hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetBakırköy Escortcasibom9018betgit casinojojobetmarsbahismatbet

News

Tag: transfer

  • Chris Davies makes strong Charlton Athletic transfer claim

    Chris Davies makes strong Charlton Athletic transfer claim

    Birmingham City boss Chris Davies chose to highlight Charlton Athletic’s summer spending after his side were beaten 1-0 at The Valley on Saturday.




    It has been a brilliant start to management for the former Spurs assistant, who had yet to taste defeat as Blues boss in the league since his appointment.

    Chris Davies

    However, the team fell to a first defeat of the campaign in the capital, with a Matty Godden effort ensuring Nathan Jones’ side deservedly picked up all three points.


    Chris Davies makes Charlton Athletic claim

    That was a huge result for the Addicks, as they were coming up against a Blues side that are the most expensively assembled in League One history.

    However, Charlton defended resolutely, and they were rewarded for their good performance with that second-half goal.

    And, speaking after the game, Birmingham boss Davies was quick to point out that whilst a lot is mentioned around how much Blues spent this summer, Charlton have also invested into their squad over the years.


    He said: “Absolutely, again, Charlton spent a fortune. They’ve spent a lot of money on their squad and they’re a good team so there’s no doubt in my mind that there are multiple teams in this league that are well equipped to be successful.

    “We are one of those teams, it’s not Birmingham and the rest. It’s League One. Every game is a different challenge for us that we have to face, and we have to prove how good we are every single game.

    Jay Stansfield v Wrexham

    “It was one of those games, only one shot on goal. It’s unusual for us, I think that’s the first time that’s happened this season. I think in the final third we normally have a little more creativity and a little more danger when we get there.


    “We just lacked a little bit of that today. It’s something that is painful, it’s painful to lose. It should be painful for all of us but you grow from defeat and that’s what you should do.”

    Chris Davies tries to take the pressure off his Birmingham City side

    This comment will no doubt have raised a few eyebrows, as the Birmingham boss talking about other clubs’ spending, given their summer was not going to go down well.

    But, this is just Davies’ way of taking the pressure off his players. Blues are probably bored with the constant references to their summer spending, and we know that it doesn’t guarantee success, so this is the manager reminding others that their rivals also have good players.

    Ultimately, Saturday was a poor performance by Blues, and there’s no denying that the better side won.

    Birmingham City must bounce back

    You can be sure that Davies won’t be getting carried away with the loss, and nor should he. He will still have full faith in his side, and the reality is that Saturday was just a bad day at the office, and credit should go to Charlton for the way they played on the day.


    League One Table

    Team

    P

    GD

    Pts

    1

    Birmingham City

    9

    8

    22

    2

    Wrexham

    10

    10

    20

    3

    Mansfield

    9

    6

    20

    Losing before the international break means this will hurt for Blues, but they have to show they have a strong mentality moving forward, as they look to get back on track.

    Birmingham are back in action on October 19 when they travel to take on Lincoln City.

    Source link

  • Explainer: Lassana Diarra and the legal case which could rock football’s transfer market

    Explainer: Lassana Diarra and the legal case which could rock football’s transfer market

    Here, we take a closer look.

    How did we get here?

    This case stems from a contract dispute between Diarra and Russian club Lokomotiv Moscow. The Frenchman and his legal team sued FIFA for damages, arguing its rules which hold clubs jointly liable for compensation and open to sanction if they sign a player who breaches contract prevented him moving to Belgian side Charleroi

    The challenge, which was upheld in a Belgian court in 2017, said the rules were contrary to EU law because they restricted Diarra’s freedom of movement and were anti-competitive. FIFA appealed against the 2017 judgement and the case was referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for a ruling.

    Why could this be significant?

    Any ruling that finds the contested rules disproportionate or restrictive will likely mean the regulations need to be rewritten.

    It could ultimately mean greater, if not total, freedom for players to terminate a contract without just cause. Union sources say the current rules treat players as assets rather than employees and want a player’s rights brought closer to, if not completely in line with, those of a regular person looking to change jobs.

    What was the last big change in the transfer market?

    The most significant shift occurred after the 1995 Bosman ruling, which effectively gave out-of-contract players total freedom over their next move and removed their former club’s entitlement to any fee once the contract had expired.

    Is this as significant?

    Any change here is likely to be more subtle, certainly at first. The question is whether the challenge to this specific aspect of the rules – the joint liability of an engaging club – leads to the whole system toppling.

    Dr Borja Garcia, an EU sports law expert at Loughborough University, believes this case is probably “as close as we have come” to Bosman but believes any changes will be less dramatic, with Bosman having already shifted the power to players.

    What is the likely outcome?

    ECJ rulings often, but not always, go in line with the non-binding opinion of the Advocate General (AG) in the case. The AG in this case said in April that the rules “may be contrary” to EU law. He described the current consequences for a player of breaching contract without just cause as “draconian” and said the rules were designed to “send a chill down each player’s spine”.

    What has FIFA said?

    FIFA has declined to comment while the case is ongoing but in its earlier court submissions it argued the rules were a necessary part of ensuring contractual stability.

    Sources close to the governing body also point out a player would still be liable for compensation where a contract is breached without just cause, only the joint liability of an engaging club is being contested.

    What could the other impacts be?

    If there are fewer obstacles and deterrents to a player breaking contract, it follows that transfer fees could trend downwards if clubs feel they have less security in the event of an in-contract player walking away.

    Contracts might also shorten if they become less stable, but Dr Garcia points out clubs are “between a rock and a hard place” on this one. On one hand they might be more reluctant to commit to a long-term deal, but equally such contracts are preferable to comply with financial rules around profit and loss.

    What do clubs think?

    A senior source within the European club game told PA the Diarra ruling had the potential to be a “dangerous one”, adding: “The transfer market is the glue that holds the pyramid together.

    “(The Diarra ruling) could have seismic implications, because if that glue starts to deteriorate, then that polarisation (between the big leagues and the rest) will get worse.”

    Source link

  • Eddie Howe hits back at Paul Mitchell’s claims after Newcastle’s sporting director labelled their transfer strategy ‘not fit for purpose’… and reveals the pair have NOT spoken since his controversial interview

    Eddie Howe hits back at Paul Mitchell’s claims after Newcastle’s sporting director labelled their transfer strategy ‘not fit for purpose’… and reveals the pair have NOT spoken since his controversial interview

    • Howe has hit back at Paul Mitchell’s claims about Newcastle’s transfer strategy 
    • The Newcastle director gave his analysis on the club’s past recruitment
    • LISTEN NOW: It’s All Kicking Off! , available wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes every Monday and Thursday

    By Craig Hope

    Published: | Updated:

    Eddie Howe has hit back at Paul Mitchell’s claims about Newcastle’s transfer strategy ‘not being fit for purpose’, as the head coach declared: ‘We can hold our heads up very high.’

    During his first press conference since Mitchell’s controversial interview last week, Howe revealed the pair have not spoken in the nine days since and there have been no discussions ahead of the January window. He also said it would not help the current situation if he was to comment on other aspects of Mitchell’s interview.

    But Howe was prepared to respond to the claims made by the new sporting director about the club overpaying for players and the remark about their approach not being fit for purpose, and he gave a strenuous defence.

    ‘I think a few things on that,’ began Howe. ‘I’m very, very proud of every single player that we signed in that period. It is very easy to look back at any transfer window and make a judgement on the players you have signed three years down the line. But you have to go back to the situation when we were in those moments, in the relegation zone and trying to recruit players. That is not an easy thing to do.

    ‘You’re also recruiting not just for the short term, but for the long term. When you look back, that work was good. Our objective was to stay in the league. I’m very, very proud of the body of work that we did and the players that we have now from the legacy of those transfer windows. We love them to bits. So I think it’s about when you’re in that moment and the decisions that you made. I think everyone can hold their heads up very high.’

    Eddie Howe (pictured above) has hit back at Paul Mitchell's claims about Newcastle's transfer strategy 'not being fit for purpose

    During his first press conference since Mitchell's interview, Howe said the pair have not spoken in the nine days since

    Eddie Howe (pictured above) has hit back at Paul Mitchell’s claims about Newcastle’s transfer strategy ‘not being fit for purpose

    Mitchell pictured joining Howe and the player for pre-season training in Germany

    Mitchell pictured joining Howe and the player for pre-season training in Germany

    He added: ‘Those signings, obviously I played a huge part in, and I took ownership of all those signings. I said that even if they’re good or bad, I will take ownership of that because, ultimately, I was always the final decision-maker on those signings, and I was very proud to sign those players.

    ‘I think they have been brilliant signings for the where we were and the long-term future of the club, and I really believe in them and I still do. You’ve asked me a question and I’ll always try and answer it if I can openly and honestly. I’d certainly like to find a few more of them if I could.’

    What did Mitchell mean when he said there was no clear transfer strategy at the club?

    ‘I think that is for Paul to answer,’ said Howe. ‘I don’t think I can answer for him. The scouting structure was there, and whatever you think about the structures, I thought the results were very good.’

    When pressed on Mitchell’s claims that he only played a ‘supporting role’ during the summer transfer window after arriving in early July, Howe said: ‘I don’t think it’s right for me to make individual comments in reply to Paul’s press conference. I don’t think that will help our current situation. It’s best for me to focus on the future.’

    Has Howe spoken to Mitchell since?

    ‘No, I’ve had no contact from Paul,’ he said. ‘But I don’t think that’s unusual. We’ve got different jobs to do. I’m focusing on the football and the team, and he’s obviously focusing on his role.’

    But Howe did revisit the subject of his and the club’s transfer dealings and the need to react to the team’s situation at that particular time.

    Mitchell has vowed to play a more commanding role in future recruitment at Newcastle

    Mitchell has vowed to play a more commanding role in future recruitment at Newcastle

    Newcastle are sitting fifth in the Premier League table after winning two out of three games

    Newcastle are sitting fifth in the Premier League table after winning two out of three games

    ‘We were in a relegation battle, so yes a couple of those signings were more short term in that moment, because you needed instant results,’ he added. ‘Relegation was not something we could contemplate but always in the back of my mind, with every signing I tried to make, it’s always about yes, can they impact the team now, but will they impact the team in the right way in the future?

    ‘Sometimes, there’s a big positional need for the here and now and sometimes you’re buying a player and thinking in a year’s time he could be a regular starter for us. Those are things that go onto it. 

    ‘It’s never as clear or as easy as everyone thinks, but the key thing now is the future and making sure we get future windows right, because ultimately that is the most important thing at any club, for you to be successful you have to recruit well.’

    Source link

  • Former Newcastle sporting director Dan Ashworth ‘hurt’ by replacement Paul Mitchell’s claims that transfer structure was ‘not fit for purpose’

    Former Newcastle sporting director Dan Ashworth ‘hurt’ by replacement Paul Mitchell’s claims that transfer structure was ‘not fit for purpose’

    • The Newcastle director has given his analysis on the club’s past recruitment 
    • Paul Mitchell admitted he previously played a ‘supporting’ role on transfers
    • LISTEN NOW: It’s All Kicking Off!, available wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes every Monday and Thursday

    By Spencer Morgan

    Published: | Updated:

    Former Newcastle sporting director Dan Ashworth and other members of his old recruitment team are reportedly upset by comments from his replacement Paul Mitchell that the club’s transfer structure was ‘not fit for purpose’.

    Mitchell said last week that the transfer strategy he walked into at Newcastle was all wrong as he promised to stamp his influence on the club after playing only a ‘supporting’ role this summer.

    The new sporting director has found himself under fire from fans and club legend Alan Shearer after failing to land Eddie Howe’s top target of Marc Guehi last month.

    The Magpies walked away from a £70million deal for the Crystal Palace defender and closed the window with only two new signings at a cost of just £10m, leaving Howe frustrated.

    ‘I think it’s difficult coming into a predefined strategy,’ he said. ‘Should our scouting and recruitment be driven more extensively with a wider reaching net? It definitely should, because this is becoming a really nuanced space now, when you can’t just capitally fund everything every year and buy loads of players at peak age and peak price. Of course it needs to be, and that’s the responsibility of me, the scouting team and Eddie. 

    Dan Ashworth is reportedly upset with recent comments made by Paul Mitchell

    Dan Ashworth is reportedly upset with recent comments made by Paul Mitchell

    ‘Is it fit for purpose? Not last winter gone, the winter before that. Is it fit for purpose in the modern game? Because other clubs that have adopted a different approach over time, with more intelligence, more data-informed than we are, actually prospered in this window. That’s where we have to grow to be now.

    ‘You look at the money we have invested up to this point, £250 million net over the last two-and-a-half years. Was our model in place to be able to spend more to the levels we would have liked to enhance the team? I don’t think it was, because we haven’t sold a player during that time, barring what we were forced to do through PSR.

    Paul Mitchell said the transfer strategy he walked into at Newcastle was not fit for purpose

    Paul Mitchell said the transfer strategy he walked into at Newcastle was not fit for purpose

    ‘We didn’t have the sales window we thought we would have – and we have to look at that strategy as well, was that right? It was all aligned with the head coach. There definitely has to be a more strategic approach that we haven’t had the last two-and-a-half years. I’ll know whether we’ve done a good job in five years’ time.’ 

    And The Telegraph claim to have been told by multiple sources that ‘Mitchell’s criticism has not gone down well with those who were involved in signing players before he took over.’

    That includes Ashworth, who is now sporting director of Manchester United. 

    Some are said to have privately expressed their frustration about Mitchell’s comments on recruitment, insisting they are proud of their work at St James’.

    It is claimed that one even insisted it was an attempt to blame others for his own failings to sign a star player.

    Source link

  • Stakeholder in Trump’s Truth Social parent company wins court ruling over share transfer

    Stakeholder in Trump’s Truth Social parent company wins court ruling over share transfer

    DOVER, Del. — A federal judge in Delaware has ruled in favor of a firm seeking assurance that it will be able to sell its minority stake in the parent company of former president Donald Trump’s Truth Social platform.

    The judge on Friday granted summary judgment to Florida-based United Atlantic Ventures LLC in a lawsuit filed against Minnesota-based Odyssey Transfer and Trust Co., a business that handles securities transfers among registered shareholders.

    UAV is owned by Andrew Litinsky and Wesley Moss, former contestants on Trump’s TV show, “The Apprentice” who also helped facilitate a merger that took Trump Media public in March.

    Since then, UAV and Trump Media have been battling in courts in both Delaware and Florida over UAV’s stake in the company. Attorneys for Trump Media assured a state judge in Delaware earlier this year that UAV was entitled to an 8.6% stake and would suffer no merger-related dilution. They now contend, however, that UAV is not entitled to its shares because of pre-merger mismanagement by Litinsky and Moss.

    Friday’s ruling involves UAV’s concerns that it will not receive its Trump Media shares, currently valued at about $350 million, from Odyssey when a post-merger lockup period expires Sept. 19. According to court filings, Odyssey told UAV earlier this year that it would be taking direction from TMTG and its lawyers.

    After Odyssey filed a lawsuit, the parties appeared to have reached a resolution, with Odyssey saying it would remove transfer restrictions on the share after the lockup period expires “without preference to any TMTG shareholder.” After seeking approval from Trump Media, however, Odyssey tried to change that language to “on the same basis as other similarly situated TMTG shareholders.”

    Trump holds about 115 million TMTG shares, or roughly 60% of the company’s outstanding shares.

    U.S. District Judge Gregory Williams questioned Odyssey’s conduct, noting that it claimed the language change was “immaterial,” while allowing it to scuttle settlement negotiations.

    “Even outside settlement negotiations, Odyssey’s conduct has been elusive,” Williams wrote.

    Williams ordered that when Odyssey is notified by TMTG of the expiration of the lockup provisions, it must promptly notify UAV, remove transfer restrictions on all shares and not interfere with the delivery of the shares.

    TMTG’s share price hit a high of $79.38 on its first day of trading but is now hovering around $17, closing Friday at $17.10.

    Source link

  • Eddie Howe cagey over Newcastle future and admits ‘it’s difficult to give any reassurance on anything in football’ – as speculation mounts following a frustrating transfer window

    Eddie Howe cagey over Newcastle future and admits ‘it’s difficult to give any reassurance on anything in football’ – as speculation mounts following a frustrating transfer window

    • Summer saw key positions such as centre-back and right-wing not strengthened 
    • Howe would’ve been powerless to prevent star name leaving  club at end of June
    • LISTEN NOW: It’s All Kicking Off!, available wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes every Monday and Thursday 

    By Craig Hope

    Published: | Updated:

    Eddie Howe admits he cannot give supporters assurances over his Newcastle future – but says his only focus is on staying at the club for a ‘long time’.

    While the England job is open and with the head coach having conceded his frustration at a summer window in which key positions such as centre-back and right-wing were not strengthened, there remains some uncertainty over Howe’s future.

    Asked if he could would consider walking away – like Kevin Keegan had done amid transfer angst in 2009 – Howe said: ‘This isn’t a loaded answer, but it’s difficult to give any reassurance on anything in football. 

    ‘But I absolutely love being Newcastle manager and I’m very proud to do it. 

    ‘No part of me is thinking anything other than trying to beat Tottenham and looking, hopefully, to a long reign here.’

    Eddie Howe admits he cannot give supporters assurances over his Newcastle future

    Eddie Howe admits he cannot give supporters assurances over his Newcastle future

    While the England job is open here remains some uncertainty over Howe's future (pictured: interim England boss Lee Carsley)

    While the England job is open here remains some uncertainty over Howe’s future (pictured: interim England boss Lee Carsley)

    Profit and Sustainability Rules have limited what Newcastle can do in the transfer market, and Howe added: ‘A lot has changed in terms of PSR (since the Saudi-led takeover in 2021). 

    ‘The biggest change, the inability to spend, and our need to comply with rules to prevent a points deduction.

    ‘Of course that impacts the ability to progress the club as quickly as maybe they wanted to. 

    ‘I don’t think the dream dies, necessarily, it takes a lot longer. We have got to build our revenue streams, that is the biggest thing. 

    ‘Bring more money into the football club, however we do that, sponsorship, loads of things.

    ‘That is the big thing we need to focus on in the next 10 years, whether I am lucky enough to see any of that, who knows. 

    ‘So the dream is not over, it is just going to take a lot, lot longer.’

    Meanwhile, Howe admits he would have been powerless to prevent a star name leaving the club at the end of June as Newcastle battled to avoid breaching PSR rules.

    Asked if he could would consider walking away – like Kevin Keegan had done in 2009 - Howe said: 'This isn't a loaded answer but it's difficult to give any reassurance on anything in football'

    Asked if he could would consider walking away – like Kevin Keegan had done in 2009 – Howe said: ‘This isn’t a loaded answer but it’s difficult to give any reassurance on anything in football’

    He added: 'Selling players was a necessity, and it was very difficult to do' (pictured: Elliot Anderson who moved to Nottingham Forest)

    He added: ‘Selling players was a necessity, and it was very difficult to do’ (pictured: Elliot Anderson who moved to Nottingham Forest)

    ‘I can’t act like that (say no to a player leaving),’ he said. ‘It’s not about my want. Especially in June, it was about what the club needs. 

    ‘We could have been sat here with a huge points deduction and everyone would say, “Why didn’t they sell players?”. 

    ‘You have to choose which way you want to go with it, and we couldn’t go down that route (points deduction). Selling players was a necessity, and it was very difficult to do.’

    Source link