hacklink hack forum hacklink film izle hacklink marsbahisizmir escortsahabetpornJojobetcasibompadişahbetjojobet

News

Tag: YouTube

  • Viral Now: Food Vlogger Quits YouTube After Investing Rs 8 Lakhs Into Her Channel

    Viral Now: Food Vlogger Quits YouTube After Investing Rs 8 Lakhs Into Her Channel

    A food vlogger recently went viral on social media for her decision to stop working on her YouTube channel that she began three years ago. Taking to X (formerly Twitter), Nalini Unagar explained what prompted her to make this move, especially after she claimed she spent around 8 lakhs over time building up her YouTube presence. However, she says that she did not get a worthwhile return on this investment. As per her post, she has also deleted 250 videos she had created and shared on the video platform over the years. She began her thread on X by informing people that she was putting the kitchen accessories and studio equipment for sale (she had apparently bought them for her YouTube work).

    She wrote “I failed in my YouTube career, so I’m selling all my kitchen accessories and studio equipment. If anyone is interested in buying, please let me know.” She added, “Let me confess today – I have invested approximately Rs 8 lakhs in my YouTube channel for building a kitchen, buying studio equipment, and promotions. The return? Rs 0.” In a post shared separately from the above thread, she stated “I’m honestly angry with YouTube. I spent my money, and time, and even risked my career to build my channel, but in return, YouTube gave me nothing. It feels like the platform favours certain channels and specific types of videos, leaving others with no recognition despite the hard work.”

    The vlogger’s story has received more than 1 million views on X so far. Many X users encouraged her not to give up and keep trying. Several people shared suggestions for the same. However, the vlogger stood her ground and explained that her decision was final. She wrote, “I’m overwhelmed by your suggestion not to quit YouTube. Let me remind you-I dedicated 3 years to YouTube, creating over 250 videos. However, I didn’t get the response I had hoped for, so I’ve finally decided to stop making videos and have deleted all my content from the platform. Online platforms require a bit of luck too, so it’s wise not to rely on them as a primary source of income. Your “shop” can shut down before you even wake up the next day.”

    In response to another comment, she reiterated, “I think trying for three years is enough. If it were a local business, I could have earned something in return, even a small amount. But with YouTube, you don’t get anything, even after spending so much time.”

    Check out how people reacted to the viral post online.

    Also Read: Indian YouTuber Who Criticised Iconic Las Vegas Hotel Gets Room Upgrade, Company Responds



    Source link

  • YouTube Streamer IShowSpeed WILL NOT Be Running at The 2028 Summer Olympics, Contrary To What is Being Reported

    YouTube Streamer IShowSpeed WILL NOT Be Running at The 2028 Summer Olympics, Contrary To What is Being Reported

    What can’t this guy do? Run in the Olympics. That is something IShowSpeed cannot do. Unfortunately, with the way the Olympics are currently constructed, in order to participate in their coveted 100m dash event, you must be one of the 56 fastest human beings on the planet. Which IShowSpeed is not.

    Sorry, I just saw some fake news being circulated online and felt responsible to issue a correction. I’m afraid IShowSpeed has Olympic Track & Field confused with boxing. Where if you have a big enough following and are annoying enough on the internet, the world will placate your delusions and just kinda blindly go along with the facade that is your “professional boxing career”. Because in the end people just want to watch an unlikable Gen Z kid beat up a likable 58-year old rapist, then bemoan the downfall of a sport they never cared about in the first place. Somehow there is a BOAT LOAD of money in that. 

    Now if IShowSpeed had done the boxing equivalent of “barely losing” to a jogging Noah Lyles in an event he only showed up for because it was a free $100k he could pass off to charity…

    …then IShowSpeed would probably be awarded with a chance to fight Sylvester Stallone in full Rocky character at the Wells Fargo Center in a sanctioned fight for $50 million. As a matter of fact, a $10 million fight between IShowSpeed and Jake Paul appears to already be in the works.

    Advertisement

    But that’s aside the point. That’s not what the Olympics are about. Although to be fair, 2028 is a long way away. Maybe things will have changed by then. Maybe by 2028 the Olympics will also be a complete fucking joke, and in order to qualify for any event you must prove that you’re able to hold ‘x’ amount of concurrent viewers on Twitch over a certain amount of time. That’s probably not out of the realm of possibility. But if that doesn’t happen… I’m sorry Mr. ShowSpeed… I’m afraid you’re not Team USA material. 

    To be perfectly frank, I’m getting a little tired of this IShowSpeed guy. I understand I’m not helping things by blogging about him (again). But this motherfucker’s big dumb face will not stop popping up on my timeline telling me how fast he is.

    We get it dude. You’re a fast and athletic guy. Faster and more athletic than most. Every time a professional athlete takes you up on a challenge, their takeaway is always, “Oh wow! This YouTube streamer is better than I had originally anticipated! I’m very impressed!”

    Then the internet gives you a polite golf clap and acknowledges the fact that you are indeed above average at __.

    You can’t do the Jake Paul boxing thing with track though. I feel like that’s the road you’re trying to go down here. But it doesn’t work. There are concrete times you have to run that you won’t be able to match. 

    Although the more I think about it… I wish the Olympics would allow him in. In fact, if I were the Olympic Committee, I’d say, “You know what, IShowSpeed… we’ve been so impressed by your athletic achievements on YouTube that we’ve decided to automatically qualify you for every individual Olympic event. You’ll be running the 100M, 200M, 400M, long jump, high jump, all the swimmings, everything. You will compete in literally everything.”

    Then we get it all out of the way at once. The Olympics will be completely unaffected. Everything will go off as normal. We’ll just have IShowSpeed bringing up the rear by a WIDE margin in every event. We’ll all get to see exactly how fast and athletic he is in comparison to the best in the world, then we can all get on with our lives. 

    Advertisement

    P.S. I really wish we could go back in time to the point where we decided to let people go by their screen names in real life and nip it in the bud. I don’t mind a stage name (i.e. Big Cat or KFC). But I wish we never just started calling people by their @’s. YouTube streamers are out there introducing each other to people with x’s and numbers in their names. “Have you met my friend xxApocolypse99? You probably haven’t heard of him, but he’s massive among autistic Asian teenagers. He has 90,000,000,000 followers across all platforms and owns 50% of the Philippines”. I just miss people having names.

    Source link

  • Facebook, YouTube and TikTok users in Europe get forum to challenge social media content decisions

    Facebook, YouTube and TikTok users in Europe get forum to challenge social media content decisions

    LONDON — Social media users in the European Union will soon have a new forum to challenge decisions by platforms to remove posts and videos for breaking their rules or leave up others that may violate them.

    An “out of court dispute settlement body” named the Appeals Center Europe said Tuesday it has been certified by Irish regulators to act as a referee on content moderation disputes across the 27-nation EU, starting with cases involving Facebook, YouTube and TikTok.

    The center is similar to Meta’s Oversight Board, a quasi-independent body set up in 2020 that acts like a supreme court for thorny decisions about content moderation issues on Facebook, Instagram and Threads submitted by users around the world.

    Under the EU’s digital rulebook known as the Digital Services Act, or DSA, tech companies and social media platforms are required to work with dispute settlement bodies and comply with any decisions they make. EU officials in Brussels wanted to give EU citizens a way to challenge any decisions made by Big Tech companies as they sought to balance the right to free speech against the goal of curbing online risks.

    The center will hear appeals from users or groups located in the EU about “everything from violence and incitement to hate speech to bullying and harassment,” CEO Thomas Hughes said.

    “It could be everything from a case that relates to a head of state all the way through to a neighborly dispute,” Hughes said.

    The Digital Services Act is a sweeping set of regulations that requires tech and social media companies operating in Europe to clean up their platforms under threat of hefty fines.

    The Appeals Center, based in Dublin, where many Silicon Valley tech companies have their European headquarters, will start hearing complaints from users before the end of the year. It’s initially dealing with Facebook, YouTube and TikTok users because it wanted to start with the biggest platforms, with plans to add others later. Unlike the Oversight Board, which can cherry pick the biggest and most important cases, the center will have to rule on every case it gets.

    The Oversight Board both issues binding decisions on individual cases, such as ruling in September on three separate posts with the controversial Palestinian rallying cry “ from the river to the sea,” and also weighs in on wider policy issues with non-binding recommendations, such as guidance in July on updating Meta’s policies on non-consensual deepfakes after reviewing a case involving deepfake intimate images of two women.

    The Appeals Center’s decisions, in contrast, will be limited to whether content such as a post, photo or video violates each platform’s rules.

    Hughes said the center will hire staff from across the EU to handle what he said could be up to tens of thousands of cases each year. The staff will have expertise in specific regions, languages and policy areas.

    Meta’s Oversight Board is providing 15 million euros ($16.5 million) in startup funding, said Hughes, who was previously the Oversight Board’s director. He added that the two bodies will operate separately but will “point in the same direction in terms of platform accountability and transparency, user rights” and applying a human rights framework to online speech.

    The Appeals Center will fund its ongoing operations by charging tech companies 95 euros for every case it hears, as well as a 5 euro fee from users who raise disputes. This “nominal” fee is intended to stop people from “gaming or abusing” the system and will be refunded if a user wins, Hughes said.

    The decisions are not binding, but users will still get their money back if the center rules in favor of their disputes, regardless of the action the platform does or does not take.

    There’s a 90-day deadline for decisions, but in most cases they will be made much more quickly, he said.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Barbara Ortutay in San Francisco contributed to this report.

    Source link

  • Arkansas sues YouTube over claims that the site is fueling a mental health crisis

    Arkansas sues YouTube over claims that the site is fueling a mental health crisis

    LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Arkansas sued YouTube and parent company Alphabet on Monday, saying the video-sharing platform is made deliberately addictive and fueling a mental health crisis among youth in the state.

    Attorney General Tim Griffin’s office filed the lawsuit in state court, accusing them of violating the state’s deceptive trade practices and public nuisance laws. The lawsuit claims the site is addictive and has resulted in the state spending millions on expanded mental health and other services for young people.

    “YouTube amplifies harmful material, doses users with dopamine hits, and drives youth engagement and advertising revenue,” the lawsuit said. “As a result, youth mental health problems have advanced in lockstep with the growth of social media, and in particular, YouTube.”

    Alphabet’s Google, which owns the video service and is also named as a defendant in the case, denied the lawsuit’s claims.

    “Providing young people with a safer, healthier experience has always been core to our work. In collaboration with youth, mental health and parenting experts, we built services and policies to provide young people with age-appropriate experiences, and parents with robust controls,” Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said in a statement. “The allegations in this complaint are simply not true.”

    YouTube requires users under 17 to get their parent’s permission before using the site, while accounts for users younger than 13 must be linked to a parental account. But it is possible to watch YouTube without an account, and kids can easily lie about their age.

    The lawsuit is the latest in an ongoing push by state and federal lawmakers to highlight the impact that social media sites have on younger users. U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy in June called on Congress to require warning labels on social media platforms about their effects on young people’s lives, similar to those now mandatory on cigarette boxes.

    Arkansas last year filed similar lawsuits against TikTok and Facebook parent company Meta, claiming the social media companies were misleading consumers about the safety of children on their platforms and protections of users’ private data. Those lawsuits are still pending in state court.

    Arkansas also enacted a law requiring parental consent for minors to create new social media accounts, though that measure has been blocked by a federal judge.

    Along with TikTok, YouTube is one of the most popular sites for children and teens. Both sites have been questioned in the past for hosting, and in some cases promoting, videos that encourage gun violence, eating disorders and self-harm.

    YouTube in June changed its policies about firearm videos, prohibiting any videos demonstrating how to remove firearm safety devices. Under the new policies, videos showing homemade guns, automatic weapons and certain firearm accessories like silencers will be restricted to users 18 and older.

    Arkansas’ lawsuit claims that YouTube’s algorithms steer youth to harmful adult content, and that it facilitates the spread of child sexual abuse material.

    The lawsuit doesn’t seek specific damages, but asks that YouTube be ordered to fund prevention, education and treatment for “excessive and problematic use of social media.”

    Source link