hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetBakırköy Escortcasibom9018betgit casinojojobet

Tag: War

  • The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    middle-class battle is brewing between country folk and an apparent city elite – including Londoners – over wood burners after a report branded them Britain’s biggest source of dangerous air pollution.

    They have become one of the latest must-have status symbols for many, following on from how Aga cookers and Smeg fridges were seen by earlier generations.

    And yet neighbours across the UK seem bitterly divided over whether wood burners should be something to celebrate and keep firing up, or else cool it for the sake of people’s health. 

    MailOnline has heard a wide-ranging variety of opinions about the trendy domestic appliances, amid surging popularity in the shops but also threatened bans by local councils.

    Many defiant Britons insisted they would continue using wood burners, despite last week’s critical research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Some 1.5million homes across the UK are estimated to now have them installed – although the welcome for wood burners is not an entirely new phenomenon.

    Cockney pub rockers Chas and Dave sang in a 1982 track, later incongruously covered by US piano balladeer Tori Amos: ‘Home baked loaves and wood burning stoves, Shirley MacLaine and Petticoat Lane … that’s what I like.’

    But they have been highlighted as a newly surging trend especially among middle-class areas both urban and rural – but fellow householders, including those with existing health conditions, have raised new objections in an array of responses to MailOnline. 

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as 'off grid in the gas sense'

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’

    James Dixon

    James Dixon's wood burner

    James Dixon (left) said he relied on wood burners to keep the sitting room and a spare bedroom (right) ‘habitable’ at his home near Lyme Regis in Dorset 

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    Homeowners living ‘off grid’ in parts of the countryside told how they needed the devices to efficiently heat their homes – while others have accused Londoners of making an indulgent ‘lifestyle choice’ by buying the stoves, suggesting they have no ‘need’ to burn wood.

    One wood burner fan is James Dixon, who lives in a rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘We rely on a modicum of oil for hot water and central heating. We cannot afford to heat the house electrically. We had an electric Aga that was on all day but that was costing the earth both, literally and metaphorically.

    ‘The central heating comes on for an hour at 6am and 6pm, when the oil burner works. We rely on our wood burners to keep the sitting room and one – slightly damp – spare bedroom habitable. 

    ‘We are contemplating a biomass – log – boiler when it comes to replacing the ageing oil boiler so will be producing more of the particulate.

    ‘I am confident a heat pump will not suit unless we spend a fortune upgrading the house. I don’t imagine we are in a “smoke control” zone yet.’

    But other MailOnline readers were quick to point out their pollution concerns relating to wood burners.

    Mandy Cairns, who suffers from long Covid, said: ‘One of my symptoms is a severe allergic reaction to wood smoke whereby the muscles in my body go weak and I collapse to the ground and struggle to breathe.

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    ‘I live in a rural town where one in three houses have wood burners and I have to move out for three months of the year because the air is so bad I can’t live here.

    ‘I can’t afford to move. Everyone around me has more than enough money to pay for their gas central heating as it’s a very affluent small town that I live in – even the local cafe-bookshop has installed one.’

    Ms Cairns, from Dollar in Clackmannshire, Scotland, added: ‘I tried going back to stay at my parents’ house last year but then their neighbours put in a wood burning stove, so that option has been taken away from me.

    ‘I know I’m not alone and that there are many people being affected out there by their neighbours’ wood burning stoves.

    ‘But everyone I speak to always says the same thing – that they don’t want to fall out with their neighbours who are using a wood burner so they don’t say anything and that they don’t think the council will do anything about it if they complain.’

    Meanwhile, Dr Shona Minelly, from Kingston-upon-Thames in south-west London, said: ‘I have suffered asthma attacks resulting in hospital visits because of the “Ecodesign” stove.

    ‘My husband suffered a heart attack last year after a neighbour burned their stove every day for a week and he was struggling to breathe.

    ‘Putting neighbours’ lives at risk in this way just so that a selfish family can stare at a pretty flame is morally wrong.’

    What are the rules on wood burners and how much can you be fined for breaking them? 

    The Government is trying to reduce air pollution by issuing fines for illegal log burner use, in an attempt to reduce harmful pollutants such as tiny particles called particulate matter being released straight into the home as well as into the air outside.

    Domestic wood burning is the UK’s largest single source of particulate matter known as PM2.5, which is linked to health problems such as heart disease, strokes and lung cancer.

    While wood burners are not banned outright anywhere in the UK, there are regulations withing ‘smoke control areas’ which mean certain wood burners cannot emit more than 3g of smoke per hour.

    But if the log burner is on a list of Defra-exempt appliances that produce fewer smoke emissions, the owner can apply for an exemption.

    People must also use an approved fuel, which varies depending on their location – with a list provided on the Defra website.

    Owners are also advised to look for the ‘Ready to Burn’ logo on fuel packaging, which means the fuel has less than 20 per cent moisture and therefore complies with Defra rules.

    All new log burners must also adhere to ‘Ecodesign’ rules to reduce smoke and pollutant emissions.

    Homeowners are also advised that wet wood is less efficient than naturally dried or ‘unseasoned’ wood, because more energy is wasted in turning the moisture in the wood into vapour.

    Anyone with wet or unseasoned wood, should dry it out for at least a year before using it – and wait until it has less than 20 per cent moisture.

    Local authorities in England can issue fines of between £175 and £300 for people breaking the rules – or up to £1,000 for using unauthorised fuel in an appliance not on the Defra-exempt list.

    This could go up to £5,000 for repeat offenders if the situation goes to court.

    She added: ‘None of the homes in London ‘need’ to burn wood, it’s a lifestyle choice. The exempt stoves are expensive and used by wealthy people with central heating.

    ‘Many of these burners have electric cars in their drive and solar panels on their roofs, so they obviously think they are being ‘green’ and are oblivious to the public health dangers.

    ‘It is only a matter of time before someone dies because of these stoves – we had a very close call.’

    Facing a similar situation is Mike Hinford, who lives in a residential area near Bristol where there are ‘a lot of wood burners’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘My health is badly affected by wood smoke pollution. If I go near wood smoke for only a few minutes my breathing is affected for hours.

    ‘We have no need to burn wood. It’s not cheaper. Unless the wood is free, and then it could be treated wood which contains arsenic. I really wish people realised how much harm they are doing with burning wood. They should never be seen as cosy.’  

    Sharon Brown, from Chipping Norton in Oxfordshire, said: ‘When the road I live in was built, most of the houses had no chimneys.

    ‘Now an awful lot of people have wood burning stoves – in the evenings my utility room and downstairs toilet smell really badly of wood smoke.’

    But supporters of the devices have also been singing their praises and pointing out possible ways to avoid any problems.

    Wendy Finney remarked ironically: ‘Our entire family were brought up with wood burners – we should all be dead from lung cancer.’

    She went on to suggest: ‘Provided proper well seasoned fuel is used and lit fast with wooden firelighters, and plenty of really dry kindling to get a good flame going to warm the flue fast, there is not a problem.

    ‘Many people don’t know how to light a fire and use stinky stuff like paper. It takes experience. My chimney never smokes.’

    A drop in particulate pollution from road transport and heavy industry such as steel has meant parts of the UK have now got the cleanest air for decades.

    But the use of wood burning stoves pumping out particulate pollution known as PM2.5 is rising, according to the recent study by the IFS – and local authorities are cracking down  in the air pollution fight, with some owners threatened with £300 fines for breaking rules.

    Reading and Oxford’s local authorities ban the use of fuel or appliances not approved by the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).

    Penalties of up to £300 could be issued to anyone breaking the rules after the new policy replacing existing so-called ‘smoke control areas’ was brought in on December 1.

    Exceptions are given for Defra-approved appliances and government-approved fuels – while outdoor barbecues, chimeneas, garden fireplaces or pizza ovens are also permitted as long as smoke is not released from them through a building chimney.

    The rules have been brought in amid growing concern over the stoves increasing the risk of lung cancer and being one of the UK’s main drivers of harmful air pollutants.

    Among those sticking up for rural-based wood burners is Philip Knowles, from Somerset, who said: ‘Wood burners may be “trendy” in London, where air pollution is reportedly 15 to 30 per cent higher than the rest of the country, but here in the countryside many people use wood burners to heat their homes.

    ‘We are paying through the nose for gas and electricity – please don’t take away the little bit of self-sufficiency that our wood burners provide.

    ‘Using properly seasoned timber, which is in plentiful supply in the countryside, wood burners are an efficient and relatively inexpensive form of heating.’

    Mr Knowles was referring to IFS data in last Friday’s report which found air pollution exposure in London has been 15 to 30 per cent higher than the average for each other region of England between 2003 and 2023.

    Andy Hill, chair of the Stove Industry Association, pointed out to MailOnline that the data referenced by the IFS report ‘clearly shows that modern closed stoves using quality, dry wood fuel account for just under 0.3 per cent of total UK PM2.5 emissions’.

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: 'Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves'

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves’ 

    He added that wood fuel is a ‘very low carbon domestic heating fuel’ and has been defined by the Scottish Government as being net zero emissions at the point of use.

    Mr Hill also said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves as an effective way of heating their homes and keeping their families warm and cosy, with the added advantage that they also offer a sense of energy grid security, a means of keeping warm in the event of a power cut and a way of managing fluctuating heating fuel costs.’  

    Particulate pollution is widely agreed to be the air pollutant with the biggest impact on human health, increasing the risk of respiratory and heart conditions, and increasing hospital admissions.

    Children growing up exposed to particulate pollution are more likely to have reduced lung function and can develop asthma as the tiny particles penetrate the lungs and enter into the bloodstream.

    The IFS said in its report: ‘The three largest sources of primary PM2.5 in the UK are domestic burning of wood and other fuels (29 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), road transport (17.9 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), and industrial processes and product use (16.5 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022) such as construction and steel manufacturing.

    ‘The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased over the period is domestic combustion. Three-quarters of the domestic combustion emissions of PM2.5 came from woodburning in 2022.’

    Only stoves officially given the ‘Ecodesign’ mark are allowed for sale in the UK and any wood for sale must be certified ‘Ready to burn’. 

    But in practice councils carry out minimal regulation of woodburning at home – with just 1 prosecution by a local authority in England in 2022, despite 10,600 complaints by residents, according to research carried out by pressure group Mums for Lungs.

    Overall, the IFS report said that in most parts of the UK levels of PM2.5 pollution had fallen to below the government’s 2040 target for PM2.5 although not below the more stringent limit set out by the World Health Organisation.

    ‘The share of the English population exposed to levels of PM2.5 above England’s 2040 target fell from 99 per cent in 2003 to less than 0.1 per cent in 2023.’

    Air pollution fell steeply during the pandemic but has remained at lower levels since. Between 2003 and 2023, average levels of PM2.5 in England fell by 54 per cent.

    A 2022 study cited by Sir Chris Whitty, chief medical officer for England, showed that even ‘Eco-design’ stoves generated 450 times more toxic air pollution than gas central heating, while older stoves now banned from sale produced 3,700 times more.

    Bobbie Upton, Research Economist at IFS and an author of the report, said: ‘There is growing evidence that fine particulate air pollution is extremely damaging for health, particularly for children and the elderly. It is hard to fully explain the striking drop in air pollution that started in 2020, during the COVID pandemic.

    ‘New clean air zones in several of England’s largest cities and reduced steel production may have both played a role.

    ‘It is important for the nation’s health, and for reducing health inequalities, that progress continues to be made on reducing air pollution.’

    The IFS report also found that ethnic minorities were now also less exposed to pollution, down to just 6 per cent more than average levels for white populations in 2023, down from 13 per cent in 2023.

    The report said that this fall in the ‘ethnic pollution gap’ was initially down to ethnic minorities moving to less polluted parts of the country (largely moving out of London to a smaller city), while cities with large ethnic minority populations chiefly London and Birmingham have also experienced drops in air pollution.

    But the report found that lower-income areas have persistently higher levels of air pollution than richer areas.

    In 2023, individuals in the top 20 per cent most deprived areas experienced 8 per cent higher average PM2.5 concentrations than those in the bottom 20 per cent.

    Speaking about the new rules in Oxford – where there is an exemption for moored vessels, including canal boats – the city council’s deputy leader Anna Railton said: ‘Fine particulate pollution from smoke poses serious health risks, and tackling it is crucial for public health.

    ‘Until now, Oxford’s Smoke Control Areas covered only 48 per cent of the city, leaving gaps in protection. From December 1, we’re unifying the city under a single Smoke Control Area, ensuring every part of Oxford benefits from improved safeguards against harmful pollution.

    ‘This expansion targets the reduction of both indoor and outdoor fine particulate emissions by restricting the use of high-polluting and inefficient solid fuels. I am proud that we’re taking this key public health intervention to protect our residents and reduce pollution across the city.’

    In February this year, official figures showed increases in wood burners in homes and the use of biomass in industry had offset drops in pollution from cars and electricity generation.

    Statistics revealed that pollutants known as particulate matter (PM) fell significantly since the 1970s but emissions have been relatively steady in recent years.

    PMs are small particles made up of a variety of materials, some of which can be toxic, and some of which can enter the bloodstream and be transported round the body with serious impact on health.

    And in July 2023, Sir Chris Whitty told MPs that air fresheners and wood burners contribute to air pollution despite many people believing the reverse to be true.

    The Chief Medical Officer for England said he would have ‘no problem’ telling someone with an asthmatic child not to use air freshener.

    He also said people who use wood burners should only do so ‘when it really matters to them for aesthetic reasons’ rather than as the main way of heating their home.

    Sir Chris said the risks from indoor air pollution are sometimes underappreciated because substantial progress has been made improving outdoor air quality in recent decades.

    The Commons Environmental Audit Committee was told products that can raise the risk inside include air freshener as well as candles and joss sticks.

    Source link

  • The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    middle-class battle is brewing between country folk and an apparent city elite – including Londoners – over wood burners after a report branded them Britain’s biggest source of dangerous air pollution.

    They have become one of the latest must-have status symbols for many, following on from how Aga cookers and Smeg fridges were seen by earlier generations.

    And yet neighbours across the UK seem bitterly divided over whether wood burners should be something to celebrate and keep firing up, or else cool it for the sake of people’s health. 

    MailOnline has heard a wide-ranging variety of opinions about the trendy domestic appliances, amid surging popularity in the shops but also threatened bans by local councils.

    Many defiant Britons insisted they would continue using wood burners, despite last week’s critical research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Some 1.5million homes across the UK are estimated to now have them installed – although the welcome for wood burners is not an entirely new phenomenon.

    Cockney pub rockers Chas and Dave sang in a 1982 track, later incongruously covered by US piano balladeer Tori Amos: ‘Home baked loaves and wood burning stoves, Shirley MacLaine and Petticoat Lane … that’s what I like.’

    But they have been highlighted as a newly surging trend especially among middle-class areas both urban and rural – but fellow householders, including those with existing health conditions, have raised new objections in an array of responses to MailOnline. 

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as 'off grid in the gas sense'

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’

    James Dixon

    James Dixon's wood burner

    James Dixon (left) said he relied on wood burners to keep the sitting room and a spare bedroom (right) ‘habitable’ at his home near Lyme Regis in Dorset 

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    Homeowners living ‘off grid’ in parts of the countryside told how they needed the devices to efficiently heat their homes – while others have accused Londoners of making an indulgent ‘lifestyle choice’ by buying the stoves, suggesting they have no ‘need’ to burn wood.

    One wood burner fan is James Dixon, who lives in a rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘We rely on a modicum of oil for hot water and central heating. We cannot afford to heat the house electrically. We had an electric Aga that was on all day but that was costing the earth both, literally and metaphorically.

    ‘The central heating comes on for an hour at 6am and 6pm, when the oil burner works. We rely on our wood burners to keep the sitting room and one – slightly damp – spare bedroom habitable. 

    ‘We are contemplating a biomass – log – boiler when it comes to replacing the ageing oil boiler so will be producing more of the particulate.

    ‘I am confident a heat pump will not suit unless we spend a fortune upgrading the house. I don’t imagine we are in a “smoke control” zone yet.’

    But other MailOnline readers were quick to point out their pollution concerns relating to wood burners.

    Mandy Cairns, who suffers from long Covid, said: ‘One of my symptoms is a severe allergic reaction to wood smoke whereby the muscles in my body go weak and I collapse to the ground and struggle to breathe.

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    ‘I live in a rural town where one in three houses have wood burners and I have to move out for three months of the year because the air is so bad I can’t live here.

    ‘I can’t afford to move. Everyone around me has more than enough money to pay for their gas central heating as it’s a very affluent small town that I live in – even the local cafe-bookshop has installed one.’

    Ms Cairns, from Dollar in Clackmannshire, Scotland, added: ‘I tried going back to stay at my parents’ house last year but then their neighbours put in a wood burning stove, so that option has been taken away from me.

    ‘I know I’m not alone and that there are many people being affected out there by their neighbours’ wood burning stoves.

    ‘But everyone I speak to always says the same thing – that they don’t want to fall out with their neighbours who are using a wood burner so they don’t say anything and that they don’t think the council will do anything about it if they complain.’

    Meanwhile, Dr Shona Minelly, from Kingston-upon-Thames in south-west London, said: ‘I have suffered asthma attacks resulting in hospital visits because of the “Ecodesign” stove.

    ‘My husband suffered a heart attack last year after a neighbour burned their stove every day for a week and he was struggling to breathe.

    ‘Putting neighbours’ lives at risk in this way just so that a selfish family can stare at a pretty flame is morally wrong.’

    What are the rules on wood burners and how much can you be fined for breaking them? 

    The Government is trying to reduce air pollution by issuing fines for illegal log burner use, in an attempt to reduce harmful pollutants such as tiny particles called particulate matter being released straight into the home as well as into the air outside.

    Domestic wood burning is the UK’s largest single source of particulate matter known as PM2.5, which is linked to health problems such as heart disease, strokes and lung cancer.

    While wood burners are not banned outright anywhere in the UK, there are regulations withing ‘smoke control areas’ which mean certain wood burners cannot emit more than 3g of smoke per hour.

    But if the log burner is on a list of Defra-exempt appliances that produce fewer smoke emissions, the owner can apply for an exemption.

    People must also use an approved fuel, which varies depending on their location – with a list provided on the Defra website.

    Owners are also advised to look for the ‘Ready to Burn’ logo on fuel packaging, which means the fuel has less than 20 per cent moisture and therefore complies with Defra rules.

    All new log burners must also adhere to ‘Ecodesign’ rules to reduce smoke and pollutant emissions.

    Homeowners are also advised that wet wood is less efficient than naturally dried or ‘unseasoned’ wood, because more energy is wasted in turning the moisture in the wood into vapour.

    Anyone with wet or unseasoned wood, should dry it out for at least a year before using it – and wait until it has less than 20 per cent moisture.

    Local authorities in England can issue fines of between £175 and £300 for people breaking the rules – or up to £1,000 for using unauthorised fuel in an appliance not on the Defra-exempt list.

    This could go up to £5,000 for repeat offenders if the situation goes to court.

    She added: ‘None of the homes in London ‘need’ to burn wood, it’s a lifestyle choice. The exempt stoves are expensive and used by wealthy people with central heating.

    ‘Many of these burners have electric cars in their drive and solar panels on their roofs, so they obviously think they are being ‘green’ and are oblivious to the public health dangers.

    ‘It is only a matter of time before someone dies because of these stoves – we had a very close call.’

    Facing a similar situation is Mike Hinford, who lives in a residential area near Bristol where there are ‘a lot of wood burners’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘My health is badly affected by wood smoke pollution. If I go near wood smoke for only a few minutes my breathing is affected for hours.

    ‘We have no need to burn wood. It’s not cheaper. Unless the wood is free, and then it could be treated wood which contains arsenic. I really wish people realised how much harm they are doing with burning wood. They should never be seen as cosy.’  

    Sharon Brown, from Chipping Norton in Oxfordshire, said: ‘When the road I live in was built, most of the houses had no chimneys.

    ‘Now an awful lot of people have wood burning stoves – in the evenings my utility room and downstairs toilet smell really badly of wood smoke.’

    But supporters of the devices have also been singing their praises and pointing out possible ways to avoid any problems.

    Wendy Finney remarked ironically: ‘Our entire family were brought up with wood burners – we should all be dead from lung cancer.’

    She went on to suggest: ‘Provided proper well seasoned fuel is used and lit fast with wooden firelighters, and plenty of really dry kindling to get a good flame going to warm the flue fast, there is not a problem.

    ‘Many people don’t know how to light a fire and use stinky stuff like paper. It takes experience. My chimney never smokes.’

    A drop in particulate pollution from road transport and heavy industry such as steel has meant parts of the UK have now got the cleanest air for decades.

    But the use of wood burning stoves pumping out particulate pollution known as PM2.5 is rising, according to the recent study by the IFS – and local authorities are cracking down  in the air pollution fight, with some owners threatened with £300 fines for breaking rules.

    Reading and Oxford’s local authorities ban the use of fuel or appliances not approved by the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).

    Penalties of up to £300 could be issued to anyone breaking the rules after the new policy replacing existing so-called ‘smoke control areas’ was brought in on December 1.

    Exceptions are given for Defra-approved appliances and government-approved fuels – while outdoor barbecues, chimeneas, garden fireplaces or pizza ovens are also permitted as long as smoke is not released from them through a building chimney.

    The rules have been brought in amid growing concern over the stoves increasing the risk of lung cancer and being one of the UK’s main drivers of harmful air pollutants.

    Among those sticking up for rural-based wood burners is Philip Knowles, from Somerset, who said: ‘Wood burners may be “trendy” in London, where air pollution is reportedly 15 to 30 per cent higher than the rest of the country, but here in the countryside many people use wood burners to heat their homes.

    ‘We are paying through the nose for gas and electricity – please don’t take away the little bit of self-sufficiency that our wood burners provide.

    ‘Using properly seasoned timber, which is in plentiful supply in the countryside, wood burners are an efficient and relatively inexpensive form of heating.’

    Mr Knowles was referring to IFS data in last Friday’s report which found air pollution exposure in London has been 15 to 30 per cent higher than the average for each other region of England between 2003 and 2023.

    Andy Hill, chair of the Stove Industry Association, pointed out to MailOnline that the data referenced by the IFS report ‘clearly shows that modern closed stoves using quality, dry wood fuel account for just under 0.3 per cent of total UK PM2.5 emissions’.

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: 'Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves'

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves’ 

    He added that wood fuel is a ‘very low carbon domestic heating fuel’ and has been defined by the Scottish Government as being net zero emissions at the point of use.

    Mr Hill also said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves as an effective way of heating their homes and keeping their families warm and cosy, with the added advantage that they also offer a sense of energy grid security, a means of keeping warm in the event of a power cut and a way of managing fluctuating heating fuel costs.’  

    Particulate pollution is widely agreed to be the air pollutant with the biggest impact on human health, increasing the risk of respiratory and heart conditions, and increasing hospital admissions.

    Children growing up exposed to particulate pollution are more likely to have reduced lung function and can develop asthma as the tiny particles penetrate the lungs and enter into the bloodstream.

    The IFS said in its report: ‘The three largest sources of primary PM2.5 in the UK are domestic burning of wood and other fuels (29 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), road transport (17.9 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), and industrial processes and product use (16.5 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022) such as construction and steel manufacturing.

    ‘The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased over the period is domestic combustion. Three-quarters of the domestic combustion emissions of PM2.5 came from woodburning in 2022.’

    Only stoves officially given the ‘Ecodesign’ mark are allowed for sale in the UK and any wood for sale must be certified ‘Ready to burn’. 

    But in practice councils carry out minimal regulation of woodburning at home – with just 1 prosecution by a local authority in England in 2022, despite 10,600 complaints by residents, according to research carried out by pressure group Mums for Lungs.

    Overall, the IFS report said that in most parts of the UK levels of PM2.5 pollution had fallen to below the government’s 2040 target for PM2.5 although not below the more stringent limit set out by the World Health Organisation.

    ‘The share of the English population exposed to levels of PM2.5 above England’s 2040 target fell from 99 per cent in 2003 to less than 0.1 per cent in 2023.’

    Air pollution fell steeply during the pandemic but has remained at lower levels since. Between 2003 and 2023, average levels of PM2.5 in England fell by 54 per cent.

    A 2022 study cited by Sir Chris Whitty, chief medical officer for England, showed that even ‘Eco-design’ stoves generated 450 times more toxic air pollution than gas central heating, while older stoves now banned from sale produced 3,700 times more.

    Bobbie Upton, Research Economist at IFS and an author of the report, said: ‘There is growing evidence that fine particulate air pollution is extremely damaging for health, particularly for children and the elderly. It is hard to fully explain the striking drop in air pollution that started in 2020, during the COVID pandemic.

    ‘New clean air zones in several of England’s largest cities and reduced steel production may have both played a role.

    ‘It is important for the nation’s health, and for reducing health inequalities, that progress continues to be made on reducing air pollution.’

    The IFS report also found that ethnic minorities were now also less exposed to pollution, down to just 6 per cent more than average levels for white populations in 2023, down from 13 per cent in 2023.

    The report said that this fall in the ‘ethnic pollution gap’ was initially down to ethnic minorities moving to less polluted parts of the country (largely moving out of London to a smaller city), while cities with large ethnic minority populations chiefly London and Birmingham have also experienced drops in air pollution.

    But the report found that lower-income areas have persistently higher levels of air pollution than richer areas.

    In 2023, individuals in the top 20 per cent most deprived areas experienced 8 per cent higher average PM2.5 concentrations than those in the bottom 20 per cent.

    Speaking about the new rules in Oxford – where there is an exemption for moored vessels, including canal boats – the city council’s deputy leader Anna Railton said: ‘Fine particulate pollution from smoke poses serious health risks, and tackling it is crucial for public health.

    ‘Until now, Oxford’s Smoke Control Areas covered only 48 per cent of the city, leaving gaps in protection. From December 1, we’re unifying the city under a single Smoke Control Area, ensuring every part of Oxford benefits from improved safeguards against harmful pollution.

    ‘This expansion targets the reduction of both indoor and outdoor fine particulate emissions by restricting the use of high-polluting and inefficient solid fuels. I am proud that we’re taking this key public health intervention to protect our residents and reduce pollution across the city.’

    In February this year, official figures showed increases in wood burners in homes and the use of biomass in industry had offset drops in pollution from cars and electricity generation.

    Statistics revealed that pollutants known as particulate matter (PM) fell significantly since the 1970s but emissions have been relatively steady in recent years.

    PMs are small particles made up of a variety of materials, some of which can be toxic, and some of which can enter the bloodstream and be transported round the body with serious impact on health.

    And in July 2023, Sir Chris Whitty told MPs that air fresheners and wood burners contribute to air pollution despite many people believing the reverse to be true.

    The Chief Medical Officer for England said he would have ‘no problem’ telling someone with an asthmatic child not to use air freshener.

    He also said people who use wood burners should only do so ‘when it really matters to them for aesthetic reasons’ rather than as the main way of heating their home.

    Sir Chris said the risks from indoor air pollution are sometimes underappreciated because substantial progress has been made improving outdoor air quality in recent decades.

    The Commons Environmental Audit Committee was told products that can raise the risk inside include air freshener as well as candles and joss sticks.

    Source link

  • The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    The middle-class war over wood burners: Countryside folk claim they need log stoves to stay warm – and it’s the London elite who are clogging up the air with unnecessarily flash ‘lifestyle choice’

    middle-class battle is brewing between country folk and an apparent city elite – including Londoners – over wood burners after a report branded them Britain’s biggest source of dangerous air pollution.

    They have become one of the latest must-have status symbols for many, following on from how Aga cookers and Smeg fridges were seen by earlier generations.

    And yet neighbours across the UK seem bitterly divided over whether wood burners should be something to celebrate and keep firing up, or else cool it for the sake of people’s health. 

    MailOnline has heard a wide-ranging variety of opinions about the trendy domestic appliances, amid surging popularity in the shops but also threatened bans by local councils.

    Many defiant Britons insisted they would continue using wood burners, despite last week’s critical research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Some 1.5million homes across the UK are estimated to now have them installed – although the welcome for wood burners is not an entirely new phenomenon.

    Cockney pub rockers Chas and Dave sang in a 1982 track, later incongruously covered by US piano balladeer Tori Amos: ‘Home baked loaves and wood burning stoves, Shirley MacLaine and Petticoat Lane … that’s what I like.’

    But they have been highlighted as a newly surging trend especially among middle-class areas both urban and rural – but fellow householders, including those with existing health conditions, have raised new objections in an array of responses to MailOnline. 

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as 'off grid in the gas sense'

    James Dixon sent MailOnline this picture of his wood burner at his rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’

    James Dixon

    James Dixon's wood burner

    James Dixon (left) said he relied on wood burners to keep the sitting room and a spare bedroom (right) ‘habitable’ at his home near Lyme Regis in Dorset 

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    Long Covid sufferer Mandy Cairns is an opponent of wood burning stoves, saying she is often forced out of her home due to adverse health effects she blames on those in nearby properties

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased since 2003 is domestic combustion, according to the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS) report

    Homeowners living ‘off grid’ in parts of the countryside told how they needed the devices to efficiently heat their homes – while others have accused Londoners of making an indulgent ‘lifestyle choice’ by buying the stoves, suggesting they have no ‘need’ to burn wood.

    One wood burner fan is James Dixon, who lives in a rural four-bedroom house just outside Lyme Regis in Dorset, which he described as ‘off grid in the gas sense’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘We rely on a modicum of oil for hot water and central heating. We cannot afford to heat the house electrically. We had an electric Aga that was on all day but that was costing the earth both, literally and metaphorically.

    ‘The central heating comes on for an hour at 6am and 6pm, when the oil burner works. We rely on our wood burners to keep the sitting room and one – slightly damp – spare bedroom habitable. 

    ‘We are contemplating a biomass – log – boiler when it comes to replacing the ageing oil boiler so will be producing more of the particulate.

    ‘I am confident a heat pump will not suit unless we spend a fortune upgrading the house. I don’t imagine we are in a “smoke control” zone yet.’

    But other MailOnline readers were quick to point out their pollution concerns relating to wood burners.

    Mandy Cairns, who suffers from long Covid, said: ‘One of my symptoms is a severe allergic reaction to wood smoke whereby the muscles in my body go weak and I collapse to the ground and struggle to breathe.

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    Mandy Cairns was among the critics of wood burners getting in touch with MailOnline

    ‘I live in a rural town where one in three houses have wood burners and I have to move out for three months of the year because the air is so bad I can’t live here.

    ‘I can’t afford to move. Everyone around me has more than enough money to pay for their gas central heating as it’s a very affluent small town that I live in – even the local cafe-bookshop has installed one.’

    Ms Cairns, from Dollar in Clackmannshire, Scotland, added: ‘I tried going back to stay at my parents’ house last year but then their neighbours put in a wood burning stove, so that option has been taken away from me.

    ‘I know I’m not alone and that there are many people being affected out there by their neighbours’ wood burning stoves.

    ‘But everyone I speak to always says the same thing – that they don’t want to fall out with their neighbours who are using a wood burner so they don’t say anything and that they don’t think the council will do anything about it if they complain.’

    Meanwhile, Dr Shona Minelly, from Kingston-upon-Thames in south-west London, said: ‘I have suffered asthma attacks resulting in hospital visits because of the “Ecodesign” stove.

    ‘My husband suffered a heart attack last year after a neighbour burned their stove every day for a week and he was struggling to breathe.

    ‘Putting neighbours’ lives at risk in this way just so that a selfish family can stare at a pretty flame is morally wrong.’

    What are the rules on wood burners and how much can you be fined for breaking them? 

    The Government is trying to reduce air pollution by issuing fines for illegal log burner use, in an attempt to reduce harmful pollutants such as tiny particles called particulate matter being released straight into the home as well as into the air outside.

    Domestic wood burning is the UK’s largest single source of particulate matter known as PM2.5, which is linked to health problems such as heart disease, strokes and lung cancer.

    While wood burners are not banned outright anywhere in the UK, there are regulations withing ‘smoke control areas’ which mean certain wood burners cannot emit more than 3g of smoke per hour.

    But if the log burner is on a list of Defra-exempt appliances that produce fewer smoke emissions, the owner can apply for an exemption.

    People must also use an approved fuel, which varies depending on their location – with a list provided on the Defra website.

    Owners are also advised to look for the ‘Ready to Burn’ logo on fuel packaging, which means the fuel has less than 20 per cent moisture and therefore complies with Defra rules.

    All new log burners must also adhere to ‘Ecodesign’ rules to reduce smoke and pollutant emissions.

    Homeowners are also advised that wet wood is less efficient than naturally dried or ‘unseasoned’ wood, because more energy is wasted in turning the moisture in the wood into vapour.

    Anyone with wet or unseasoned wood, should dry it out for at least a year before using it – and wait until it has less than 20 per cent moisture.

    Local authorities in England can issue fines of between £175 and £300 for people breaking the rules – or up to £1,000 for using unauthorised fuel in an appliance not on the Defra-exempt list.

    This could go up to £5,000 for repeat offenders if the situation goes to court.

    She added: ‘None of the homes in London ‘need’ to burn wood, it’s a lifestyle choice. The exempt stoves are expensive and used by wealthy people with central heating.

    ‘Many of these burners have electric cars in their drive and solar panels on their roofs, so they obviously think they are being ‘green’ and are oblivious to the public health dangers.

    ‘It is only a matter of time before someone dies because of these stoves – we had a very close call.’

    Facing a similar situation is Mike Hinford, who lives in a residential area near Bristol where there are ‘a lot of wood burners’.

    He told MailOnline: ‘My health is badly affected by wood smoke pollution. If I go near wood smoke for only a few minutes my breathing is affected for hours.

    ‘We have no need to burn wood. It’s not cheaper. Unless the wood is free, and then it could be treated wood which contains arsenic. I really wish people realised how much harm they are doing with burning wood. They should never be seen as cosy.’  

    Sharon Brown, from Chipping Norton in Oxfordshire, said: ‘When the road I live in was built, most of the houses had no chimneys.

    ‘Now an awful lot of people have wood burning stoves – in the evenings my utility room and downstairs toilet smell really badly of wood smoke.’

    But supporters of the devices have also been singing their praises and pointing out possible ways to avoid any problems.

    Wendy Finney remarked ironically: ‘Our entire family were brought up with wood burners – we should all be dead from lung cancer.’

    She went on to suggest: ‘Provided proper well seasoned fuel is used and lit fast with wooden firelighters, and plenty of really dry kindling to get a good flame going to warm the flue fast, there is not a problem.

    ‘Many people don’t know how to light a fire and use stinky stuff like paper. It takes experience. My chimney never smokes.’

    A drop in particulate pollution from road transport and heavy industry such as steel has meant parts of the UK have now got the cleanest air for decades.

    But the use of wood burning stoves pumping out particulate pollution known as PM2.5 is rising, according to the recent study by the IFS – and local authorities are cracking down  in the air pollution fight, with some owners threatened with £300 fines for breaking rules.

    Reading and Oxford’s local authorities ban the use of fuel or appliances not approved by the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).

    Penalties of up to £300 could be issued to anyone breaking the rules after the new policy replacing existing so-called ‘smoke control areas’ was brought in on December 1.

    Exceptions are given for Defra-approved appliances and government-approved fuels – while outdoor barbecues, chimeneas, garden fireplaces or pizza ovens are also permitted as long as smoke is not released from them through a building chimney.

    The rules have been brought in amid growing concern over the stoves increasing the risk of lung cancer and being one of the UK’s main drivers of harmful air pollutants.

    Among those sticking up for rural-based wood burners is Philip Knowles, from Somerset, who said: ‘Wood burners may be “trendy” in London, where air pollution is reportedly 15 to 30 per cent higher than the rest of the country, but here in the countryside many people use wood burners to heat their homes.

    ‘We are paying through the nose for gas and electricity – please don’t take away the little bit of self-sufficiency that our wood burners provide.

    ‘Using properly seasoned timber, which is in plentiful supply in the countryside, wood burners are an efficient and relatively inexpensive form of heating.’

    Mr Knowles was referring to IFS data in last Friday’s report which found air pollution exposure in London has been 15 to 30 per cent higher than the average for each other region of England between 2003 and 2023.

    Andy Hill, chair of the Stove Industry Association, pointed out to MailOnline that the data referenced by the IFS report ‘clearly shows that modern closed stoves using quality, dry wood fuel account for just under 0.3 per cent of total UK PM2.5 emissions’.

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: 'Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves'

    Stove Industry Association chair Andy Hill said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves’ 

    He added that wood fuel is a ‘very low carbon domestic heating fuel’ and has been defined by the Scottish Government as being net zero emissions at the point of use.

    Mr Hill also said: ‘Many households up and down the country cherish their wood burning stoves as an effective way of heating their homes and keeping their families warm and cosy, with the added advantage that they also offer a sense of energy grid security, a means of keeping warm in the event of a power cut and a way of managing fluctuating heating fuel costs.’  

    Particulate pollution is widely agreed to be the air pollutant with the biggest impact on human health, increasing the risk of respiratory and heart conditions, and increasing hospital admissions.

    Children growing up exposed to particulate pollution are more likely to have reduced lung function and can develop asthma as the tiny particles penetrate the lungs and enter into the bloodstream.

    The IFS said in its report: ‘The three largest sources of primary PM2.5 in the UK are domestic burning of wood and other fuels (29 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), road transport (17.9 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022), and industrial processes and product use (16.5 per cent of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022) such as construction and steel manufacturing.

    ‘The only source of PM2.5 emissions that has increased over the period is domestic combustion. Three-quarters of the domestic combustion emissions of PM2.5 came from woodburning in 2022.’

    Only stoves officially given the ‘Ecodesign’ mark are allowed for sale in the UK and any wood for sale must be certified ‘Ready to burn’. 

    But in practice councils carry out minimal regulation of woodburning at home – with just 1 prosecution by a local authority in England in 2022, despite 10,600 complaints by residents, according to research carried out by pressure group Mums for Lungs.

    Overall, the IFS report said that in most parts of the UK levels of PM2.5 pollution had fallen to below the government’s 2040 target for PM2.5 although not below the more stringent limit set out by the World Health Organisation.

    ‘The share of the English population exposed to levels of PM2.5 above England’s 2040 target fell from 99 per cent in 2003 to less than 0.1 per cent in 2023.’

    Air pollution fell steeply during the pandemic but has remained at lower levels since. Between 2003 and 2023, average levels of PM2.5 in England fell by 54 per cent.

    A 2022 study cited by Sir Chris Whitty, chief medical officer for England, showed that even ‘Eco-design’ stoves generated 450 times more toxic air pollution than gas central heating, while older stoves now banned from sale produced 3,700 times more.

    Bobbie Upton, Research Economist at IFS and an author of the report, said: ‘There is growing evidence that fine particulate air pollution is extremely damaging for health, particularly for children and the elderly. It is hard to fully explain the striking drop in air pollution that started in 2020, during the COVID pandemic.

    ‘New clean air zones in several of England’s largest cities and reduced steel production may have both played a role.

    ‘It is important for the nation’s health, and for reducing health inequalities, that progress continues to be made on reducing air pollution.’

    The IFS report also found that ethnic minorities were now also less exposed to pollution, down to just 6 per cent more than average levels for white populations in 2023, down from 13 per cent in 2023.

    The report said that this fall in the ‘ethnic pollution gap’ was initially down to ethnic minorities moving to less polluted parts of the country (largely moving out of London to a smaller city), while cities with large ethnic minority populations chiefly London and Birmingham have also experienced drops in air pollution.

    But the report found that lower-income areas have persistently higher levels of air pollution than richer areas.

    In 2023, individuals in the top 20 per cent most deprived areas experienced 8 per cent higher average PM2.5 concentrations than those in the bottom 20 per cent.

    Speaking about the new rules in Oxford – where there is an exemption for moored vessels, including canal boats – the city council’s deputy leader Anna Railton said: ‘Fine particulate pollution from smoke poses serious health risks, and tackling it is crucial for public health.

    ‘Until now, Oxford’s Smoke Control Areas covered only 48 per cent of the city, leaving gaps in protection. From December 1, we’re unifying the city under a single Smoke Control Area, ensuring every part of Oxford benefits from improved safeguards against harmful pollution.

    ‘This expansion targets the reduction of both indoor and outdoor fine particulate emissions by restricting the use of high-polluting and inefficient solid fuels. I am proud that we’re taking this key public health intervention to protect our residents and reduce pollution across the city.’

    In February this year, official figures showed increases in wood burners in homes and the use of biomass in industry had offset drops in pollution from cars and electricity generation.

    Statistics revealed that pollutants known as particulate matter (PM) fell significantly since the 1970s but emissions have been relatively steady in recent years.

    PMs are small particles made up of a variety of materials, some of which can be toxic, and some of which can enter the bloodstream and be transported round the body with serious impact on health.

    And in July 2023, Sir Chris Whitty told MPs that air fresheners and wood burners contribute to air pollution despite many people believing the reverse to be true.

    The Chief Medical Officer for England said he would have ‘no problem’ telling someone with an asthmatic child not to use air freshener.

    He also said people who use wood burners should only do so ‘when it really matters to them for aesthetic reasons’ rather than as the main way of heating their home.

    Sir Chris said the risks from indoor air pollution are sometimes underappreciated because substantial progress has been made improving outdoor air quality in recent decades.

    The Commons Environmental Audit Committee was told products that can raise the risk inside include air freshener as well as candles and joss sticks.

    Source link

  • Pakistan declare war on India’s 2036 Olympic bid in retaliation to CT stance

    Pakistan declare war on India’s 2036 Olympic bid in retaliation to CT stance

    Pakistan National Cricket Team are all set to make things difficult for the India National Cricket Team. As per the reports in GEO News, it is learned that the BCCI’s denial to send the Indian team to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 is set to have major implications for sporting ties between the two countries.

    The ICC Champions Trophy 2025 is all set to take place in Pakistan during February and March of next year. But the major question that has been keeping many engaged is whether the India National Cricket Team will be traveling to Pakistan for the tournament or not.

    India National Cricket Team reportedly has refused to travel to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025

    India National Cricket Team reportedly have refused to travel to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy. There have been reports which claimed that the Indian government hasn’t given clearance to the Board of Control for Cricket in India to send a team to the neighboring nation.

    The reports claimed that BCCI has explained the entire situation to the International Cricket Council and has formally written to them that they won’t be able to travel to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy 2025. This has seen rise to the talks of the tournaments being played in the Hybrid model.

    As per the reports, it is learned that the ICC Champions Trophy will be played in the Hybrid model, and all the India games will be played in Dubai or Sri Lanka. However, the Pakistan Cricket Board, on the other hand, has denied all the talks.

    Pakistan to withdraw from playing against India in any international event

    But with India denying to visit for the Champions Trophy, it is learned that Pakistan is prepared to withdraw from playing against India in any international event until the Men in Blue visit them.

    Not only this, they are set to take some more actions.

    Pakistan will act as a massive hurdle in India’s bid to host the 2036 Olympic Games

    As per the reports, Pakistan will act as a massive hurdle in India’s bid to host the 2036 Olympic Games. It is learned that the Pakistani government has planned to formally communicate to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) that India has ‘politicized sporting competitions.’

    Coming to the Olympic bid, India recently sent a letter of intent to host the 2036 Olympic and Paralympics games to the Future Hosts Commission (FHC) of the IOC. This move comes after India’s intention to host the mega event was made public by Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the 141st IOC Session held in Mumbai last year.

    However, if the Pakistani government intends to spoil their party, it will be a massive blow to India as well as their government. It remains to be seen what will be the impact of the Indian not traveling to Champions Trophy 2025 on the sporting ties between the two nations.

    Also Read: ICC Champions Trophy 2025: Pakistan issue a new threat through veterans after India’s denial

    Source link

  • After a year of avoiding the worst, football is caught up in the war in the Middle East

    After a year of avoiding the worst, football is caught up in the war in the Middle East

    Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters in Amsterdam before the Europa League match against Ajax on November 7, 2024.

    Nothing at the end of Ajax Amsterdam’s 5-0 Europa League victory over Maccabi Tel Aviv could have predicted such a violent outburst. A few hours after the final whistle, several supporters of the Israeli club were attacked in the streets of the Dutch capital on the night of Thursday, November 7 to Friday, November 8. Law enforcement officers made 62 arrests and several people were injured.

    The incident sparked outrage across Europe. Ajax Amsterdam said it was “horrified to learn what happened,” after a “match with a good atmosphere,” and “strongly condemn[ed] this violence.” A similar statement came from the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA), organizers of the Europa League.

    “We trust that the relevant authorities will identify and charge as many of those responsible for such actions as possible,” the body wrote in a statement. “UEFA will examine all official reports, gather available evidence, assess them and evaluate any further appropriate course of action in accordance with its relevant regulatory framework.”

    UEFA is well aware of the explosive nature of the international context. Immediately after the October 7 attacks on Israel and its response in the Gaza Strip, it suspended international matches on Israeli territory for two weeks. The measure was quickly extended and is still in force. Until now, the governing body had managed to avoid a worst-case scenario.

    Players insulted in Florence

    For the 2023-2024 season, two Israeli clubs were part of the European Cup: Maccabi Haifa and Maccabi Tel Aviv, who had to play their “home” matches in Serbia, Hungary or Cyprus. Everything went without a hitch.

    Away from home, however, Maccabi Haifa experienced a few minor disruptions. On February 21, the club played its match against K.A.A. Gent, in Belgium, in a closed-door stadium. The mayor, Mathias De Clercq, deemed it too risky to hold the match as a public event.

    The following month, its players played against Fiorentina in front of a handful of spectators: 6,738, compared to an average of 17,463. A large number of Italian fans simply decided to boycott the match, protesting against the complexity of the security measures taken by the Italian authorities. “UEFA, with all the moral principles it prides itself on defending, has nothing to say about the ongoing massacre in Palestine?,” said members of the Curva Fiesole, a group of supporters of the Florence club, in a statement. After the match, the local crowd insulted several Maccabi Haifa players.

    You have 43.63% of this article left to read. The rest is for subscribers only.

    Source link

  • New Jersey man pleads guilty in smuggling scheme intended to aid Russia’s war effort

    New Jersey man pleads guilty in smuggling scheme intended to aid Russia’s war effort

    NEW YORK — A New Jersey man who was among seven people charged with smuggling electronic components to aid Russia’s war effort pleaded guilty Friday to conspiracy to commit bank fraud and other charges, authorities said.

    Vadim Yermolenko, 43, faces up to 30 years in prison for his role in a transnational procurement and money laundering network that sought to acquire sensitive electronics for Russian military and intelligence services, Breon Peace, the U.S. attorney in Brooklyn, said in a statement.

    Yermolenko, who lives in Upper Saddle River, New Jersey and has dual U.S. and Russian citizenship, was indicted along with six other people in December 2022.

    Prosecutors said the conspirators worked with two Moscow-based companies controlled by Russian intelligence services to acquire electronic components in the U.S. that have civilian uses but can also be used to make nuclear and hypersonic weapons and in quantum computing.

    The exporting of the technology violated U.S. sanctions, prosecutors said.

    The prosecution was coordinated through the Justice Department’s Task Force KleptoCapture, an interagency entity dedicated to enforcing sanctions imposed after Russian invaded Ukraine.

    Attorney General Merrick Garland said in statement that Yermolenko “joins the nearly two dozen other criminals that our Task Force KleptoCapture has brought to justice in American courtrooms over the past two and a half years for enabling Russia’s military aggression.”

    A message seeking comment was sent to Yermolenko’s attorney with the federal public defender’s office.

    Prosecutors said Yermolenko helped set up shell companies and U.S. bank accounts to move money and export-controlled goods. Money from one of his accounts was used to purchase export-controlled sniper bullets that were intercepted in Estonia before they could be smuggled into Russia, they said.

    One of Yermolenko’s co-defendants, Alexey Brayman of Merrimack, New Hampshire, pleaded guilty previously to conspiracy to defraud the United States and is awaiting sentencing.

    Another, Vadim Konoshchenok, a suspected officer with Russia’s Federal Security Service, was arrested in Estonia and extradited to the United States. He was later released from U.S. custody as part of a prisoner exchange that included Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich and other individuals.

    The four others named in the indictment are Russian nationals who remain at large, prosecutors said.

    Source link

  • Israel-Hamas war latest: Israel turns its focus north toward Lebanon and Hezbollah

    Israel-Hamas war latest: Israel turns its focus north toward Lebanon and Hezbollah

    Israel’s defense minister has declared the start of a “new phase” of the war as Israel turns its focus toward the northern front against Hezbollah militants in Lebanon.

    Two waves of explosive attacks hit Syria and Lebanon: an apparent Israeli attack targeting pagers used by Hezbollah that killed at least 12 and wounded nearly 3,000 on Tuesday, and exploding walkie-talkies and other electronics Wednesday across Lebanon that killed at least 20 people and injured 450 others.

    “We are at the start of a new phase in the war — it requires courage, determination and perseverance,” Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant told troops on Wednesday.

    The head of Hezbollah’s Executive Council promised the group would respond to Tuesday’s pager explosion attack with “special punishment.”

    Hezbollah began striking Israel almost immediately after Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack that sparked the Israel-Hamas war. Since then, Israel and Hezbollah have exchanged fire daily, coming close to a full-blown war on several occasions and forcing tens of thousands on both sides of the border to evacuate their homes.

    Gaza’s Health Ministry says more than 41,000 Palestinians have been killed in the territory since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack. The ministry does not differentiate between fighters and civilians in its count but says a little over half of those killed were women and children. Israel says it has killed over 17,000 militants, without providing evidence.

    ___

    Here’s the latest:

    TOKYO — Japanese wireless communication equipment-maker Icom says it cannot confirm whether a walkie-talkie used in the explosive attacks against Hezbollah was related to the company, noting that the production and sales of that device and its battery were discontinued about a decade ago.

    The Osaka-based Icom was responding Thursday to a report that said one of the walkie-talkies used in the attacks a day earlier had a sticker with the company’s logo. Icom also noted that the device in question did not have an anti-counterfeit hologram sticker, which all authentic Icom products should be carrying.

    Company executive Yoshiki Enomoto told Japanese television NTV he was “surprised” by the news. He said the company could not confirm if the unit in question was Icom-made.

    “This specific device had a lot of fake copies out in the market,” he said, adding that company officials could only determine its authenticity if they see its circuits.

    Icom said the wireless radio unit IC-V82 was once manufactured for export including to the Middle East from 2004 to October 2014. But the production and shipment of its main unit ended about 10 years ago and batteries for the main units have also been discontinued.

    The company said its export models are only distributed through official sales representatives under rigid export control rules set by the Japanese Trade Ministry.

    All Icom radio equipment is manufactured by its subsidiary, Wakayama Icom Inc., under strict security controls that only allow use of authorized parts. The products are only manufactured at the Wakayama plant in Japan, Icom said.

    Source link

  • What to Stream: ‘Civil War,’ Snow Patrol, ‘How to Die Alone,’ Sylvester Stallone and ‘Uglies’

    What to Stream: ‘Civil War,’ Snow Patrol, ‘How to Die Alone,’ Sylvester Stallone and ‘Uglies’

    Hallmark launching a streaming service with two new original series, and Bill Skarsgård out for revenge in “Boy Kills World” are some of the new television, films, music and games headed to a device near you.

    Also among the streaming offerings worth your time as selected by The Associated Press’ entertainment journalists: Alex Garland’s “Civil War” starring Kirsten Dunst, Natasha Rothwell’s heartfelt comedy for Hulu called “How to Die Alone” and Sylvester Stallone’s second season of “Tulsa King” debuts.

    Alex Garland’s “Civil War” is finally making its debut on MAX on Friday, Sept. 13. The film stars Kirsten Dunst as a veteran photojournalist covering a violent war that’s divided America; She reluctantly allows an aspiring photographer, played by Cailee Spaeny, to tag along as she, an editor (Stephen McKinley Henderson) and a reporter (Wagner Moura) make the dangerous journey to Washington, D.C., to interview the president (Nick Offerman), a blustery, rising despot who has given himself a third term, taken to attacking his citizens and shut himself off from the press. In my review, I called it a bellowing and haunting experience; Smart and thought-provoking with great performances. It’s well worth a watch.

    — Joey King stars in Netflix’s adaptation of Scott Westerfeld’s “Uglies,” about a future society in which everyone is required to have beautifying cosmetic surgery at age 16. Streaming on Friday, Sept. 13, McG directed the film, in which King’s character inadvertently finds herself in the midst of an uprising against the status quo. “Outer Banks” star Chase Stokes plays King’s best friend.

    — Bill Skarsgård is out for revenge against the woman (Famke Janssen) who killed his family in “Boy Kills World,” coming to Hulu on Friday, Sept. 13. Moritz Mohr directed the ultra-violent film, of which Variety critic Owen Gleiberman wrote: “It’s a depraved vision, yet I got caught up in its kick-ass revenge-horror pizzazz, its disreputable commitment to what it was doing.”

    AP Film Writer Lindsey Bahr

    — The year was 2006. Snow Patrol, the Northern Irish-Scottish alternative rock band, released an album, “Eyes Open,” producing the biggest hit of their career: “Chasing Cars.” A lot has happened in the time since — three, soon to be four quality full-length albums, to be exact. On Friday, Sept. 13, the band will release “The Forest Is the Path,” their first new album in seven years. Anthemic pop-rock is the name of the game across songs of love and loss, like “All,”“The Beginning” and “This Is the Sound Of Your Voice.”

    — For fans of raucous guitar music, Jordan Peele’s 2022 sci-fi thriller, “NOPE,” provided a surprising, if tiny, thrill. One of the leads, Emerald “Em” Haywood portrayed by Keke Palmer, rocks a Jesus Lizard shirt. (Also featured through the film: Rage Against the Machine, Wipers, Mr Bungle, Butthole Surfers and Earth band shirts.) The Austin noise rock band are a less than obvious pick, having been signed to the legendary Touch and Go Records and having stopped releasing new albums in 1998. That changes on Friday the 13th, when “Rack” arrives. And for those curious: The Jesus Lizard’s intensity never went away.

    AP Music Writer Maria Sherman

    — Hallmark launches a streaming service called Hallmark+ on Tuesday with two new original series, the scripted drama “The Chicken Sisters” and unscripted series “Celebrations with Lacey Chabert.” If you’re a Hallmark holiday movies fan, you know Chabert. She’s starred in more than 30 of their films and many are holiday themed. Off camera, Chabert has a passion for throwing parties and entertaining. In “Celebrations,” deserving people are surprised with a bash in their honor — planned with Chabert’s help. “The Chicken Sisters” stars Schuyler Fisk, Wendie Malick and Lea Thompson in a show about employees at rival chicken restaurants in a small town. The eight-episode series is based on a novel of the same name.

    Natasha Rothwell of “Insecure” and “The White Lotus” fame created and stars in a new heartfelt comedy for Hulu called “How to Die Alone.” She plays Mel, a broke, go-along-to-get-along, single, airport employee who, after a near-death experience, makes the conscious decision to take risks and pursue her dreams. Rothwell has been working on the series for the past eight years and described it to The AP as “the most vulnerable piece of art I’ve ever put into the world.” Like Mel, Rothwell had to learn to bet on herself to make the show she wanted to make. “In the Venn diagram of me and Mel, there’s significant overlap,” said Rothwell. It premieres Friday, Sept. 13 on Hulu.

    — Shailene Woodley, DeWanda Wise and Betty Gilpin star in a new drama for Starz called “Three Women,” about entrepreneur Sloane, homemaker Lina and student Maggie who are each stepping into their power and making life-changing decisions. They’re interviewed by a writer named Gia (Woodley.) The series is based on a 2019 best-selling book of the same name by Lisa Taddeo. “Three Women” premieres Friday, Sept. 13 on Starz.

    — Sylvester Stallone’s second season of “Tulsa King” debuts Sunday, Sept. 15 on Paramount+. Stallone plays Dwight Manfredi, a mafia boss who was recently released from prison after serving 25 years. He’s sent to Tulsa to set up a new crime syndicate. The series is created by Taylor Sheridan of “Yellowstone” fame.

    Alicia Rancilio

    — One thing about the title of Focus Entertainment’s Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2 — you know exactly what you’re in for. You are Demetrian Titus, a genetically enhanced brute sent into battle against the Tyranids, an insectoid species with an insatiable craving for human flesh. You have a rocket-powered suit of armor and an arsenal of ridiculous weapons like the “Chainsword,” the “Thunderhammer” and the “Melta Rifle,” so what could go wrong? Besides the squishy single-player mode, there are cooperative missions and six-vs.-six free-for-alls. You can suit up Monday on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S or PC.

    — Likewise, Wild Bastards isn’t exactly the kind of title that’s going to attract fans of, say, Animal Crossing. It’s another sci-fi shooter, but the protagonists are a gang of 13 varmints — aliens and androids included — who are on the run from the law. Each outlaw has a distinctive set of weapons and special powers: Sarge, for example, is a robot with horse genes, while Billy the Squid is … well, you get the idea. Australian studio Blue Manchu developed the 2019 cult hit Void Bastards, and this Wild-West-in-space spinoff has the same snarky humor and vibrant, neon-drenched cartoon look. Saddle up Thursday on PlayStation 5, Xbox X/S, Nintendo Switch or PC.

    Lou Kesten



    Source link

  • Only Palestinian Athlete At Paralympics Vows To Be A ‘Voice’ Amid War In Gaza

    Only Palestinian Athlete At Paralympics Vows To Be A ‘Voice’ Amid War In Gaza

    PARIS (AP) — Fadi Aldeeb got the competing out of the way early at the Paralympic Games. He’s been using the rest of the time to talk.

    The only Paralympian in the Palestinian delegation in Paris, Aldeeb feels he bears special responsibility to represent all Palestinians living in Gaza, the West Bank and elsewhere. He tries not to think about his own situation.

    “I’m their voice. And I want to talk and talk and talk,” the Gaza native told The Associated Press in an interview this week.

    The 40-year-old Aldeeb, who uses a wheelchair, was the Palestinian flag bearer during the Games’ opening ceremony, two days before he placed last in the men’s shot put for seated athletes with a season best throw of 8.81 meters.

    The winner, world record holder Ruzhdi Ruzhdi, returned to Bulgaria with his gold medal, but Aldeeb has stayed around the Paralympic Village, speaking to media about the desperate situation in his homeland following Israel’s retaliatory offensive in Gaza after Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking about 250 hostages.

    After nearly 11 months of fighting, the war has killed more than 40,000 Palestinians, according to local health officials, who say about half of the dead are women and children. It has displaced the vast majority of Gaza’s 2.3 million people, often multiple times. It has plunged the besieged territory into a humanitarian catastrophe, including new fears of a polio outbreak.

    Aldeeb said he lost his younger brother on Dec. 6 when the building containing the family home in the Gaza City neighborhood of Shijaiyah was bombed and destroyed.

    Fadi Aldeeb throws during the shot put finals at the Paralympic Games in Paris on Friday, Aug. 30, 2024. (AP Photo/Nathalee Simoneau)
    Fadi Aldeeb throws during the shot put finals at the Paralympic Games in Paris on Friday, Aug. 30, 2024. (AP Photo/Nathalee Simoneau)

    Aldeeb, who besides competing in shot put is a professional wheelchair basketball player, was playing a French league match and only saw afterward he’d received many missed calls from the brother. There was no connection when he tried calling back. Another brother told him the next day he had been killed.

    Aldeeb said it made him question why he plays sport. He said the image of his brother comes to him at night and he often wonders what he was trying to say when he called during the league match.

    “I received a call from his daughter, she’s like, 7 years old. I never ever can forget this,” Aldeeb said, fighting tears. “She asked me, ‘My uncle, I know he’s died and he goes – Inshallah – to Jannah, but I want his body. I don’t need his body to stay under the building, and the dogs start eating his body.’ Imagine, a child 7 years old, speaking like this.”

    Aldeeb said other family members decided to scatter around the Gaza Strip to maximize their chances of survival.

    “If they stay together, it’s all too easy that all of this family disappears and is killed,” he said.

    Aldeeb said he hasn’t seen his own wife and children for two years because they’re still in Turkey, where he moved from Gaza in 2016 to play basketball. They can’t get a visa to join him in France, and he says he can’t get a visa to join them in Turkey without going to Gaza.

    “Sometimes, you keep your feelings inside of yourself because you don’t want to show yourself, like, weak or something like that. You want to keep going because you have a big goal. You want to have it, but at the same time when you’re alone, yeah, you’re crying, you’re human,” he said.

    Fadi Aldeeb, the only Palestinian athlete at the Paralympic Games, signs an autograph for a young fan during an interview with The Associated Press in Paris, Tuesday, Sept. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Ciaran Fahey)
    Fadi Aldeeb, the only Palestinian athlete at the Paralympic Games, signs an autograph for a young fan during an interview with The Associated Press in Paris, Tuesday, Sept. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Ciaran Fahey)

    Aldeeb said he received his life-changing injury on Oct. 4, 2001. He said he was shot in the back by an Israeli sniper when soldiers responded with bullets after some kids threw stones at an Israeli tank.

    The current war is creating many more potential Paralympians, but Aldeeb said all Palestinian athletes face a lack of facilities and equipment – and difficulties leaving.

    The 3 million Palestinians in the West Bank live under seemingly open-ended military rule, and Gaza’s borders have been sealed for months. Even before the war, athletes struggled to leave the territory for international competitions because of an Israeli-Egyptian blockade imposed after the Hamas militant group seized power in 2007.

    Aldeeb wants to see future Palestinian delegations at Paralympic and Olympic competitions grow.

    “We have in Gaza something the world doesn’t have – the type of players, the type of athletes. What they need are just little programs. You cannot imagine what they can do,” Aldeeb said. “I hope they can get this opportunity before they are killed, I hope.”

    Jack Leo, a student in the undergraduate certificate program at the Carmical Sports Media Institute at the University of Georgia, contributed to this report.

    Support Free Journalism

    Consider supporting HuffPost starting at $2 to help us provide free, quality journalism that puts people first.

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?

    Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.

    The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. We hope you’ll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.

    Support HuffPost

    Source link