introduced viewers to 8 women (who are mostly the breadwinners of their families) who were all dealing with their own trials and tribulations that included cheating allegations, friendship betrayals, and even serious health issues.




    Although Season 1 focused on MomTok “creator” Taylor Frankie Paul’s relationship with the father of her unborn child, Dakota Mortensen, and Whitney Leavitt’s falling out with the MomTok group, viewers have become increasingly interested in Jen and Zac Affleck’s marriage. The season ended with a huge blowout between the couple, and viewers learned they were moving out of Utah and to New York. As of late, Jen’s TikTok’s may be revealing that their marriage may be on the rocks.

    Related

    The Secret Lives Of Mormon Wives Season 1 Completely Left Out Mayci Neeley’s Tragic Loss

    Season 1 of The Secret Lives Of Mormon Wives left out Mayci Neeley’s incredibly heart-wrenching story involving her son’s father.

    Fans Are Noticing Jen Affleck Not Wearing Her Wedding Ring In Her TikToks

    The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives season finale ended with still a lot to unpack. Now that it has been confirmed that Season 2 is in the works and is slated for a Spring 2025 release, viewers are hoping that some of their burning questions will be answered.


    When it came to Jen and Zac Affleck’s marriage, a lot had unfolded near the end of Season 1. Jen was labeled as the “most Mormon” of the bunch, so she was especially concerned about being “disrespectful” to her husband while the women attended a Chippendales show in Las Vegas. Although Jen did not attend the show, she gets into a very heated argument with Zac over text. Zac was furious with his wife as it went against their Mormon beliefs and even went as far as to threaten to divorce her. The women found him to be extremely controlling and were concerned about Jen.


    Ever since Jen and Zac’s conflict aired, people have been dissecting it left and right. Most agree that Zac’s behavior was shown as manipulative and demanding. They also felt that Jen was stuck in a controlling marriage because the couple share children.

    As MomTok continues to create videos for social media since the season ended, fans have noticed that Jen may be giving away hints that her marriage to Zac may be over. Comedian Chris Burns actually pointed out in an Instagram video that Jen was not wearing her wedding ring in her TikToks. In addition, it looks like Jen is back in Utah.

    In a TikTok shared on September 24th, Jen is seen wearing her wedding ring while with her two children in what appears to be New York City. However, a few days later, Jen shares another video on TikTok where she dances and is hiding her hands with her sweater. Burns noted that the home she was in certainly did not look like the average New York City dwelling, making the case that she might have moved back to Utah. Burns also pointed out that her castmate Demi Engemann commented on her TikTok, stating, “Jenn!!!! I love this version of you sm hahaahha HOT!!!!!”


    Jen further raised questions about her marriage in an October 9th TikTok. Here she dances in a large kitchen and is still seen without her wedding ring. Her TikTok followers noticed the absence of a ring, too. They flooded her comment section with things like, “The way we’re all hoping that ringless finger means you’re FREEEEE!”

    Another comment read, “Jen with no ring and what looks like a new place?!?!?!

    Followers also noticed that Jen debuted a new shorter hair style, which may signify a new change in her life. “NO RING, NEW HAIR, NEW PLACE,” another follower wrote.

    Related

    The Secret Lives Of Mormon Wives’ Whitney Makes A Red Carpet Appearance In Her Third Trimester

    Whitney Leavitt made her first red-carpet appearance alongside her husband after a long season of marital woes and leaving MomTok.


    Jen Admitted That The Couple Sought Therapy After The Show

    Jen and Zac Affleck smiling
    Via: Instagram/@jenniferaffleck

    The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives’ viewers began to forget about Zac’s possible family relation with actor Ben Affleck and more about his demanding personality when it came to how he treated his wife, Jen. However, when filming came to an end, Jen surprisingly shared that being on reality TV actually helped her marriage.

    Speaking to Us Weekly, Jen revealed that the show helped to strengthen their marriage, despite viewers seeing them on the verge of divorce.

    “I definitely think it was the best thing to happen to our relationship. While watching the show, a lot of people are going to think that maybe this would break our relationship apart. But if anything, it did the opposite. Being on camera and having those moments happen made us step back and actually look at a relationship and make us just see what we have to change.”


    In fact, Jen revealed that she and Zac sought therapy after the show. In an interview with Vulture, the reality TV star admitted, “Since filming, we’ve done therapy nonstop. If we continue in our relationship, there are changes that need to be made. If they’re not made, we might have to… look at other options. But as of right now, I do think he’s trying his best to make those changes.”

    Jen’s future in Season 2 of The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives is also up in the air. Jen’s castmates, including Taylor and Mayci shared TikTok videos that left both Jen and Whitney out when they revealed Season 2 was in the works. However, fans are hoping that Jen will make a return with or without Zac.

    For more The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives, visit our Reality TV Hub.


    the-secret-lives-of-mormon-wives-2024.jpg

    A scandalous group of Mormon mom influencers, known as #MomTok, faces the fallout of their controversial “soft swinging” lifestyle that rocked the internet in 2022. As their friendships and reputations are put to the test, the docuseries explores the intense drama, broken trust, and the public’s reaction to their choices​.

    Release Date
    September 6, 2024

    Main Genre
    Reality

    Seasons
    1

    Streaming Service(s)

    Main Cast



    Source link

  • TikTok’s Bow Trend Gets Absurd

    TikTok’s Bow Trend Gets Absurd

    Want to go viral on TikTok right now? Grab some pink ribbon and a random object. A roll of toilet paper, a houseplant, or a kosher dill spear will do. Tie it up in a bow and film it. Post the video online, and voilà.

    In recent weeks, bows in all the wrong places have become all the rage on the social media platform. Popular TikTok videos have featured ribbons wrapped around a bowl of macaroni and cheese, a knife and a Chick-fil-A order. Another video showed what appeared to be a bowl of cereal at first glance — but instead of cereal, it’s just a bowl of bows.

    If you can name it, somebody has probably tied a bow on it.

    The online trend comes in reaction to the recent popularity of bows in fashion and pop culture.

    Sierra Palian, a 22-year-old nanny in Washington, D.C., recently posted an 8-second video that shows a glass of ice water on top of a table. It is shot from above, and the three floating ice cubes are tied in pink bows.

    Like some other bow videos, Ms. Palian’s was set to “Let the Light In,” a dreamy love song by Lana Del Rey, whose personal style is known for being traditionally feminine and bow heavy.

    The ice cube video has racked up more than 11 million views on TikTok. Ms. Palian said it was meant as a commentary on the coquette aesthetic, a style she described as girlie, soft, delicate and often marked by pastels.

    “It’s a way to express your femininity, but in an extremely self-aware way,” she said. “It’s hyper feminine, but also there’s an awareness to it. It’s not ditsy culture.”

    The ice cube video and others like it are part of what Ms. Palian described as “a large-scale inside joke.”

    “I saw one comment that was talking about how the ice cubes melting kind of represents how feminine beauty is viewed in society,” she said. “And I was like, ‘Whoa, that is deep.’”

    Chrissy Trovato, who works in influencer marketing for a jewelry company, said she was inspired to make a bow video of her own after a few popped up on her For You page. Noticing that she had some pink ribbon left over from a work event, she tied bows on her TV remote and other random objects in her Manhattan apartment. Then she took out her phone and filmed them.

    In her 10-second video, which is also set to Ms. Del Rey’s “Let the Light In,” the bowed objects take on an uncanny look. Ms. Trovato, 25, captioned the video “Coquette Girl.”

    The act of tying bows on everyday objects and filming them for social media videos might be a parody of the way the internet invents and circulates trends at warp speed, she said. She cited the spread this year of so-called blueberry milk nails, a fingernail polish trend that took off on TikTok this year, thanks in part to its catchy descriptor.

    “We don’t need to come up with a name for everything,” Ms. Trovato said. “I think this might be making a joke almost about many of the trends that are out there.”

    One question remains: Does the recent spate of absurdist bow videos signal the end of the bow?

    “I hope not,” Ms. Palian said. “I’ve been seeing multiple people getting bow tattoos on their bodies.”



    Source link